切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 435 -440. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.04.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

孕产妇住院时间影响因素分析
魏小华1, 周芳芳1, 赵倩1, 曹敏1, 雷春梅1,()   
  1. 1. 710061 西安交通大学第一附属医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-08 修回日期:2018-07-06 出版日期:2018-08-01
  • 通信作者: 雷春梅

Influence factors of length of hospital stay of pregnant women

Xiaohua Wei1, Fangfang Zhou1, Qian Zhao1, Min Cao1, Chunmei Lei1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
  • Received:2018-04-08 Revised:2018-07-06 Published:2018-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Chunmei Lei
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lei Chunmei, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81701532); Key Science and Technology Project of Shaanxi Province(2015SF124); Joint Fund of Buchang Pharma Co. Ltd. and First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University(BC2017-08)
引用本文:

魏小华, 周芳芳, 赵倩, 曹敏, 雷春梅. 孕产妇住院时间影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(04): 435-440.

Xiaohua Wei, Fangfang Zhou, Qian Zhao, Min Cao, Chunmei Lei. Influence factors of length of hospital stay of pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(04): 435-440.

目的

探讨西安市孕产妇住院时间的影响因素。

方法

选择2015年12月至2016年12月,于西安交通大学第一附属医院产科住院分娩或治疗的3 421例孕产妇为研究对象。采用回顾性分析方法,采集孕产妇年龄、民族,以及本次妊娠住院时间、住院次数、医疗费用支付方式、分娩方式、就诊季节、手术级别、是否由其他科室转入产科病房、妊娠期并发症、围生儿妊娠结局等临床资料。2组孕产妇住院时间比较,采用成组t检验,3组比较,采用单因素方差分析。采用多重线性逐步回归分析法,对孕产妇住院时间影响因素进行多因素分析。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》的要求。

结果

①本研究3 421例孕产妇的住院时间为(6.4±3.0)d,生育年龄为(29.5±3.9)岁,高龄(≥35岁)产妇占11.0%(375/3 421)。②对孕产妇住院时间影响因素的单因素分析结果显示,不同年龄(<35岁与≥35岁),以及本次妊娠住院次数(1次与≥2次),医疗费用支付方式(全自费、新型农村合作医疗保险、城镇居民基本医疗保险、城镇职工基本医疗保险),分娩方式(自然分娩、产钳助产、剖宫产术分娩)及手术级别(治疗性操作或未进行手术,一、二、三级手术),是否由其他科室转入产科病房,是否有妊娠期并发症,围生儿妊娠结局为不良与良好孕产妇住院时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-3.34、-2.24,F=15.46、268.81、259.68,t=-7.58、-13.57、-13.82;P<0.05)。③对孕产妇住院时间影响因素进行多重线性逐步回归分析的结果显示,本次妊娠医疗费用支付费方式为全自费(β=0.08,95%CI:0.01~0.16,P=0.035)或新型农村合作医疗保险(β=0.32,95%CI:0.06~0.59,P=0.018),分娩方式为自然分娩(β=0.29,95%CI:0.04~0.54,P=0.026),手术级别为治疗性操作或未进行手术(β=0.95,95%CI:0.71~1.19,P<0.001)或一级手术(β=-0.47,95%CI:-0.79~-0.15,P=0.004),住院次数≥2次(β=0.26,95%CI:0.01~0.51,P=0.043),有妊娠期并发症(β=0.76,95%CI:0.58~0.95,P<0.001),围生儿妊娠结局不良(β=0.80,95%CI:0.58~1.02,P<0.001),以及由其他科室转入产科病房(β=6.55,95%CI:4.32~8.77,P<0.001),均为孕产妇住院时间的影响因素。

结论

西安市孕产妇住院时间,可能受医疗费用支付方式、分娩方式、手术级别、妊娠期并发症、围生儿妊娠结局、由其他科室转入产科病房等多种因素的影响。临床应当采取针对性措施,缩短孕产妇住院时间,减轻医院负担,提高医疗资源的使用效率。

Objective

To discuss the influence factors of length of hospital stay of pregnant women in Xi′an.

Methods

From December 2015 to December 2016, a total of 3 421 cases of pregnant women who were delivered or treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University were selected as research subjects. Then the patients′ maternal age, nationality, times of hospitalization, and the clinical data of this pregnancy, such as length of hospital stay, payment methods of medical care costs, modes of delivery, the seasons of operation, operation levels, whether transferring from other department into maternity ward or not, pregnancy complications, fetal pregnancy outcomes and so on were collected by retrospective method. Idependent-samples t test and one-way ANOVA were used to compare the length of hospital stay of pregnant women between two groups and three groups, respectively. Multiple linear stepwise regression analysis was used to analyze the influence factors of length of hospital stay of pregnant women. The procedure in this study was in line with the requirements of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①The length of hospital stay of 3 421 cases of pregnant women was (6.4±3.0) d. The maternal age was (29.5±3.9) years old, and the elderly women (≥ 35 years old) accounted for 11.0% (375/3 421). ②Univariate analysis of the factors influencing the length of hospital stay of pregnant women showed that there were significant differences in the length of hospital stay of pregnant women with different ages (<35 years old and ≥ 35 years old), different times of hospitalization (1 time and ≥2 times), and different payment methods of medical care costs (self-paying, new rural cooperative medical insurance, urban residents basic medical insurance, urban workers basic medical insurance), different delivery modes (spontaneous delivery, forceps delivery, caesarean section), different operation levels (therapeutic or without operation, first-level operation, second-level operation, third-level operation), whether transferring from other department into maternity ward or not, combined with pregnancy complications or not, and different fetal pregnancy outcomes (poor and good) of this pregnancy, and all the differences were statistically significant (t=-3.34, -2.24; F=15.46, 268.81, 259.68; t=-7.58, -13.57, -13.82; all P<0.05). ③Multiple linear stepwise regression analysis results showed that self-paying (β=0.08, 95%CI: 0.01-0.16, P=0.035) or new rural cooperative medical insurance (β=0.32, 95%CI: 0.06-0.59, P=0.018), spontaneous delivery (β=0.29, 95%CI: 0.04-0.54, P=0.026), therapeutic or without operation (β=0.95, 95%CI: 0.71-1.19, P<0.001) or first-level operation (β=-0.47, 95%CI: -0.79--0.15, P=0.004), ≥ 2 times of hospitalization (β=0.26, 95%CI: 0.01-0.51, P=0.043), pregnancy complications (β=0.76, 95%CI: 0.58-0.95, P<0.001), and transferring from other department into maternity ward (β=6.55, 95%CI: 4.32-8.77, P<0.001) of this pregnancy all were the influence factors of length of hospital stay in 3 421 cases of pregnant women.

Conclusions

The length of hospital stay of pregnant women in Xi′an is influenced by payment methods of medical care costs, modes of delivery, operation levels, pregnancy complications, fetal pregnancy outcomes and transferring from other department into maternity ward and so on. In clinical, targeted measures should be taken to shorten the average length of hospital stay, also to relieve the burden on the hospital and improve the efficiency of the usage of medical resources.

图1 本研究3 421例孕产妇的住院时间分布
表1 孕产妇住院时间影响因素的单因素分析
表2 孕产妇住院时间影响因素的多重线性逐步回归分析的变量与其赋值
表3 孕产妇住院时间影响因素的多重线性逐步回归分析结果
[1]
汪雅璇,张馨予,李书,等. 医院床位资源利用与平均住院日的国内外比较分析[J]. 中华医院管理杂志,2016, 32(5): 361-364.
[2]
Arefian H, Hagel S, Heublein S, et al. Extra length of stay and costs because of health care-associated infections at a German university hospital[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2016, 44(2): 160-166.
[3]
Jeddian A, Afzali A, Jafari N. Evaluation of appropriateness of admission and hospital stay at educational hospital[J]. Arch Iran Med, 2017, 20(1): 16-21.
[4]
刘庆,王清亮,胡耀斌,等. 新医改条件下缩短平均住院日的综合效益分析[J]. 中国卫生事业管理,2017, 34(6): 423-424, 460.
[5]
Mathijssen NM, Verburg H, van Leeuwen CC, et al. Factors influencing length of hospital stay after primary total knee arthroplasty in a fast-track setting[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(8): 2692-2696.
[6]
康健. 骨科手术患者平均住院日影响因素分析[D]. 太原:山西医科大学,2017.
[7]
肖煜吟,李国红,张军. 上海市产妇住院分娩费用影响因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2018, 38(3): 323-327.
[8]
肖涛,丁四清,严文广,等. 脑血管意外住院时间的影响因素[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2014, 39(9): 907-911.
[9]
张鹏云,张亚萌,黄桂英,等. 产妇感染性疾病发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2016, 26(8): 1863-1865.
[10]
Zhang WL, Wang LJ, Hu XQ. Risk factors and prevention countermeasures for infections after cesarean section[J]. Chin J Nosocomiol, 2012, 22(21): 4791-4792.
[11]
段建梅. 2000—2005年某院产妇住院日数分析[J]. 现代临床医学,2005, 31(4): 260-261.
[12]
成松岩,曾凡伟,任国娇. 超长住院日分布特点及影响因素的探讨[J]. 中国病案,2016, 17(7): 42-44.
[13]
卢裕陈,郑玉建,谢慧玲,等. 乌鲁木齐市某三甲医院手术科室平均住院日影响因素分析[J]. 医学与社会,2017, 30(10): 47-50.
[14]
张姗姗. 高龄产妇剖宫产术住院时间的影响因素研究[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2016, 24(S1): 137-139.
[15]
Mendoza TLA, Arias GM, Osorio RMA. Factors associated with prolonged hospital stay in infants[J]. Rev Chil Pediatr, 2014, 85(2): 164-173.
[1] 欧阳建, 厉锦巧, 徐淑英, 王斌, 陈剑平. 急性心肌梗死患者住院期间死亡风险模型的构建[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 116-122.
[2] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[5] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[6] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[7] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[8] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[9] 冯丹艳, 曹晓辉, 史玉霞. 血清脂联素与胎盘亮氨酸氨肽酶对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[10] 匡德凤, 李志国, 华绍芳, 薛凤霞. 高脂诱导孕鼠血清及胎盘组织脂肪酸结合蛋白-4及相关脂蛋白水平变化及其意义[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 338-344.
[11] 邬龙海, 黄淼, 龚云辉, 喻云倩. 血清趋化因子在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇中的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 357-362.
[12] 李华娟, 唐英俊, 王赛妮, 徐旺, 林玲, 李羲, 黄华萍. 肺结节临床与CT影像学特征分析及良恶性预测模型构建[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 318-323.
[13] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[14] 刘雪云, 范颖, 姚爱军, 张胜苗, 吕亚妮, 张冰清, 张晓宇, 刘恒. 基于微信小程序的个体化、全程护理干预对孕妇孕期体重及分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
[15] 尹江涛, 王宇超, 潘鑫, 缪志龙, 梅琼, 黄自强, 刘大东. COVID-19感染患者低钾血症与临床预后的相关性研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 70-79.
阅读次数
全文


摘要