切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 236 -240. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.02.018

所属专题: 文献

论著

单核苷酸多态性微阵列技术检测自然流产妊娠产物的应用价值
程苾恒1,(), 陈建华1, 徐万洲2   
  1. 1. 430060 武汉大学人民医院产科
    2. 430060 武汉大学人民医院检验科
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-14 修回日期:2018-02-20 出版日期:2018-04-01
  • 通信作者: 程苾恒

Application value of single nucleotide polymorphism array testing applied to products of conception from miscarriage

Biheng Cheng1,(), Jianhua Chen1, Wanzhou Xu2   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei Province, China
    2. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2017-11-14 Revised:2018-02-20 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Biheng Cheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cheng Biheng, Email:
引用本文:

程苾恒, 陈建华, 徐万洲. 单核苷酸多态性微阵列技术检测自然流产妊娠产物的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(02): 236-240.

Biheng Cheng, Jianhua Chen, Wanzhou Xu. Application value of single nucleotide polymorphism array testing applied to products of conception from miscarriage[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(02): 236-240.

目的

探讨单核苷酸多态性微阵列(SNP-array)技术检测自然流产妊娠产物(POC),在自然流产病因分析与遗传咨询中的应用价值。

方法

选择2016年5月至2017年7月,于武汉大学人民医院因超声检查提示"胚胎停止发育",而接受妊娠终止术的143例孕妇为研究对象。对其自然流产POC采用SNP-array技术进行检测,总结POC的染色体异常特点,并采用χ2检验,对POC染色体异常和染色体正常孕妇的预产期年龄构成比(<35岁和≥35岁)进行统计学比较。本研究经武汉大学人民医院伦理委员会批准,所有受试者均签署知情同意书。

结果

①本组143例单胎妊娠孕妇的143例POC标本中,128例标本符合SNP-array技术检测要求,因此SNP-array对POC的检测成功率为89.5%。采取SNP-array对POC进行检测的结果显示,染色体异常率为57.0%(73/128),包括染色体结构畸变(1p36微缺失)1例(1.4%,1/73),以及染色体数目异常72例(98.6%,72/73)。②72例染色体数目异常的各类型分布为:二倍体非整倍体中的三体占59.7%(43/72),单体占18.1%(13/72),其次为三倍体占13.9%(10/72),嵌合体占8.3%(6/72)。③自然流产POC检测结果为染色体异常孕妇的预产期年龄<35岁与≥35岁的构成比分别为67.1%(44/73)与32.9%(24/73),而POC染色体正常孕妇的预产期年龄<35岁与≥35岁的构成比分别为80.0%(44/55)与20.0%(11/55),二者比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.618,P=0.106)。

结论

采取SNP-array技术对自然流产POC染色体异常的检测,可对自然流产原因分析提供依据,对遗传咨询和生育指导亦具有一定作用。

Objective

To evaluate the application value of assaying the products of conception (POC) of miscarriage with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array in the etiology analysis and genetic counseling of miscarriage.

Methods

A total of 143 pregnant women were chosen as study subjects.They were diagnosed as " embryos stop developing" by ultrasonography and terminated pregnancy from May 2016 to July 2017 in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. SNP-array was conducted to test the POC of these pregnant women, and characteristics of the chromosomal abnormalities of POC were summarized. Meanwhile, the constituent ratios of age at expected date of delivery (<35 years old and ≥35 years old) between pregnant women with and without POC chromosomal abnormality was compared by chi-square test. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University.Informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Results

①Among 143 singleton pregnancies, we obtained results of 128 eligible samples which met the requirements of SNP-array testing from 143 samples of POC, and the success rate of SNP-array testing for POC was 89.5%. SNP-array testing of POC showed that the proportion of chromosomal abnormalities was 57.0%(73/128), including 1 case (1.4%, 1/73) of structural abnormality of chromosome (1p36 micro-deletion), and 72 cases (98.6%, 72/73) of numerical abnormalities of chromosome. ②The types distribution of 72 cases of numerical abnormalities of chromosome were 59.7%(43/72) of trisomy, 18.1%(13/72) of monosomy, 13.9%(10/72) of triploidy and 8.3%(6/72) of mosaicism. ③The constituent ratios of age at expected date of delivery of <35 years old and ≥35 years old in pregnant women with POC chromosomal abnormality were 67.1%(49/73) and 32.9%(24/73), respectively, and were 80.0%(44/55) and 20.0%(11/55) in pregnant women without POC chromosomal abnormality, respectively, and there was no significant difference between pregnant women with and without POC chromosomal abnormality (χ2=2.618, P=0.106).

Conclusions

SNP-array testing for detecting the chromosomal abnormalities of POC from miscarriage can provide a basis of miscarriage etiology analysis, and also play a certain role in clinical genetic counselling and future pregnancy planning.

表1 73例自然流产妊娠产物染色体异常类型[%(n/n′)]
[1]
BardosJ,HerczD,FriedenthalJ, et al. A national survey on public perceptions of miscarriage[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 125(6): 1313-1320.
[2]
ZhuJ,LiangJ,MuY, et al. Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of stillbirths in China: a census of nearly 4 million health facility births between 2012 and 2014[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2016, 4(2): e109-e118.
[3]
GardnerRJM,SutherlandGR,ShafferLG. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling[M].4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[4]
WapnerRJ. Genetics of stillbirth[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 53(3): 628-634.
[5]
LinSB,XieYJ,ChenZ, et al. Improved assay performance of single nucleotide polymorphism array over conventional karyotyping in analyzing products of conception[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2015, 78(7): 408-413.
[6]
王晨冉,冯碧波,翟建军. 微阵列比较基因组杂交应用于产前诊断中的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(3): 393-396.
[7]
LathiRB,MassieJA,LoringM, et al. Informatics enhanced SNP microarray analysis of 30 miscarriage samples compared to routine cytogenetics[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(3): e31282.
[8]
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 122(6): 1374-1377.
[9]
LevyB,SigurjonssonS,PettersenB, et al. Genomic imbalance in products of conception: single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray analysis[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 124(2 Pt 1): 202-209.
[10]
WangY,ChengQ,MengL, et al. Clinical application of SNP array analysis in first-trimester pregnancy loss: a prospective study[J]. Clin Genet, 2017, 91(6): 849-858.
[11]
陆国辉. 产前遗传病诊断[M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社, 2002: 245-248.
[12]
卢建,黄伟伟,李怡, 等. 染色体微阵列技术在产前诊断中的应用[J/CD]. 中国产前诊断杂志(电子版), 2016, 8(4): 8-10, 75.
[13]
曾艳,张建军. 反复妊娠21三体综合征胎儿的相关研究[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2014, 22(9): 4-6.
[14]
符梅,徐克惠. 复发性自然流产夫妇的病因分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(4): 395-400.
[15]
AntonE,VidalF,BlancoJ. Reciprocal translocations: tracing their meiotic behavior[J]. Genet Med, 2008, 10(10): 730-738.
[16]
PujolA,BenetJ,StaessenC, et al. The importance of aneuploidy screening in reciprocal translocation carriers[J]. Reproduction, 2006, 131(6): 1025-1035.
[17]
WickJB,JohnsonKJ,O′BrienJ, et al. Second-trimester diagnosis of triploidy: a series of four cases[J]. AJP Rep, 2013, 3(1): 37-40.
[18]
SchaefferAJ,ChungJ,HeretisK, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2004, 74(6): 1168-1174.
[19]
吴坚柱,何志明,林少宾, 等. 一例心脏缺陷胎儿染色体1p36.3微缺失的产前诊断[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志, 2016, 33(3): 353-356.
[20]
周静,张硕,徐建忠, 等. 不同助孕方式中2 318例早孕期自然流产物异常核型比较[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2017, 16(3): 277-281.
[21]
Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics, Committee on Genetics, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Practice Bulletin No. 163: screening for fetal aneuploidy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 127(5): e123-e137.
[1] 申成凯, 孟飞, 刘坤, 朱卫洁, 赵海军. 白介素-1β基因型与原发性冻结肩易感性的关联研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 17-23.
[2] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[3] 黄蓉, 梁自毓, 祁文瑾. NLRP3炎症小体在胎膜早破孕妇血清中的表达及其意义[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 540-548.
[4] 何霞, 黄蓉, 祁文瑾. 胎膜早破孕妇胎盘与胎膜菌群丰度的高通量测序研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 549-555.
[5] 谢江燕, 王亚菲, 贺芳. 妊娠合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[6] 徐婷婷, 詹泳池, 王晓东, 刘兴会. 电子胎心监测结果出现正弦波形的胎母输血综合征围生期结局分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 382-389.
[7] 韩肖燕, 杨桦. 中孕期孕妇血清胎盘生长因子水平低与胎儿不良预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 398-402.
[8] 杜佳丽, 鲍睿, 乔春红, 韩伟. 中孕期宫颈功能不全孕妇经阴道紧急宫颈环扎术后不良妊娠结局预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 403-409.
[9] 谭娟, 谭建新, 邵彬彬, 王艳, 许争峰. 胎儿单基因遗传病无创产前检测的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 245-250.
[10] 张少华, 林爱齐, 张玉, 董晓云, 刘红英. HLAIL基因多态性及其与复发性自然流产的相关性[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 251-259.
[11] 林雪, 陈锰, 杨梅琳, 刘兴会, 周红雨. 妊娠合并重症肌无力患者的围产结局和重症肌无力病情恶化的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 125-132.
[12] 陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[13] 贾赛君, 张英, 万佳义. 妊娠合并亚临床甲状腺功能减退孕妇的妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[14] 王叶青, 李利彤, 李伟绪, 曹猛. 牙周炎和糖尿病视网膜病变的因果关系:一项双向两样本孟德尔随机化分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 160-168.
[15] 胡采宏, 张卫社. 辅助生殖技术与早期流产[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 69-72.
阅读次数
全文


摘要