Ultrasonographic characteristics and prognosis of fetal congenital absent pulmonary valve syndrome

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.04.006

Objective

To analyze ultrasonographic characteristics and concomitant malformations and prognosis of absent pulmonary valve syndrome (APVS).

Methods

From November 2010 to December 2020, a total of 26 fetuses (fetus 1-26) diagnosed as APVS in Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University were selected in the study, and they were enrolled into APVS group. Meanwhile, other 78 healthy fetuses who prenatal examination at the same hospital and fetal age match with APVS group were enrolled into control group. Fetal age at diagnosis, cardiothoracic ratio, cardiac axis, presence of combined intra- and extracardiac malformations and heart failure, ventricular septal defect (VSD) size, aortic ride-through rate, lung area, aortic valve annular diameter, pulmonary valve annular diameter, pulmonary artery trunk and branch diameter, left atrial internal diameter, left ventricular internal diameter, right atrial internal diameter, right ventricular internal diameter, aortic valve flow velocity and pulmonary valve flow velocity were collected and compared between 2 groups. Further, 4 fetuses with copy number variant sequencing (CNV-seq) results were collected. The influencing factors of fetal APVS diagnosis and identification were analyzed by multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis. The procedure followed in this study conformed to the standards formulated by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, and was approved by the Ethics Committee (Approval No. 2023135X). Written informed consents were obtained from pregnant mother of all fetuses.

Results

①Among 26 cases of APVS fetuses, 17 cases (17/26, 65.4%) were tetralogy of Fallot (TOF)-type APVS, 4 cases (4/26, 15.4%) were isolated APVS, and 5 cases (5/26, 19.2%) were complicated with heart malformation.② Echocardiography of 26 APVS cases showed stenosis of pulmonary valve ring, absence or dysplasia of pulmonary valve leaves, and tumor-like expansion of pulmonary trunk and left and right branches. Examination result of color doppler flow imaging(CDFI)showed severe regurgitation of fetal pulmonary valve in 26 cases, and pulsed-wave Doppler (PW) measured increased blood flow velocity of fetal pulmonary valve in 23 cases. ③Among 26 APVS fetuses, 1 case was stillborn, 18 cases were induced to terminate pregnancy, and 12 cases of 19 cases were confirmed by autopsy. One of them was misdiagnosed as pulmonary valve stenosis by fetal echocardiography. Seven cases lost follow-up. ④ There were significant differences in fetal heart axis, cardiothoracic ratio, right ventricular diameter, aortic annulus diameter, pulmonary annulus diameter, left pulmonary artery diameter, right pulmonary artery diameter, aortic valve velocity and pulmonary valve velocity between two groups (P<0.05). ⑤Multivariate unconditional logistics regression analysis showed that gestational age (OR=0.538, 95%CI: 0.295-0.984, P=0.044), right ventricular diameter (OR=2.772, 95%CI: 1.024-7.511, P=0.045), cardiac axis (OR=1.331, 95%CI: 1.101-1.608, P=0.003), and cardiothoracic ratio (OR=2.084, 95%CI: 1.082-4.017, P=0.028) were influencing factors to identify the existence of fetal APVS.

Conclusions

Fetal APVS is a rare conic malformation. Pulmonary valve absence or hypoplasia, pulmonary valve ring stenosis, pulmonary artery trunk or branch tumor-like dilation are typical ultrasound features. Combined with the parameters of cardiac axis, right ventricle and cardiothoracic ratio, it will improves the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis rate. Fetal APVS affects the development of left lung. The prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal APVS provides important information for prenatal prognosis consultation and timely treatment after birth.

Key words: Absence of pulmonary valve syndrome, Echocardiography, Prenatal diagnosis, Logistic models, Fetus

表1 2组胎儿胎龄及其母亲年龄比较(±s)

组别	例数	胎龄(周)	母亲年龄(岁)
AVPS组	26	25.8±4.1	28.9±3.5
对照组	78	26.5±4.0	28.1±3.8
t值		0.75	－0.94
P值		0.457	0.350

表1 2组胎儿胎龄及其母亲年龄比较(±s)

组别	例数	胎龄(周)	母亲年龄(岁)
AVPS组	26	25.8±4.1	28.9±3.5
对照组	78	26.5±4.0	28.1±3.8
t值		0.75	－0.94
P值		0.457	0.350

表2 本研究26例APVS胎儿(胎儿1~26)胎龄、母亲年龄及主要心脏畸形比较

胎儿编号	母亲年龄(岁)	胎龄(周)	主要心脏畸形	胎儿编号	母亲年龄(岁)	胎龄(周)	主要心脏畸形
1	26	24⁺⁵	TOF	14	27	18⁺⁶	TOF
2	28	25⁺⁵	—	15	32	20⁺⁵	MA、DORV、RAA、ALSA
3	32	21⁺⁵	TOF	16	33	24	TOF、RAA
4	28	23⁺¹	TOF、RAA、ALSA	17	28	22	TAPVC、VSD、HAAO
5	29	30⁺⁶	—	18	29	23⁺¹	TOF
6	30	27	TOF	19	30	24	TOF、RAA
7	32	26⁺²	TOF	20	22	24⁺²	TOF
8	22	26	TOF	21	27	27	TOF
9	29	31⁺²	TOF	22	28	23⁺⁶	—
10	27	32⁺³	SV、RAA	23	26	36⁺⁵	VI、SV
11	35	31⁺¹	TOF	24	26	24⁺⁴	TOF、RAA
12	35	23⁺⁴	TECD、SV	25	27	23	TOF
13	29	25⁺²	TOF、ACUA	26	35	30	—

表2 本研究26例APVS胎儿(胎儿1~26)胎龄、母亲年龄及主要心脏畸形比较

胎儿编号	母亲年龄(岁)	胎龄(周)	主要心脏畸形	胎儿编号	母亲年龄(岁)	胎龄(周)	主要心脏畸形
1	26	24⁺⁵	TOF	14	27	18⁺⁶	TOF
2	28	25⁺⁵	—	15	32	20⁺⁵	MA、DORV、RAA、ALSA
3	32	21⁺⁵	TOF	16	33	24	TOF、RAA
4	28	23⁺¹	TOF、RAA、ALSA	17	28	22	TAPVC、VSD、HAAO
5	29	30⁺⁶	—	18	29	23⁺¹	TOF
6	30	27	TOF	19	30	24	TOF、RAA
7	32	26⁺²	TOF	20	22	24⁺²	TOF
8	22	26	TOF	21	27	27	TOF
9	29	31⁺²	TOF	22	28	23⁺⁶	—
10	27	32⁺³	SV、RAA	23	26	36⁺⁵	VI、SV
11	35	31⁺¹	TOF	24	26	24⁺⁴	TOF、RAA
12	35	23⁺⁴	TECD、SV	25	27	23	TOF
13	29	25⁺²	TOF、ACUA	26	35	30	—

表3 本研究APVS组26例APVS胎儿(胎儿1~26)超声心动图参数比较

胎儿编号	VSD(mm)	主动脉骑跨率(%)	心轴(°)	心胸比(%)	左心房内径(mm)	右心房内径(mm)	左心室内径(mm)	右心室内径(mm)
1	4.4	70	76.0	32	11.7	11.0	9.8	12.7
2	－	－	66.0	51	7.4	13.8	9.8	15.0
3	3.9	50	66.0	32	5.7	9.5	7.1	12.1
4	4.7	40	56.0	32	7.4	7.7	7.4	8.9
5	6.6	50	57.0	28	9.5	11.0	9.3	12.6
6	5.1	50	95.0	26	9.9	13.0	8.5	17.0
7	5.2	50	61.0	35	9.5	11.8	12.5	10.8
8	4.6	60	44.0	32	8.8	13.7	8.8	13.4
9	4.4	20	43.0	35	8.5	9.1	9.8	12.4
10	－	－	40.0	26	9.2	12.9	－	26.5
11	7.6	60	－	－	12.6	14.6	11.8	13.5
12	－	－	78.0	30	7.5	12.6	7.4	13.1
13	4.1	50	62.0	34	8.9	10.3	9.0	10.9
14	5.0	50	77.6	26	6.1	5.7	6.0	6.7
15	2.9	－	70.0	28	6.0	6.7	3.2	10.8
16	3.1	30	82.0	30	8.6	9.6	8.1	9.5
17	4.0	30	54.0	29	4.7	8.7	9.4	9.8
18	2.8	30	50.0	31	8.5	9.3	8.9	9.5
19	3.8	30	60.0	30	9.2	10.1	9.0	10.8
20	7.6	30	55.0	31	9.5	10.6	9.1	11.0
21	4.0	50	50.0	29	11.4	12.3	10.3	11.0
22	－	－	46.0	29	6.7	10.7	7.0	12.5
23	－	－	45.0	28	12.3	14.2	15.6	－
24	4.4	60	35.0	30	8.8	9.1	8.0	8.7
25	3.8	50	120.0	38	5.3	9.4	9.3	11.4
26	－	－	54.0	41	13.4	15.5	15.4	16.6
胎儿编号	主动脉瓣环径(mm)	肺动脉瓣环径(mm)	肺动脉主干径(mm)	左肺动脉内径(mm)	右肺动脉内径(mm)	动脉导管内径(mm)	主动脉瓣流速(cm/s)	肺动脉瓣流速(cm/s)
1	6.8	3.0	9.1	10.9	9.8	－	94	172
2	4.0	5.8	11.6	5.2	4.6	－	102	124
3	4.5	2.5	16.8	9.5	9.7	－	83	189
4	3.3	3.8	7.1	4.9	5.2	－	79	192
5	6.2	4.8	11.2	5.5	7.3	－	69	180
6	5.7	2.6	7.2	6.3	6.6	2.8	72	177
7	6.1	4.7	10.5	6.5	9.8	3.0	105	183
8	6.7	3.3	19.0	9.6	9.8	－	64	138
9	5.7	3.0	9.5	5.6	6.9	－	103	248
10	6.3	5.9	15.9	13.4	12.4	－	64	63
11	6.1	3.0	9.2	6.2	5.4	3.5	90	143
12	4.1	3.9	8.9	4.5	5.3	－	56	157
13	5.5	3.1	8.7	6.1	6.2	－	74	168
14	4.1	2.3	5.3	3.0	3.1	2.0	91	198
15	4.9	3.1	7.8	6.6	5.5	－	85	120
16	5.8	3.9	9.5	5.2	7.9	－	90	153
17	2.1	3.0	6.0	2.8	3.2	－	66	146
18	5.3	3.8	9.2	6.3	5.9	－	89	138
19	4.7	2.7	5.9	6.8	4.6	－	94	177
20	5.1	2.8	12.5	8.5	5.2	－	87	205
21	5.8	4.0	7.9	4.3	3.9	3.0	88	143
22	3.3	3.6	6.7	2.4	2.4	2.1	85	164
23	5.7	3.2	10.4	5.1	5.0	2.5	90	145
24	5.4	6.0	14.8	6.1	6.4	－	80	224
25	4.8	4.0	10.8/融合部20.3	22.0	16.0	2.2	91	82
26	5.8	12.6	13.8	3.2	3.7	3.1	87	63

表3 本研究APVS组26例APVS胎儿(胎儿1~26)超声心动图参数比较

胎儿编号	VSD(mm)	主动脉骑跨率(%)	心轴(°)	心胸比(%)	左心房内径(mm)	右心房内径(mm)	左心室内径(mm)	右心室内径(mm)
1	4.4	70	76.0	32	11.7	11.0	9.8	12.7
2	－	－	66.0	51	7.4	13.8	9.8	15.0
3	3.9	50	66.0	32	5.7	9.5	7.1	12.1
4	4.7	40	56.0	32	7.4	7.7	7.4	8.9
5	6.6	50	57.0	28	9.5	11.0	9.3	12.6
6	5.1	50	95.0	26	9.9	13.0	8.5	17.0
7	5.2	50	61.0	35	9.5	11.8	12.5	10.8
8	4.6	60	44.0	32	8.8	13.7	8.8	13.4
9	4.4	20	43.0	35	8.5	9.1	9.8	12.4
10	－	－	40.0	26	9.2	12.9	－	26.5
11	7.6	60	－	－	12.6	14.6	11.8	13.5
12	－	－	78.0	30	7.5	12.6	7.4	13.1
13	4.1	50	62.0	34	8.9	10.3	9.0	10.9
14	5.0	50	77.6	26	6.1	5.7	6.0	6.7
15	2.9	－	70.0	28	6.0	6.7	3.2	10.8
16	3.1	30	82.0	30	8.6	9.6	8.1	9.5
17	4.0	30	54.0	29	4.7	8.7	9.4	9.8
18	2.8	30	50.0	31	8.5	9.3	8.9	9.5
19	3.8	30	60.0	30	9.2	10.1	9.0	10.8
20	7.6	30	55.0	31	9.5	10.6	9.1	11.0
21	4.0	50	50.0	29	11.4	12.3	10.3	11.0
22	－	－	46.0	29	6.7	10.7	7.0	12.5
23	－	－	45.0	28	12.3	14.2	15.6	－
24	4.4	60	35.0	30	8.8	9.1	8.0	8.7
25	3.8	50	120.0	38	5.3	9.4	9.3	11.4
26	－	－	54.0	41	13.4	15.5	15.4	16.6
胎儿编号	主动脉瓣环径(mm)	肺动脉瓣环径(mm)	肺动脉主干径(mm)	左肺动脉内径(mm)	右肺动脉内径(mm)	动脉导管内径(mm)	主动脉瓣流速(cm/s)	肺动脉瓣流速(cm/s)
1	6.8	3.0	9.1	10.9	9.8	－	94	172
2	4.0	5.8	11.6	5.2	4.6	－	102	124
3	4.5	2.5	16.8	9.5	9.7	－	83	189
4	3.3	3.8	7.1	4.9	5.2	－	79	192
5	6.2	4.8	11.2	5.5	7.3	－	69	180
6	5.7	2.6	7.2	6.3	6.6	2.8	72	177
7	6.1	4.7	10.5	6.5	9.8	3.0	105	183
8	6.7	3.3	19.0	9.6	9.8	－	64	138
9	5.7	3.0	9.5	5.6	6.9	－	103	248
10	6.3	5.9	15.9	13.4	12.4	－	64	63
11	6.1	3.0	9.2	6.2	5.4	3.5	90	143
12	4.1	3.9	8.9	4.5	5.3	－	56	157
13	5.5	3.1	8.7	6.1	6.2	－	74	168
14	4.1	2.3	5.3	3.0	3.1	2.0	91	198
15	4.9	3.1	7.8	6.6	5.5	－	85	120
16	5.8	3.9	9.5	5.2	7.9	－	90	153
17	2.1	3.0	6.0	2.8	3.2	－	66	146
18	5.3	3.8	9.2	6.3	5.9	－	89	138
19	4.7	2.7	5.9	6.8	4.6	－	94	177
20	5.1	2.8	12.5	8.5	5.2	－	87	205
21	5.8	4.0	7.9	4.3	3.9	3.0	88	143
22	3.3	3.6	6.7	2.4	2.4	2.1	85	164
23	5.7	3.2	10.4	5.1	5.0	2.5	90	145
24	5.4	6.0	14.8	6.1	6.4	－	80	224
25	4.8	4.0	10.8/融合部20.3	22.0	16.0	2.2	91	82
26	5.8	12.6	13.8	3.2	3.7	3.1	87	63

图4 本研究APVS组胎儿13(胎龄为25⁺²周)PW测量显示肺动脉瓣上流速增快，肺动脉瓣处"穿梭"血流信号

表4 2组胎儿超声心动图检查结果比较[M(Q₁，Q₃)]

组别	例数	心轴(°)	心胸比(%)	左心房内径(mm)	右心房内径(mm)	左心室内径(mm)^a	右心室内径(mm)^a	主动脉瓣环径(mm)
APVS组	26	61.7(35.0，120.0)	31.7(26.0，51.0)	8.7(4.7，13.4)	10.9(5.7，15.5)	9.2(3.2，15.6)	12.3(6.7，26.5)	5.1(2.1，6.8)
对照组	78	35.7(25.0，51.0)	28.6(25.0，33.0)	9.7(5.7，14.8)	11.0(6.8，18.0)	9.3(5.5，16.0)	9.9(6.2，17.0)	4.3(2.8，7.5)
Z值		－6.80	－3.22	－1.84	－0.19	－0.13	－3.10	－3.62
P值		<0.001	0.001	0.065	0.851	0.894	0.002	<0.001
组别	例数	肺动脉瓣环径(mm)	左肺动脉内径(mm)	右肺动脉内径(mm)	动脉导管内径(mm)^a	主动脉瓣流速(cm/s)	肺动脉瓣流速(cm/s)
APVS组	26	4.0(2.3，12.6)	6.8(2.4，22.0)	6.6(2.4，16.0)	2.7(2.0，3.5)	83.8(56.0，105.0)	157.4(63.0，248.0)
对照组	78	5.6(2.7，9.1)	2.3(1.3，3.9)	2.4(1.3，4.5)	2.5(1.3，4.9)	66.8(41.0，108.7)	60.1(40.0，95.4)
Z值		－5.17	－7.19	－7.25	－1.28	－4.64	－7.23
P值		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.202	<0.001	<0.001

表4 2组胎儿超声心动图检查结果比较[M(Q₁，Q₃)]

组别	例数	心轴(°)	心胸比(%)	左心房内径(mm)	右心房内径(mm)	左心室内径(mm)^a	右心室内径(mm)^a	主动脉瓣环径(mm)
APVS组	26	61.7(35.0，120.0)	31.7(26.0，51.0)	8.7(4.7，13.4)	10.9(5.7，15.5)	9.2(3.2，15.6)	12.3(6.7，26.5)	5.1(2.1，6.8)
对照组	78	35.7(25.0，51.0)	28.6(25.0，33.0)	9.7(5.7，14.8)	11.0(6.8，18.0)	9.3(5.5，16.0)	9.9(6.2，17.0)	4.3(2.8，7.5)
Z值		－6.80	－3.22	－1.84	－0.19	－0.13	－3.10	－3.62
P值		<0.001	0.001	0.065	0.851	0.894	0.002	<0.001
组别	例数	肺动脉瓣环径(mm)	左肺动脉内径(mm)	右肺动脉内径(mm)	动脉导管内径(mm)^a	主动脉瓣流速(cm/s)	肺动脉瓣流速(cm/s)
APVS组	26	4.0(2.3，12.6)	6.8(2.4，22.0)	6.6(2.4，16.0)	2.7(2.0，3.5)	83.8(56.0，105.0)	157.4(63.0，248.0)
对照组	78	5.6(2.7，9.1)	2.3(1.3，3.9)	2.4(1.3，4.5)	2.5(1.3，4.9)	66.8(41.0，108.7)	60.1(40.0，95.4)
Z值		－5.17	－7.19	－7.25	－1.28	－4.64	－7.23
P值		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.202	<0.001	<0.001

表5 识别胎儿APVS诊断的APVS组胎儿影响因素的多因素非条件logistics回归分析结果

影响因素	B	SE	Wald值	P值	OR值	OR值95%CI
胎龄	－0.619	0.308	4.052	0.044	0.538	0.295~0.984
右心室内径	1.020	0.509	4.020	0.045	2.772	1.024~7.511
心轴	0.286	0.097	8.748	0.003	1.331	1.101~1.608
心胸比	0.735	0.335	4.815	0.028	2.084	1.082~4.017

表5 识别胎儿APVS诊断的APVS组胎儿影响因素的多因素非条件logistics回归分析结果

影响因素	B	SE	Wald值	P值	OR值	OR值95%CI
胎龄	－0.619	0.308	4.052	0.044	0.538	0.295~0.984
右心室内径	1.020	0.509	4.020	0.045	2.772	1.024~7.511
心轴	0.286	0.097	8.748	0.003	1.331	1.101~1.608
心胸比	0.735	0.335	4.815	0.028	2.084	1.082~4.017

表6 2组胎儿左、右肺面积比较[cm², M(Q₁，Q₃)]

组别	例数	左肺面积	右肺面积
APVS组	18	2.4(1.3，4.3)	3.8(1.3，8.7)
对照组	54	3.3(1.1，6.1)	4.4(1.5，8.5)
Z值		－2.73	－1.58
P值		0.006	0.114

表6 2组胎儿左、右肺面积比较[cm², M(Q₁，Q₃)]

组别	例数	左肺面积	右肺面积
APVS组	18	2.4(1.3，4.3)	3.8(1.3，8.7)
对照组	54	3.3(1.1，6.1)	4.4(1.5，8.5)
Z值		－2.73	－1.58
P值		0.006	0.114

[1]	Wertaschnigg D, Jaeggi M, Chitayat D, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of absent pulmonary valve syndrome: contemporary single-center experience and review of the literature [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(2): 162-167. DOI: 10.1002/uog.11193.
[2]	Recker F, Weber EC, Strizek B, et al. Management and outcome of prenatal absent pulmonary valve syndrome [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2022, 306(5): 1449-1454. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06397-4.
[3]	Zhang WJ, Zhang ZL, Chang JJ, et al. Prenatal ultrasonic diagnosis of absent pulmonary valve syndrome: a case report[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(35): e7747. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007747.
[4]	Rychik J, Ayres N, Cuneo B, et al. American Society of Echocardiography guidelines and standards for performance of the fetal echocardiogram [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2004, 17(7): 803-810. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2004.04.011.
[5]	中华医学会儿科学分会心血管学组胎儿心脏病协作组，中华医学会儿科学分会心血管学组围产期先天性心脏病诊疗协作组，周开宇，等. 胎儿心律失常产前治疗及管理专家指导意见[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)，2022, 18(1): 15-29. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.01.003.
[6]	Brandt T, Sack LM, Arjona D, et al. Adapting ACMG/AMP sequence variant classification guidelines for single-gene copy number variants [J]. Genet Med, 2020, 22(2): 336-344. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0655-2.
[7]	Monacci F, Bondi T, Canessa C, et al. ′Absent′ pulmonary valve with intact ventricular septum mimicking tricuspid valve atresia: prenatal diagnosis and postnatal course [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2019, 45(3): 714-718. DOI: 10.1111/jog.13878.
[8]	云鼎，李一飞，王川，等. 基于共词分析法的我国胎儿先天性心脏病学科知识发展可视化研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)，2016，12(3):266-273. DOI：10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.03.004..
[9]	Gottschalk I, Jehle C, Herberg U, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of absent pulmonary valve syndrome from first trimester onwards: novel insights into pathophysiology, associated conditions and outcome [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 49(5): 637-642. DOI: 10.1002/uog.15977.
[10]	Grewal DS, Chamoli SC, Saxena S. Absent pulmonary valve syndrome - antenatal diagnosis [J]. Med J Armed Forces India, 2014, 70(2): 198-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.07.002.
[11]	Horigome H, Sakakibara Y, Atsumi N, et al. Absent pulmonary valve with intact ventricular septum presenting as cardiorespiratory failure at birth [J]. Pediatr Cardiol, 1997, 18(2): 136-138. DOI: 10.1007/s002469900132.
[12]	Drogalis-Kim DE, Reemtsen BL, Reardon LC. Unrepaired tetralogy of fallot with absent pulmonary valve in a mildly symptomatic 16-year-old boy[J]. Tex Heart Inst J, 2016，43(6):517-519. DOI: 10.14503/THIJ-15-5385.
[13]	Piacentini G, Mastromoro G, Romano V, et al. Fetal echocardiographic features of absent pulmonary valve syndrome [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 227(2): 331-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.023.
[14]	Wang ES, Fan XS, Xiang L, et al. Surgical outcome after complete repair of tetralogy of Fallot with absent pulmonary valve: comparison between bovine jugular vein-valved conduit and monocusp-valve patch [J]. World J Pediatr, 2018, 14(5): 510-519. DOI: 10.1007/s12519-018-0169-z.
[15]	Hu R, Zhang H, Xu Z, et al. Late outcomes for the surgical management of absent pulmonary valve syndrome in infants [J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2013, 16(6): 792-796. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivt050.
[16]	Nair AK, Haranal M, Elkhatim IM, et al. Surgical outcomes of absent pulmonary valve syndrome: an institutional experience [J]. Ann Pediatr Cardiol, 2020, 13(3): 212-219. DOI: 10.4103/apc.APC_111_19.
[17]	Mastromoro G, Khaleghi HN, Guadagnolo D, et al. Chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses detected with isolated cardiovascular malformation: a multicenter study, systematic review of the literature and Meta-analysis [J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2022, 12(6): 1328. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061328..
[18]	牛海燕，宋青，李喆，等. 实时三维经胸超声心动图诊断儿童心脏横纹肌瘤的临床价值[J]. 发育医学电子杂志，2023, 11(2): 106-111.
[19]	Yong MS, Yim D, Brizard CP, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with absent pulmonary valve syndrome: 38 years of experience [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97(5): 1671-1677. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.01.035.

[1]	Xiaoni Li, Qing Wei, Qinglong Meng, Lili Niu, Yue Tian, Weichun Wu, Zhenhui Zhu, Hao Wang. Value of echocardiography in diagnosing isolated left ventricular apical dysplasia[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(10): 937-942.
[2]	Hui Chen, Jing Yao, Ning Zhang, Lei Liu, Xiuling Ma, Xiaoxian Wang, Aijuan Fang, Jingjing Guan. Diagnostic value of echocardiography in cardiac amyloidosis in multiple myeloma[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(10): 943-949.
[3]	Fei Dai, Bowen Zhao, Mei Pan, Xiaohui Peng, Ran Chen, Yuanshi Tian, Ming Di. Value of multiple fetal echocardiographic quantitative parameters in assessing heart structure and function in fetuses with coarctation of the aorta[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[4]	Fen Chen, Beibei Ge, Xiaoxian Wang, Mingxia Li, Fang Xu, Jian Shi, Guanjun Guo, Aijuan Fang, Zhongqing Shi, Zhanru Qi, Hui Chen, Jing Yao. Electrical-mechanical remodeling in left bundle branch block-induced cardiomyopathy：An experimental study[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(10): 978-985.
[5]	Hongyu Tao, Jingjing Ye, Jin Yu, Xiuzhen Yang, Jingjing Qian, Bin Xu, Weize Xu, Qiang Shu. Value of contrast transthoracic echocardiography in assessing right-to-left shunt-related diseases in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[6]	Zusheng Du, Bowen Zhao, Zhen Zhang, Mei Pan, Xiaohui Peng, Ran Chen, Yankai Mao. Impact of gestational age and apex orientation on left atrial strain assessed by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging in normal fetuses during the second and third trimesters[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[7]	Shangdi Zhang, Bowen Zhao, Mei Pan, Xiaohui Peng, Ran Chen, Yankai Mao, Yang Chen, Hua Yuan, Yan Chen. Value of quantitative fetal atrial size parameters in assessing cardiac malformations in fetuses with atrial disproportion in middle and late trimesters[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(08): 785-793.
[8]	Yijia Wang, Qing Zhou, Sheng Cao, Fangjie Yuan, Yan Zhou, Mei Zhang. Current status of quality control for image archiving and reporting of transthoracic echocardiography in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(07): 657-663.
[9]	Lili Gu, Fan Jiang. Survey and analysis of quality of screening prenatal ultrasound images in Anhui Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.
[10]	Ying Mo, Wenxiu Li, Gang Li, Xiaofang Wang, Qiang Wang, Wenhong Ding. Clinical application of echocardiography in Ebstein's anomaly[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(07): 702-708.
[11]	Qiulian Wang, Ying Zhang, Chunmin Li, Shuming Xu, Yuqi Zhang. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal aortic arch obstruction with complex intracardiac structural malformations: causes of missed diangosis and misdiagnosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(07): 718-725.
[12]	Yuxin Cao, Zhuojun Mao, Jiahe Liang, Jiangpu Yi, Zekai Zhang, Wenshuai Ma, Yuntao Chen, Xiaoqian Li, Yuxin Zhang, Tiesheng Cao, Lijun Yuan. Application of three-dimensional printed heart model in simulating clinical teaching of left atrial appendage closure[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(06): 602-607.
[13]	Jinghan Xia, Fengjiao Lin, Yi Wang, Geqi Ding, Qingfeng Zhang, Hongmei Zhang, Shenghua Xie, Mingxing Li, Lixue Yin, Wenhua Li. Predictive value of mitral valve spatial changes combined with left atrial strain for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(06): 585-592.
[14]	Lan Wang, Binsheng Xu, Le Xie. Transthoracic echocardiographic and electrocardiographic features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(06): 593-596.
[15]	Qing Zeng, Huaxuan Wen, Ying Yuan, Yimei Liao, Yue Qin, Dandan Luo, Meiling Liang, Shengli Li. Sylvian fissure plateau angle: a new parameter to evaluate fetal sylvian fissure by transabdominal two-dimensional ultrasound[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(05): 454-459.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export