Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01): 29 -34. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.01.006

Special Issue:

Original Article

Expression of vasculogenic mimicry and matrix metalloproteinase-2 in endometrial carcinoma

Qinghua Sun1, Geping Yin1(), Ming Chen1, Aifang Wu1, Zheng Yuan1, Jing Liang1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jinan Military General Hospital, Jinan 250031, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2015-10-09 Revised:2016-01-04 Published:2016-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Geping Yin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yin Geping, Email:
Objective

To study the expression of vasculogenic mimicry (VM) and matrix metalloproteinase(MMP)-2 in endometrial carcinoma (EC) tumor tissue and their clinical relationship with EC.

Methods

A total of 52 EC patients at the Jinan Military General Hospital from October 2010 to December 2013 were selected as EC group, which underwent hysterectomy and had complete clinical data. Another 21 cases over the same period as control group, which had hysterectomy because of the uterine fibroids or other benign diseases. Furthermore, 12 cases of pathological findings diagnosed as atypical endometrial hyperplasia(EIN) patients were selected as EIN group. Endometrial paraffin-embedded sections of all patients were taken for the study. All of the paraffin-embedded sections adopted staining of CD34 and periodic acid-schiff (PAS) together, and observed the expression of VM in three groups, while the paraffin-embedded sections of EC group were stained by immunohistochemistry streptavidin-perosidase (SP) in order to observe the expression of MMP-2. The differences of the positive expression rates of VM and the high expression rates of MMP-2 in different clinical factors among 52 cases of EC patients, including age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO) clinical stages, World Health Organization(WHO) pathological differentiated grading, the infiltrating depth of muscular layer and whether had lymph node metastasis, were statistically analyzed. Meanwhile, the correlation between the expression of VM and MMP-2 in EC group were analyzed. This study followed the Ethical Standards of the Human Trials Committee of the Jinan Military General Hospital, had the approval of the commission. Informed consent was obtained from each participant. There were no significant differences among three groups in general clinical data, such as the age, menopause, childbearing history, menstrual history, etc.(P>0.05).

Results

①The positive rate of VM in the tumor tissue of EC group was 30.8%(16/52), but did not find VM express in endometrium in control group and EIN group. ②The positive expression rate of VM in stageⅠpatients of FIGO was lower than that of stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ(14.3%vs 70.0%), and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.002); WHO pathological differentiated grading between well, moderately and poorly differentiation of the EC patients had pairwise comparisons, showed the higher level of differentiation had a lower VM positive expression rate than the lower level of differentiation, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05); The VM positive expression rate in patients with lymph node metastasis was higher than that in patients without lymph node metastasis(66.7%vs 23.3%), and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=4.704, P=0.030); There were no significant differences of VM positive expression rate between ≤50 years and >50 years old patients, between patients with infiltrating depth of muscular layer <1/2 and ≥1/2(P>0.05). ③The high expression rate of MMP-2 in patients with lymph node metastasis was higher than that in patients without lymph node metastasis(88.9%vs 23.2%), and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=11.413, P=0.000); There were no significant differences of high expression rate of MMP-2 between patients ≤50 years and >50 years old, among FIGO clinical stageⅠ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ-Ⅳ, among WHO pathological differentiated grading of well, moderately and poorly, between the infiltrating depth of muscular layer <1/2 and ≥1/2(P>0.05). ④The correlation of expression level of VM and MMP-2 were positively correlated in the 52 cases tumor tissue in EC group(r=0.478, P=0.000).

Conclusions

VM exists in some EC tissues and was related to the severity of EC. MMP-2 may promotes the formation of VM. Both of VM and MMP-2 may together promote the lymph node metastasis of EC patients.

图1 中、低分化EC石蜡包埋切片VM表达情况(CD34/PAS双重染色,高倍镜)(图1A:中分化EC;图1B:低分化EC)
表1 EC组52例患者不同临床因素间VM阳性表达率比较[例数(%)]
表2 EC组52例患者不同临床因素间MMP-2高表达率比较[例数(%)]
图2 EC石蜡包埋切片MMP-2表达情况(SP染色,高倍镜)(图2A:高表达;图2B:低表达)
1
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A, et al. Cancer ststistics, 2013[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2013, 63(1):11-30.
2
Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, et al. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. a gynecologic oncology group study[J]. Cancer, 1987, 60(8 suppl):2035-2041.
3
Kohorn EI. Gestagens and endometrial carcinoma[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1976, 4(4):398-411.
4
Maniotis AJ, Folberg R, Hess A, et al. Vascular channel formation by human melanoma cells in vivo and in vitro: vasculogenic mimicry[J]. Am J Pathol, 1999, 155(3):739-752.
5
Liu TJ, Sun BC, Zhao XL, et al. CD133+ cells with cancer stem cell characteristics associates with vasculogenic mimicry in triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Oncogene, 2013, 32(5):544-553.
6
Wu S, Yu L, Wang D, et al. Aberrant expression of CD133 in non-small cell lung cancer and its relationship to vasculogenic mimicry[J]. BMC Cancer, 2012, 12:535.
7
Su M, Wei W, Xu X, et al. Role of hCG in vasculogenic mimicry in OVCAR-3 ovarian cancer cell line[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2011, 21(8):1366-1374.
8
Li M, Gu Y, Zhang Z, et al. Vasculogenic mimicry:a new prognostic sign of gastric adenocarcinoma[J]. Pathol Oncol Res, 2010, 16(2):259-266.
9
Zhao H, Gu XM. Study on vasculogenic mimicry in malignant esophageal stromal tumors[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2008, 14(15):2430-2433.
10
Lu XS, Sun W, Ge CY, et al. Contribution of the PI3K/MMPs/Ln-5γ2 and EphA2/FAK/Paxillin signaling pathways to tumor growth and vasculogenic mimicry of gallbladder carcinomas[J]. Int J Oncol, 2013, 42(6):2103-2115.
11
Liu R, Yang K, Meng C, et al. Vasculogenic mimicry is a marker of poor prognosis in prostate cancer[J]. Cancer Biol Ther, 2012, 13(7):527-533.
12
Chen LX, He YJ, Zhao SZ, et al. Inhibition of tumor growth and vasculogenic mimicry by curcumin through down-regulation of the EphA2/PI3K/MMP pathway in a murine choroidal melanoma model[J]. Cancer Biol Ther, 2011, 11(2):229-235.
13
Liu Z, Li Y, Zhao W, et al. Demonstrion of vasculogenic mimicry in astrocytomas and offects of Endostar on U251 cells[J]. Pathol Res Pract, 2011, 207(10):645-651.
14
Polberg R, Pe'er J, Gruman LM, et al.The morphologic characteristics of tumor blood vessels as a marker of tumor progression in primary human uveal melanoma: a matched case-control study[J]. Hum Pathol, 1992, 23(11):1298-1305.
15
Liu WB, Xu GL, Jia WD, et al. Prognostic significance and mechanisms of patterned matrix vasculogenic mimicry in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Med Oncol, 2011, 28(Suppl 1):S228-S238.
16
Wang SY, Yu L, Ling GQ, et al. Vasculogenic mimicry and its clinical significance in medulloblastoma[J]. Cancer Biol Ther, 2012, 13(5):341-348.
17
Cao Z, Bao M, Miele L, et al. Tumour vasculogenic mimicry is associated with poor prognosis of human cancer patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2013, 49(18):3914-3923.
18
Folberg R, Maniotis AJ. Vasculogenic mimicry[J]. APMIS, 2004, 112(7-8):508-525.
19
Liu XM, Zhang QP, Mu YG, et al. Clinical significance of vasculogenic mimicry in human gliomas[J]. J Neurooncol, 2011, 105(2):173-179.
20
Liu T, Sun B, Zhao X, et al. HER2/neu expression correlates with vasculogenic mimicry in invasive breast carcinoma[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2013, 17(1):116-122.
21
Upile T, Jerjes W, Radhi H, et al. Vascular mimicry in cultured head and neck tumor cell lines[J]. Head Neck Oncol, 2011, 3:55.
22
Mao XG, Xue XY, Wang L, et al. CDH5 is specifically activated in glioblastoma stemlike cells and contributes to vasculogenic mimicry induced by hypoxia[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2013, 15(7):865-879.
23
Kleiner DE, Stetler-Stevenson WG. Matrix metalloproteinases and metastasis[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1999, 43(Suppl):S42-S51.
24
Kostova E, Slaninka-Miceska M, Labacevski N, et al. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases 2, 7 and 9 in patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Vojnosanit Pregl, 2014, 71(1):52-59.
[1] Xin Chen, Sha Hu, Hong Luo. Ultrasonographic features and diagnostic value of obstructive cervical dysplasia[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(10): 1052-1057.
[2] Minrong Ma, Cong Li, Qin Zhou. Current research status of treatment of cervical cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 497-504.
[3] Changsheng Lin, Jun Zhan, Xue Xiao. Genetic testing and precision molecular targeted therapy in diagnosis and treatment of epithelial ovarian caner[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 505-510.
[4] Lu Wang, Yang Fan. Advances in endometrial cancer-related biomarker research[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 511-516.
[5] Juan Gu, Qingqing Sun, Fangfang Hu, Yijuan Cao, Yujuan Qi. Clinical application of endometrial receptivity array to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[6] Wenrong Dai, Lijuan Zhao, Zhihui Li. Research progress of influence of extracellular vesicles on embryo implantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 616-620.
[7] Dongjie Zhou, Min Jiang, Hairui Fan, Lingling Gao, Xiang Kong, Dan Lu, Liping Wang. Current research progress on non-coding RNA in follicular development and maturation[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 387-393.
[8] Huizhu Chen, Yingkun Guo, Xinrong Wang, Gang Ning, Xijian Chen. Current research status on the " dualistic model" of epithelial ovarian cancer and its molecular biology[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 394-402.
[9] Chunying Han, Tingting Wang, Yanyan Li, Jinxia Piao. Current research status on predictors of lymphatic vascular invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 403-409.
[10] Zhaomin Zeng, Haiyan Yu. Clinical cognition of superfemale syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(02): 145-150.
[11] Quan Wei, Shen Zhang, Huijia Chen, Heng Zou, Lina Hu. Current research progress on correlation between female reproductive tract microbiota and assisted reproductive technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(02): 151-155.
[12] Yanyan Liu, Xi Tan, Xue Peng. Pregnancy complicated with papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(02): 212-218.
[13] Ouchan Hu, Zhongying Huang. Current status and outlook of research in treatment of unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(01): 16-22.
[14] Lifei Tian, Jianfeng Yao, Le Zhang, Yaqi Qu, Xiaolong Zhang, Pan Quan, Likun Yan. Application of deperitonealization of the round ligament in female inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(01): 56-59.
[15] Zhenyu Wu, Yafen Hu, Xiaofen Dong, Yuanfang Ma. Predictive values of serum CTGF, TGF-β1 and MMP2 levels on renal interstitial fibrosis in diabetes nephropathy[J]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(06): 332-337.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract