切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 164 -170. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.02.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

早发型重度子痫前期患者胎盘组织中Notch1和PPAR-γ蛋白表达的临床意义
赵莉娜1, 吴锦华1, 刘国成1, 马瑞霞1,()   
  1. 1. 广东省妇幼保健院,广州 510610
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-10 修回日期:2019-03-06 出版日期:2019-04-01
  • 通信作者: 马瑞霞

Clinical significance of expressions of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein in placenta of patients with early onset severe preeclampsia

Lina Zhao1, Jinghua Wu1, Guocheng Liu1, Ruixia Ma1,()   

  1. 1. Guangdong Women and Children′s Hospital, Guangzhou 510610, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2018-11-10 Revised:2019-03-06 Published:2019-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Ruixia Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Ruixia, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province(2018KJYZ015)
引用本文:

赵莉娜, 吴锦华, 刘国成, 马瑞霞. 早发型重度子痫前期患者胎盘组织中Notch1和PPAR-γ蛋白表达的临床意义[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(02): 164-170.

Lina Zhao, Jinghua Wu, Guocheng Liu, Ruixia Ma. Clinical significance of expressions of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein in placenta of patients with early onset severe preeclampsia[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(02): 164-170.

目的

探讨Notch1蛋白和过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体(PPAR)-γ蛋白在早发型重度子痫前期(PE)孕妇胎盘组织中的表达及相关性。

方法

选择2016年10月1日至2017年9月30日,在广东省妇幼保健院住院,行择期剖宫产术分娩的65例重度PE孕妇为研究对象。按照发病孕龄不同,将33例早发型重度PE孕妇(孕龄≤34孕周)纳入早发型重度PE组,将32例晚发型重度PE孕妇(孕龄>34孕周)纳入晚发型重度PE组。同时采用随机数字表法,随机选择同期在本院住院因胎位异常或者胎儿窘迫行择期剖宫产术分娩的30例孕妇,纳入对照组。采用免疫组织化学链霉菌抗生物素蛋白-过氧化物酶(SP)法检测Notch1和PPAR-γ蛋白在3组产妇胎盘组织中的分布及相对表达水平。采用单因素方差分析,对3组孕妇的年龄、孕龄和Notch1、PPAR-γ蛋白平均灰度值等进行整体比较,再采用最小显著差异(LSD)法进一步对3组孕妇Notch1和PPAR-γ蛋白平均灰度值进行两两比较。采用Pearson相关分析对孕妇胎盘组织中Notch1和PPAR-γ蛋白平均灰度值进行相关性分析。本研究遵循的程序符合广东省妇幼保健院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,并得到该伦理委员会审批(批准文号:201601027),并且与所有研究对象均签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①早发型重度PE组、晚发型重度PE组和对照组孕妇的年龄和孕龄等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②Notch1与PPAR-γ蛋白在3组产妇的胎盘组织中均有表达,Notch1蛋白主要定位于胎盘滋养细胞的细胞质中,呈淡黄色-深棕色颗粒。PPAR-γ蛋白主要定位于绒毛细胞滋养层细胞核,少部分表达于细胞质内,呈黄褐色-深棕色颗粒。③3组孕妇胎盘组织中Notch1和PPAR-γ蛋白平均灰度值总体比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=5.565,P=0.012;F=8.694,P=0.006)。3组孕妇胎盘组织中Notch1蛋白平均灰度值进行两两比较,差异均有统计学意义(早发型重度PE组vs晚发型重度PE组:LSD-t=3.218,P=0.005;早发型重度PE组vs对照组:LSD-t=4.832,P=0.007;晚发型重度PE组vs对照组:LSD-t=2.948,P=0.008)。对3组孕妇胎盘组织中PPAR-γ蛋白平均灰度值分别进行两两比较,差异亦均有统计学意义(早发型重度PE组vs晚发型重度PE组:LSD-t=3.412,P=0.003;早发型重度PE组vs对照组:LSD-t=4.927,P=0.002;晚发型重度PE组vs对照组:LSD-t=3.168,P=0.001)。④在早发型重度PE组、晚发型重度PE组的胎盘组织中,Notch1和PPAR-γ蛋白的平均灰度值进行Pearson相关分析的结果显示,Notch1和PPAR-γ蛋白的平均灰度值呈负相关关系(r=—0.461,P<0.05)。

结论

早发型重度PE孕妇胎盘组织中Notch1相对表达水平下调,PPAR-γ蛋白相对表达水平上调,提示Notch1蛋白和PPAR-γ蛋白表达异常可能在滋养细胞的浸润过程中起着主导作用,并且影响早发型重度PE的发生、发展。

Objective

To investigate the expression and correlation of Notch1 protein and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ protein in placenta of early onset severe preeclampsia ( PE ) pregnant women.

Methods

From October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017, 65 pregnant women with severe PE who were hospitalized in Guangdong Women and Children′s Hospital and underwent elective cesarean section were selected into this study. According to different gestational ages, 33 pregnant women with early onset severe PE (gestational age≤34 weeks) were included into early onset severe PE group, and 32 pregnant women with late onset severe PE (gestational age>34 weeks) were included in late onset severe PE group. At the same time, 30 pregnant women who were hospitalized in the same hospital due to abnormal fetal position or fetal distress and underwent elective cesarean section during the same period were randomly selected into control group. Immunohistochemically streptavidin peroxidase (SP) method was used to detect the distribution and expression levels of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein in placental tissues. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the age, gestational age, average gray-value scale of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein among three groups. The least significant difference (LSD) method was used to further compare the average gray-value scale of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein among three groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein in placenta tissue of pregnant women. The procedures followed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards established by the Human Subjects Trial Committee of Guangdong Women and Children′s Hospital, and this study was approved by this committee (Approval No. 201601027). Informed consent was obtained and signed with each subject.

Results

①There were no significant differences in age and gestational age between early onset severe PE group, late onset severe PE group and control group (P>0.05). ② Notch1 protein was expressed in placental tissues of 3 groups, mainly localized in the cytoplasm of placental trophoblast cells, showing pale yellow-dark brown granules. PPAR-γ protein is mainly located in the nucleus of villous cytotrophoblast, and a small part of PPAR-γ protein is expressed in cytoplasm, presenting tan-dark brown granules. ③ The average grey-scale values of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein in placental tissues among 3 groups were all statistically significant (F=5.565, P=0.012; F=8.694, P=0.006). Multiple comparison results showed the following results. The average gray-scale values of Notch1 protein in placenta tissues of 3 groups were respectively pairwise compared, and the differences were statistically significant (early onset severe PE group vs late onset severe PE group: LSD-t=3.218, P=0.005; early onset severe PE group vs control group: LSD-t=4.832, P=0.007; late onset severe PE group vs control group: LSD-t=2.948, P=0.008). The average grey-scale values of PPAR-γ protein in placental tissues were compared among 3 groups, and the differences were also statistically significant (early onset severe PE group vs late onset severe PE group: LSD-t=3.412, P=0.003; early onset severe PE group vs control group: LSD-t=4.927, P=0.002; late onset severe PE group vs control group: LSD-t=3.168, P=0.001). ④Pearson correlation analysis of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein in placenta tissues of early severe PE group and late severe PE group showed that the average gray-scale values of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein were negatively correlated (r=-0.461, P<0.05).

Conclusions

The relative expression level of Notch1 and PPAR-γ protein in placental tissue of pregnant women with early onset severe PE were down-regulated and up-regulated, suggesting that abnormal expressions of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein may play a leading role in the infiltration of trophoblasts and affect the occurrence and development of early onset severe PE.

表1 3组产妇的一般临床资料比较(±s)
图1 Notch1蛋白在3组产妇胎盘组织中的表达(图1A:早发型重度PE组;图1B:晚发型重度PE组;图1C:对照组)(SP染色,高倍)
图2 PPAR-γ蛋白在3组产妇胎盘组织中的表达(图2A:早发型重度PE组;图2B:晚发型重度PE组,图2C:对照组)(SP染色,高倍)
表2 3组产妇胎盘组织中Notch1和PPAR-γ蛋白平均灰度值比较(±s)
[1]
Liu Q, Yang J. Expression and significance of miR155 and vascular endothelial growth factor in placenta of rats with preeclampsia [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(9): 15731-15737.
[2]
赵杨,韩凤珍,刘益芬,等. 正常妊娠和子痫前期胎盘Syncytin表达差异探讨[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版),2009, 30(2): 211-214.
[3]
Liu X, Luo Q, Zheng Y, et al. Notch1 impairs endothelial progenitor cell bioactivity in preeclampsia [J]. Reprod Sci, 2017, 24(1): 47-56.
[4]
Haider S, Meinhardt G, Saleh L, et al. Notch1 controls development of the extravillous trophoblast lineage in the human placenta [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2016, 113(48): E7710-E7719.
[5]
Tache V, Ciric A, Moretto-Zita M, et al. Hypoxia and trophoblast differentiation: a key role for PPARγ [J]. Stem Cells Dev, 2013, 22(21): 2815-2824.
[6]
Pham J, Arul NRK, Li P, et al. The role of Sirtuin1-PPARγ axis in placental development and function [J]. J Mol Endocrinol, 2018, 60(4): R201-R201, R212.
[7]
Garnier V, Traboulsi W, Salomon A, et al. PPARγ controls pregnancy outcome through activation of EG-VEGF: new insights into the mechanism of placental development [J]. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 2015, 309(4): E357-E369.
[8]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组. 妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2015)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2015, 50(10): 721-728.
[9]
赵卫秀,林建华. Notch2和Notch3对滋养细胞株迁移与侵袭功能的影响[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2015, 35(12): 1785.
[10]
Zhao WX, Wu ZM, Liu W, et al. Notch2 and Notch3 suppress the proliferation and mediate invasion of trophoblast cell lines [J]. Biol Open, 2017, 6(8): 1123-1129.
[11]
Hany H, Shalaby A, Al Kashef W, et al. Evaluation of the role of Notch1 expression in hepatic carcinogenesis with clinicopathological correlation [J]. Pathology, 2018, 50(7): 730-736.
[12]
Sun HW, Wu C, Tan HY, et al. Combination DLL4 with Jagged1-siRNA can enhance inhibition of the proliferation and invasiveness activity of human gastric carcinoma by Notch1/VEGF pathway [J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2012, 59(115): 924-929.
[13]
Hsu KW, Fang WL, Huang KH, et al. Notch1 pathway-mediated microRNA-151-5p promotes gastric cancer progression [J]. Oncotarget, 2016, 7(25): 38036-38051.
[14]
Li D, Masiero M, Banham AH, et al. The notch ligand JAGGED1 as a target for anti-tumor therapy [J]. Front Oncol, 2014, 4: 254.
[15]
Krebs LT, Xue Y, Norton CR, et al. Notch signaling is essential for vascular morphogenesis in mice [J]. Genes Dev, 2000, 14(11): 1343-1352.
[16]
Limbourg FP, Takeshita K, Radtke F, et al. Essential role of endothelial Notch1 in angiogenesis [J]. Circulation, 2005, 111(14): 1826-1832.
[17]
Harris LK. Trophoblast-vascular cell interactions in early pregnancy: how to remodel a vessel [J]. Placenta, 2010, 31(Suppl): S93-S98.
[18]
Szpera-Godziewicz A, Majcherek M, Boruczkowski M, et al. Circulating endothelial cells, circulating endothelial progenitor cells, and von Willebrand factor in pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 2017, 77(3): e12625.
[19]
狄政莉,牛小麟,魏瑾,等. PPAR-γ在自发性高血压大鼠血管平滑肌表达的增龄性变化[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2006, 37(2): 204-207.
[20]
McCarthy FP, Delany AC, Kenny LC, et al. PPAR-γ-a possible drug target for complicated pregnancies[J]. Br J Pharmacol, 2013, 168(5): 1074-1085.
[21]
Pekson R, Poltoratsky V, Gorasiya S, et al. N,N-Dimethylacetamide significantly attenuates LPS- and TNFα-induced proinflammatory responses via inhibition of the nuclear factor kappa B pathway [J]. Mol Med, 2016, 22(1): 747-758.
[22]
Sakowicz A. The role of NFκB in the three stages of pregnancy-implantation, maintenance, and labour: a review article [J]. BJOG, 2018, 125(11): 1379-1387.
[23]
Holdsworth-Carson SJ, Lim R, Mitton A, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are altered in pathologies of the human placenta: gestational diabetes mellitus, intrauterine growth restriction and preeclampsia [J]. Placenta, 2010, 31(3): 222-229.
[24]
李苑,陈文玲,刘岚,等. 子痫前期孕妇胎盘组织中PPAR、FABP-4的表达及其与孕妇预后的相关性[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2017,52(7): 443-448.
[25]
Levytska K, Drewlo S, Baczyk D. PPAR-γ regulates trophoblast differentiation in the BeWo cell model [J]. PPAR Res, 2014, 2014: 637251.
[26]
Meher A, Sundrani D, Joshi S. Maternal nutrition influences angiogenesis in the placenta through peroxisome proliferator activated receptors: a novel hypothesis [J]. Mol Reprod Dev, 2015, 82(10): 726-734.
[27]
Ganss R. Maternal metabolism and vascular adaptation in pregnancy: the PPAR link [J]. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2017, 28(1): 73-84.
[28]
Echeverría F, Ortiz M, Valenzuela R, et al. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids regulation of PPARs, signaling: relationship to tissue development and aging [J]. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids, 2016, 114: 28-34.
[29]
Hutter S, Knabl J, Andergassen U, et al. The role of PPARs in placental immunology: a systematic review of the literature[J]. PPAR Res, 2013, 2013: 970276.
[1] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[2] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[3] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[4] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[5] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[7] 魏宇婷, 罗红. 超声弹性成像评价胎儿生长受限的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 256-260.
[8] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[9] 冯丹艳, 曹晓辉, 史玉霞. 血清脂联素与胎盘亮氨酸氨肽酶对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[10] 匡德凤, 李志国, 华绍芳, 薛凤霞. 高脂诱导孕鼠血清及胎盘组织脂肪酸结合蛋白-4及相关脂蛋白水平变化及其意义[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 338-344.
[11] 邬龙海, 黄淼, 龚云辉, 喻云倩. 血清趋化因子在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇中的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 357-362.
[12] 刘雪云, 范颖, 姚爱军, 张胜苗, 吕亚妮, 张冰清, 张晓宇, 刘恒. 基于微信小程序的个体化、全程护理干预对孕妇孕期体重及分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
[13] 吴晓翔, 杨波, 李景漩, 张凤玲, 郭桂辉, 郑少培. 脐动脉超声检查联合NLR、sFlt-1/PLGF对妊娠高血压综合征患者不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[14] 郭志荣, 马京梅. 胎盘植入性疾病的风险评估和治疗策略[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 151-154.
[15] 张丽姿, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的不良结局及远期影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
阅读次数
全文


摘要