切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 398 -402. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2024.04.006

围产医学专辑

中孕期孕妇血清胎盘生长因子水平低与胎儿不良预后的关系
韩肖燕1, 杨桦1,()   
  1. 1.首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院妇产科,北京 100050
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-25 修回日期:2024-07-15 出版日期:2024-08-01
  • 通信作者: 杨桦

Relationship between low level of serum placental growth factor in the second trimester pregnancy women and adverse fetal prognosis

Xiaoyan Han1, Hua Yang1,()   

  1. 1.Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China
  • Received:2024-05-25 Revised:2024-07-15 Published:2024-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Hua Yang
引用本文:

韩肖燕, 杨桦. 中孕期孕妇血清胎盘生长因子水平低与胎儿不良预后的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 398-402.

Xiaoyan Han, Hua Yang. Relationship between low level of serum placental growth factor in the second trimester pregnancy women and adverse fetal prognosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(04): 398-402.

目的

探讨中孕期孕妇血清胎盘生长因子(PLGF)水平低与胎儿不良预后的关系。

方法

选择2023年3月至2024 年5 月于首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院产科规律产前检查的177例孕妇为研究对象。采用回顾性分析方法,根据中孕期血清PLGF 水平,将其分别纳入研究组(n=87,中孕期血清PLGF 水平<60 pg/m L)与对照组(n=90,中孕期血清PLGF 水平≥60 pg/m L)。收集2组孕妇分娩孕龄、早产率及分娩新生儿出生体重、低出生体重儿发生率、生后1 min Apgar评分、脐动脉血p H 值、新生儿窒息发生率,并采用成组t检验或χ2 检验,或Fisher确切概率法进行统计学比较。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年新修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。2组孕妇年龄、孕次、产次、早孕期人体质量指数(BMI)等一般临床资料分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

①研究组孕妇分娩孕龄为(33.6±3.1)孕周,低于对照组的(38.3±1.2)孕周,研究组早产率为12.6%(11/87),高于对照组的3.3%(3/90),并且差异均有统计学意义(t=4.45、P<0.001,χ2=5.26、P=0.002)。②研究组新生儿出生体重为(1 954±459)g,低于对照组的(2 964±283)g,研究组低出生体重儿发生率为13.8%(12/87),高于对照组的2.2%(2/90),并且差异均有统计学意义(t=5.93、P <0.001,χ2=8.13、P <0.001)。③研究组新生儿生后1 min Apgar评分为(7.9±1.7)分,脐动脉血p H 值为7.2±0.2,均分别低于对照组的(9.3±1.1)分与7.3±0.1,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=2.25、P=0.038,t=2.16、P=0.045)。④2组新生儿窒息发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.362)。

结论

中孕期孕妇血清PLGF水平低与胎儿早产及新生儿出生体重、生后1 min Apgar评分、脐动脉血p H 值低等胎儿不良预后有关。临床对于血清PLGF水平低孕妇,需早期识别高危人群,改善新生儿预后。

Objective

To investigate the relationship between low level of serum placental growth factor (PLGF)in the second trimester pregnancy women and adverse fetal prognosis.

Methods

A total of 177 cases of pregnant women who received regular prenatal checkups in the Department of Obstetrics,Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University from March 2023 to May 2024 were selected as research subjects.They were grouped into study group (n=87,serum PLGF level<60 pg/m L during the second trimester)and control group (n=90,serum PLGF level≥60 pg/m L during the second trimester)according to the serum PLGF level during the second trimester by retrospective analysis method.The gestational age,premature delivery rate,birth weight of newborn,incidence of low birth weight,Apgar score at 1 min after birth,p H of umbilical artery and incidence of neonatal asphyxia of two groups were collected,and were statistically compared by independent-samples t test or chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability method.This study was in line with the requirements of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki

Results

①The gestational age of study group was (33.6±3.1)gestational weeks,which was lower than that of control group (38.3±1.2)gestational weeks,while the premature delivery rate of study group was 12.6%(11/87),which was higher than that of control group (3.3%,3/90),and both the differences were statistically significant (t=4.45,P<0.001; χ2=5.26,P=0.002).②The birth weight of newborns in study group was(1 954±459)g,which was lower than that in control group(2 964±283)g,and the incidence of low birth weight infants in study group was 13.8%(12/87),which was higher than that in control group 2.2%,2/90),and both the differences were statistically significant(t=5.93,P<0.001; χ2=8.13,P<0.001).③In study group,the Apgar score at 1 min after birth of neonate was(7.9±1.7)points,and the p H value of umbilical artery blood was 7.2±0.2,which were both lower than those of control group (9.3±1.1)points and 7.3±0.1 respectively,and both the differences were statistically significant (t=2.25,P=0.038;t=2.16,P=0.045).④There was no significant difference in the incidence of neonatal asphyxia between two groups (P=0.362).

Conclusions

Low level of serum PLGF in the second trimester is associated with adverse fetal prognosis,such as premature birth,low birth weight,low Apgar score at 1 min after birth,and low umbilical cord blood p H value in newborns.For pregnant women with low level of serum PLGF in clinical practice,it is necessary to strengthen prenatal examinations,identify high-risk groups early,so as to improve the prognosis of newborn.

表1 2组孕妇一般临床资料比较(±s
表2 2组孕妇分娩孕龄及早产率比较
表3 2组新生儿出生体重与低出生体重儿发生率比较
表4 2组新生儿生后1 min Apgar评分及脐动脉血p H 值比较(±s
[1]
Verlohren S,Brennecke SP,Galindo A,et al.Clinical interpretation and implementation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the prediction,diagnosis and management of preeclampsia[J].Pregnancy Hypertens,2022,27:42-50.DOI:10.1016/j.preghy.2021.12.003.
[2]
Binder J,Palmrich P,Kalafat E,et al.Longitudinal assessment of angiogenic markers in prediction of adverse outcome in women with confirmed pre-eclampsia[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2023,62(6):843-851.DOI:10.1002/uog.26276.
[3]
Stepan H,Galindo A,Hund M,et al.Clinical utility of sFlt-1 and PlGF in screening,prediction,diagnosis and monitoring of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2023,61(2):168-180.DOI:10.1002/uog.26032.
[4]
Herraiz I,Llurba E,Verlohren S,et al.Update on the diagnosis and prognosis of preeclampsia with the aid of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in singleton pregnancies[J].Fetal Diagn Ther,2018,43(2):81-89.DOI:10.1159/000477903.
[5]
Singh Thakur A,Tayade S,Patel D,et al.Unraveling the predictive power:placenta growth factor and pregnancyassociated plasma protein A in pre-eclampsia[J].Cureus,2024,16(1):e52752.DOI:10.7759/cureus.52752.
[6]
王泽华, 王艳丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京: 人民卫生出版社,2019:67.Wang ZH,Wang YL.Obstetrics and gynecology[M].8th ed.Beijing:People's Medical Publishing House,2019:67.
[7]
邵肖梅, 叶鸿瑁, 丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2023:57.Shao XM,Ye HM,Qiao XS.Practice of neonatology[M].5th ed.Beijing:People's Medical Publishing House,2023:57.
[8]
中华医学会围产医学分会新生儿复苏学组.新生儿窒息诊断的专家共识[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(1):3-6.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2016.01.002.Neonatal Resuscitation Subgroup,Chinese Society of Perinatal Medicine,Chinese Medical Association.Expert consensus on the diagnosis of neonatal asphyxia[J].Chin J Perinat Med,2016,19(1):3-6.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2016.01.002.
[9]
Lévy P,Hamdi S,Guiboudenche J,et al.Applying the concept of uncertainty to the sFlt-1/PlGF cut-offs for diagnosis and prognosis of preeclampsia[J].Clin Chem Lab Med,2021,59 (4):681-686.DOI:10.1515/cclm-2020-0477.
[10]
Agrawal S,Shinar S,Cerdeira AS,et al.Predictive performance of PlGF (placental growth factor)for screening preeclampsia in asymptomatic women:a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J].Hypertension,2019,74(5):1124-1135.DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13360.
[11]
Chang YS,Chen CN,Jeng SF,et al.The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio as a predictor for poor pregnancy and neonatal outcomes[J].Pediatr Neonatol,2017,58(6):529-533.DOI:10.1016/j.pedneo.2016.10.005.
[12]
Middendorf L,Gellhaus A,Iannaccone A,et al.The impact of increased maternal sFlt-1/PlGF ratio on motor outcome of preterm infants[J].Front Endocrinol,2022,13:913514.DOI:10.3389/fendo.2022.913514.
[13]
王慧娟, 唐淑稳, 兰淑海.早发型重度子痫前期患者胎盘生长因子表达及与妊娠结局关系[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2019,27(12):1693-1696.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2019.12.031.Wang HJ,Tang SW,Lan SH.Expression of placental growth factor and its relationship with pregnancy outcome in patients with early-onset severe preeclampsia[J].Chin J Fam Plann,2019,27(12):1693-1696.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2019.12.031.
[1] 于桐, 孙姗姗, 刘扬. 乳腺导管原位癌的浸润转化机制及临床病理特征[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 304-307.
[2] 马中正, 杨云川, 马翔, 周迟, 丁丁, 霍俊一, 徐楠, 崔培元, 周磊. 胰腺癌双硫死亡相关的lncRNA预后模型的构建及免疫反应研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 368-376.
[3] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[4] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[8] 孙建娜, 孔令军, 任崇禧, 穆坤, 王晓蕊. 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者预后分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 502-505.
[9] 袁庆港, 刘理想, 张亮, 周世振, 高波, 丁超, 管文贤. 尿素-肌酐比值(UCR)可预测结直肠癌患者术后的长期预后[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 506-509.
[10] 黄福, 王黔, 金相任, 唐云川. VEGFR2、miR-27a-5p在胃癌组织中的表达与临床病理参数及预后的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 558-561.
[11] 张蔚林, 王哲学, 白峻阁, 黄忠诚, 肖志刚. 利用TCGA数据库构建基于miRNA的结直肠癌列线图预后模型[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 381-388.
[12] 李素娟, 王文玲, 董洪敏, 李小凯, 黄思成, 王刚. 多原发与单原发大肠腺癌的预后分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 407-412.
[13] 孙文恺, 沈青, 杭丽, 张迎春. 纤维蛋白原与清蛋白比值、中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值、C反应蛋白与溃疡性结肠炎病情评估和预后的关系[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 426-431.
[14] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
[15] 闫战涛, 王辉, 周梓迪, 史勇强, 陈铜兵. 胃淋巴上皮瘤样癌三级淋巴结构特征及其与预后的相关性[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 455-461.
阅读次数
全文


摘要