切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 133 -139. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2024.02.002

妊娠合并症专辑

妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究
陈义思1, 梁敏1, 李红雨1, 夏雪1, 刘燕茜1, 李晨曲1, 王丹1,()   
  1. 1. 陆军军医大学第一附属医院妇产科,重庆 400030
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-04 修回日期:2024-03-09 出版日期:2024-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王丹

Value of multidisciplinary team management in perinatal period for pregnant women with chronic kidney disease

Yisi Chen1, Min Liang1, Hongyu Li1, Xue Xia1, Yanxi Liu1, Chenqu Li1, Dan Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400030, China
  • Received:2024-01-04 Revised:2024-03-09 Published:2024-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Dan Wang
  • Supported by:
    Joint Medical Research Project of Chongqing Municipal Science and Technology Bureau and Chongqing Municipal Health Commission(2021MSXM082)
引用本文:

陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.

Yisi Chen, Min Liang, Hongyu Li, Xue Xia, Yanxi Liu, Chenqu Li, Dan Wang. Value of multidisciplinary team management in perinatal period for pregnant women with chronic kidney disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.

目的

探讨妊娠合并慢性肾病(CKD)孕妇围产期采取多学科团队(MDT)管理模式临床疗效。

方法

选择2018年1月至2022年12月于陆军军医大学第一附属医院妇产科分娩,并且于孕前或孕龄<25孕周时明确诊断为CKD的70例孕妇为研究对象。根据CKD孕妇围产期管理模式,将其分别纳入研究组(n=40,围产期采取MDT管理模式干预)与对照组(n=30,围产期采取产科单一科室医护联合管理模式干预)。采用回顾性研究方法,收集2组孕妇的一般临床资料,围产期干预前、后,即早、晚孕期肌酐浓度、24 h尿蛋白定量等肾功能指标,妊娠期并发症、妊娠结局等,并对这些指标采用成组t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、χ2检验或连续性校正χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法进行比较。本研究获得陆军军医大学第一附属医院医学伦理委员会批准[审批号:(B)KY2023085]。

结果

①2组CKD孕妇年龄、身高、孕前3个月体重和人体质量指数(BMI)等一般临床资料分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②干预前,2组CKD孕妇早孕期24 h尿蛋白定量、肌酐浓度等肾功能指标分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,研究组CKD孕妇晚孕期24 h尿蛋白定量显著低于对照组,并且差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.09、P=0.002)。③研究组CKD孕妇妊娠期并发症总发生率为50.0%(20/40),显著低于对照组的86.7%(26/30),并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.23、P=0.001)。研究组CKD孕妇甲状腺功能异常率为5.0%(2/40),显著低于对照组的30.0%(9/30),并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.31、P=0.012)。④研究组孕妇早产、引产、自然流产等不良妊娠结局总发生率为12.5%(5/40),显著低于对照组的43.3%(13/30),并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.53、P=0.008)。⑤研究组CKD孕妇新生儿出生体重、胎龄及生后1、5、10 min Apgar评分,均显著高于对照组,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.90、P=0.007,t=-2.33、P=0.027,t=-2.37、P=0.027,t=-2.13、P=0.042,t=-2.07、P=0.048)。

结论

对CKD孕妇围产期采用MDT管理模式干预,可有效降低围产期并发症发生率,减轻肾脏负担,降低不良妊娠结局、早产等发生率。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of multidisciplinary team (MDT) management model in pregnant women with chronic kidney disease (CKD) during perinatal period.

Methods

Seventy pregnant women who gave birth at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from January 2018 to December 2022 and were diagnosed with CKD before pregnancy or at gestational age < 25 weeks were selected as the research subjects. According to the perinatal management model of CKD pregnant women, they were included into study group (n=40, receiving MDT management intervention measures during perinatal period) and control group (n=30, receiving an obstetric single-department joint management intervention measures by medical and nursing staff during perinatal period). General clinical data, renal function indicators such as creatinine concentration and 24 h urine protein quantification before and after perinatal intervention (the first and third trimester pregnancy), pregnancy complications, and pregnancy outcomes of two groups were collected by retrospective study method, and were compared by independent-samples t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test or continuity correction chi-square test or Fisher′s exact probability method. This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University [Approval No. (B)KY2023085].

Results

①There were no statistical differences in general clinical data such as age, height, weight and body mass index (BMI) three months before pregnancy between two groups (P>0.05). ②Before intervention, there were no statistical differences between two groups in renal function indicators such as 24 h urine protein quantification and creatinine concentration in the first trimester pregnancy (P>0.05). After intervention, the 24 h urinary protein quantification of CKD pregnant women in the third trimester pregnancy of study group was significantly lower than that of control group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-3.09, P=0.002). ③The total incidence of pregnancy complications of study group was 50.0% (20/40), which was significantly lower than that of control group 86.7% (26/30), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=10.23, P=0.001). The incidence of thyroid dysfunction in study group was 5.0% (2/40), which was significantly lower than that of control group 30.0% (9/30), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=6.31, P=0.012). ④The total incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes such as premature birth, induced abortion, and spontaneous abortion in study group was 12.5% (5/40), which was significantly lower than that of control group 43.3% (13/30), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=8.53, P=0.008). ⑤The birth weight, gestational age at birth, and Apgar scores at 1, 5, and 10 min after birth of newborns delivered by CKD pregnant women in the study group all were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=-2.90, P=0.007; t=-2.33, P=0.027; t=-2.37, P=0.027; t=-2.13, P=0.042; t=-2.07, P=0.048).

Conclusions

Adopting intervention measures of MDT management model during perinatal period for CKD pregnant women can effectively reduce the incidence of perinatal complications, alleviate renal burden, reduce incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes and premature birth.

表1 2组CKD孕妇一般临床资料比较(±s)
表2 2组CKD孕妇干预前(早孕期)、后(晚孕期)24 h尿蛋白定量、肌酐浓度比较[M(Q1Q3)]
表3 2组CKD孕妇妊娠期并发症发生情况比较[例数(%)]
表4 2组CKD孕妇妊娠结局比较[例数(%)]
表5 2组CKD孕妇新生儿结局比较
[1]
Ammirati AL. Chronic kidney disease[J]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992), 2020, 66(Suppl 1): s03-s09.DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.66S1.3.
[2]
Zhang L, Wang F, Wang L, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: a cross-sectional survey [J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9818): 815-822. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60033-6.
[3]
Piccoli GB, Zakharova E, Attini R, et al. Pregnancy in chronic kidney disease: need for higher awareness. A pragmatic review focused on what could be improved in the different CKD stages and phases[J]. J Clin Med, 2018, 7(11): 415. DOI: 10.3390/jcm7110415.
[4]
Ainsworth J. Exploring medical students′ early experiences of interacting with the multi-disciplinary team (MDT): a qualitative study[J]. MedEdPublish (2016), 2021, 10: 30. DOI: 10.15694/mep.2021.000030.1.
[5]
林容,翁晓英,林靓. 多学科团队合作诊疗在胎盘植入性疾病中的临床应用[J]. 创伤与急诊电子杂志2022, 10(2): 91-96. DOI: 10.16746/j.cnki.11-9332/r.2022.02.009.
[6]
上海市肾内科临床质量控制中心专家组. 慢性肾脏病早期筛查、诊断及防治指南(2022年版)[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志2022, 38(5): 453-464. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441217-20210819-00067.
[7]
白伶伶. 同伴支持干预对妊娠期高血压患者负性情绪,应对方式及妊娠结局的影响[J].医学临床研究2020, 37(2): 3. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2020.02.052.
[8]
林建华. 妊娠合并结构异常性心脏病并发产后出血MDT管理专家共识[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2019, 35(5): 528-535. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2019050111.
[9]
Eskandar J, Lucas A, Dixon A, et al. Pregnancy and family planning in women with kidney disease[J]. Kidney Int Rep, 2024, 9(5): 1236-1243. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.02.1438.
[10]
Rao A, Brewster UC. Pregnancy in chronic kidney disease: acute kidney injury in pregnant women and management of chronic kidney disease in the pregnant patient[J]. Med Clin North Am, 2023, 107(4): 717-726. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2023.03.005.
[11]
王妮妮,陶于洪. 慢性肾脏病与甲状腺功能减退研究现状 [J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(3): 233-238. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.03.001
[12]
Zhang JJ, Ma XX, Hao L, et al. A systematic review and Meta-analysis of outcomes of pregnancy in CKD and CKD outcomes in pregnancy[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2015, 10(11): 1964-1978. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.09250914.
[13]
Li Z, Chen S, Tan Y, et al. Twenty-four-hour proteinuria levels are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with CKD[J]. Clin Kidney J, 2023, 16(10): 1634-1643. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad44.
[14]
Oei JL, Kandasamy Y. Population data suggest persistently high risk of pregnancy complications in women with chronic kidney disease[J]. Evid Based Nurs, 2021, 25(3): 106. DOI: 10.1136/ebnurs-2021-103448.
[15]
Al Khalaf S, Bodunde E, Maher GM, et al. Chronic kidney disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 226(5): 656-670. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.037.
[16]
Hopkins J, Hewawasam E, Aldridge E, et al. South Australian prospective cohort study evaluating outcomes of maternal kidney and cardiac disease in pregnancy: a protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2022, 12(2): e059160. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059160.
[17]
姚丽,薛伟. 慢性肾脏病患者妊娠管理的研究进展[J]. 中华医学信息导报2020, 35(7): 22. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-8039.2020.07.131.
[1] 尹宏宇, 吴青青, 李晓菲. 颈后透明层和头臀长在妊娠11~13+6周双胎心脏畸形筛查中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 251-256.
[2] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 范思涵, 叶彩玲, 纪学芹. 产前超声心动图在先天性血管环诊断中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 37-41.
[3] 何雪威, 谷美玉, 吴亭亭. 超声子宫动脉及子宫内膜血流参数对不明原因复发性流产患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1158-1163.
[4] 林雪, 陈锰, 杨梅琳, 刘兴会, 周红雨. 妊娠合并重症肌无力患者的围产结局和重症肌无力病情恶化的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 125-132.
[5] 李莉, 马梅, 黄欣欣, 杨丹林, 潘勉. 妊娠期糖尿病早孕期相关影响因素及基于早孕期孕妇糖脂相关生化指标与人口学资料的4种机器学习算法构建妊娠期糖尿病预测模型的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 105-113.
[6] 袁琼, 李智珍, 黄少容, 孙玮萱. 腹腔镜下单侧输卵管开窗取胚术结合甲氨蝶呤对输卵管妊娠患者卵巢储备功能及血流动力学的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(12): 1315-1319.
[7] 胡惠英, 高劲松. 妊娠合并甲状旁腺功能减退症的诊治[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 13-17.
[8] 徐真, 白桂芹. 妊娠合并甲状腺功能亢进的诊治进展[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 18-23.
[9] 王嘉琳, 宋青. 妊娠合并胰岛素抵抗诊治的研究进展[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 29-32.
[10] 赵平月, 樊尚荣. 妊娠合并皮质醇增多症的诊治[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 1-5.
[11] 邹童, 姚强. 妊娠合并肾上腺皮质功能减退症的诊治[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 6-12.
[12] 周杨, 吕淑兰. 围孕期高催乳素血症的诊治与管理[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 24-28.
[13] 崔骞文, 汪燕兰, 李晴, 赵平月, 徐一菲, 袁知东, 韩巍, 张笑薇, 黄磊, 樊尚荣. IgG4相关甲状腺疾病合并妊娠一例并文献复习[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 33-40.
[14] 李晴, 丁玉珍, 樊尚荣. 妊娠合并机械心脏瓣膜患者血栓形成抗凝治疗的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 41-48.
[15] 初桂芝, 王淑娟, 栾文杰, 郭桂敏, 官春霞, 武晓峰, 李松洋, 王好玲, 栾泽东. 早孕期羊膜带综合征产前超声诊断分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 57-60.
阅读次数
全文


摘要