切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04) : 468 -475. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.04.013

论著

激素敏感型原发性肾病综合征患儿激素治疗巩固维持阶段不同减量方案比较
曾舒涵, 庾楠楠, 应道静, 陈丽植, 容丽萍, 莫樱, 蒋小云()   
  1. 中山大学附属第一医院小儿肾脏风湿病中心,广州 510080
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-11 修回日期:2022-06-08 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 蒋小云

Comparison of different dosage reduction regimens in consolidation and maintenance stage of hormone therapy for children with primary steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Shuhan Zeng, Nannan Yu, Daojing Ying, Lizhi Chen, Liping Rong, Ying Mo, Xiaoyun Jiang()   

  1. Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Rheumatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2021-12-11 Revised:2022-06-08 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoyun Jiang
引用本文:

曾舒涵, 庾楠楠, 应道静, 陈丽植, 容丽萍, 莫樱, 蒋小云. 激素敏感型原发性肾病综合征患儿激素治疗巩固维持阶段不同减量方案比较[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 468-475.

Shuhan Zeng, Nannan Yu, Daojing Ying, Lizhi Chen, Liping Rong, Ying Mo, Xiaoyun Jiang. Comparison of different dosage reduction regimens in consolidation and maintenance stage of hormone therapy for children with primary steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(04): 468-475.

目的

探讨激素敏感型原发性肾病综合征(PNS)患儿激素治疗巩固维持阶段不同减量方案对疾病复发率的影响。

方法

选择2017年6月至2020年6月,在中山大学附属第一医院确诊的41例初治PNS患儿为研究对象,均对激素治疗敏感。根据激素治疗巩固维持阶段采用的不同减量方案,将其分为每日顿服组(n=22)和隔日顿服组(n=19)。本研究41例激素敏感型PNS患儿中,男性患儿为29例,女性为12例,男、女比例为2.4∶1,确诊时年龄为1.3~14.6岁。采取回顾性分析法对2组患儿一般临床资料、实验室检查结果进行分析。同时分析2组患儿PNS首次治疗复发时间、复发率、频复发率、加用免疫抑制剂治疗率,以及激素相关不良反应发生情况。本研究遵循的程序符合中山大学附属第一医院伦理委员会规定,通过该伦理委员会审查,并获得批准(审批文号:伦审〔2022〕334号)。

结果

①2组患儿发病年龄、性别构成比、PNS临床分型构成比比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②2组患儿初治时24 h尿蛋白定量、血清白蛋白、血清胆固醇、血清肌酐、估算的肾小球过滤率(eGFR)、免疫球蛋白(Ig)G、补体C3水平,以及足量激素疗程及变态反应性疾病占比、肾功能不全占比比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患儿初治时血清IgE水平比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=-2.153,P=0.031)。③本研究41例PNS患儿中,距初始治疗3、6、12个月时复发率分别为12.2%(5/41)、31.7%(13/41)、53.7%(22/41)。与隔日顿服组相比,距初始治疗时12个月内,每日顿服组患儿首次复发时间明显延长(χ2=4.973,P=0.026)。距初始治疗3、6个月时,每日顿服组患儿的复发率明显低于隔日顿服组,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);距初始治疗12个月时复发率,也低于隔日顿服组[40.9%(9/22) vs 68.4%(13/19)],但是2组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。这41例PNS患儿中,60.7%患儿复发有明确诱因(感染或激素减量/停药),对其采取控制感染和(或)激素加量/再次使用足量激素治疗后,尿蛋白检查结果均在4周内转阴。每日顿服组患儿激素相关性眼损害发生率高于隔日顿服组,但是差异无统计学意义(22.7% vs 5.3%,P=0.257)。

结论

激素敏感型PNS患儿预后良好,复发率高,巩固维持阶段采用每日顿服方案可延长复发时间,降低中期复发率。治疗期间需定期监测患儿眼压,早发现、早治疗糖皮质激素相关性眼损害。

Objective

To investigate the different dosage reduction regimens in consolidation and maintenance stage of hormone therapy for children with primary nephrotic syndrome (PNS).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 41 children who were diagnosed as PNS in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from June 2017 to June 2020. According to the different therapeutic regimens adopted in maintenance phase, the children were divided into alternate treatment group (n=19) and daily treatment group (n=22). The clinical data, laboratory examination results, the first relapsing course, recurrence rate, glucocorticoid-induced side effects and the proportion of requirement for immunosuppressive agents as well as participants who developed frequently relapsing or steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome were recorded. Forty-one children included 29 boys and 12 girls (ratio 2.4∶1), ranging from 1.3 to 14.6 years old. The procedure followed in this study met the standards formulated by the Ethics Review Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and has been approved by it (Approval No. [2022]334). Informed consent was obtained from each participant′s parents.

Results

①There were no significant differences in the age of onset, gender ratio and clinical phenotypes between two groups (P>0.05).②Except for immunoglobulin (Ig)E (χ2=-2.153, P=0.031), there were no significant differences between two groups in terms of 24h urinary protein, serum albumin, serum cholesterol, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), IgG, complement 3, remission induction therapy as well as the proportion of allergic diseases and renal insufficiency (P>0.05). ④The relapse rates at 3, 6 and 12 months from the initial treatment were 12.2% (5/41), 31.7% (13/41) and 53.7% (22/41), respectively. Compared with the alternate treatment group, the daily treatment group reduced the rate of relapse at 3 or 6 months (P<0.05) and increased the time to first relapse within a year from the initial treatment (χ2=4.973, P=0.026). Its relapse rate at 1 year from the initial treatment was still lower than that of alternate treatment group [40.9% (9/22) vs 68.4% (13/19)], without statistically significance (P>0.05). 60.7% of relapses were induced by infection, steroid reduction or withdrawal. All patients got remission within 4 weeks after infection control or the addition of steroid dosage. The incidence of eye damage caused by glucocorticoid in daily treatment group was higher than that in alternate treatment group (22.7% vs 5.3%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.257).

Conclusions

Children with PNS generally have a good prognosis despite the high relpase rate. The daily administration of steroid regimen to maintain remission for initial episode of PNS may decrease the time to first relapse and reduce the mid-term replase rate.

表1 2组激素敏感型PNS患儿一般临床资料比较
表2 2组激素敏感型PNS患儿初治时及治疗后相关临床指标比较
表3 2组激素敏感型PNS患儿复发及激素治疗相关不良反应比较
图1 2组激素敏感型PNS患儿距初始治疗12个月时无复发患儿生存曲线图注:PNS为原发性肾病综合征
表4 本研究与国内PNS患儿激素治疗巩固维持阶段治疗方案及复发率比较
[1]
Nephrotic syndrome in children: prediction of histopathology from clinical and laboratory characteristics at time of diagnosis. A report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children[J]. Kidney Int, 1978, 13(2): 159-165. DOI: 10.1038/ki.1978.23.
[2]
Beck L, Bomback AS, Choi MJ, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2013, 62(3): 403-441. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.06.002.
[3]
中华医学会儿科学分会肾脏学组. 儿童激素敏感、复发/依赖肾病综合征诊治循证指南(2016)[J].中华儿科杂志201755(10):729-734. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2017.10.003.
[4]
易玲,陈青,曾海江,等. 不同种类糖皮质激素治疗儿童原发性肾病综合征的疗效及不良反应研究[J].中国现代医生201957(35): 69-71,74.
[5]
李凤鸣.中华眼科学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2005: 230, 1583, 1772.
[6]
Trompeter RS, Lloyd BW, Hicks J, et al. Long-term outcome for children with minimal-change nephrotic syndrome[J]. Lancet, 1985, 1(8425): 368-370. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91387-x.
[7]
全国儿童常见肾脏病诊治现状调研工作组. 我国儿童激素敏感、复发/依赖肾病综合征诊疗现状的多中心研究[J]. 中华儿科杂志201452 (3): 194-200. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2014.03.007.
[8]
Banh TH, Hussain-Shamsy N, Patel V, et al. Ethnic differences in incidence and outcomes of childhood nephrotic syndrome[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016, 11(10): 1760-1768. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00380116.
[9]
中华医学会儿科学分会肾脏病学组,杨霁云,陈述枚,等. 小儿肾小球疾病的临床分类、诊断及治疗[J]. 中华儿科杂志2001, 39(12): 746-749. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2001.12.115.
[10]
中华医学会儿科学分会肾脏病学组,蒋小云,高岩,等. 儿童常见肾脏疾病诊治循证指南(一):激素敏感、复发/依赖肾病综合征诊治循证指南(试行)[J]. 中华儿科杂志2009, 47(3): 167-170. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2009.03.003.
[11]
付辉,李小亚,吴小磊,等. 泼尼松不同减量方案治疗肾病综合征的疗效观察[J].中国临床医生杂志2016, 44(3): 92-95. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-8552.2016.03.035.
[12]
Abdel-Hafez M, Shimada M, Lee PY, et al. Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and atopy: is there a common link?[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2009, 54(5): 945-953. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.03.019.
[13]
Özlü SG, Demircin G, Tökmeci N, et al. Long-term prognosis of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children[J]. Ren Fail, 2015, 37(4): 672-677. DOI: 10.3109/0886022X.2015.1010940.
[14]
沈定. 不同泼尼松减量方法对儿童肾病综合征疗效和复发率的影响[J].浙江医学2014, 36(11): 993-994.
[15]
赵篱陶,黄慈波. 糖皮质激素的合理使用[J].临床药物治疗杂志20108(1):23-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3384.2010.01.006.
[16]
赵芸,苏白鸽,肖慧捷,等. 原发肾病综合征患儿糖皮质激素治疗致眼科不良反应临床特点分析[J].北京大学学报(医学版)201749(5):794-797. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.05.009.
[17]
苗静,徐虹,沈茜,等. 原发性肾病综合征患儿糖皮质激素治疗致眼科不良反应分析[J].临床儿科杂志2013, 31(4): 335-338. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3606.2013.04.010.
[18]
张建江,谈文秀. 原发性肾病综合征患儿应用糖皮质激素致眼部不良反应的防治[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志202136(5):333-337. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20210130-00127.
[19]
李玉柳,刘翠华,张书锋,等. 原发性肾病综合征患儿应用糖皮质激素治疗所致眼损害的临床特点[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志201934(12):938-941. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2019.12.014.
[20]
申家泉,张士玺. 糖皮质激素性青光眼防治中的几个问题[J].眼科2011, 20(1): 17-20.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[5] 张钊, 骆成玉, 张树琦, 何平, 李旭斌. 不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.
[6] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[7] 高建新, 王啸飞, 于淼, 路夷平. 局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后行ISR术远切缘距离的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 539-543.
[8] 丁志翔, 于鹏, 段绍斌. 血浆BRAF基因检测对腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中行幽门淋巴结清扫的指导价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-573.
[9] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[10] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[11] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[12] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[13] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[14] 杭丽, 张耀辉, 孙文恺. 参菝抗瘤液对结直肠腺瘤性息肉术后肠道功能、炎症指标及复发情况的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 413-416.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要