Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (01): 69 -75. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2026.01.010

Original Article

Genetic etiological analysis of abnormal pregnancy caused by pericentric inverted insertion of chromosome 9

Chengxiu Xie, Nan Li, Chonglan Gao, Yuchun Pan, Xiong Zhu, Huanhuan Zhang, Qingsong Liu()   

  1. Department of Prenatal Diagnosis, Chengdu Women′s and Children′s Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610073, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2025-01-17 Revised:2025-12-01 Published:2026-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Qingsong Liu
Objective

To explore the genetic causes of abnormal pregnancy caused by pericentric inverted insertion of chromosome 9 and provide guidance for reproduction.

Methods

The pregnant woman, her husband and the induced fetal tissues, who underwent induced abortion due to fetal growth restriction and fetal cardiac abnormalities in Chengdu Women′s and Children′s Central Hospital in February 2023, were enrolled in this study. Genetic methods such as chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), peripheral blood G-banding chromosome karyotyping, optical genome mapping (OGM), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to sequential detect, analyze, and verify the abnormality of chromosome 9 in this family. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chengdu Women′s and Children′s Central Hospital [Approval No. KYLS2023(23)]. Informed consent was obtained from all individuals and guardians of fetal included in this study.

Results

① A 15.459 Mb duplication in the fetal chromosome 9q33.2q34.3 region were detected by CMA in the induced fetal tissues. ② There was no abnormality in the pregnant woman′s chromosome karyotype result, but her husband′s karyotype may be 46, XY, ? ins(9)(p24.3q34.3q33.2) or 46, XY, inv(9)(p24.3q33.2). ③ The husband′s OGM test results showed 9q34.3q33.2 was inversely inserted into chromosome 9p24.3 of the same chromosome, which was further verified by mid-stage FISH analysis. The husband′s accurate karyotype was 46, XY, ins(9)(p24.3q34.3q33.2). ④ The couple chose assisted reproductive technology (ART) for pregnancy assistance, and the results of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) showed that among their 11 embryos, 2 were normal embryos and could be implanted preferentially.

Conclusions

The 9q33.2q34.3 duplication of fetal tissue comes from the recombinant gametes produced by pericentric inverted insertion of the father′s chromosome 9. The combination of multiple genetic technologies is conducive to the accurate diagnosis of rare chromosomal balanced structural variations, and provides an accurate laboratory data for the assessment risk of recurrence and the selection of fertility mode in offspring.

图1 引产胎儿(男性,胎龄为24周)CMA检测结果图[9号染色体长臂q33.2q34.3片段重复(蓝色箭头所示)]注:CMA为染色体微阵列分析
图2 丈夫(37岁)染色体核型分析图谱[1条9号染色体发生结构重排(箭头所示)]
图3 丈夫(37岁)的OGM检测结果图(图3A:9号染色体短臂断点融合细节线性图;图3B:模式图,推断9号染色体臂间反向插入,A段可能为丢失的30 kb片段;图3C:环形图,显示9p24.3和9q34.3q33.2发生2次断裂-重接,根据重接位点推断为9号染色体臂间反向插入)注:OGM为光学基因组图谱。chr9表示9号染色体,der9表示衍生9号染色体
图4 丈夫(37岁)外周血中期FISH分析结果图[红色箭头所示为der(9):9q末端的红色荧光信号与9p末端的绿色荧光信号位于同一染色体末端]注:FISH为荧光原位杂交
表1 本研究夫妻的PGT结果
[1]
Ardalan A, Prieur M, Choiset A, et al. Intrachromosomal insertion mimicking a pericentric inversion: molecular cytogenetic characterization of a three break rearrangement of chromosome 20[J]. Am J Med Genet A, 2005, 138A(3): 288-293. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30966.
[2]
Mantere T, Neveling K, Pebrel-Richard C, et al. Optical genome mapping enables constitutional chromosomal aberration detection[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2021, 108(8): 1409-1422. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.05.012.
[3]
Gozzetti A, Le Beau MM. Fluorescence in situ hybridization: uses and limitations[J]. Semin Hematol, 2000, 37(4): 320-333. DOI: 10.1016/s0037-1963(00)90013-1.
[4]
许伊云,张沁欣,胡平,等. 基因组光学图谱技术在遗传病诊断中的应用[J]. 现代妇产科进展2023, 32(8): 636-638, 640. DOI:10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2023.08.018.
[5]
王昊,杨扬,杨南南,等. 罕见的17号染色体臂内反向插入一个家系的光学基因组图谱分析[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志2023, 40(6): 727-732. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20220107-00012.
[6]
Dremsek P, Schwarz T, Weil B, et al. Optical genome mapping in routine human genetic diagnostics-its advantages and limitations[J]. Genes (Basel), 2021, 12(12): 1958. DOI: 10.3390/genes12121958.
[7]
Van Hemel JO, Eussen HJ. Interchromosomal insertions. Identification of five cases and a review[J]. Hum Genet, 2000, 107(5): 415-432. DOI: 10.1007/s004390000398.
[8]
Neill NJ, Ballif BC, Lamb AN, et al. Recurrence, submicroscopic complexity, and potential clinical relevance of copy gains detected by array CGH that are shown to be unbalanced insertions by FISH[J]. Genome Res, 2011, 21(4): 535-544. DOI: 10.1101/gr.114579.110.
[9]
周家红,周攀,吕志宇,等. 母源性染色体内插入致18q21.2-q22.3重复和缺失后代家系的遗传学分析[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志2023, 40(4): 483-489. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20220630-00444.
[10]
Domínguez MG, Rivera H, Aguilar-Lemarroy A, et al. Two familial intrachromosomal insertions with maternal dup(6)(p22.3p25.3) or dup(2)(q24.2q32.1) in recombinant offspring[J]. Clin Dysmorphol, 2017, 26(4): 209-216. DOI: 10.1097/MCD.0000000000000191.
[11]
Madan K, Menko FH. Intrachromosomal insertions: a case report and a review[J]. Hum Genet, 1992, 89(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00207032.
[12]
Gardner R, Amor D. Gardner and Sutherland′s chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling[M]. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199329007.001.0001.
[1] Shawei Sa, Qianhong Ma. Current research status on window of implantation and endometrial microbiota in personalized embryo transfer[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2025, 21(02): 140-144.
[2] Min Wang, Ling Zhou. Current research status on etiology of genetic factors in recurrent spontaneous miscarriage[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(04): 374-381.
[3] Jianlong Zhuang, Wanyu Fu, Wenli Chen, Yuying Jiang, Shuhong Zeng, Yuanbai Wang, Xiaoxia Wu. Rare chromosome 13q22.1-13q31.3 deletion sydrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(03): 337-342.
[4] Jiangmei He, Hongmei Liu, Meiling Zheng, Zhili Zhang. Clinical value of non-invasive prenatal testing for screening of fetal chromosome copy number variation[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(03): 300-306.
[5] Liangyu Xie, He Wang, Xiaowen Zhao, Xun Zhang, Xuemei Zhang, Hongqian Liu, Qian Zhu, Jing Wang, Ting Hu, Zhu Zhang, Yi Lai, Li Qin, Shanling Liu. Fetal karyotype of amniotic fluid cells and interventional prenatal diagnosis indications of pregnant women in the second trimester with high risk of fetal chromosome abnormality: a large sample study[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(01): 73-79.
[6] Lina Zhang, Dongzhi Li, Jin Han, Min Pan, Tingying Lei, Fang Fu, Li Zhen. Prenatal diagnosis value of fetal systematic ultrasound at gestational age of 16 to 18 weeks combined with fetal whole exome sequencing technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(05): 559-565.
[7] Yaqin Lei, Yunli Lai, Shang Yi, Fuben Xu, Yanqing Tang, Xiaoshan Huang, Jian Yi, Xiaoxia Qiu. Analysis of non-invasive prenatal screening in 50 975 pregnant women in Guangxi region[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(04): 410-419.
[8] Aiqi Cai, Jinman Zhang, Xinhua Tang, Baosheng Zhu. Prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of fetal copy number variation[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(03): 262-267.
[9] Guanchen Bai, Yuyu Liu, Miaomiao Gao, Sifeng Gao, Jilei Zhang, Qingliang Teng. Treatment of hematologic malignancies with same monosomal karyotype: Report of two cases and review of the literature[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(07): 569-572.
[10] Lina Ding, Zhilin Gao, Huimin Zhang, Wenzhi He, Shaoying Li, Min Chen, Fei Chen, Wei Jian, Nan Li, Yinong Xie, Zhihua Li. Genetic etiology and pregnancy outcome of non-immune fetal edema syndrome: a Chinese cohort study[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(01): 38-45.
[11] Jian Lu, Jie Liang, Tonglong Yuan, Weiwei Huang, Tianwen He, Chuangqi Chen, Yunqiao Dong, Aihua Yin. Clinical application of high-throughput sequencing technology in pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal translocations[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(03): 174-178.
[12] Rongye Huang, Jianlan Zheng. Research progress of pre-implantation genetic testing[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(03): 161-164.
[13] Tianxiang Ni, Junhao Yan. Causes and treatment of repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(03): 155-160.
[14] Le Chai, Dan Geng, Bo Yuan, Hexiang Du. Genetic study of a case of complex Turner syndrome chimera[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(02): 110-113.
[15] Haoyu Zheng, Muling Zhang, Chenxing Li, Xiaoyan Zhou. The application of chromosomal microarray analysis combined with whole exome sequencing in the diagnosis of fetuses with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(01): 36-41.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract