切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (05) : 398 -409. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2026.05.004

论著

海南省新生儿遗传代谢病筛查结果分析
范霞林1, 黄慈丹2, 周俏苗2, 曹霞1,3,†()   
  1. 1海南省妇女儿童医学中心保健部,海口 570206
    2海南省妇女儿童医学中心新生儿疾病筛查中心,海口 570206
    3海南省妇女儿童医学中心产前诊断中心,海口 570206
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-25 修回日期:2026-08-24 出版日期:2026-10-01
  • 通信作者: 曹霞

Analysis of newborns screening results for inborn errors of metabolism in Hainan Province

Xialin Fan1, Cidan Huang2, Qiaomiao Zhou2, Xia Cao1,3,†()   

  1. 1Department of Healthcare, Hainan Women and Children′s Medical Center, Haikou 570206, Hainan Province, China
    2Neonatal Disease Screening Center, Hainan Women and Children′s Medical Center, Haikou 570206, Hainan Province, China
    3Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Hainan Women and Children′s Medical Center, Haikou 570206, Hainan Province, China
  • Received:2026-02-25 Revised:2026-08-24 Published:2026-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Xia Cao
  • Supported by:
    Project of Excellent Talent Team of Hainan Province(QRCBT202121)
引用本文:

范霞林, 黄慈丹, 周俏苗, 曹霞. 海南省新生儿遗传代谢病筛查结果分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(05): 398-409.

Xialin Fan, Cidan Huang, Qiaomiao Zhou, Xia Cao. Analysis of newborns screening results for inborn errors of metabolism in Hainan Province[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2026, 22(05): 398-409.

目的

探讨海南省新生儿多种遗传代谢病(IEM)的发病情况。

方法

选择2024年1月1日至12月31日在海南省出生、监护人同意进行新生儿IEM筛查的86 543例新生儿为研究对象。采用串联质谱技术,对新生儿足跟血滤纸干血斑标本进行多种IEM初筛、复筛。对复筛结果呈阳性的部分新生儿,采集外周血,基于全外显子组测序(WES)技术,确诊IEM种类和基因突变情况。采用χ2检验,对不同性别、出生胎龄及体重、民族、户籍所在地新生儿的IEM初筛阳性率进行统计学比较,进一步采用χ2分割法进行两两比较,并采用Bonferroni法调整检验水准后进行统计学分析。本研究遵循的程序符合海南省妇女儿童医学中心伦理委员会标准,并通过该伦理委员会审批(审批文号:HNWCMC伦审2026年第151号)。

结果

①2024年,海南省活产新生儿为92 170例,对其中86 543例进行IEM筛查,IEM筛查率为93.89%。这86 543例新生儿的IEM初筛阳性率为3.58%(3 094/86 543)。对初筛结果呈阳性中的2 591例进行IEM复筛,IEM复筛阳性率为9.46%(245/2 591),对复筛结果呈阳性中的136例(55.51%,136/245)新生儿进行基因检测后,最终被确诊的IEM患儿为38例,海南省新生儿的IEM发病率约为4.39×10-4(38/86 543)。②出生胎龄<37周新生儿IEM初筛阳性率高于出生胎龄≥37~42周者,并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=361.64,P<0.001)。不同出生体重新生儿的IEM初筛阳性率总体比较,差异亦有统计学意义(χ2=291.65,P<0.001),进一步对出生体重<2 500 g、≥2 500~4 000 g与>4 000 g新生儿的IEM初筛阳性率进行任意两两比较,差异均有统计学意义(P≤0.001)。不同民族新生儿的IEM初筛阳性率总体比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=36.12,P<0.001),进一步进行两两比较的结果显示,黎族新生儿的IEM初筛阳性率高于汉族和苗族,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001、P=0.006)。不同户籍所在地新生儿IEM初筛阳性率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=80.62,P<0.001),进一步进行两两比较的结果显示,户籍所在地为海南省少数民族市、县新生儿的IEM初筛阳性率高于汉族市、县,并且差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。③本研究86 543例新生儿中,IEM相关基因突变检出率为7.16×10-4(62/86 543),检出的前4位突变基因为SLC22A5、SLC25A13、ACADS和ASS1,检出前3位基因突变位点分别为c.51C>G、c.852_855del、c.322G>A。④经基因检测确诊的38例IEM新生儿中,氨基酸代谢病为4例、有机酸血症为7例、尿素循环障碍为5例、脂肪酸氧化代谢障碍为22例。新生儿IEM筛查确诊数量最高的3种IEM依次为原发性肉碱缺乏症(13例)、短链酰基辅酶A脱氢酶缺乏症(6例)、瓜氨酸血症Ⅱ型(5例)。

结论

海南省新生儿的IEM发病率较高、种类较多。建议海南省对新生儿开展多种IEM筛查,并加强IEM筛查呈阳性患儿的管理。

Objective

To explore the incidence of various inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) in newborns in Hainan Province.

Methods

A total of 86 543 newborns born in Hainan Province from January 1 to December 31, 2024, whose guardians agreed to undergo neonatal IEM screening, were selected as the study subjects. Using tandem mass spectrometry detection technology, initial and re-screening of various IEM were conducted on dried blood spot specimens collected from the heels of newborn infants. For some newborns who tested positive in the rescreening, peripheral blood was collected, and the type of IEM and gene mutations were confirmed by whole exome sequencing (WES) detection technology. The positive rates of initial IEM screening among newborns of different genders, gestational ages, birth weights, ethnicities, and registered residences were compared by chi-square test, and further pairwise comparisons were performed using the chi-square splitting method, and the Bonferroni method was used to adjust the significance level. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of Hainan Women and Children′s Medical Center, and was approved by its Ethics Committee (Approval No.HNWCMC-2026-151).

Results

①In 2024, there were 92 170 live births in Hainan Province, and 86 543 of them underwent IEM screening, with an IEM screening rate of 93.89%. Among these 86 543 newborns, the positive rate of initial IEM screening was 3.58% (3 094/86 543). And 2 591 cases underwent IEM rescreening, with an IEM rescreening rate of 83.74% (2 591/3 094). Among them, 245 cases were positive for IEM rescreening, the positive rate of IEM rescreening was 9.46% (245/2 591), and 136 (55.51%, 136/245) newborns underwent genetic testing, and 38 were finally diagnosed with IEM. The incidence rate of IEM in newborns was about 4.39×10-4 (38/86 543). ②The positive rate of initial IEM screening in newborns with gestational age <37 weeks was higher than that in newborns with gestational age ≥37 to 42 weeks, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=361.64, P<0.001). The overall comparison of the positive rate of initial IEM screening among newborns with different birth weights also showed a statistically significant difference (χ2=291.65, P<0.001). Further pairwise comparisons revealed that the positive rate of initial IEM screening in newborns with birth weight <2 500 g, ≥2 500 to 4 000 g, and >4 000 g differed significantly in any pairwise comparison (P≤0.001). The overall comparison of the positive rate of initial IEM screening among newborns of different ethnic groups showed a statistically significant difference (χ2=36.12, P<0.001). Further pairwise comparisons revealed that the positive rate of initial IEM screening in Li ethnic group newborns was higher than that in Han and Miao ethnic group newborns, and both the differences were statistically significant (P<0.001, P=0.006). The comparison of the positive rate of initial IEM screening among newborns with different registered residence also showed a statistically significant difference (χ2=80.62, P<0.001). Further pairwise comparisons revealed that the positive rate of initial IEM screening in newborns from ethnic minority cities and counties in Hainan Province was higher than that in newborns from Han ethnic group cities and counties in Hainan Province, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). ③Among the 86 543 newborns, the detection rate of IEM-related gene mutation was 7.16×10-4 (62/86 543). The top four detected gene mutations were SLC22A5, SLC25A13, ACADS, and ASS1 gene mutations. The top three detected gene mutation sites were c. 51C>G, c. 852_855del, and c.322G>A, respectively. ④Among the 38 newborns with IEM confirmed by genetic testing, 4 cases were amino acid metabolism disorders, 7 cases were organic acidemia, 5 cases were urea cycle disorders, and 22 cases were fatty acid oxidation metabolism disorders. The top three IEM diseases in terms of confirmed cases were primary carnitine deficiency (13 cases), short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (6 cases), and citrullinemia type Ⅱ (5 cases).

Conclusions

The incidence of IEM among newborns in Hainan Province is relatively high, with a diverse range of types. It is recommended to initiate early screening for various IEM in newborns and to enhance the management of infants with positive IEM screening results in Hainan Province.

表1 海南省不同临床特征新生儿IEM初筛阳性率比较
表2 海南省62例检出IEM相关基因突变新生儿的IEM相关基因检出及位点分布情况
突变基因 突变位点/突变类型 例数 携带率(×10-4) 诊断结果a/疾病名称/IEM类型 确诊例数 发病率(×10-4)
ACAD8 c.1000C>T杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
ACAD8 c.235C>G杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
ACAD8+ACADM c.286G>A杂合突变+c.1060G>A杂合突变/多基因突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
ACAD8+ACADSB c.172C>T杂合突变+c.746del杂合突变/多基因突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
ACADS c.322G>A杂合突变+c.625G>A杂合突变/复合杂合突变 4 0.46 阳性/SCADD/FAOD 4 0.46
ACADS c.322G>A杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
ACADS c.322G>A杂合突变+c.1031A>G杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/SCADD/FAOD 1 0.12
ACADS c.431C>T杂合突变+c.625G>A杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/SCADD/FAOD 1 0.12
ACADSB c.1165A>G杂合突变+c.655G>A杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/SBCADD/OA 1 0.12
ACADSB c.746del杂合突变+c.655G>A杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/SBCADD/OA 1 0.12
ACADSB c.275C>G杂合突变+c.746del杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/SBCADD/OA 1 0.12
ASS1 c.1087C>T杂合突变/杂合突变 4 0.46 阴性/—/— — —
ASS1 c.773+4A>C杂合突变/杂合突变 2 0.23 阴性/—/— — —
ASS1 c.1168G>A杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
BCKDHB c.658C>T杂合突变+c.920dup杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/MSUD/AAMD 1 0.12
CPT1A c.1339C>T杂合突变+c.2246G>A杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/CPTⅠ缺乏症/FAOD 1 0.12
CLPB c.1700A>T杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
CREB3L3 c.157-1G>A杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
ETFDH c.250G>A杂合突变+c.353G>T杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/GA-Ⅱ/FAOD 1 0.12
GCDH c.1063C>T杂合突变+c.271+1G>A杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/GA-Ⅰ/OA 1 0.12
GCDH c.881G>A杂合突变+c.1063C>T杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/GA-Ⅰ/OA 1 0.12
HLCS c.1564del杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
MAT1A c.754A>T杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/MATⅠ与Ⅲ缺乏所致HMM/AAMD 1 0.12
MCCC1 c.2043G>T杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
MCCC1 c.612del杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
MCCC2 c.464G>A杂合突变+c.1538T>C杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/MCC2D/OA 1 0.12
MCCC2 c.914A>G杂合突变+c.903+1G>A杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/MCC2D/OA 1 0.12
MMUT c.1208G>A杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
PAH c.1315+6T>A杂合突变+c.1222C>T杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/PKU/AAMD 1 0.12
PAH c.478C>T杂合突变+c.320A>G杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/PKU/AAMD 1 0.12
SLC22A5 c.51C>G纯合突变/纯合突变 2 0.23 阳性/PCD/UCD 2 0.23
SLC22A5 c.51C>G杂合突变+c.1400C>G杂合突变/复合杂合突变 2 0.23 阳性/PCD/UCD 2 0.23
SLC22A5 c.51C>G杂合突变+c.338G>A杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/PCD/UCD 1 0.12
SLC22A5 c.51C>G杂合突变+c.415G>A杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/PCD/UCD 1 0.12
SLC22A5 c.51C>G杂合突变+c.760C>T杂合突变/复合杂合突变 3 0.35 阳性/PCD/UCD 3 0.35
SLC22A5 c.51C>G杂合突变+c.92C>G杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/PCD/UCD 1 0.12
SLC22A5 c.694A>G杂合突变+c.1064C>T杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/PCD/UCD 1 0.12
SLC22A5 c.844C>T杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
SLC22A5 c.51C>G杂合突变+c.797C>T杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/PCD/UCD 1 0.12
SLC22A5 c.839C>T杂合突变+c.1064C>T杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/PCD/UCD 1 0.12
SLC22A5 c.769C>T杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
SLC25A13 c.852_855del杂合突变/杂合突变 2 0.23 阴性/—/— — —
SLC25A13 c.852_855del杂合突变+IVS16ins3Kbp杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/NICCD/UCD 1 0.12
SLC25A13 c.852_855del杂合突变+c.615+5G>A杂合突变/复合杂合突变 2 0.23 阳性/NICCD/UCD 2 0.23
SLC25A13 c.852_855del纯合突变/纯合突变 2 0.23 阳性/NICCD/UCD 2 0.23
SLC25A13 c.1712G>A杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
SLC25A20 c.199-10T>G杂合突变/杂合突变 1 0.12 阴性/—/— — —
SLC25A20 c.199-10T>G杂合+c.326+1G>A杂合突变/复合杂合突变 1 0.12 阳性/CACTD/FOAD 1 0.12
图1 1例原发性肉碱缺乏症新生儿(女性,39 d龄)及其父母SLC22A5基因Sanger法测序图[图1A:新生儿为c.51C>G纯合突变(箭头所示);图1B、1C:新生儿父亲、母亲均为c.51C>G杂合突变(箭头所示)]
图2 1例枫糖尿病新生儿(女性,14 d龄)及其父母BCKDHB基因Sanger法测序图[图2A、2B:新生儿及其父亲均为c.658C>T杂合突变(箭头所示);图2C:新生儿母亲未检出c.658C>T突变(箭头所示);图2D:新生儿为c.920dup杂合突变(箭头所示);图2E:新生儿父亲未检出c.920dup突变(箭头所示);图2F:新生儿母亲为c.920dup杂合突变(箭头所示)]
图3 1例2-甲基丁酰甘氨酸尿症新生儿(女性,18 d龄)及其父母ACADSB基因Sanger法测序图(图3A、3B:新生儿及其父亲均为c.1165A>G杂合突变(箭头所示);图3C:新生儿母亲未检出c.1165A>G突变(箭头所示);图3D:新生儿为c.655G>A杂合突变(箭头所示);图3E:新生儿父亲未检出c.655G>A突变(箭头所示);图3F:新生儿母亲为c.655G>A杂合突变(箭头所示)]
[1]
石海杰,赵振东. 海南省少数民族地区37 482例新生儿遗传代谢病筛查结果分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(1): 30-36. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.01.005.
[2]
Burlina AB, Corsello G. Survey of Italian pediatricians′ perspectives and knowledge about neonatal screening[J]. Ital J Pediatr, 2015, 41: 41. DOI: 10.1186/s13052-015-0147-1.
[3]
Wang T, Ma J, Zhang Q, et al. Expanded newborn screening for inborn errors of metabolism by tandem mass spectrometry in Suzhou, China: disease spectrum, prevalence, genetic characteristics in a Chinese population[J]. Front Genet, 2019, 10: 1052-1052. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01052.
[4]
郝会青,付立新,支红霞,等. 105 437例新生儿遗传代谢病串联质谱筛查结果分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2020, 35(20): 3837-3839. DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.20.040.
[5]
原卫生部. 新生儿疾病筛查技术规范(2010年版)[EB/OL]. (2010-11-10)[2026-08-09].

URL    
[6]
中华预防医学会出生缺陷预防与控制专业委员会新生儿遗传代谢病筛查学组.新生儿筛查遗传代谢病诊治规范专家共识[J]. 中华新生儿科杂志(中英文), 2023, 38(7): 385-394. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2932.2023.07.001.
[7]
中华预防医学会出生缺陷预防与控制专委会新生儿遗传代谢病筛查学组,山东省医学会罕见病分会,山东省罕见疾病协会遗传代谢分会. 新生儿基因筛查流程、结果判读及召回专家共识(2026版)[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志,2026, 43(3): 171-179. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20250922-00559.
[8]
陈国梁. 省人大常委会开展《中华人民共和国民族区域自治法》和《海南省实施〈中华人民共和国民族区域自治法〉若干规定》执法检查[J]. 海南人大,2014, 14(8): 17.
[9]
黄国英,孙锟,罗小平. 儿科学[M]. 10版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2024: 80.
[10]
郭元芳,李改杰,田丽萍,等. 串联质谱筛查新生儿遗传代谢疾病中氨基酸浓度波动性及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2018, 33(24): 5886-5889. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2018.24.74.
[11]
周婧瑶,张钰,胡琦,等. 影响新生儿氨基酸代谢的多因素分析[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志,2020, 35(23): 1773-1776. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20200109-00042.
[12]
王棋,陈亚平,马骏,等. 苏州市新生儿重症监护室新生儿29项遗传代谢病筛查的影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2023, 38(1): 132-136. DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2023.01.035.
[13]
McMahon R, DeMartino L, Sowizral M, et al. The impact of seasonal changes on thyroxine and thyroid-stimulating hormone in newborns[J]. Int J Neonatal Screen, 2021,7(1): 8. DOI: 10.3390/ijns7010008.
[14]
van Trotsenburg P, Stoupa A, Léger J, et al. Congenital hypothyroidism: a 2020-2021 consensus guidelines update-an ENDO-European Reference Network initiative endorsed by the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and the European Society for Endocrinology[J]. Thyroid, 2021, 31(3): 387-419. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2020.0333.
[15]
国家卫生健康委员会临床检验中心新生儿遗传代谢病筛查室间质评委员会. 新生儿遗传代谢病筛查指标切值建立方法专家共识[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志,2019, 34(11): 881-884. DOI: 10.19538/j.ek2019110601.
[16]
杨雪,李林洁,张晓怡,等. 贵阳地区新生儿遗传代谢疾病串联质谱技术筛查分析[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2022, 30(6): 1404-1407. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2022.06.041.
[17]
陈琪,朱静潆,冯子奕,等. 新疆地区新生儿遗传代谢病串联质谱筛查的结果分析[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志,2024, 32(4): 869-873. DOI: 10.13404/j.cnki.cjbhh.2024.04.038.
[18]
白文学,龙川江. 江津区新生儿串联质谱法遗传代谢病筛查研究[J]. 数理医药学杂志,2019, 32(8): 1180-1181. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4337.2019.08.036.
[19]
Loeber JG, Platis D, Zetterström RH, et al. Neonatal screening in europe revisited: an ISNS perspective on the current state and developments since 2010[J]. Int J Neonatal Screen, 2021, 7(1):15.DOI: 10.3390/ijns7010015.
[20]
Messina MA, Meli C, Raudino F, et al. Expanded newborn screening using tandem mass spectrometry: seven years of experience in eastern sicily[J]. Int J Neonatal Screen, 2018, 4(2): 12. DOI: 10.3390/ijns4020012.
[21]
Cambra Conejero A, Martinez Figueras L, Ortiz Temprado A, et al. Newborn screening program in the community of Madrid: evaluation of positive cases[J]. Rev Esp Salud Publica, 2020, 94: e202012185.
[22]
Deng K, Zhu J, Yu E, et al. Incidence of inborn errors of metabolism detected by tandem mass spectrometry in China: a census of over seven million newborns between 2016 and 2017[J]. J Med Screen, 2021, 28(3): 223-229. DOI: 10.1177/0969141320973690.
[23]
陈迟,徐益红,吴璀璐,等. 2009—2021年浙江省新生儿遗传代谢病串联质谱法筛查工作质量评价[J]. 预防医学,2022, 34(8): 765-769. DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.08.003.
[24]
Lin Y, Zhang W, Chen Z, et al. Newborn screening and molecular features of patients with multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in Quanzhou, China[J]. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab, 2021, 34(5): 649-652.DOI: 10.1515/jpem-2020-0694.
[25]
唐诚芳. 广州地区新生儿遗传代谢病串联质谱法筛查结果及筛查性能评估[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2021, 50(4): 463-471. DOI: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2021-0260.
[26]
王欣荣,刘艳秋,官慧珍,等. 126 111例新生儿串联质谱遗传代谢病筛查结果及基因突变情况分析[J]. 江西医药,2022, 57(7): 707-710. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2238.2022.07.009.
[27]
朱颖杰,张雯艳,宋萍,等. 105 437例新生儿遗传代谢病串联质谱筛查结果分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2020, 35(20): 3837-3839. DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.20.040.
[28]
赵娜,王金玮,李雪燕. 廊坊地区41 062例新生儿遗传代谢病串联质谱筛查结果分析[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志,2022, 30(3): 504-508. DOI: 10.13404/j.cnki.cjbhh.20220224.001.
[29]
张亚果,苏星月,李婷,等. 四川省部分地区新生儿遗传代谢病串联质谱筛查情况分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2020, 28(7): 809-812. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2020-0085.
[1] 李霞, 李世平, 屈艺. 免疫因素在新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎患儿中的作用机制的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(02): 93-102.
[2] 冉金玲, 冯卓慧, 赵智. 孕妇低剂量抗菌药物应用对新生儿肠道菌群影响的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(02): 103-108.
[3] 高阳, 张立明. 外周灌注指数在新生儿领域的应用研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(06): 628-633.
[4] 刘琪, 顾宁, 杨玲, 周燕, 芮燕京, 戴毅敏. 妊娠合并恶性肿瘤的临床特征及母儿结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(06): 634-642.
[5] 许海珠, 李芳, 赵振东. 海南省新生儿希特林蛋白缺乏症筛查及基因突变分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(05): 525-533.
[6] 朱文清, 柳仁凤, 李维明, 王二款. 奥曲肽联合西罗莫司对二氮嗪治疗无效的先天性高胰岛素血症患儿的疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(05): 561-567.
[7] 周润泽, 郭映兰, 刘霞, 韦红. 新生儿重症百日咳临床特征及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(03): 329-336.
[8] 李继承, 刘仕祺, 杜娟, 杨子馨, 朱杏, 黑明燕. 肠造瘘术后新生儿肠液回输安全性的系统评价和Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(02): 219-229.
[9] 邱玉芬, 高晓燕. 新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病诊治的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(02): 133-139.
[10] 陈昊, 富建华. 基于床旁即时超声指导新生儿脓毒性休克救治的临床应用研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(01): 67-72.
[11] 李茂军, 唐彬秩, 吴青, 阳倩, 梁小明, 邹福兰, 黄蓉, 陈昌辉. 新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的管理:多国指南/共识及RDS-NExT workshop 共识陈述简介和评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 607-617.
[12] 李悦, 豆小文, 纪翔, 李瑞, 刘婷, 莫红梅. 基于质谱法的胆汁酸和微量元素联合分析作为阿尔茨海默病预测标志物的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 1-10.
[13] 王彦云, 洪冬洋, 管贤伟, 王欣, 孙云. 串联质谱法检测精氨酰琥珀酸和瓜氨酸水平在新生儿精氨酰琥珀酸尿症筛查中的价值[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2025, 13(04): 225-229.
[14] 李振硕, 张晓红, 张小萌, 孙红双, 苏琳, 刘鲲. 超声诊断新生儿肠旋转不良合并中肠扭转的特征及误诊原因分析[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2025, 13(04): 255-259.
[15] 许朱琳, 刘璐, 朱锦舟, 刘晓琳. 减重代谢手术从外科到内镜治疗的革新与进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 303-310.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?