Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03): 345 -349. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.03.015

Original Article

Prenatal MRI diagnosis and perinatal outcome of fetal congenital hydrocephalus in Beijing

Wen Zhang, Yanchun Zhang, Kaibo Liu, Hongyan Xu()   

  1. Department of Perinatal Health Care, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University · Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing 100026, China
  • Received:2022-10-28 Revised:2023-04-20 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Hongyan Xu
  • Supported by:
    Project of Beijing Scientific and Technology Commission(Z141100006014025)
Objective

To explore prenatal MRI diagnosis and perinatal outcome of fetal congenital hydrocephalus (CH) in Beijing in recent 6 years.

Methods

From January 2015 to December 2020, a total of 468 fetuses and newborns with CH included into Beijing Birth Defects Monitoring Network were selected as the study subjects. The diagnosis of CH and perinatal death data of intrauterine and within 0-6 d after birth were analyzed retrospectively. The perinatal mortality of children with isolated CH were compared between prenatal diagnosis and postnatal diagnosis by chi-square test. The procedure followed in this study was in line with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①The prevalence of CH fetuses and newborns within 0-6 d after birth from 2015 to 2020 in Beijing Birth Defects Monitoring Network was 3.57×10-4 (468/1 310 025). The prenatal diagnosis rate of 468 children with CH was 97.44% (456/468). The median gestational age when CH was detected in pregnancy was 24 weeks, and the gestational age ≥28 weeks at the time of diagnosis of CH accounted for 26.53%(121/456). ② Among 456 prenatal diagnosed cases, 56 cases were examined by prenatal ultrasound combined with MRI, accounted for 12.28%(56/456). Among those 56 cases, results of MRI were consistent with ultrasound diagnosis in 40 cases, and 16 cases were supplementary diagnosed specific types of intracranial malformations. ③ Among 105 children with isolated hydrocephalus of gestational age ≥28 weeks, except 49 cases were taken therapeutic induction labortion measures, the perinatal mortality rate of another 56 cases was 14.29%(8/56). The perinatal mortality rate of prenatal diagnosis and postpartum diagnosis of isolated hydrocephalus were 12.24%(6/49) and 28.57%(2/7), respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (χ2=0.33, P=0.564). The perinatal mortality rate of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and prenatal ultrasound combined MRI diagnosis of isolated hydrocephalus were 11.63%(5/43) and 16.67%(1/6), respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (P=0.564).

Conclusion

Prenatal MRI has supplementary diagnostic value for intracranial malformation than prenatal ultrasound in children with CH.

表1 2015—2020年北京市出生缺陷监测系统内收集的56例胎龄≥28周被诊断为孤立性脑积水患儿的围产期转归及死亡率
[1]
Fernández-Méndez R, Richards HK, Seeley HM, et al. Current epidemiology of cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery in the UK and Ireland (2004-2013)[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2019, 90(7): 747-754. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319927.
[2]
吴青青,杨文娟. 解读胎儿孕中期常规超声筛查应用指南[国际妇产科超声学会(ISUOG)][J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2011, 8(1): 17-21. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2011.01.004.
[3]
中华人民共和国卫生部令(第33号)——产前诊断技术管理办法[EB/OL]. (2002-12-13)[2022-07-23].

URL    
[4]
中国出生缺陷监测中心,全国妇幼卫生监测办公室. 中国出生缺陷监测系统疑难和微小畸形报告指南(试用版2012)[EB/OL]. (2012-11-01)[2022-07-23].

URL    
[5]
World Health Organization. ICD-11: International Statistical Classification of Diseases. The global standard for diagnostic health information[EB/OL]. (2021-05-05)[2022-07-23].

URL    
[6]
Yi L, Wan C, Deng C, et al. Changes in prevalence and perinatal outcomes of congenital hydrocephalus among Chinese newborns: a retrospective analysis based on the hospital-based birth defects surveillancesystem[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2017, 17(1): 406. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1603-2.
[7]
Garne E, Loane M, Addor MC, et al. Congenital hydrocephalus - prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy in four European regions[J]. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 2010, 14(2): 150-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.03.005.
[8]
Andersson J, Rosell M, Kockum K, et al. Prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective, population-based study[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(5): e0217705. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217705.
[9]
Manganaro L, Bernardo S, De Vito C, et al. Role of fetal MRI in the evaluation of isolated and non-isolated corpus callosum dysgenesis: results of a cross-sectional study[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2017, 37(3): 244-252. DOI: 10.1002/pd.4990.
[10]
Nagaraj UD, Calvo-Garcia MA, Kline-Fath BM. Abnormalities associated with the cavum septi pellucidi on fetal MRI: what radiologists need to know[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2018, 210(5): 989-997. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.19219.
[11]
Prayer D, Malinger GBrugger PC, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Ultrasound Obstet & Gyne, 2017, 49(5): 671-680. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17412.
[12]
夏秋玲,漆洪波. "2018年美国母胎医学会胎儿轻度侧脑室增宽诊断、评估、管理指南"解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2018, 34(11):1238-1242. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2018110113.
[13]
Van denVeyver IB. Prenatally diagnosed developmental abnormalities of the central nervous system and genetic syndromes: a practical review[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2019, 39(9): 666-678. DOI: 10.1002/pd.5520.
[14]
朱颖. 胎儿疾病的MRI诊断[J]. 中华围产医学杂志2020, 23(11):737-741. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20201113-01102.
[1] Fei Dai, Bowen Zhao, Mei Pan, Xiaohui Peng, Ran Chen, Yuanshi Tian, Ming Di. Value of multiple fetal echocardiographic quantitative parameters in assessing heart structure and function in fetuses with coarctation of the aorta[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[2] Zusheng Du, Bowen Zhao, Zhen Zhang, Mei Pan, Xiaohui Peng, Ran Chen, Yankai Mao. Impact of gestational age and apex orientation on left atrial strain assessed by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging in normal fetuses during the second and third trimesters[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[3] Shangdi Zhang, Bowen Zhao, Mei Pan, Xiaohui Peng, Ran Chen, Yankai Mao, Yang Chen, Hua Yuan, Yan Chen. Value of quantitative fetal atrial size parameters in assessing cardiac malformations in fetuses with atrial disproportion in middle and late trimesters[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(08): 785-793.
[4] Lili Gu, Fan Jiang. Survey and analysis of quality of screening prenatal ultrasound images in Anhui Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.
[5] Qiulian Wang, Ying Zhang, Chunmin Li, Shuming Xu, Yuqi Zhang. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal aortic arch obstruction with complex intracardiac structural malformations: causes of missed diangosis and misdiagnosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(07): 718-725.
[6] Qing Zeng, Huaxuan Wen, Ying Yuan, Yimei Liao, Yue Qin, Dandan Luo, Meiling Liang, Shengli Li. Sylvian fissure plateau angle: a new parameter to evaluate fetal sylvian fissure by transabdominal two-dimensional ultrasound[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(05): 454-459.
[7] Wenjing Xiang, Yan Xu, Tong Ru, Mingming Zheng, Yan Gu, Chenyan Dai, Xiangyu Zhu, Chenchen Yan. Application of neurosonography in prenatal diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum malformations[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[8] Chenlu Liu, Jie Liu, Fan Zhang, Caiying Yan, Qian Chen, Shuangqing Chen. Habitat analysis based on enhanced MRI radiomic features in predicting HER-2 expression in breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[9] Jingyu Qian, Mingming Zheng. Interpretation of the Italian guidelines on non-invasive and invasive prenatal diagnosis:executive summary of recommendations for practice the Italian Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology(SIGO)[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[10] Daiqin Li, Peijie Liu. Value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the efficacy and prognosis of middle and advanced low rectal cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[11] Minghui Liu, Fangming Ge. Evaluation value of MRI on early postoperative complications in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 579-583.
[12] Dawen Zheng, Jiandong Wang. Research progress in adjuvant diagnosis of gallbladder cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[13] Lijun Zhang, Cunjie Sun, Chunfeng Hu, Chong Meng, Hui Zhang. Accuracy of MSCT and DCE-MRI in evaluating preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[14] Jingming Wang, Lei Wang, Xiaoduo Xu, Wenqiang Xing, Zhaoyan Zhang, Weimin Huang. Advances in research of paravertebral muscles of the lumbar spine[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] Ansong Jin, Yusong Zou, Jiutao Liu, Fenglin Xue, Ailan Pang. Solitary intracranial plasmacytoma: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 495-500.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract