切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04) : 476 -483. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.04.014

论著

复发性流产孕妇早孕期血栓标志物筛查及干预
李雪, 鲁锦, 张弘()   
  1. 苏州大学附属第二医院妇产科,苏州 215004
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-25 修回日期:2022-07-10 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 张弘

Screening and treatment of thrombus markers of pregnant women in first trimester with recurrent spontaneous abortion

Xue Li, Jin Lu, Hong Zhang()   

  1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215004, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2022-01-25 Revised:2022-07-10 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Hong Zhang
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81873835)
引用本文:

李雪, 鲁锦, 张弘. 复发性流产孕妇早孕期血栓标志物筛查及干预[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 476-483.

Xue Li, Jin Lu, Hong Zhang. Screening and treatment of thrombus markers of pregnant women in first trimester with recurrent spontaneous abortion[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(04): 476-483.

目的

探讨复发性流产(RSA)后再次妊娠早孕期孕妇血栓标志物,并评估低分子肝素(LMWH)干预对血栓标志物水平异常RSA孕妇妊娠结局的影响。

方法

选择2018年1月至2019年10月在苏州大学附属第二医院妇产科就诊的174例RSA早孕期孕妇(孕龄为7~10孕周)为研究对象,并纳入研究组。将同期在本院就诊并定期进行产前检查的78例健康孕妇纳入对照组。研究组174例孕妇中,血栓5项标志物[血栓弹力图(TEG)、抗凝血酶(AT)-Ⅲ、同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)、血小板最大聚集率(MAR)、D-二聚体(DD)]任意一项升高为139例,根据是否采取LMWH干预治疗,将其分为干预亚组(n=91,采取LMWH干预治疗措施)和未干预亚组(n=48,未采取LMWH干预治疗措施)。采用回顾性分析法,对研究组与对照组孕妇年龄、人体质量指数(BMI)和孕龄等一般临床资料进行分析,并对其血栓5项标志物水平进行比较。绘制Hcy、TEG最大振幅(MA)值和MAR诊断RSA孕妇血栓前状态(PTS)受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并计算ROC曲线下面积(ROC-AUC),根据约登指数最大原则,确定Hcy、MA值和MAR诊断RSA孕妇PTS的最佳临界值,并计算其诊断PTS的敏感度、特异度。本研究遵循的程序符合苏州大学附属第二医院伦理委员会规定,并获得该伦理委员会批准(审批文号:JD-LK-2018-030-03),与所有参与本研究的受试者签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①研究组与对照组孕妇年龄、BMI及孕龄比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②研究组和对照组孕妇MA值、Hcy和MAR分别比较[(65.3±5.4) mm vs (62.3±5.2) mm、(8.3±3.2) g/L vs (7.4±1.9) g/L及(73.8±7.7)% vs (69.9±9.3)%],差异均有统计学意义(t=5.135、3.512、4.724,P=0.036、0.012、0.014)。③Hcy、MA值和MAR诊断RSA孕妇PTS的ROC-AUC分别为0.681(95%CI:0.611~0.750,P<0.001),0.712(95%CI:0.651~0.773,P<0.001),0.877(95%CI:0.838~0.916,P<0.001)。根据约登指数最大原则,Hcy、MA值和MAR诊断RSA孕妇PTS的最佳临界值分别为7.05 g/L、59.1 mm、70.5%,并且诊断RSA孕妇PTS的敏感度分别为73.3%、80.1%及70.1%,特异度分别为65.2%、55.0%、92.1%。④干预亚组、未干预亚组和对照组孕妇活产率、流产率、妊娠随访率、剖宫产率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。⑤随访期内干预亚组孕妇无一例出现血小板减少、严重变态反应及肝、肾功能受损等情况。

结论

Hcy、MA值、MAR血栓3项标志物,对RSA孕妇的PTS诊断具有一定预警作用。建议对血栓标志物水平异常的RSA患者,应及时采取LMWH治疗措施,对于改善其妊娠结局有一定作用。

Objective

To investigate thrombus markers of pregnant women in first trimester with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA), and to evaluate treatment effects of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on pregnancy outcomes of those with abnormal thrombus markers.

Methods

A total of 174 pregnant women in first trimester with RSA history who were admitted into the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2018 to October 2019 were selected into this study (study group). Meanwhile 78 healthy pregnant women in first trimester who underwent prenatal examination in the same hospital were included into control group. Of the 174 pregnant women in study group, 139 cases whose levels of any one in 5 indexes of thrombotic markers [thromboelastography (TEG), antithrombin (AT)-Ⅲ, homocysteine (Hcy), maximum platelet aggregation rate (MAR), and D-dimer (DD)] increased remarkably were divided into intervention subgroup (n=91, treated by LMWH) and non-intervention subgroup (n=48, treated without LMWH) according to whether by LMWH or not. The general clinical data, such as age, body mass index (BMI) and gestational age between study group and control group were retrospectively analyzed, and thrombus markers were compared. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of different indexes (Hcy, MA of TEG and MAR) to diagnose prethrombotic state (PTS) of pregnant women were drawn, and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. According to principle of maximum Youden index, the best critical values of different indexes for diagnosing RSA pregnant women with PTS were determined. The procedure followed in this study met the standards formulated by the Ethics Review Committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and has been approved by it (Approval No. JD-LK-2018-030-03). Informed consent was obtained from each participate.

Results

① There were no significant differences in age, BMI and gestational age between study group and control group (P>0.05). ②There were significant difference in MA of TEG value [(65.3±5.4) mm vs (62.3±5.2) mm], Hcy [(8.3±3.2) g/L vs (7.4±1.9) g/L], and MAR [(73.8±7.7)% vs (69.9±9.3)%] between study group and control group (t=5.135, 3.512, 4.724; P=0.036, 0.012, 0.014). ③The AUC of Hcy, MA of TEG value and MAR in diagnosing PTS of RSA gravidae were 0.681 (95%CI: 0.611-0.750, P<0.001), 0.712 (95%CI: 0.651-0.773, P<0.001), 0.877 (95%CI: 0.838-0.916, P<0.001), respectively. According to the principle of maximum Youden index, the best critical value of Hcy, MA of TEG value and MAR in diagnosing RSA pregnant women with PTS were 7.05 g/L, 59.1 mm, and 70.5%, and the sensitivities were 73.3%, 80.1% and 70.1%, and specificities were 65.2%, 55.0%, and 92.1%, respectively. ④There were significant differences in live birth rate, abortion rate, pregnancy follow-up rate and cesarean section rate among intervention group, non-intervention group and control group (P<0.05). ⑤ None of pregnant women in intervention subgroup showed thrombocytopenia, severe allergic reactions, or impaired liver or kidney function during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Three thrombotic markers, Hcy, MA of TEG value, and MAR, have early warning effects on the diagnosis of PTS of RSA pregnant women. The promotion of LMWH therapy is recommended for RSA re-pregnancy patients with abnormal levels of thrombotic markers, which may improve their pregnancy outcomes.

表1 2组孕妇一般临床资料比较(±s)
表2 研究组和对照组孕妇血栓标志物水平比较
表3 各项血栓标志物诊断RSA孕妇PTS的ROC曲线分析
图1 各项血栓标志物诊断RSA孕妇PTS的ROC曲线图注:MAR为血小板最大聚集率,MA为最大振幅,Hcy为同型半胱氨酸,RSA为复发性流产,PTS为血栓前状态,ROC曲线为受试者工作特征曲线
表4 干预亚组、未干预亚组与对照组孕妇妊娠结局比较
表5 干预亚组、未干预亚组与对照组孕妇妊娠并发症比较[例数(%)]
[1]
谢幸,孔北华,段涛.妇产科学[M].9版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:72-73.
[2]
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion[J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 99(1): 63. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.023.
[3]
Wang Y, Lin X, Wu Q, et al. Thrombophilia markers in patients with recurrent early miscarriage[J]. Clin Lab, 2015, 61(11): 1787-1794. DOI: 10.7754/clin.lab.2015.150603.
[4]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组.复发性流产诊治的专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志2016, 51(1): 3-9.
[5]
Kuon RJ, Wallwiener LM, Germeyer A, et al. Establishment of a standardized immunological diagnostic procedure in RM patients[J]. J Reprod Immunol, 2012, 94(1): 55.
[6]
王曌华,张建平.血栓前状态与复发性流产及抗凝治疗[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志2013, 29(2): 102-106.
[7]
Lu X, Liu Z, Zhang X, et al. Prothrombotic state of patients with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2015, 131(2): 161-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.049.
[8]
Kumar N, Ahluwalia J, Das R, et al. Inherited thrombophilia profile in patients with recurrent miscarriages: experience from a tertiary care center in north India[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2015, 58(6): 514-517. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.6.514.
[9]
Chapin JC, Hajjar KA. Fibrinolysis and the control of blood coagulation[J]. Blood Rev, 2015, 29(1): 17-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2014.09.003.
[10]
刘伟靓,姚丽,曹士红,等. 复发性自然流产患者血栓标志物及其诊断界限值的研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科2017, 9(11): 24-27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020.2017.11.06.
[11]
Wang P, Yang H, Wang G, et al. Predictive value of thromboelastography parameters combined with antithrombin Ⅲ and D-dimer in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 2019, 82(4): e13165. DOI: 10.1111/aji.13165.
[12]
Chandler WL. The human fibrinolytic system[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 1996, 24(1): 27-45. DOI: 10.1016/1040-8428(96)00206-5.
[13]
Mete UU, Bayoǧlu TY, Balik G, et al. Could platelet distribution width be a predictive marker for unexplained recurrent miscarriage?[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2014, 290(2): 233-236. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3192-x.
[14]
Wang M, Hu Z, Cheng QX, et al. The ability of thromboelastography parameters to predict severe pre-eclampsia when measured during early pregnancy[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2019, 145(2): 170-175. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12785.
[15]
Asanidze E, Kristesashvili J, Andguladze S. Correlation between levels of homocysteine, anti-müllerian hormone and insulin resistance in pcos patients with recurrent miscarriage[J]. Georgian Med News, 2019, 290: 25-29.
[16]
Diao J, Luo L, Li J, et al. Maternal homocysteine and folate levels and risk of recurrent spontaneous abortion: a Meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2020. DOI: 10.1111/jog.14500.[published online ahead of print September 2020]
[17]
Nowak I, Bylińska A, Wilczyńska K, et al. The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase c.c.677 C>T and c.c.1298 A>C polymorphisms in reproductive failures: experience from an RSA and RIF study on a Polish population[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(10): e0186022. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186022.
[18]
何健,罗玲,陈智林,等. 血清同型半胱氨酸水平与反复性自然流产关系的探讨[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志2013, 23(15): 3095-3097.
[19]
低分子肝素防治自然流产中国专家共识编写组. 低分子肝素防治自然流产中国专家共识[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志2018, 27(4): 339-344. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2916.2018.09.001.
[20]
林建华,张建平,贺晶,低分子肝素在产科中的应用[J].现代妇产科进展200716(6):401-409.
[21]
Kang X, Wang T, He L, et al. Effect of low-dose aspirin on midluteal phase uterine artery blood flow in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2016, 35(12): 2583-2587. DOI: 10.7863/ultra.16.01020.
[22]
Fawzy M, Shokeir T, El-Tatongy M, et al. Treatment options and pregnancy outcome in women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage: a randomized placebo-controlled study[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2008, 278(1): 33-38. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-007-0527-x.
[23]
Elmahashi MO, Elbareg AM, Essadi FM, et al. Low dose aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of pregnant Libyan women with recurrent miscarriage[J]. BMC Res Notes, 2014, 7: 23. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-23.
[24]
Gris JC, Chauleur C, Faillie JL, et al. Enoxaparin for the secondary prevention of placental vascular complications in women with abruptio placentae. The pilot randomised controlled NOH-AP trial[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2010, 104(4): 771-779. DOI: 10.1160/TH10-03-0167.
[1] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] 李文琳, 羊玲, 邢凯慧, 陈彩华, 钟丽花, 张娅琴, 张薇. 脐动脉血血气分析联合振幅整合脑电图对新生儿窒息脑损伤的早期诊断价值分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 550-558.
[3] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[4] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[5] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[6] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[7] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[8] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[9] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[10] 邢海东, 胡满意, 许贺松, 李强. CT纹理特征对肺磨玻璃结节生长倾向的预测意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 406-408.
[11] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[12] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[13] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[14] 刘雪云, 范颖, 姚爱军, 张胜苗, 吕亚妮, 张冰清, 张晓宇, 刘恒. 基于微信小程序的个体化、全程护理干预对孕妇孕期体重及分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
[15] 张丽姿, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的不良结局及远期影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
阅读次数
全文


摘要