切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (06) : 689 -696. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2025.06.012

论著

妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后感染影响因素分析
田海琦1, 侯章梅2, 李佳芮3, 陈诚4, 刘小艳2,()   
  1. 1重庆市南岸区人民医院妇产科,重庆 400060
    2重庆大学附属人民医院/重庆市人民医院感染控制处,重庆 401147
    3陆军军医大学预防医学系卫生统计学教研室,重庆 400038
    4重庆大学附属人民医院/重庆市人民医院妇产科,重庆 401147
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-29 修回日期:2025-11-10 出版日期:2025-12-01
  • 通信作者: 刘小艳

Analysis of factors influencing postoperative infection in patients with gynecological malignant tumors

Haiqi Tian1, Zhangmei Hou2, Jiarui Li3, Cheng Chen4, Xiaoyan Liu2,()   

  1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chongqing Nan′an District People′s Hospital, Chongqing 400060, China
    2Department of Infection Control Office, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing University/Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing 401147, China
    3Department of Health Statistics, College of Preventive Medicine, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
    4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing University/Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing 401147, China
  • Received:2025-05-29 Revised:2025-11-10 Published:2025-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoyan Liu
  • Supported by:
    Key and Special Project for Technological Innovation and Application Development of Chongqing Science and Technology Bureau(CSTB2022TIAD-KPX0183)
引用本文:

田海琦, 侯章梅, 李佳芮, 陈诚, 刘小艳. 妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后感染影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(06): 689-696.

Haiqi Tian, Zhangmei Hou, Jiarui Li, Cheng Chen, Xiaoyan Liu. Analysis of factors influencing postoperative infection in patients with gynecological malignant tumors[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2025, 21(06): 689-696.

目的

探讨妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后感染影响因素。

方法

选择2020年4月至2023年3月于重庆大学附属人民医院妇科进行手术治疗的234例妇科恶性肿瘤患者为研究对象。其中,宫颈癌患者为80例,卵巢癌为107例,子宫内膜癌为47例。根据患者术后是否发生感染,将其分别纳入感染组(n=55)与非感染组(n=179)。采用回顾性分析方法,收集2组患者一般临床资料及术前、术中与术后相关临床资料,并分别采用成组t检验、χ2检验进行统计学分析。采用多因素非条件logistic回归分析法,对妇科肿瘤患者术后感染的独立影响因素进行分析。2组患者年龄、人体质量指数(BMI)等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究遵循的程序通过重庆大学附属人民医院医学伦理委员会批准(批准文号:KYS2022-012-01)。

结果

①本研究感染组55例发生术后感染患者阴道分泌物细菌培养结果显示,60株菌株中,大肠埃希菌占比最高(32/55,58.2%),其次为铜绿假单胞菌感染(4/55,9.1%),阴沟肠杆菌阴沟亚种(4/55,7.3%)及肺炎克雷伯菌(4/55,7.3%);8例(14.5%)患者为双重细菌感染。②2组患者肿瘤类型、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、手术时长、阴道断端缝线种类、使用引流管、引流管留置位置、引流管留置时间、尿管插管次数、尿管留置时间、中心静脉插管≥1次、中心静脉插管时间、术后使用抗菌药物类型和抗菌药物使用时间等13个因素分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果显示,ASA分级为Ⅲ+Ⅳ级、阴道断端缝线为普通荞缝线,均为妇科肿瘤患者术后感染的独立危险因素(OR=3.266、3.632,95%CI:1.361~7.645、1.454~9.072,P=0.008、0.006);相对于术后单用头孢类抗菌药物治疗,术后使用非头孢类抗菌药物为妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后感染的独立保护因素(OR=0.298,95%CI:0.127~0.702,P=0.006);相对于术后抗菌药物使用1~3 d,术后抗菌药物使用4~7 d与≥8 d,亦均为妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后感染的独立保护因素(OR=0.103、0.073,95%CI:0.031~0.340、0.019~0.277,均为P<0.001)。

结论

ASA分级、阴道断端缝线类型、术后使用抗菌药物类型和术后抗菌药物使用时间,均为妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后感染的独立影响因素。术前积极营养支持,术中合理选择抗菌缝线,以及术后合理使用抗菌药物与足量、足疗程抗菌药物治疗等,将有助于降低妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后感染风险。

Objective

To explore the influencing factors of postoperative infection in patients with gynecological malignant tumors.

Methods

A total of 234 patients with gynecological malignancies who underwent surgical treatment at the Department of Gynecology, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing University from April 2020 to March 2023 were selected as the study subjects. Among them, 80 cases were cervical cancer, 107 cases were ovarian cancer, and 47 cases were endometrial cancer. Patients were divided into infection group (n=55) and non-infection group (n=179) based on whether they developed postoperative infection. A retrospective analysis was conducted to collect general clinical data and preoperative, surgical, and postoperative data from both groups, and comparative analyses were performed using independent-samples t test and chi-square test. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the independent influencing factors of postoperative infection in gynecological malignant tumor patients. There were no statistically significant differences in age, body mass index (BMI), or other general clinical data between two groups (P>0.05). The procedures followed in this study were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing University (Approval No. KYS2022-012-01).

Results

①Among 234 patients with gynecological malignancies, 55 cases (23.5%) developed postoperative infections. Of the 55 infected patients, 60 strains of pathogens were cultured, with Escherichia coli having the highest incidence (32/55, 58.2%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5/55, 9.1%), Enterobacter cloacae subsp. cloacae (4/55, 7.3%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (4/55, 7.3%); 8 cases (14.5%) had dual bacterial infections. ②Univariate analysis revealed that there were statistically significant differences between two groups in 13 factors, including tumor type, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, operation duration, type of vaginal stump suture, use of drainage tube, drainage tube placement location, duration of indwelling drainage tube, number of urinary catheter insertions, duration of indwelling urinary catheter, ≥1 central venous catheterization, duration of central venous catheterization, types of postoperative use of antibiotics, and duration of antibiotic use (P<0.05). ③Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that ASA classification Ⅲ+ Ⅳ and conventional suture for vaginal stump closure were independent risk factors for postoperative infection in patients with gynecological tumors (OR=3.266, 3.632, 95%CI: 1.361-7.645, 1.454-9.072, P=0.008, 0.006). Compared to postoperative cephalosporin antibiotics alone, postoperative use of non-cephalosporin antibiotics was an independent protective factor against postoperative infection in patients with gynecological malignancies (OR=0.298, 95%CI: 0.127-0.702, P=0.006). Compared to postoperative antibiotic use for 1-3 days, postoperative antibiotic use for 4-7 days and ≥8 days were also independent protective factors against postoperative infection in patients with gynecological malignancies (OR=0.103, 0.073, 95%CI: 0.031-0.340, 0.019-0.277, both P<0.001).

Conclusions

ASA classification, vaginal suture type, type of postoperative antibiotics used, and duration of postoperative antibiotic use are all independent influencing factors for postoperative infection in patients with gynecological malignancies. Postoperative nutritional intervention, intraoperative antimicrobial suture utilization, proper postoperative use of antibiotics and standardized postoperative antibiotic protocols may effectively reduce the risk of postoperative infection in patients with gynecological malignancies.

表1 感染组与非感染组妇科恶性肿瘤患者一般临床资料和术前相关资料比较
表2 感染组与非感染组妇科恶性肿瘤患者手术季节及手术相关资料比较[例数(%)]
组别 例数 手术季节 ASA分级 手术方式 术中使用抗菌药物
春季 夏季 秋季 冬节 Ⅰ+Ⅱ级 Ⅲ+Ⅳ级 开腹 腹腔镜
感染组 55 17(30.9) 16(29.1) 12(21.8) 10(5.6) 40(72.7) 15(27.3) 45(81.8) 10(18.2) 10(18.2)
非感染组 179 42(23.5) 59(33.0) 39(21.8) 39(21.8) 90(50.3) 89(49.7) 157(87.7) 22(12.3) 41(22.9)
χ2   1.38 8.59 1.24 0.55
P   0.710 0.003 0.266 0.458
组别 例数 手术时长 麻醉方式 术中出血量
<1 h ≥1~3 h ≥3 h 全身麻醉 其他 <200 mL 200~500 mL >500 mL
感染组 55 1(1.8) 5(9.1) 49(89.1) 55(100.0) 0(0) 32(58.2) 14(25.4) 9(16.4)
非感染组 179 19(10.6) 28(15.6) 132(73.7) 175(97.8) 4(2.2) 124(69.3) 39(21.8) 16(8.9)
χ2   6.37 a 3.20
P   0.041 0.340 0.202
组别 例数 术中输血治疗 手术时手术室内最多人数 阴道断端缝线种类 引流管留置位置
<8人 ≥8人 抗菌倒刺缝线 普通微荞线 盆腔 上腹部+盆腔
感染组 55 4(7.3) 54(98.2) 1(1.8) 45(81.8) 10(18.2) 8(14.6) 46(83.6) 1(1.8)
非感染组 179 10(5.6) 165(92.2) 14(7.8) 109(60.9) 70(39.1) 57(31.8) 120(67.0) 2(1.2)
χ2   0.02b 1.63b 8.19 a
P   0.892 0.202 0.004 0.042
组别 例数 使用引流管 引流管引出位置c 引流管留置时间
经腹部 经阴道 经腹部+阴道 未插管 1~3 d 4~7 d ≥8 d
感染组 55 47(85.5) 15(31.9) 31(66.0) 1(2.1) 8(14.5) 23(41.8) 19(34.6) 5(9.1)
非感染组 179 122(67.0) 43(35.2) 77(63.1) 2(1.6) 57(31.8) 39(21.9) 62(34.6) 21(11.7)
χ2   6.28 <0.01 11.17
P   0.012 0.953 0.011
表3 感染组与非感染组妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后相关资料比较[例数(%)]
表4 妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后感染影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果
[1]
Wang Q, Cao M, Tao H, et al. Evidence-based guideline for the prevention and management of perioperative infection [J]. J Evid Based Med, 2023, 16(1): 50-67. DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12514.
[2]
孔北华,马丁,段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 10版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2024: 219-295.
[3]
中华人民共和国卫生部. 医院感染诊断标准(试行)[J]. 中华医学杂志2001, 81(5): 314-320. DOI: 10.3760/j:issn:0376-2491.2001.05.027.
[4]
Klein A, Chudamani C, Wieser A, et al. Surgical site infections after sarcoma resections in the peripelvic region: do we need perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis?[J]. Front Oncol, 2024, 14: 1467694. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1467694.
[5]
Sai N. Effect of cefazolin sodium on perioperative prophylactic anti-infection in patients undergoing gynecological surgery [J]. Adv Emerg Med, 2021, 10(1): 11. DOI: 10.18686/aem.v10i1.184.
[6]
Szymankiewicz M, Dziobek K, Sznajdorwska M, et al. An analysis of the influence of infection on overall survival rates, following modified posterior pelvic exenteration for advanced ovarian cancer [J]. Ginekol Pol, 2018, 89(11): 618-626. DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2018.0106.
[7]
Zhou Y, Zhang T. Trends in bacterial resistance among perioperative infections in patients with primary ovarian cancer: a retrospective 20-year study at an affiliated hospital in South China [J]. J Int Med Res, 2020, 48(6): 300060520928780. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520928780.
[8]
Iyer R, Gentry-Maharaj A, Nordin A, et al. Predictors of complications in gynaecological oncological surgery: a prospective multicentre study (UKGOSOC-UK gynaecological oncology surgical outcomes and complications)[J]. Br J Cancer, 2015, 112(3): 475-484. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.630.
[9]
Szymankiewicz M, Dziobek K, Sznajdorwska M, et al. An analysis of the influence of infection on overall survival rates, following modified posterior pelvic exenteration for advanced ovarian cancer [J]. Ginekol Pol, 2018, 89(11): 618-626. DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2018.0106.
[10]
Steiner HL, Strand EA. Surgical-site infection in gynecologic surgery: pathophysiology and prevention [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 217(2): 121-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.014.
[11]
O′Donnell RL, Angelopoulos G, Beirne JP, et al. Impact of surgical site infection (SSI) following gynaecological cancer surgery in the UK: a trainee-led multicentre audit and service evaluation [J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(1): e024853. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024853.
[12]
Nayan A, Sarang B, Khajanchi M, et al. Exploring the perioperative infection control practices & incidence of surgical site infections in rural India [J]. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 2023, 12(1): 65. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-023-01258-4.
[13]
Seidelman JL, Mantyh CR, Anderson DJ. Surgical site infection prevention: a review [J]. JAMA, 2023, 329(3): 244-252. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.24075.
[14]
Pellegrini JE, Toledo P, Soper DE, et al. Consensus bundle on prevention of surgical site infections after major gynecologic surgery[J]. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs, 2017, 46(1): 100-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2016.10.003.
[15]
ACOG practice bulletin No.195: prevention of infection after gynecologic procedures[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 131(6): e172-e189. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002670.
[16]
孟菲,范丽娟,程晨晨,等. 妇科恶性肿瘤围术期手术部位感染影响因素分析[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2025, 41(10): 1018-1021. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2025100112.
[17]
Wall CJ, de Steiger RN, Vertullo CJ, et al. ASA class is a stronger predictor of early revision risk following primary total knee arthroplasty than BMI[J]. JB JS Open Access, 2025, 10(1): e24.00064. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00064.
[18]
王新勇,王国倩,李万斌,等. 妇科恶性肿瘤术后盆腔感染的危险因素及病原菌分布和耐药性分析[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志2019, 14(7): 822-825, 829. DOI: 10.13350/j.cjpb.190717.
[19]
钱伟,徐敬云,陈珊. 妇科肿瘤患者术后盆腔感染情况调查、病原菌分布及其危险因素分析[J]. 中国微生态学杂志2018, 30(8): 936-939. DOI: 10.13381/j.cnki.cjm.201808015.
[20]
杨帆. 《抗菌药物临床应用指导原则(2015年版)》解读[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志2016, 9(5): 390-393. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2016.05.003.
[1] 张琳, 张师前. 《老年卵巢癌规范化手术治疗中国专家共识(2024年版)》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(06): 605-610.
[2] 魏艺, 李欣, 凌秀凤, 赵纯. 改良自然周期和来曲唑诱导排卵周期中不同黄体支持方案对高龄及非高龄女性妊娠结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(05): 568-579.
[3] 范舒舒, 李玉凤, 林莉, 龙梅, 汪成, 何金娜. 血清25-羟维生素D水平对体外受精-胚胎移植助孕患者妊娠结局的影响及其与外周血和卵泡液淋巴细胞亚群相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(05): 580-589.
[4] 何瑾, 周圣涛. 年轻早期子宫内膜癌患者保留生育功能治疗评估与临床思考[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(05): 495-501.
[5] 薛绍龙, 杨博文, 郄明蓉. 《老年子宫内膜癌手术治疗中国专家共识(2024年版)》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(05): 508-515.
[6] 刘俊希, 吴瑾. 《欧洲内分泌学会指南:特纳综合征女童与妇女护理》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(05): 516-524.
[7] 沈丹华. 子宫内膜息肉的病理诊断与恶变研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(04): 375-379.
[8] 赵颖, 尹晓宇, 步华磊. 卵巢癌的分子诊疗临床应用现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(04): 380-385.
[9] 何玥, 吴玉梅. 《老年宫颈癌规范化诊疗中国专家共识(2024年版)》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(04): 395-402.
[10] 张芳芳, 王晶, 苗润琴. 乳腺实性乳头状癌的超声表现与病理学特征研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(04): 460-465.
[11] 徐宁, 夏丹萍, 李元宏. 子宫囊性腺肌瘤自发破裂患者1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(04): 466-474.
[12] 王秋毅, 黄薇. 妇科恶性肿瘤年轻患者生育力保存的临床实践与挑战[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(03): 266-270.
[13] 曹司雨, 赵成钰, 李金科. 交界性和恶性卵巢肿瘤育龄患者保留生育功能的相关思考[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(03): 271-277.
[14] 叶子悟, 周燕, 祖木来提·艾尔肯, 刘娜, 廖贵清, 邱小玲, 周震, 努尔比亚·阿不都西库. 新疆喀什市3 ~ 5岁儿童乳牙龋纵向变化分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 393-399.
[15] 许月芳, 杨林森, 黎春彤. 外科术后感染使用利奈唑胺致血小板减少症的高危因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 682-684.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?