Objective To evaluate the impact of different luteal phase support (LPS) regimens on pregnancy outcomes among women of advanced and non-advanced maternal age undergoing modified natural cycle (mNC) or letrozole-stimulated (LC) frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).
Methods A total of 2 400 patients who underwent mNC-FET (n=1 260) or LC-FET (n=1 140) between January 2018 and December 2021 at the Reproductive Medicine Center of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, were retrospectively analyzed. According to the route of LPS administration, mNC-FET patients were divided into mNC-FET-1 group (n=772, intramuscular progesterone) and mNC-FET-2 group (n=488, vaginal progesterone). Similarly, LC-FET patients were classified into LC-FET-1 group (n=860, intramuscular progesterone) and LC-FET-2 group (n=280, vaginal progesterone). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics across groups. Patients were further stratified by age (≥35 vs <35 years old), and matched based on LPS regimen. The mNC-FET subgroup included: group mNC-FET-1 subgroup 1 (n=364, <35 years old, intramuscular), group mNC-FET-1 subgroup 2 (n=364, <35 years old, vaginal), group mNC-FET-2 subgroup 1 (n=78, ≥35 years old, intramuscular), and group mNC-FET-2 subgroup 2 (n=84, ≥35 years old, vaginal). The LC-FET subgroup included: group LC-FET-1 subgroup 1 (n=185, <35 years old, intramuscular), group LC-FET-1 subgroup 2 (n=177, <35 years, vaginal), group LC-FET-2 subgroup 1 (n=39, ≥35 years old, intramuscular), and group LC-FET-2 subgroup 2 (n=77, ≥35 years old, vaginal).
Results ①After PSM, baseline clinical characteristics, including age, body mass index (BMI), infertility type, duration of infertility, basal hormone levels [basal estradiol (bE2), basal follicle-stimulating hormone (bFSH), basal luteinizing hormone (bLH), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)], history of intrauterine surgery, number of previous embryo transfer cycles, endometrial thickness on the day of progesterone initiation, fertilization method, type and number of embryos transferred, and number of high-quality embryos, were comparable between mNC-FET-1 and mNC-FET-2 groups, and also between subgroups mNC-FET-1 subgroup 1 vs mNC-FET-1 subgroup 2 and mNC-FET-2 subgroup 1 vs mNC-FET-2 subgroup 2 (all P>0.05). ② Similarly, no significant differences in the same baseline characteristics were found between LC-FET-1 and LC-FET-2 groups, or between subgroups LC-FET-1 subgroup 1 vs LC-FET-1 subgroup 2 and LC-FET-2 subgroup 1 vs LC-FET-2 subgroup 2 (all P>0.05). ③ Among mNC-FET patients aged ≥35 years, the intramuscular group (mNC-FET-2 subgroup 1) had significantly higher implantation (42.7% vs 28.7%), clinical pregnancy (56.4% vs 39.3%), and live birth rates (48.7% vs 32.1%) compared to the vaginal group (mNC-FET-2 subgroup 2) (all P<0.05). ④ Among LC-FET patients, no significant differences were observed in implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate (total, early, or late), or live birth rate between the LC-FET-1 and LC-FET-2 groups or among the corresponding age-stratified subgroups (all P>0.05).
Conclusions Intramuscular progesterone administration for luteal phase support may result in improved pregnancy outcomes in advanced-age women undergoing mNC-FET. In contrast, among women undergoing LC-FET, the efficacy of different LPS regimens appears comparable, regardless of age.