切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 236 -240. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.02.018

所属专题: 文献

论著

单核苷酸多态性微阵列技术检测自然流产妊娠产物的应用价值
程苾恒1,(), 陈建华1, 徐万洲2   
  1. 1. 430060 武汉大学人民医院产科
    2. 430060 武汉大学人民医院检验科
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-14 修回日期:2018-02-20 出版日期:2018-04-01
  • 通信作者: 程苾恒

Application value of single nucleotide polymorphism array testing applied to products of conception from miscarriage

Biheng Cheng1,(), Jianhua Chen1, Wanzhou Xu2   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei Province, China
    2. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2017-11-14 Revised:2018-02-20 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Biheng Cheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cheng Biheng, Email:
引用本文:

程苾恒, 陈建华, 徐万洲. 单核苷酸多态性微阵列技术检测自然流产妊娠产物的应用价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(02): 236-240.

Biheng Cheng, Jianhua Chen, Wanzhou Xu. Application value of single nucleotide polymorphism array testing applied to products of conception from miscarriage[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(02): 236-240.

目的

探讨单核苷酸多态性微阵列(SNP-array)技术检测自然流产妊娠产物(POC),在自然流产病因分析与遗传咨询中的应用价值。

方法

选择2016年5月至2017年7月,于武汉大学人民医院因超声检查提示"胚胎停止发育",而接受妊娠终止术的143例孕妇为研究对象。对其自然流产POC采用SNP-array技术进行检测,总结POC的染色体异常特点,并采用χ2检验,对POC染色体异常和染色体正常孕妇的预产期年龄构成比(<35岁和≥35岁)进行统计学比较。本研究经武汉大学人民医院伦理委员会批准,所有受试者均签署知情同意书。

结果

①本组143例单胎妊娠孕妇的143例POC标本中,128例标本符合SNP-array技术检测要求,因此SNP-array对POC的检测成功率为89.5%。采取SNP-array对POC进行检测的结果显示,染色体异常率为57.0%(73/128),包括染色体结构畸变(1p36微缺失)1例(1.4%,1/73),以及染色体数目异常72例(98.6%,72/73)。②72例染色体数目异常的各类型分布为:二倍体非整倍体中的三体占59.7%(43/72),单体占18.1%(13/72),其次为三倍体占13.9%(10/72),嵌合体占8.3%(6/72)。③自然流产POC检测结果为染色体异常孕妇的预产期年龄<35岁与≥35岁的构成比分别为67.1%(44/73)与32.9%(24/73),而POC染色体正常孕妇的预产期年龄<35岁与≥35岁的构成比分别为80.0%(44/55)与20.0%(11/55),二者比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.618,P=0.106)。

结论

采取SNP-array技术对自然流产POC染色体异常的检测,可对自然流产原因分析提供依据,对遗传咨询和生育指导亦具有一定作用。

Objective

To evaluate the application value of assaying the products of conception (POC) of miscarriage with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array in the etiology analysis and genetic counseling of miscarriage.

Methods

A total of 143 pregnant women were chosen as study subjects.They were diagnosed as " embryos stop developing" by ultrasonography and terminated pregnancy from May 2016 to July 2017 in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. SNP-array was conducted to test the POC of these pregnant women, and characteristics of the chromosomal abnormalities of POC were summarized. Meanwhile, the constituent ratios of age at expected date of delivery (<35 years old and ≥35 years old) between pregnant women with and without POC chromosomal abnormality was compared by chi-square test. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University.Informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Results

①Among 143 singleton pregnancies, we obtained results of 128 eligible samples which met the requirements of SNP-array testing from 143 samples of POC, and the success rate of SNP-array testing for POC was 89.5%. SNP-array testing of POC showed that the proportion of chromosomal abnormalities was 57.0%(73/128), including 1 case (1.4%, 1/73) of structural abnormality of chromosome (1p36 micro-deletion), and 72 cases (98.6%, 72/73) of numerical abnormalities of chromosome. ②The types distribution of 72 cases of numerical abnormalities of chromosome were 59.7%(43/72) of trisomy, 18.1%(13/72) of monosomy, 13.9%(10/72) of triploidy and 8.3%(6/72) of mosaicism. ③The constituent ratios of age at expected date of delivery of <35 years old and ≥35 years old in pregnant women with POC chromosomal abnormality were 67.1%(49/73) and 32.9%(24/73), respectively, and were 80.0%(44/55) and 20.0%(11/55) in pregnant women without POC chromosomal abnormality, respectively, and there was no significant difference between pregnant women with and without POC chromosomal abnormality (χ2=2.618, P=0.106).

Conclusions

SNP-array testing for detecting the chromosomal abnormalities of POC from miscarriage can provide a basis of miscarriage etiology analysis, and also play a certain role in clinical genetic counselling and future pregnancy planning.

表1 73例自然流产妊娠产物染色体异常类型[%(n/n′)]
[1]
BardosJ,HerczD,FriedenthalJ, et al. A national survey on public perceptions of miscarriage[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 125(6): 1313-1320.
[2]
ZhuJ,LiangJ,MuY, et al. Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of stillbirths in China: a census of nearly 4 million health facility births between 2012 and 2014[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2016, 4(2): e109-e118.
[3]
GardnerRJM,SutherlandGR,ShafferLG. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling[M].4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[4]
WapnerRJ. Genetics of stillbirth[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 53(3): 628-634.
[5]
LinSB,XieYJ,ChenZ, et al. Improved assay performance of single nucleotide polymorphism array over conventional karyotyping in analyzing products of conception[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2015, 78(7): 408-413.
[6]
王晨冉,冯碧波,翟建军. 微阵列比较基因组杂交应用于产前诊断中的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(3): 393-396.
[7]
LathiRB,MassieJA,LoringM, et al. Informatics enhanced SNP microarray analysis of 30 miscarriage samples compared to routine cytogenetics[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(3): e31282.
[8]
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 122(6): 1374-1377.
[9]
LevyB,SigurjonssonS,PettersenB, et al. Genomic imbalance in products of conception: single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray analysis[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 124(2 Pt 1): 202-209.
[10]
WangY,ChengQ,MengL, et al. Clinical application of SNP array analysis in first-trimester pregnancy loss: a prospective study[J]. Clin Genet, 2017, 91(6): 849-858.
[11]
陆国辉. 产前遗传病诊断[M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社, 2002: 245-248.
[12]
卢建,黄伟伟,李怡, 等. 染色体微阵列技术在产前诊断中的应用[J/CD]. 中国产前诊断杂志(电子版), 2016, 8(4): 8-10, 75.
[13]
曾艳,张建军. 反复妊娠21三体综合征胎儿的相关研究[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2014, 22(9): 4-6.
[14]
符梅,徐克惠. 复发性自然流产夫妇的病因分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(4): 395-400.
[15]
AntonE,VidalF,BlancoJ. Reciprocal translocations: tracing their meiotic behavior[J]. Genet Med, 2008, 10(10): 730-738.
[16]
PujolA,BenetJ,StaessenC, et al. The importance of aneuploidy screening in reciprocal translocation carriers[J]. Reproduction, 2006, 131(6): 1025-1035.
[17]
WickJB,JohnsonKJ,O′BrienJ, et al. Second-trimester diagnosis of triploidy: a series of four cases[J]. AJP Rep, 2013, 3(1): 37-40.
[18]
SchaefferAJ,ChungJ,HeretisK, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2004, 74(6): 1168-1174.
[19]
吴坚柱,何志明,林少宾, 等. 一例心脏缺陷胎儿染色体1p36.3微缺失的产前诊断[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志, 2016, 33(3): 353-356.
[20]
周静,张硕,徐建忠, 等. 不同助孕方式中2 318例早孕期自然流产物异常核型比较[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2017, 16(3): 277-281.
[21]
Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics, Committee on Genetics, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Practice Bulletin No. 163: screening for fetal aneuploidy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 127(5): e123-e137.
[1] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[2] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[3] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[4] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[5] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[7] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[8] 冯丹艳, 曹晓辉, 史玉霞. 血清脂联素与胎盘亮氨酸氨肽酶对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[9] 匡德凤, 李志国, 华绍芳, 薛凤霞. 高脂诱导孕鼠血清及胎盘组织脂肪酸结合蛋白-4及相关脂蛋白水平变化及其意义[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 338-344.
[10] 邬龙海, 黄淼, 龚云辉, 喻云倩. 血清趋化因子在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇中的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 357-362.
[11] 曾照敏, 余海燕. 超雌综合征的临床认知[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 145-150.
[12] 张璐, 杨惠娟, 刘凯波. 2015—2021年北京市辅助生殖技术助孕活产及高龄孕母占比与不良妊娠结局变化趋势[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 46-53.
[13] 刘雪云, 范颖, 姚爱军, 张胜苗, 吕亚妮, 张冰清, 张晓宇, 刘恒. 基于微信小程序的个体化、全程护理干预对孕妇孕期体重及分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
[14] 王晓怡, 洪凡, 陈晴晴, 孙雯. 新型冠状病毒感染疫情高发状态下封闭封控管理区孕产妇的管理方案研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 109-112.
[15] 张娟, 纪青, 胡国宏, 谭成, 王双双, 易秀英. CD11b基因rs4597342位点多态性与川崎病的相关性研究[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 92-96.
阅读次数
全文


摘要