Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03): 262 -267. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.03.004

Editorial

Prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of fetal copy number variation

Aiqi Cai1,2,1,2, Jinman Zhang2,3,2,3, Xinhua Tang2,3,2,3, Baosheng Zhu1,2,3,1,2,3,()   

  • Received:2021-05-11 Revised:2021-05-21 Published:2021-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Baosheng Zhu
  • Supported by:
    Key Science and Technology Project of Yunnan Province: Clinical Medical Research Center for Birth Defects and Rare Diseases in Yunnan Province(2019ZF015); Key Science and Technology Project of Yunnan Province: A Study on Key Technologies of Maternal and Infant Health Screening and Intervention in Advanced Age and Reproductive Families(2018ZF009)

Fetal copy number variation (CNV) refers to increase or decrease in copy number of DNA fragments with more than 1 kb in length, and it also includes the deletion and duplication of chromosome fragments at submicroscopic level. Diseases caused by fetal CNV are collectively referred as microdeletion and microduplication syndromes (MMS). Through technologies such as chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and CNV sequencing, CNV and numerical chromosome abnormalities can be detected accurately and quickly, as well as chimera and mosaic individuals with mosaic ratio ≥30%. CMA or/and CNV sequencing can increase the detection rate of MMS by 1.0%-1.7% compared with karyotype analysis. Since there are no obvious and characteristic imaging abnormalities in most diseases during fetal period, judgment of fetal pathogenicity CNV (pCNV) and genetic counseling have become main challenges in current prenatal diagnosis service. Therefore, relevant principles for pCNV sequencing are as follows. ①Judgement of pCNV fragment is not only based on its fragment size, but also needs to be evaluated based on fragment′s location, the number of gene mutations, and whether gene has a dose effect. It is often necessary to further test parental chromosome karyotype, parental CNV and combined with clinical phenotype of parents, thus conducting a comprehensive evaluation of pCNV. ②A fetal CNV with fragment <1 Mb in length and inherited from one parental generation has limited pathogenicity, while a CNV with fragment ≥ 1 Mb length and being a new mutation means that it bears higher pathogenic risk. ③When CNV of the same size are compared with each other, clinical impact of chromosome deletion is greater than that of duplicates. CNV scoring system on the ClinGen website can be used to quickly determine fetal pCNV: CNV with a score ≥0.99 are judged as pCNV, those with a score between 0.9 to 0.98 are likely pCNV (LpCNV), CNV scored between -0.89 to 0.89 are regarded as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) CNV, and those with a score between -0.98 to -0.9 are determined as likely benign (LB) CNV, and the rest with a score ≤ -0.99 are benign CNV. Benign CNV is widespread in normal population. Clinical manifestations of some pCNV may not be serious. Only when it is confirmed that fetal pCNV can cause death or serious birth defects, clinicians should advice pregnant women terminate pregnancy in time to prevent major birth defects.

[1]
Martin K, Iyengar S, Kalyan A, et al. Clinical experience with a single-nucleotide polymorphism-based non-invasive prenatal test for five clinically significant microdeletions[J]. Clin Genet, 2018, 93(2): 293-300. DOI: 10.1111/cge.13098.
[2]
Evans MI, Wapner RJ, Berkowitz RL. Noninvasive prenatal screening or advanced diagnostic testing: caveat emptor[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 215(3): 298-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.029.
[3]
Weckselblatt B, Rudd MK. Human structural variation: mechanisms of chromosome rearrangements[J]. Trend Genet, 2015, 31(10): 587-599. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.05.010.
[4]
Campbell IM, Gambin T, Dittwald P, et al. Human endogenous retroviral elements promote genome instability via non-allelic homologous recombination[J]. BMC Biol, 2014, 12: 74. DOI; 10.1186/s12915-014-0074-4.
[5]
染色体微阵列分析技术在产前诊断中的应用协作组. 染色体微阵列分析技术在产前诊断中的应用专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志2014, 49(8): 570-572. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2014.08.002.
[6]
Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(23): 2175-2184. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382.
[7]
Dong Z, Zhang J, Ping H, et al. Low-pass whole-genome sequencing in clinical cytogenetics: a validated approach[J]. Genet Med, 2016, 18(9): 940-948. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.199.
[8]
中华医学会医学遗传学分会临床遗传学组,中国医师协会医学遗传医师分会遗传病产前诊断专业委员会,中华预防医学会出生缺陷预防与控制专业委员会遗传病防控学组. 低深度全基因组测序技术在产前诊断中的应用专家共识[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志2019, 36(4): 293-296. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2019.04.001.
[9]
Wang J, Chen L, Cong Z, et al. Prospective chromosome analysis of 3 429 amniocentesis samples in China using copy number variation sequencing[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 219(3): 287.el-287.e18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.030.
[10]
Wang H, Dong Z, Rui Z, et al. Low-pass genome sequencing versus chromosomal microarray analysis: implementation in prenatal diagnosis[J]. Genet Med, 2020, 22(3): 500-510. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0634-7.
[11]
章锦曼,朱宝生. 高通量测序技术在产前诊断中的应用[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2020, 36(9): 17-19. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2020090104.
[12]
Nevado J, Mergener R, Palomares-Bralo M, et al. New microdeletion and microduplication syndromes: a comprehensive review[J]. Genet Mol Biol, 2014, 37(1 Suppl): 210-219. DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572014000200007.
[13]
Farnaes L, Hildreth A, Sweeney N M, et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing decreases infant morbidity and cost of hospitalization[J]. NPJ Genom Med, 2018, 3: 10. DOI: 10.1038/s41525-018-0049-4.
[14]
Zhang J, Tang X, Hu J, et al. Investigation on combined copy number variation sequencing and cytogenetic karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2021, 21(1): 496. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03918-y.
[15]
Marcou CA, Pitel B, Hagen CE, et al. Limited diagnostic impact of duplications<1 Mb of uncertain clinical significance: a 10-year retrospective analysis of reporting practices at the Mayo Clinic[J]. Genet Med, 2020, 22(12): 2120-2124. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0932-0.
[16]
Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen)[J]. Genet Med, 2020, 22(2): 245-257. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8.
[17]
Shi P, Li R, Wang C, et al. Influence of validating the parental origin on the clinical interpretation of fetal copy number variations in 141 core family cases[J]. Mol Genet Genomic Med, 2019, 7(10): e00944. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.944.
[1] Shuihua Yang, Guidan He, Guican Qin, Mengfeng Liang, Yanhe Luo, Xueqin Li, Juansong Tang. Echocardioimagedata characteristics of fetal isolated total anomalous pulmonary venous connection and application of high definition flow imaging and spatio-temporal image correlation[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] Lei Liu, Xin Yang, Xiaohua Xu, Shengmou Lin, Chuqin Xiong, Lilu Nong, Zhenyu Dong, Shengli Li. Measurement of fetal prenasal thickness and nasal bone length as a screening tool for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 in the second trimester of pregancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(05): 506-510.
[3] Xiuqin Ji, Xiaohong Yang, Sheng Zhao, Xiaojun Lu, Xiaoyan Zhang, Tao Zhang, Xiaoyu Huang. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence in early pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(12): 1355-1360.
[4] Qing Zeng, Huaxuan Wen, Ying Yuan, Yan Ding, Dandan Luo, Yimei Liao, Meiling Liang, Yue Qin, Guiyan Peng, Yi Lin, Yu Zou, Shengli Li. Diagnostic value of a new method by two-dimensional axial planes in fetal corpus callosum structural abnormalities[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(09): 899-907.
[5] Tingting Man, Xiaoyan Hao, Xiaowei Liu, Hairui Sun, Yihua He. Common intracardiac malformations and genetic abnormalities in tetralogy of Fallot[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(08): 779-784.
[6] Chao Xue, Ye Zhang, Ying Zhao, Jiancheng Han, Xiaoyan Gu, Lin Sun, Xiaowei Liu, Wei Song, Yihua He. Ultrasonographic characteristics and prognosis of fetal congenital absent pulmonary valve syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 410-418.
[7] Wen Zhang, Yanchun Zhang, Kaibo Liu, Hongyan Xu. Prenatal MRI diagnosis and perinatal outcome of fetal congenital hydrocephalus in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.
[8] Zhaomin Zeng, Haiyan Yu. Clinical cognition of superfemale syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(02): 145-150.
[9] Qing Hu, Haiyan Yu. Fetal intrauterine therapy and evaluation of the risk[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(01): 23-30.
[10] Hexuan Zhang, Yonggang Song, Xue Yang. Results of non-invasive prenatal testing to pregnant women: a large sample analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(06): 685-691.
[11] Jinwei Chen, Changping Dai, Weihui Shentu, Weijuan Zhang, Rui Zhang, Hongying Wang. Screening time and detection rate of prenatal ultrasonography at different pregnancy trimesters for fetal congenital cleft lip and palate[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(04): 442-448.
[12] Jianlong Zhuang, Wanyu Fu, Wenli Chen, Yuying Jiang, Shuhong Zeng, Yuanbai Wang, Xiaoxia Wu. Rare chromosome 13q22.1-13q31.3 deletion sydrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(03): 337-342.
[13] Jiangmei He, Hongmei Liu, Meiling Zheng, Zhili Zhang. Clinical value of non-invasive prenatal testing for screening of fetal chromosome copy number variation[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(03): 300-306.
[14] Jianping Tan, Bowen Hu, Jing Tang, Yingna Liu, Tao Du, Liqiong Zhu, Yinglin Liu, Chunwei Cao, Hui Chen. Prenatal diagnostic and pregnancy outcome of 60 cases of recurrent spontaneous abortion[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(04): 234-240.
[15] Xiaodan Chen, Hongying Hou. Screen and diagnosis of thalassemia[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(04): 208-212.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract