切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 241 -248. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.02.019

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜下子宫腹直肌前鞘悬吊固定术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的临床疗效
黄兰婕1, 陈威2, 朱耀魁2,()   
  1. 1. 517200 广东省河源市和平县人民医院妇科
    2. 510632 广州,暨南大学附属第一医院妇科
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-19 修回日期:2018-02-09 出版日期:2018-04-01
  • 通信作者: 朱耀魁

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic uterine suspension and fixation to anterior sheath of rectus abdominis in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Lanjie Huang1, Wei Chen2, Yaokui Zhu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Heping County People′s Hospital, Heyuan 517200, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
    2. Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2017-11-19 Revised:2018-02-09 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yaokui Zhu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhu Yaokui, Email:
引用本文:

黄兰婕, 陈威, 朱耀魁. 腹腔镜下子宫腹直肌前鞘悬吊固定术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的临床疗效[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(02): 241-248.

Lanjie Huang, Wei Chen, Yaokui Zhu. Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic uterine suspension and fixation to anterior sheath of rectus abdominis in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(02): 241-248.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下子宫腹直肌前鞘悬吊固定术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂(POP)的临床疗效。

方法

选择2014年10月1日至2017年1月31日于广东省河源市和平县人民医院及暨南大学附属第一医院因POP就诊的21例患者为研究对象,并纳入研究组,所有患者均接受腹腔镜下子宫腹直肌前鞘悬吊固定术。选择同期于上述2家医院就诊并接受阴式全子宫切除术+阴道前、后壁修补术的17例POP患者纳入对照组。采用盆腔脏器脱垂定量分度法(POP-Q)对2组患者POP程度进行评估,并对2组患者术前及研究组患者术后第4天进行POP-Q评分系统中AaBaApBpC点共计5个指示点进行测量。采用成组t检验,对2组患者手术时间、术中出血量及住院时间进行比较。采用配对t检验,对研究组患者术前与术后POP-Q评分系统5个指示点测定结果比较。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,对2组患者子宫脱垂、阴道前壁脱垂和阴道后壁脱垂POP-Q分度构成比进行比较。采用Fisher确切概率法,对2组患者术后总客观复发率进行比较。本研究遵循的程序符合广东省河源市和平县人民医院及暨南大学附属第一医院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,并与所有受试者签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①2组患者的年龄、产次、绝经年限及人体质量指数(BMI)等一般情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②2组患者的子宫脱垂、阴道前壁脱垂及阴道后壁脱垂的POP-Q分度构成比比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③研究组患者的手术时间为(76.7±15.6)min,显著短于对照组的(123.8±17.9)min;研究组患者的术中出血量为(37.9±6.4)mL,显著低于对照组的(138.8±28.9)mL;研究组患者的住院时间为(6.3±2.8)d,显著短于对照组的(9.4±3.8)d,2组上述指标分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-8.654, P<0.001; t=-14.150, P<0.001; t=-2.452, P=0.023)。④研究组术前与术后第4天POP-Q评分系统测定结果显示,Aa点分别位于(-0.5±1.3)cm与(-2.3±0.5)cm处,Ba点分别位于(2.1±1.6)cm与(-1.9±0.4)cm处,Ap点分别位于(-1.1±1.3)cm与(-2.8±0.3)cm处,Bp点分别位于(0.3±1.8)cm与(-2.6±0.4)cm处,C点分别位于(3.6±1.7)cm与(-7.7±0.6)cm处,上述测定结果分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=12.408、14.791、6.355、8.820、28.302, P<0.001)。⑤研究组和对照组患者的总客观复发率分别为33.3%(7/21)和23.5%(4/17),2组比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.167)。

结论

腹腔镜下子宫腹直肌前鞘悬吊固定术治疗POP安全有效,并且在手术时间、术中出血量及术后住院时间较阴式全子宫切除术+阴道前、后壁修补术具有明显优势,但是腹腔镜下子宫腹直肌前鞘悬吊固定术的远期疗效仍有待多中心、随机对照研究进一步证实。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic uterine suspension and fixation to anterior sheath of rectus abdominis in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

From October 1, 2014 to January 31, 2017, a total of 21 POP patients who received laparoscopic uterine suspension and fixation to anterior sheath of rectus abdominis were included into study group. Meanwhile, another 21 POP patients who received vaginal hysterectomy and vaginal wall repair surgery were included into control group. Patients of both two groups were admitted to Heping County People′s Hospital and First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University. The degree of POP was assessed by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q), and 5 indicators of Aa, Ba, Ap, Bp and C points of the POP-Q scoring system were measured before the operation of two groups and at the 4th day after operation of study group. The operation duration, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between two groups were compared by independent-samples t test. Five indicators of Aa, Ba, Ap, Bp and C points of the POP-Q scoring system were measured by paired-samples t test. The constituent ratio of POP-Q degrees of uterine prolapse, anterior vaginal wall prolapse and posterior vaginal wall prolapse were compared by Wilcoxon rank sum test. The objective recurrence rates between two groups were detected by Fisher exact test. The study protocol was approved by the Ethnical Review Board of Investigation in Human Beings of Heping County People′s Hospital and First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University. Informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Results

① There were no significant differences between two groups in general clinical characteristics such as age, parity, menopause duration and body mass index (BMI) (P>0.05). ② There were no significant differences between two groups in constituent ratio of POP-Q degrees of uterine prolapse, anterior vaginal wall prolapse and posterior vaginal wall prolapse (P>0.05). ③ The operation duration in study group was (76.7±15.6)min, which was significant shorter than (123.8±17.9) min in control group, intraoperative blood loss in study group was (37.9±6.4) mL, which was significant less than (138.8±28.9) mL in control group, hospital stay in study group was (6.3±2.8) d, which was significant shorter than (9.4±3.8) d, and all the above differences were statistically significant (t=-8.654, P<0.001; t=-14.150, P<0.001; t=-2.452, P=0.023). ④ The results of POP-Q scoring system in study group before the operation and at the 4th day after the operation were as follows. Point Aa (point in the anterior vaginal wall, 3 cm from hymen) were located at (-0.5±1.3) cm and (-2.3±0.5) cm, point Ba (point in the anterior vaginal prolapse) were located at (2.1±1.6) cm and (1.9±0.4)cm, point Ap (point in the posterior vaginal wall, 3 cm from hymen) were located at (-1.1±1.3) cm and (-2.8±0.3) cm, point Bp (point in the posterior vaginal prolapse, farthest from hymen) were located at (0.3±1.8) cm and (-2.6±0.4) cm, point C (point in the anterior fornix of vagina or vaginal stump) were located at (3.6±1.7) cm and (-7.7±0.6) cm, respectively; and all the differences between two groups were statistically significant (t=12.408, 14.791, 6.355, 8.820, 28.302; P<0.001). ⑤ The objective recurrence rates of two groups were 33.3% (7/21) and 23.5% (4/17), and the difference between them was not statistically significant (P=0.167).

Conclusions

The surgery of laparoscopic uterine suspension and fixation to anterior sheath of rectus abdominis is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of POP. Compared with traditional operation, it has obvious advantages in the aspects of operation duration, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, but the long-term complications remain to be followed up.

图1 腹腔镜下子宫腹直肌前鞘悬吊固定术的主要手术步骤(图1A:进针穿过右侧子宫壁;图1B:在子宫前壁制造创面;图1C:收紧缝线悬吊子宫;图1D:子宫紧贴悬吊于腹前壁)
表1 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者一般临床资料比较(±s)
表2 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者子宫脱垂和阴道前、后壁脱垂POP-Q分度构成比比较[例数(%)]
表3 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者手术情况比较(±s)
图2 盆腔脏器脱垂患者治疗前、后对照(图2A:治疗前全子宫及阴道前、后壁重度脱垂;图2B:治疗后全子宫及阴道前、后壁均恢复正常位置)
表4 研究组盆腔脏器脱垂患者术前与术后第4天POP-Q评分系统各指示点比较(cm,±s)
[1]
ACOG technical bulletin. Pelvic organ prolapse. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 1996, 52(2): 197-205.
[2]
DoaeeM,Moradi-LakehM,NourmohammadiA, et al. Management of pelvic organ prolapse and quality of life: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2014, 25(2): 153-163.
[3]
KhanZA,ThomasL,EmerySJ. Outcomes and complications of trans-vaginal mesh repair using the Prolift™ kit for pelvic organ prolapse at 4 years median follow-up in a tertiary referral centre [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2014, 290(6): 1151-1157.
[4]
HinoulP,OmbeletWU,BurgerMP, et al. A prospective study to evaluate the anatomic and functional outcome of a transobturator mesh kit (prolift anterior) for symptomatic cystocele repair [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2008, 15(5): 615-620.
[5]
AbedH,RahnDD,LowensteinL, et al. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22(7): 789-798.
[6]
谢幸, 苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 278-279.
[7]
段华, 林仲秋. 妇科手术彩色图解[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 2013: 12.
[8]
曹泽毅. 中华妇产科学(中册)[M]. 3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014.
[9]
DominicL,BenjaminE. D, Karen B. et al. Total hysterectomy and anterior vaginal wall suspension for concurrent uterine and bladder prolapses: long-term anatomical results of additional vault and/or posterior compartment prolapse repair [J]. Urol Sci, 2015, 26(1): 51-56.
[10]
JelovsekJE,MaherC,BarberMD. Pelvic organ prolapse [J]. Lancet, 2007, 369(9566): 1027-1038.
[11]
HelenJ,JacksonSR,PriceN. Management of uterine prolapse: is hysterectomy necessary? [J]. Obstet Gynaecol, 2016, 18(1): 17-23.
[12]
IbrahimKI,MowafaaM,EngyM, et al. Efficacy of biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle training in females with pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Alexandria J Med, 2015, 51(2): 137-142.
[13]
MarchionniM,BraccoGL,CheccucciV, et al. True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience [J]. J Reprod Med, 1999, 44(8): 679-684.
[14]
刘树伟, 李瑞锡. 局部解剖学[M].8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 102-104.
[15]
孙秀云,邵继宏,孙连华, 等. 腹腔镜腹直肌悬吊术治疗子宫脱垂50例分析[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2015, 31(11): 1038-1039.
[16]
李文亮,魏向群,张磊. 腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘子宫固定术治疗子宫脱垂的临床分析[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2015, 36(3): 72-74.
[17]
ForsgrenC,LundholmC,JohanssonAL, et al. Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2012, 23(1): 43-48.
[18]
WilkinsMF,JenniferMW. Epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse [J]. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep, 2016, 5(2): 119-123.
[19]
刘俊,唐瑶,黄娟, 等. 盆腔脏器脱垂定量分度法对不同方式分娩初产妇产后近期盆底功能的评价[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(1): 25-30.
[20]
ChenG,WuD,ZhaoW, et al. Modified laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall: the easier way to treat uterine prolapse [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2012, 23(7): 887-891.
[21]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科盆底学组. 腹腔镜子宫或阴道骶骨固定术专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2014, 49(8): 573-575.
[22]
刘丽萍,刘丽丽,刘丽燕, 等. 经阴道髂尾肌筋膜固定术联合传统术式治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效分析 [J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(6): 705-709.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[11] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[12] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[13] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[14] 崔占斌, 乔军利, 张丽丽, 韩明强. 尿碘水平与甲状腺乳头状癌患者术后复发危险度分层的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 615-618.
[15] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
阅读次数
全文


摘要