切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 669 -673. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.06.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

非贫血孕妇早孕期红细胞参数在妊娠期糖尿病预测中的价值
闵玲1, 王茜1, 姚强1,()   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院妇产科、出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-31 修回日期:2017-09-17 出版日期:2017-12-01
  • 通信作者: 姚强

Predictive values of first trimester red blood cell parameters on gestational diabetes mellitus in non-anemic pregnant women

Ling Min1, Xi Wang1, Qiang Yao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2017-05-31 Revised:2017-09-17 Published:2017-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Qiang Yao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yao Qiang, Email:
引用本文:

闵玲, 王茜, 姚强. 非贫血孕妇早孕期红细胞参数在妊娠期糖尿病预测中的价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(06): 669-673.

Ling Min, Xi Wang, Qiang Yao. Predictive values of first trimester red blood cell parameters on gestational diabetes mellitus in non-anemic pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 13(06): 669-673.

目的

探讨非贫血孕妇早孕期红细胞相关参数与妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)发生的相关性,为临床早期预测GDM提供依据。

方法

选择2016年10月至2017年2月,于四川大学华西第二医院门诊建卡、定期产前检查、住院分娩,并且符合本研究纳入标准的3 617例非贫血孕妇为研究对象。采用回顾性分析方法,采集所有受试者的一般临床资料,早孕期(孕龄为10~14孕周)血红蛋白(Hb)水平、红细胞计数(RBC)、血细胞比容(HCT)等红细胞相关参数。根据四分位数法,将本研究受试者的Hb水平、RBC、HCT划分为4个范围:A(<P25)、B(≥P25P50)、C(≥P50P75)、D(≥P75),分别对Hb水平、RBC、HCT处于不同范围受试者的GDM发生率进行比较。对非贫血孕妇GDM发生的影响因素进行多因素非条件logistic回归分析。

结果

①Hb水平、RBC、HCT处于不同范围受试者的GDM发生率分别整体比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=15.499,P=0.001;χ2=20.342,P<0.001;χ2=26.566,P<0.001);而两两比较的结果显示,Hb水平处于D范围受试者的GDM发生率,高于处于A、B范围受试者的GDM发生率;RBC处于C、D范围受试者的GDM发生率,均高于处于A范围受试者的GDM发生率;RBC处于D范围受试者的GDM发生率,高于处于B范围受试者的GDM发生率;HCT处于B、C、D范围受试者的GDM发生率,均高于处于A范围受试者的GDM发生率,并且上述差异均有统计学意义(χ2=13.540,P<0.001;χ2=8.199,P=0.004;χ2=7.841,P=0.005;χ2=10.437,P=0.001;χ2=13.903,P<0.001;χ2=17.953,P<0.001;χ2=23.490,P<0.001)。②对非贫血孕妇GDM发生的影响因素进行多因素非条件logistic回归分析的结果显示,早孕期Hb水平和HCT,为非贫血孕妇GDM发生的独立影响因素(OR=2.297、2.097,95%CI:1.121~7.265、1.019~5.874;P=0.033、0.019)。

结论

非贫血孕妇早孕期不同红细胞相关参数水平与GDM发生密切相关,其中早孕期Hb水平和RBC是非贫血孕妇GDM发生的独立影响因素。由于本研究为回顾性研究,临床能否根据非贫血孕妇早孕期红细胞相关参数水平,对GDM高危人群进行监控,仍需多中心、大样本、随机对照的前瞻性研究进一步证实。

Objective

To explore the correlation between first trimester red blood cell parameters and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in non-anemic pregnant women, and to provide references for early clinical prediction of GDM.

Methods

A total of 3 617 cases of non-anemic pregnant women from October 2016 to February 2017 in West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan Universtiy who met the inclusion criteria in this study were selected as research subjects. The retrospective analysis was conducted in general clinical data, and first trimester (10-14 gestational weeks) hemoglobin (Hb) levels, red blood cell count (RBC) and hematocrit (HCT) of all subjects. According to the quartile method, Hb levels, RBC and HCT of all subjects were divided into four ranges: A (<P25), B (≥P25-P50), C (≥P50-P75), D (≥P75), respectively. Incidence of GDM in subjects with different ranges of Hb levels, RBC, HCT were compared, respectively. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was performed on the influencing factors of GDM in non-anemic pregnant women.

Results

①There were statistical differences in GDM incidences in subjects with different ranges of Hb levels, RBC and HCT (χ2=15.499, P=0.001; χ2=20.342, P<0.001; χ2=26.566, P<0.001). Multiple comparison results showed that the incidence of GDM in subjects with D range of Hb levels was higher than those in subjects with A and B ranges of Hb levels; the incidences of GDM in subjects with C and D ranges of RBC were higher than that in subjects with A range of RBC, the incidence of GDM in subjects with D range of RBC was higher than that in subjects with B range of RBC; the incidences of GDM in subjects with B, C and D ranges of HCT were higher than that in subjects with A range of HCT, and all the differences were statistically significant (χ2=13.540, P<0.001; χ2=8.199, P=0.004; χ2=7.841, P=0.005; χ2=10.437, P=0.001; χ2=13.903, P<0.001; χ2=17.953, P<0.001; χ2=23.490, P<0.001). ②Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis of GDM influencing factors in non-anemic pregnant women results showed that first trimester Hb level and HCT were independent influencing factors of GDM in non-anemic pregnant women (OR=2.297, 2.097; 95%CI: 1.121-7.265, 1.019-5.874; P=0.033, 0.019).

Conclusions

In non-anemic pregnant women, the first trimester levels of red blood cell related parameters are closely related to the occurrence of GDM, in which the first trimester Hb levels and RBC are independent influencing factors of GDM. Because this study is a retrospective study, whether clinicians can monitor the high-risk groups of GDM according to the levels of first trimester red blood cell parameters of non-anemic pregnant women or not, it still needs multi-center, large scale, prospective and randomized trial to further confirmed.

表1 不同早孕期红细胞参数范围的非贫血孕妇妊娠期糖尿病发生率比较结果
表2 非贫血孕妇妊娠期糖尿病发生影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析的变量含义及其赋值
表3 非贫血孕妇妊娠期糖尿病发生影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果
[1]
Hartling L, Dryden DM, Guthrie A, et al. Screening and diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus. Evidence report/technology assessment No. 210[M]. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2012: 1-327.
[2]
Chiefari E, Arcidiacono B, Foti D, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: an updated overview[J]. J Endocrinol Invest, 2017, 40(9): 899-909.
[3]
张言博,张露,严锐,等. 运动对妊娠期糖尿病防治作用的流行病学研究概述[J]. 现代预防医学,2016, 43(24): 4459-4461, 4466.
[4]
朱东,鲁丽利,张剑丰,等. 糖尿病患者免疫功能改变与预防肺部感染的临床研究[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2015, 25(8): 1790-1792.
[5]
American Diabetes Association. Initial evaluation and diabetes management planning[J]. Diabetes Care, 2015, 38(Suppl 1): S17-S19.
[6]
世界卫生组织. 血红蛋白浓度用于诊断贫血和评估其严重程度[EB/OL]. (2011) [2017-08-26].

URL    
[7]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组,中华医学会围产医学分会妊娠合并糖尿病协作组. 妊娠合并糖尿病诊治指南(2014)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2014, 49(8): 561-569.
[8]
Cho NH, Whiting D, Forouhi N, et al. IDF diabetes atlas. 7th ed[M]. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2015.
[9]
Poston L, Bell R, Croker H, et al. Effect of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnant women (the UPBEAT study): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2015, 3(10): 767-777.
[10]
Mpondo BC, Ernest A, Dee HE. Gestational diabetes mellitus: challenges in diagnosis and management[J]. J Diabetes Metab Disord, 2015, 14: 42.
[11]
Mehrabian F, Hosseini SM. Comparison of gestational diabetes mellitus and pre-eclampsia in women with high hemoglobin in the first trimester of pregnancy: a longitudinal study[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2013, 29(4): 986-990.
[12]
卢红梅,葛志平,孙丽洲. 非贫血孕妇妊娠早期红细胞参数与妊娠期糖尿病的关系[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 33(9): 1247-1250.
[13]
Hanna FW, Duff CJ, Shelley-Hitchen A, et al. Diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus: implications of recent changes in diagnostic criteria and role of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)[J]. Clin Med (Lond), 2017, 17(2): 108-113.
[14]
李华,冯振东,叶树新,等. 2型糖尿病患者血液流变学指标与血糖监测指标的相关性分析[J]. 中国全科医学,2013, 16(50): 1763-1765.
[15]
Moon JS, Kim JH, Kim JH, et al. Impaired RBC deformability is associated with diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Metab, 2016, 42(6): 448-452.
[16]
谭芸. 非贫血孕妇妊娠早期红细胞参数对妊娠期糖尿病的预测价值[J]. 河北医学,2013, 19(12): 1792-1794.
[1] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[2] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[3] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[4] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[5] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[7] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[8] 冯丹艳, 曹晓辉, 史玉霞. 血清脂联素与胎盘亮氨酸氨肽酶对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[9] 匡德凤, 李志国, 华绍芳, 薛凤霞. 高脂诱导孕鼠血清及胎盘组织脂肪酸结合蛋白-4及相关脂蛋白水平变化及其意义[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 338-344.
[10] 邬龙海, 黄淼, 龚云辉, 喻云倩. 血清趋化因子在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇中的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 357-362.
[11] 王国成, 刘雅静, 彭亚光. 北京市顺义区学龄前儿童血常规4项指标参考区间及其变化[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 187-193.
[12] 张璐, 杨惠娟, 刘凯波. 2015—2021年北京市辅助生殖技术助孕活产及高龄孕母占比与不良妊娠结局变化趋势[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 46-53.
[13] 沈立平, 龙驭云, 杨月华, 张敏, 许阳, 赵亚丽, 李静, 张昀, 江世文, 孙志明. 不同避孕方式对女性再次受孕的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 107-112.
[14] 刘雪云, 范颖, 姚爱军, 张胜苗, 吕亚妮, 张冰清, 张晓宇, 刘恒. 基于微信小程序的个体化、全程护理干预对孕妇孕期体重及分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
[15] 王晓怡, 洪凡, 陈晴晴, 孙雯. 新型冠状病毒感染疫情高发状态下封闭封控管理区孕产妇的管理方案研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 109-112.
阅读次数
全文


摘要