切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 19 -24. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.01.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

宫颈内口成形术在完全性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入患者剖宫产术分娩中的应用
黄桂琼1, 王晓东1,(), 余海燕1, 周淑1   
  1. 1. 四川大学华西第二医院妇产科、出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室,成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-11 修回日期:2019-01-08 出版日期:2019-02-01
  • 通信作者: 王晓东

Cervical internal os plasty in cesarean section of pregnant women with complete placenta previa and placenta accreta: a new surgical technique

Guiqiong Huang1, Xiaodong Wang1,(), Haiyan Yu1, Shu Zhou1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2018-10-11 Revised:2019-01-08 Published:2019-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaodong Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Xiaodong, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province(2018SZ0265)
引用本文:

黄桂琼, 王晓东, 余海燕, 周淑. 宫颈内口成形术在完全性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入患者剖宫产术分娩中的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(01): 19-24.

Guiqiong Huang, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu, Shu Zhou. Cervical internal os plasty in cesarean section of pregnant women with complete placenta previa and placenta accreta: a new surgical technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(01): 19-24.

目的

探讨宫颈内口成形术治疗完全性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入孕妇剖宫产术分娩大出血的有效性和安全性。

方法

选择2012年1月至2018年5月,在四川大学华西第二医院确诊为完全性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入,并且在剖宫产术分娩中采用宫颈内口成形术进行止血的56例孕妇为研究对象,纳入研究组。按照随机数字表法,随机抽取同期在本院因完全性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入进行剖宫产术分娩,并且于术中采用其他缝合止血技术进行止血的60例孕妇纳入对照组。回顾性分析2组孕妇围手术期结局指标,其中2组孕妇产后大出血率、术中输血率、止血治疗有效率等比较,采用χ2检验;2组孕妇手术时间、术后住院时间及住院费用等比较,采用成组t检验。本研究遵循的程序符合四川大学华西第二医院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,并得到该委员会批准[审批文号:(2014)伦审批第(27)号]。

结果

①2组孕妇年龄、孕次、产次、孕龄及剖宫产术分娩史、既往宫腔操作史和急诊剖宫产术分娩者所占比例等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②研究组孕妇止血治疗有效率为92.9%(52/56),明显高于对照组的73.3%(44/60),2组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.773,P=0.003)。③研究组与对照组孕妇产后大出血率、术中输血率、手术时间、术后住院时间、住院费用分别为41.1%(23/56)与43.3%(26/60)、28.6%(16/56)与25.0%(15/60)、(66.7±22.5)min与(69.5±22.0)min、(4.6±1.1) d与(5.1±1.6) d、(2.09±0.09)万元与(2.22±0.11)万元,2组上述指标分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.062,P=0.805;χ2=0.194,P=0.661;t=0.661,P=0.510;t=1.852,P=0.067;t=0.935,P=0.356)。2组孕妇无一例发生手术及大出血相关并发症。

结论

采用宫颈内口成形术,对完全性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入孕妇剖宫产术分娩大出血进行止血治疗,安全、有效。因本研究仅为回顾性研究,该技术在临床推广应用价值,还需要大样本、多中心、随机对照研究结果证实。

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of cervical internal os plasty in treating hemorrhea during cesarean section of pregnant women with complete placenta previa and placenta accreta.

Methods

From January 2012 to May 2018, a total of 56 pregnant women who were diagnosed as complete placenta previa with placenta accreta in West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University and underwent cervical internal os plasty for hemostasis during cesarean section were selected as research subjects and included in study group. According to the random number table method, another 60 pregnant women who were delivered by cesarean section due to complete placenta previa with placenta accreta and received other suture hemostasis techniques during the same period in the same hospital were randomly selected and included in control group. The perioperative outcomes of two groups were retrospectively analyzed and compared. And chi-square test was used to compare postpartum hemorrhage rate, intraoperative blood transfusion rate and effective rate of hemostasis between two groups. Independent-samples t test was used to compare the operation duration, length of stay after operation and hospitalization expenses between two groups. The procedure of this study was consistent with ethical standard established by the committee of investigation in human beings of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University [Approval No. 2014(27)].

Results

①There were no significant differences between two groups in age, gravidity, parity, gestational age, and the proportion of cesarean section history, previous uterine cavity operation history and emergency cesarean section (P>0.05). ②The effective rate of hemostasis in study group was 92.9% (52/56), which was significantly higher than 73.3% (44/60) in control group, and the difference between two groups was statistically significant (χ2=8.773, P=0.003). ③The postpartum hemorrhage rate, intraoperative blood transfusion rate, operation duration, length of stay after operation and hospitalization expenses in study group were 41.1% (23/56), 28.6% (16/56), (66.7±22.5) min, (4.6±1.1) d and (2.09±0.09) × 104 yuan, respectively, and these five indexes were 43.3% (26/60), 25.0% (15/60), (69.5±22.0) min, (5.1±1.6) d and (2.22±0.11) × 104 yuan, respectively in control group, and all the differences between two groups were not statistically significant (χ2=0.062, P=0.805; χ2=0.194, P=0.661; t=0.661, P=0.510; t=1.852, P=0.067; t=0.935, P=0.356). No complications related to surgery or massive hemorrhage occurred in two groups.

Conclusions

Cervical internal os plasty is a safe and effective hemostatic technique in cesarean section for pregnant women with complete placenta previa and placenta accreta. As the sample size of this study is relatively small, whether this hemostatic technique is worthy of clinical application or not, it still needs to be confirmed by large-sample, multi-center and randomized controlled studies.

图1 宫颈内口成形术术中照片[图1A:暴露子宫下段胎盘附着的损伤薄弱区域出血面(蓝色箭头所示);图1B:组织钳钳夹位于薄弱区域下端的子宫下段环形肌纤维;图1C:采用可吸收缝线"8"字缝合子宫下段环形肌纤维和移位的子宫体纵行肌纤维末端]
表1 2组完全性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入孕妇一般临床资料比较
表2 2组完全性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入孕妇围手术期结局比较
[1]
Garmi G, Salim R. Epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and management of placenta accreta [J]. Obstet Gynecol Int, 2012, 2012: 873929.
[2]
Klar M, Michels KB. Cesarean section and placental disorders in subsequent pregnancies: a Meta-analysis [J]. J Perinat Med, 2014, 42(5): 571-583.
[3]
Gibbins KJ, Einerson BD, Varner MW, et al. Placenta previa and maternal hemorrhagic morbidity [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2018, 31(4): 494-499.
[4]
Cekmez Y, Ozkaya E, Öcal FD, et al. Experience with different techniques for the management of postpartum hemorrhage due to uterine atony: compression sutures, artery ligation and Bakri balloon [J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2015, 184(2): 399-402.
[5]
Huang G, Zhou R, Hu Y. A new suture technique for cesarean delivery complicated by hemorrhage in cases of placenta previa accreta [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2014, 124(3): 262-263.
[6]
邓黎,常青,徐惠成,等.宫颈提拉式缝合在前置胎盘剖宫产术宫颈管出血中应用效果观察[J].实用妇产科杂志,2014,30(4): 281-283.
[7]
Cho JH, Jun HS, Lee CN. Hemostatic suturing technique for uterine bleeding during cesarean delivery [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 96(1): 129-131.
[8]
Arab M, Ghavami B, Saraeian S, et al. Successful management of two cases of placenta accreta and a literature review: use of the B-Lynch suture and bilateral uterine artery ligation procedures [J]. Iran Red Crescent Med J, 2016, 18(4): e35006.
[9]
Palacios-Jaraquemada JM. Efficacy of surgical techniques to control obstetric hemorrhage: analysis of 539 cases [J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2011, 90(9): 1036-1042.
[10]
侯燕燕,林婧,顾玮.前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的临床特点和产前诊断 [J/CD] .中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2017,13(5): 524-531.
[11]
Silver RM, Barbour KD. Placenta accreta spectrum: accreta, increta, and percreta [J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 2015, 42(2): 381-402.
[12]
朱晓童,孔祥,郑英.介入治疗在前置胎盘合并胎盘植入剖宫产分娩中应用的研究进展 [J/CD] .中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2017,13(2): 240-243.
[13]
Hossain GA, Islam SM, Mahmood S, et al. Placenta previa and it′s relation with maternal age, gravidity and cesarean section [J]. Mymensingh Med J, 2004, 13(2): 143-148.
[14]
王娟,晋雅凌,李引弟.前置胎盘导致选择性剖宫产产妇大出血的影响因素分析 [J/CD] .中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2016,12(4): 442-445.
[1] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[2] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[3] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[4] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[5] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[7] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[8] 刘雪云, 范颖, 姚爱军, 张胜苗, 吕亚妮, 张冰清, 张晓宇, 刘恒. 基于微信小程序的个体化、全程护理干预对孕妇孕期体重及分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
[9] 陈颖, 曾万江. 病理组织学诊断在胎盘植入性疾病中的作用和意义[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 143-146.
[10] 赵先兰, 周艳. 胎盘植入性疾病出血血管介入治疗策略[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 147-150.
[11] 郭志荣, 马京梅. 胎盘植入性疾病的风险评估和治疗策略[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 151-154.
[12] 岳永飞, 朱利平, 王晓艳. 磁共振成像技术在预测胎盘植入性疾病患者剖宫产术中出血量的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 167-172.
[13] 王永, 李霞林, 杨蓉, 潘康妮, 余琳, 王伟伟, 孙雯, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入合并严重产后出血输血方案的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 173-179.
[14] 吴文诗, 魏宋荃, 李桂民, 郑晓芳, 孙雯, 陈敦金, 余琳. 胎盘植入性疾病患者行子宫部分切除术后再次妊娠的临床研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 180-186.
[15] 陆晓勤, 刘先保, 龙尚乾, 宋可欣, 邓艳红, 张春芳. 不同程度胎盘植入患者剖宫产的麻醉决策及母婴结局[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 187-192.
阅读次数
全文


摘要