切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 435 -440. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.04.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

孕产妇住院时间影响因素分析
魏小华1, 周芳芳1, 赵倩1, 曹敏1, 雷春梅1,()   
  1. 1. 710061 西安交通大学第一附属医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-08 修回日期:2018-07-06 出版日期:2018-08-01
  • 通信作者: 雷春梅

Influence factors of length of hospital stay of pregnant women

Xiaohua Wei1, Fangfang Zhou1, Qian Zhao1, Min Cao1, Chunmei Lei1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
  • Received:2018-04-08 Revised:2018-07-06 Published:2018-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Chunmei Lei
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lei Chunmei, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81701532); Key Science and Technology Project of Shaanxi Province(2015SF124); Joint Fund of Buchang Pharma Co. Ltd. and First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University(BC2017-08)
引用本文:

魏小华, 周芳芳, 赵倩, 曹敏, 雷春梅. 孕产妇住院时间影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(04): 435-440.

Xiaohua Wei, Fangfang Zhou, Qian Zhao, Min Cao, Chunmei Lei. Influence factors of length of hospital stay of pregnant women[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(04): 435-440.

目的

探讨西安市孕产妇住院时间的影响因素。

方法

选择2015年12月至2016年12月,于西安交通大学第一附属医院产科住院分娩或治疗的3 421例孕产妇为研究对象。采用回顾性分析方法,采集孕产妇年龄、民族,以及本次妊娠住院时间、住院次数、医疗费用支付方式、分娩方式、就诊季节、手术级别、是否由其他科室转入产科病房、妊娠期并发症、围生儿妊娠结局等临床资料。2组孕产妇住院时间比较,采用成组t检验,3组比较,采用单因素方差分析。采用多重线性逐步回归分析法,对孕产妇住院时间影响因素进行多因素分析。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》的要求。

结果

①本研究3 421例孕产妇的住院时间为(6.4±3.0)d,生育年龄为(29.5±3.9)岁,高龄(≥35岁)产妇占11.0%(375/3 421)。②对孕产妇住院时间影响因素的单因素分析结果显示,不同年龄(<35岁与≥35岁),以及本次妊娠住院次数(1次与≥2次),医疗费用支付方式(全自费、新型农村合作医疗保险、城镇居民基本医疗保险、城镇职工基本医疗保险),分娩方式(自然分娩、产钳助产、剖宫产术分娩)及手术级别(治疗性操作或未进行手术,一、二、三级手术),是否由其他科室转入产科病房,是否有妊娠期并发症,围生儿妊娠结局为不良与良好孕产妇住院时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-3.34、-2.24,F=15.46、268.81、259.68,t=-7.58、-13.57、-13.82;P<0.05)。③对孕产妇住院时间影响因素进行多重线性逐步回归分析的结果显示,本次妊娠医疗费用支付费方式为全自费(β=0.08,95%CI:0.01~0.16,P=0.035)或新型农村合作医疗保险(β=0.32,95%CI:0.06~0.59,P=0.018),分娩方式为自然分娩(β=0.29,95%CI:0.04~0.54,P=0.026),手术级别为治疗性操作或未进行手术(β=0.95,95%CI:0.71~1.19,P<0.001)或一级手术(β=-0.47,95%CI:-0.79~-0.15,P=0.004),住院次数≥2次(β=0.26,95%CI:0.01~0.51,P=0.043),有妊娠期并发症(β=0.76,95%CI:0.58~0.95,P<0.001),围生儿妊娠结局不良(β=0.80,95%CI:0.58~1.02,P<0.001),以及由其他科室转入产科病房(β=6.55,95%CI:4.32~8.77,P<0.001),均为孕产妇住院时间的影响因素。

结论

西安市孕产妇住院时间,可能受医疗费用支付方式、分娩方式、手术级别、妊娠期并发症、围生儿妊娠结局、由其他科室转入产科病房等多种因素的影响。临床应当采取针对性措施,缩短孕产妇住院时间,减轻医院负担,提高医疗资源的使用效率。

Objective

To discuss the influence factors of length of hospital stay of pregnant women in Xi′an.

Methods

From December 2015 to December 2016, a total of 3 421 cases of pregnant women who were delivered or treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University were selected as research subjects. Then the patients′ maternal age, nationality, times of hospitalization, and the clinical data of this pregnancy, such as length of hospital stay, payment methods of medical care costs, modes of delivery, the seasons of operation, operation levels, whether transferring from other department into maternity ward or not, pregnancy complications, fetal pregnancy outcomes and so on were collected by retrospective method. Idependent-samples t test and one-way ANOVA were used to compare the length of hospital stay of pregnant women between two groups and three groups, respectively. Multiple linear stepwise regression analysis was used to analyze the influence factors of length of hospital stay of pregnant women. The procedure in this study was in line with the requirements of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①The length of hospital stay of 3 421 cases of pregnant women was (6.4±3.0) d. The maternal age was (29.5±3.9) years old, and the elderly women (≥ 35 years old) accounted for 11.0% (375/3 421). ②Univariate analysis of the factors influencing the length of hospital stay of pregnant women showed that there were significant differences in the length of hospital stay of pregnant women with different ages (<35 years old and ≥ 35 years old), different times of hospitalization (1 time and ≥2 times), and different payment methods of medical care costs (self-paying, new rural cooperative medical insurance, urban residents basic medical insurance, urban workers basic medical insurance), different delivery modes (spontaneous delivery, forceps delivery, caesarean section), different operation levels (therapeutic or without operation, first-level operation, second-level operation, third-level operation), whether transferring from other department into maternity ward or not, combined with pregnancy complications or not, and different fetal pregnancy outcomes (poor and good) of this pregnancy, and all the differences were statistically significant (t=-3.34, -2.24; F=15.46, 268.81, 259.68; t=-7.58, -13.57, -13.82; all P<0.05). ③Multiple linear stepwise regression analysis results showed that self-paying (β=0.08, 95%CI: 0.01-0.16, P=0.035) or new rural cooperative medical insurance (β=0.32, 95%CI: 0.06-0.59, P=0.018), spontaneous delivery (β=0.29, 95%CI: 0.04-0.54, P=0.026), therapeutic or without operation (β=0.95, 95%CI: 0.71-1.19, P<0.001) or first-level operation (β=-0.47, 95%CI: -0.79--0.15, P=0.004), ≥ 2 times of hospitalization (β=0.26, 95%CI: 0.01-0.51, P=0.043), pregnancy complications (β=0.76, 95%CI: 0.58-0.95, P<0.001), and transferring from other department into maternity ward (β=6.55, 95%CI: 4.32-8.77, P<0.001) of this pregnancy all were the influence factors of length of hospital stay in 3 421 cases of pregnant women.

Conclusions

The length of hospital stay of pregnant women in Xi′an is influenced by payment methods of medical care costs, modes of delivery, operation levels, pregnancy complications, fetal pregnancy outcomes and transferring from other department into maternity ward and so on. In clinical, targeted measures should be taken to shorten the average length of hospital stay, also to relieve the burden on the hospital and improve the efficiency of the usage of medical resources.

图1 本研究3 421例孕产妇的住院时间分布
表1 孕产妇住院时间影响因素的单因素分析
表2 孕产妇住院时间影响因素的多重线性逐步回归分析的变量与其赋值
表3 孕产妇住院时间影响因素的多重线性逐步回归分析结果
[1]
汪雅璇,张馨予,李书,等. 医院床位资源利用与平均住院日的国内外比较分析[J]. 中华医院管理杂志,2016, 32(5): 361-364.
[2]
Arefian H, Hagel S, Heublein S, et al. Extra length of stay and costs because of health care-associated infections at a German university hospital[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2016, 44(2): 160-166.
[3]
Jeddian A, Afzali A, Jafari N. Evaluation of appropriateness of admission and hospital stay at educational hospital[J]. Arch Iran Med, 2017, 20(1): 16-21.
[4]
刘庆,王清亮,胡耀斌,等. 新医改条件下缩短平均住院日的综合效益分析[J]. 中国卫生事业管理,2017, 34(6): 423-424, 460.
[5]
Mathijssen NM, Verburg H, van Leeuwen CC, et al. Factors influencing length of hospital stay after primary total knee arthroplasty in a fast-track setting[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(8): 2692-2696.
[6]
康健. 骨科手术患者平均住院日影响因素分析[D]. 太原:山西医科大学,2017.
[7]
肖煜吟,李国红,张军. 上海市产妇住院分娩费用影响因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2018, 38(3): 323-327.
[8]
肖涛,丁四清,严文广,等. 脑血管意外住院时间的影响因素[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2014, 39(9): 907-911.
[9]
张鹏云,张亚萌,黄桂英,等. 产妇感染性疾病发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2016, 26(8): 1863-1865.
[10]
Zhang WL, Wang LJ, Hu XQ. Risk factors and prevention countermeasures for infections after cesarean section[J]. Chin J Nosocomiol, 2012, 22(21): 4791-4792.
[11]
段建梅. 2000—2005年某院产妇住院日数分析[J]. 现代临床医学,2005, 31(4): 260-261.
[12]
成松岩,曾凡伟,任国娇. 超长住院日分布特点及影响因素的探讨[J]. 中国病案,2016, 17(7): 42-44.
[13]
卢裕陈,郑玉建,谢慧玲,等. 乌鲁木齐市某三甲医院手术科室平均住院日影响因素分析[J]. 医学与社会,2017, 30(10): 47-50.
[14]
张姗姗. 高龄产妇剖宫产术住院时间的影响因素研究[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2016, 24(S1): 137-139.
[15]
Mendoza TLA, Arias GM, Osorio RMA. Factors associated with prolonged hospital stay in infants[J]. Rev Chil Pediatr, 2014, 85(2): 164-173.
[1] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[2] 黄蓉, 梁自毓, 祁文瑾. NLRP3炎症小体在胎膜早破孕妇血清中的表达及其意义[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 540-548.
[3] 何霞, 黄蓉, 祁文瑾. 胎膜早破孕妇胎盘与胎膜菌群丰度的高通量测序研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 549-555.
[4] 谢江燕, 王亚菲, 贺芳. 妊娠合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[5] 徐婷婷, 詹泳池, 王晓东, 刘兴会. 电子胎心监测结果出现正弦波形的胎母输血综合征围生期结局分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 382-389.
[6] 韩肖燕, 杨桦. 中孕期孕妇血清胎盘生长因子水平低与胎儿不良预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 398-402.
[7] 杜佳丽, 鲍睿, 乔春红, 韩伟. 中孕期宫颈功能不全孕妇经阴道紧急宫颈环扎术后不良妊娠结局预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 403-409.
[8] 谭娟, 谭建新, 邵彬彬, 王艳, 许争峰. 胎儿单基因遗传病无创产前检测的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 245-250.
[9] 林雪, 陈锰, 杨梅琳, 刘兴会, 周红雨. 妊娠合并重症肌无力患者的围产结局和重症肌无力病情恶化的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 125-132.
[10] 陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[11] 贾赛君, 张英, 万佳义. 妊娠合并亚临床甲状腺功能减退孕妇的妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[12] 王卉, 薛宝睿, 李恭驰, 刘慧真, 雷霞, 李炳辉. 2型糖尿病患者下肢动脉硬化的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 147-152.
[13] 刘斌, 朱慧, 席江伟, 郑卫, 王新波. 健康饮食模式降低胆结石风险的相关因素Logistic分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 188-191.
[14] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[15] 王绅, 王如海, 李春, 杨震, 孙菲琳. 中重型颅脑创伤患者住院时间延长的危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 146-153.
阅读次数
全文


摘要