Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01): 73 -79. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.01.010

Original Article

Fetal karyotype of amniotic fluid cells and interventional prenatal diagnosis indications of pregnant women in the second trimester with high risk of fetal chromosome abnormality: a large sample study

Liangyu Xie, He Wang(), Xiaowen Zhao, Xun Zhang, Xuemei Zhang, Hongqian Liu, Qian Zhu, Jing Wang, Ting Hu, Zhu Zhang, Yi Lai, Li Qin, Shanling Liu   

  • Received:2021-03-03 Revised:2021-09-12 Published:2022-02-01
  • Corresponding author: He Wang
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Project of China(2018YFC1002203)
Objective

To explore fetal karyotype (FK) of amniotic fluid cells and interventional prenatal diagnosis (IPD) indications of pregnant women in the second trimester with high risk of fetal chromosome abnormality (FCA).

Methods

A total of 63 581 pregnant women in the second trimester (19 to 27+ 6 gestational weeks) with high risk of FCA who received amniocentesis for FK detection of amniotic fluid cells in Department of Prenatal Diagnosis Center of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University from 2014 to 2018 were selected as research subjects. Results of different indications of IPD and fetal karyotype abnormality (FKA) in pregnant women were analyzed retrospectively. The procedures followed in this study complied with the ethical standards of Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University and were approved by the Ethics Committee (Approval No. 077 for Medical Research 2019).

Results

①Among 63 581 pregnant women in the second trimester, detection rate of FKA was 3.13% (1 989/63 581). IPD indications in 63 581 pregnant women included: 25 648 cases of advanced age (age at date of confinement ≥ 35 years old), 29 009 cases were high risk of serological screening, 333 cases were high risk of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), 603 cases were carriers of chromosomal abnormalities in one of the couple, 2 647 cases with fetal structure abnormality and abnormal soft index in ultrasound screening, 1 546 cases were with birth defect history, 7 cases were with abnormal results in FK analysis of amniotic fluid cells in other hospitals, 149 cases were pregnant women with mental retardation or family history of mental retardation, 1 400 cases with a history of adverse exposure to harmful substances during the first trimester, and 2 239 cases were with other indications. And detection rates of FKA in pregnant women with the above IPD indications were 3.26% (836/25 648), 2.04% (593/29 009), 65.17% (217/333), 34.33% (207/603), 3.51% (93/2 647), 1.68% (26/1 546), 85.71% (6/7), 4.03% (6/149), 0.14% (2/1 400), and 0.13% (3/2 239), respectively. ②Among 351 pregnant women whose IPD indications were fetal structural abnormalities in ultrasound screening, the detection rate of FKA in pregnant women with fetal lymphatic cystoma and cutaneous edema was the highest, which was 26.09% (6/23). Among 2 296 pregnant women whose IPD indications were abnormal fetal ultrasound soft indexes, the detection rate of FKA in pregnant women with fetal nuchal translucency (NT) value ≥ 2.5 mm was the highest, which was 7.74% (66/853).

Conclusions

Advanced age, high risk of serological screening and NIPT, carrier of chromosomal abnormalities in one of the couple, fetal structure abnormality and abnormal soft index in ultrasound screening all are indications of IPD for FCA of pregnant women in the second trimester, and the risk of FCA varies with different types of IPD indications. Amniotic fluid cells FK detection by amniocentesis can assess the pregnancy outcomes of pregnant women with IPD indications and provide a reference for reducing birth rate of FKA.

表1 本组63 581例孕妇不同IPD指征的FKA分布
表2 351例IPD指征为超声筛查发现胎儿结构异常孕妇的FKA检出率[例数(%)]
表3 2 296例IPD指征为胎儿超声软指标异常孕妇的FKA检出率[例数(%)]
[1]
邬玲仟, 张学. 医学遗传学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2016: 97.
[2]
王岳平, 姜卫华, 郝明革, 等. 妊娠中期羊水染色体检查662例临床分析[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2008, 24(3): 224-225. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2216.2008.03.025.
[3]
Simons A, Schmid M. An international system for human cytogenomic nomenclature (2016). Special topic issue: cytogenetic and genome research[J]. ISSN, 2016, 149(1-2): 1-140.
[4]
顾京红, 蒋荣珍, 沈国芳, 等. 598例妊娠中晚期胎儿超声异常与染色体异常的关系[J]. 实用妇产科杂志2015, 31(2): 139-142.
[5]
陈香艳. 研究早中孕期胎儿超声软指标情况和染色体异常之间的相关性[J].母婴世界2016, 16(1): 12-15.
[6]
金克勤, 程秒鸳, 沈双双. 2 605份孕中期羊水细胞染色体核型分析[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志2017, 34(2): 307-309. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2017.02.037.
[7]
张彩荣, 郭敏, 木合塔尔江·木沙, 等. 308例不同产前诊断指征的羊水细胞染色体核型分析[J]. 国际检验医学杂志2018, 39(18): 2217-2219. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2018.18.004.
[8]
中华人民共和国卫生部. WS 322.1—2010胎儿常见染色体异常与开放性神经管缺陷的产前筛查与诊断技术标准. 第1部分:中孕期母血清学产前筛查[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国卫生部, 2010.
[9]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 《规范有序开展孕妇外周血胎儿游离DNA产前筛查与诊断工作的通知》及有关技术规范解读[EB/OL]. (2016-11-09)[2021-08-10].

URL    
[10]
雷亚琴, 赖允丽, 易赏, 等. 广西地区50 975例孕妇无创产前筛查分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(4): 410-419. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.04.006.
[11]
苏杭, 刘之英, 赖怡, 等. 高龄孕妇产前诊断结果及其首选无创产前筛查局限性的大样本分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(6): 718-723. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.06.015.
[12]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 国家卫生计生委办公厅关于规范有序开展孕妇外周血胎儿游离DNA产前筛查与诊断工作的通知[EB/OL]. (2016-11-09)[2021-08-10].

URL    
[13]
吴玥丽, 许雅娟. 染色体结构异常携带者的产前诊断与遗传研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健2014, 29(24): 3941-3943. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2014.24.29.
[14]
张玲玲, 郭碧芸, 黄和明, 等. 产前染色体非平衡易位胎儿的临床诊断分析[J]. 检验医学与临床2016, 13(增刊Ⅱ): 85-88. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2016.26.037.
[15]
Graesslin O, Derniaux E, Alanio E, et al. Characteristics and outcome of fetal cystic hygroma diagnosed in the first trimester[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2007, 86(12): 1442-1446. DOI: 10.1080/00016340701644843.
[16]
Naidoo P, Erasmus I, Jeebodh J, et al. Nuchal translucency as a method of first-trimester screening for aneuploidy[J]. S Afr Med J, 2008, 98(4): 295-299.
[17]
Jiang J, Fu M, Wang D. Cytogenetic analysis in 61 couples with spontaneous abortions[J]. Chin Med J (Engl)2001, 114(2): 200-201.
[18]
Benacerraf BR, Frigoletto FD Jr, Laboda LA. Sonographic diagnosis of Down syndrome in the second trimester[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1985, 153(1): 49-52. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90588-5.
[19]
Rochon M, Eddleman K. Controversial ultrasound findings[J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 2004, 31(1): 61-99. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-8545(03)00123-2.
[20]
Wax JR, Royer D, Mather J, et al. A preliminary study of sonographic grading of fetal intracardiac foci: feasibility, reliability, and association with aneuploidy[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 16(2): 123-127. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00206.x.
[21]
苏文, 崔娓, 潘丽, 等. 羊水检查疑似染色体嵌合体的处理及妊娠结局[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志2012, 29(4): 494-495. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2012.04.027.
[22]
中华人民共和国卫生部. WS 322.2—2010胎儿常见染色体异常与开放性神经管缺陷的产前筛查与诊断技术标准. 第2部分:胎儿染色体异常的细胞遗传学产前诊断技术标准[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国卫生部, 2010.
[23]
邹波, 鲁丽萍, 毛倩倩. 不同羊膜腔穿刺指征的产前细胞遗传学结果分析[J].中华医学遗传学杂志2014, 31(6): 805-806. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2014.06.030.
[1] Shuihua Yang, Guidan He, Guican Qin, Mengfeng Liang, Yanhe Luo, Xueqin Li, Juansong Tang. Echocardioimagedata characteristics of fetal isolated total anomalous pulmonary venous connection and application of high definition flow imaging and spatio-temporal image correlation[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] Lei Liu, Xin Yang, Xiaohua Xu, Shengmou Lin, Chuqin Xiong, Lilu Nong, Zhenyu Dong, Shengli Li. Measurement of fetal prenasal thickness and nasal bone length as a screening tool for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 in the second trimester of pregancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(05): 506-510.
[3] Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[4] Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[5] Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[6] Xu Chen, Yuru Zhan, Chunhua Wang. Clinical value of ABO blood group combined with thyroid function in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[7] Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[8] Chao Xue, Ye Zhang, Ying Zhao, Jiancheng Han, Xiaoyan Gu, Lin Sun, Xiaowei Liu, Wei Song, Yihua He. Ultrasonographic characteristics and prognosis of fetal congenital absent pulmonary valve syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 410-418.
[9] Chenxi Ran, Rufei Shen, Mingyu Liao, Qian Liao, Ling Zhou, Yuling Zhang, Min Long. Treatment and management of pituitary tumor during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[10] Ying Chen, Yanli Chen. Causes of heart rate variability and perinatal outcomes in elderly pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[11] Danyan Feng, Xiaohui Cao, Yuxia Shi. Effect of serum adiponectin and placental leucine aminopeptidase levels on pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[12] Defeng Kuang, Zhiguo Li, Shaofang Hua, Fengxia Xue. Levels and significance of fatty acid-binding protein 4 in serum and placental tissues and related lipid protein expression of high-fat-induced pregnant rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 338-344.
[13] Wen Zhang, Yanchun Zhang, Kaibo Liu, Hongyan Xu. Prenatal MRI diagnosis and perinatal outcome of fetal congenital hydrocephalus in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.
[14] Longhai Wu, Miao Huang, Yunhui Gong, Yunqian Yu. Clinical value of serum chemokines in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 357-362.
[15] Xueyun Liu, Ying Fan, Aijun Yao, Shengmiao Zhang, Yani Lv, Bingqing Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Heng. Liu. Effects of individualized whole-course nursing intervention based on WeChat mini program on pregnancy weight and delivery outcome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract