切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (04) : 460 -465. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2025.04.012

论著

乳腺实性乳头状癌的超声表现与病理学特征研究
张芳芳1, 王晶2,(), 苗润琴1   
  1. 1山西省肿瘤医院/中国医学科学院肿瘤医院山西医院/山西医科大学附属肿瘤医院超声科,太原 030013
    2山西省肿瘤医院/中国医学科学院肿瘤医院山西医院/山西医科大学附属肿瘤医院病理科,太原 030013
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-05 修回日期:2025-07-17 出版日期:2025-08-01
  • 通信作者: 王晶

Analysis of ultrasound imaging and pathological features of breast solid papillary carcinoma

Fangfang Zhang1, Jing Wang2,(), Runqin Miao1   

  1. 1Department of Ultrasound, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030013, Shanxi Province, China
    2Department of Pathology, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030013, Shanxi Province, China
  • Received:2025-03-05 Revised:2025-07-17 Published:2025-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jing Wang
引用本文:

张芳芳, 王晶, 苗润琴. 乳腺实性乳头状癌的超声表现与病理学特征研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(04): 460-465.

Fangfang Zhang, Jing Wang, Runqin Miao. Analysis of ultrasound imaging and pathological features of breast solid papillary carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2025, 21(04): 460-465.

目的

探讨乳腺实性乳头状癌(SPC)的乳腺超声检查结果及组织病理学结果。

方法

选择2014年1月至2022年5月在山西省肿瘤医院进行手术治疗并经手术切除组织病理学检查确诊的81例乳腺SPC患者为研究对象。根据患者病理学分型,将其分为原位型组(n=34)与伴浸润型组(n=47)。采用回顾性分析方法收集2组患者的病变位置、发病年龄、首发症状、乳腺超声检查结果及组织病理学检测结果,并采用χ2检验、连续性校正χ2检验、Fisher确切概率法进行统计学分析。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。

结果

①本研究乳腺SPC患者发病年龄较大,>60岁者为56例(69.1%),61例(75.3%)首发症状为扪及乳腺肿块。2组患者病变位置、发病年龄、首发症状构成比分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②对这81例患者的乳腺超声检查结果显示,SPC肿块多表现为单发(65例,80.2%),低回声(72例,88.9%),形态不规则(50例,61.7%),边界清晰(48例,59.3%),平行位生长(68例,84%),不伴钙化(75例,92.6%),后方回声无变化(67例,82.7%),Adler血流分级为Ⅱ~Ⅲ级(49例,60.5%),淋巴结无转移(80例,98.8%),不伴导管扩张(61例,75.3%)。原位型组与伴浸润型组患者上述指标分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。伴浸润型组患者中,被乳腺超声辅助诊断为乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)4类者占比为89.4%(42/47),显著高于原位型组的67.6%(23/34),并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.87,P=0.015)。③这81例患者的手术切除组织免疫组化结果显示,SPC细胞雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)阳性率均为100.0%(81/81),P63阳性率为39.5%(32/81),Syn、CgA阳性率分别为63.0%(51/81)与51.8%(42/81)。原位型组患者P63阳性率显著高于伴浸润型组,并且差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),而2组患者Syn、CgA阳性率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

乳腺SPC患者的乳腺超声检查结果具有一定特征,其乳腺超声检查结果与组织病理学检查的SPC亚型密切相关。乳腺SPC细胞P63表达,有助于临床对原位型与伴浸润型乳腺SPC患者的区分。

Objective

To explore the breast ultrasound examination and histopathological findings of breast solid papillary carcinoma (SPC).

Methods

A total of 81 patients with breast SPC who underwent surgical treatment at Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital from January 2014 to May 2022 and were confirmed by pathological examination of surgically resected tissues were selected as the research subjects. According to pathological subtypes, they were divided into in situ group (n=34) and invasive group (n=47). Retrospective analysis methods were used to collect lesion location, onset age, initial symptoms, breast ultrasound results, and pathological results of the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test, continuity correction chi-square test, or Fisher′s exact probability method. This study followed the requirements of the 2013 revised World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

① Patients with breast SPC were significantly older, with 56 cases (69.1%) aged ≥60 years. The first symptom of 61 cases (75.3%) was a palpable breast mass.There were no statistically significant differences in lesion location, onset age, and initial symptom composition between two groups (P>0.05). ② The results of breast ultrasound examination of these 81 patients showed SPC masses predominantly exhibited a single occurrence (65 cases, 80.2%), hypoechoic characteristics (72 cases, 88.9%), irregular morphology (50 cases, 61.7%), well-defined borders (48 cases, 59.3%), parallel growth orientation (68 cases, 84%), absence of calcification (75 cases, 92.6%), unchanged posterior echo (67 cases, 82.7%), Adler blood flow grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ (49 cases, 60.5%), no lymph node metastasis (80 cases, 98.8%), and no ductal ectasia (61 cases, 75.3%). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between in situ and invasive groups regarding these parameters (all P>0.05). In the invasive group, 89.4% (42/47) of those diagnosed with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 by breast ultrasound were significantly higher than 67.6% (23/34) in the in situ group (χ2=5.87, P=0.015). ③The immunohistochemical results of surgically resected tissues from 81 patients showed that the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive rates of SPC cells were 100.0% (81/81), the P63 positive rate was 39.5% (32/81), and the Syn and CgA positive rates were 63.0% (51/81) and 51.8% (42/81), respectively. The in situ group exhibited significantly higher P63 positive rate than the invasive group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in Syn and CgA positive rates (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The breast ultrasound examination results of patients with breast SPC have certain characteristics and are closely correlated with the SPC subtypes detected by histopathological examination. The expression of P63 in breast SPC cells is helpful for clinical differentiation of patients with in situ and invasive breast SPC.

表1 2组乳腺SPC患者一般临床资料比较[例数(%)]
图1 本研究不同类型乳腺SPC患者的病变超声图像[图1A:1例BI-RADS 3类原位型SPC患者(女性,62岁)的单发导管内病变超声图像,可见病变呈囊实性,边界清晰,实性部分回声均匀,内见Ⅰ级血流信号(红色箭头所示);图1B:1例BI-RADS 4A类原位型SPC患者(女性,59岁)的单发导管内病变超声图像,可见病变呈实性,形态不规则,边界清晰,实性部分回声均匀(红色箭头所示);图1C:1例BI-RADS 4B类伴浸润型SPC患者(女性,71岁)的实性肿块超声图像,可见低回声占位,边界不清晰,形态不规则,内回声不均,见Ⅱ级血流信号(红色箭头所示)]注:SPC为实性乳头状癌。BI-RADS为乳腺影像报告和数据系统
表2 原位型组与伴浸润型组乳腺SPC患者的乳腺超声结果比较[例数(%)]
图2 原位型乳腺SPC患者SPC细胞P63、Syn免疫组化染色图[图2A:原位型SPC(女性,67岁)P63免疫组化染色图,提示肌上皮存在(高倍);图2B:原位型SPC(女性,59岁)Syn免疫组化染色图,提示Syn呈阳性(高倍)](EnVision二步法染色)注:SPC为实性乳头状癌
表3 原位型组与伴浸润型组SPC患者免疫组化结果比较[例数(%)]
[1]
Jadhav T, Prasad SS, Guleria B, et al. Solid papillary carcinoma of the breast[J]. Autops Case Rep, 2022, 12: e2021352. DOI: 10.4322/acr.2021.352. eCollection 2022.
[2]
Spak DA, Plaxco JS, Santiago L, et al. BI-RADS® fifth edition: a summary of changes[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2017, 98(3): 179-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.01.001.
[3]
Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1990, 16(6): 553-559. DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(90)90020-d.
[4]
李玉佳,黄备建,夏罕生,等. 乳腺实性乳头状癌的超声表现及其病理学相关性研究[J]. 肿瘤影像学2023, 32(6): 500-505. DOI: 10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2023.06.003.
[5]
张小鹰,王浩,韩靖,等. 乳腺实性乳头状癌中MUC系列的表达及意义[J]. 诊断病理学杂志2022, 29(5): 407-411. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn1007-8096.2002.05.005.
[6]
叶欣,黄建. 乳腺乳头状癌的临床病理及影像学特征分析[J]. 浙江医学2024, 46(8): 814-819. DOI: 10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2024.46.8.2023-2349.
[7]
Rehman B, Mumtaz A, Sajjad B, et al. Papillary carcinoma of breast: clinicopathological characteristics, management, and survival[J]. Int J Breast Cancer, 2022, 2022: 5427837. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5427837.
[8]
刘强. 男性乳腺包裹性乳头状癌伴灶状浸润多模态超声表现1例[J]. 中国超声医学杂志2024, 40(1): 95. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2024.01.029.
[9]
韩玥,王艺璇,唐瑞雪,等. 男性乳腺癌并一侧乳腺囊内乳头状癌超声表现1例并文献复习[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志2021, 32(8): 599-601. DOI: 10.12117/jccmi.2021.08.017.
[10]
余方芳,倪贤伟,杨琰. 乳头状癌的多模态超声表现[J]. 中国超声医学杂志2020, 36(5): 409-412. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn:1002-0101.2020.05.008.
[11]
巩海燕,胡菊萍,周文斌,等. 超声在鉴别乳腺实性乳头状癌和乳腺导管内乳头状瘤中的应用[J]. 肿瘤影像学2021, 30(4): 283-287. DOI: 10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2021.04.009.
[12]
张悦,胡娜,马林晓曦,等. 乳腺实性乳头状癌超声影像学研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志2021, 30(2): 132-137. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131148-20200711-00555.
[13]
贺慧杰,赵瑞刚,都吉雅,等. 乳腺实性乳头状癌的病理学分析[J]. 临床与病理杂志2020, 40(8): 2215-2219. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2020.08.047.
[14]
张冲冲,刘健,陈鹏飞,等. 乳腺实性乳头状癌78例临床病理特征[J]. 临床与实验病理学杂志2021, 37(7): 780-784. DOI: 10.13315/j.cnki.cjcep.2021.07.004.
[1] 赵诗迪, 杨姣, 周妍, 范园, 杨谨. CDK4/6抑制剂在激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌一线治疗中的挑战及进展后策略[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 257-266.
[2] 蒋树云, 马志军, 张旭, 陈棋帅, 耿智华贞. R-spondin 2在乳腺癌中的表达及其对SKBR-3细胞生长转移能力的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 267-274.
[3] 陈庆秋, 钟玲, 张婷, 张孔涌, 桂余, 齐晓伟, 任林. IGF2BP2/CCNB2轴促进三阴性乳腺癌进展的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 287-295.
[4] 邹莉, 夏羽, 陈杰. 乳腺浸润性小叶癌的治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 296-301.
[5] 柴松山, 周晓宇, 高明阳, 韩世新. 乳腺癌皮肤转移误诊为头部疖肿一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 305-307.
[6] 汪秀静, 董梦婷, 盛佳钰, 江科. CDK4/6抑制剂致乳腺癌患者白癜风样皮损一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 311-313.
[7] 段炼, 王燕, 李靖若. 乳腺转移性黑色素瘤伴全身多发转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 314-316.
[8] 蓝苑溶, 吕青, 谭秋雯. 乳腺癌孤立性脉络膜转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 317-319.
[9] 孙圣梅, 习一清, 安宁. 人表皮生长因子受体2阳性型乳腺癌新辅助治疗响应的基因预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 332-339.
[10] 阮希伦, 单臻, 范远键, 林颖, 王深明, 龙健婷, 徐向东. 一项妊娠相关性乳腺癌病理学特征、治疗方案及预后信息的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 340-344.
[11] 王达, 朱建敏. 血小板/淋巴细胞计数比值对乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的预测效能[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 650-653.
[12] 马超, 王传嘉, 张武坊. 经腋窝入路单孔腔镜保乳术与传统开放手术治疗早期乳腺癌的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 674-677.
[13] 孟庆杰, 印玉龙, 韩晓刚, 张浩萌, 江思源, 刘向华, 吕勇刚, 刘曌宇. 保留皮肤乳房切除+乳腺重建术治疗早期乳腺癌的近期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 646-649.
[14] 刘小娜, 史博慧, 马晓霞, 陈瑶, 郝娜. 乳腺癌不同手术方式对术后并发症及康复影响的对比观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 551-554.
[15] 郭雯, 任谊, 魏庆忠. 改良VSD装置在乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝引流中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 555-558.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?