Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05): 481 -485. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.05.001

Special Issue:

Editorial

Current research status of diagnosis and treatment of margin positive of residual lesions in uterine specimens after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Mengpei Zhang1, Rutie Yin1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2019-03-27 Revised:2019-08-17 Published:2019-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Rutie Yin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yin Rutie, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Project of Suitable Technology by Health and Family Planning Commission of Sichuan Province(17SYJS0063); Science and Technology Program for the Wellbeing of Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau(2014-HM01-00028-SF)

Common treatment methods for patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) include physical therapy and surgical treatment, and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP) is relatively widely used in surgical treatment of CIN. However, some CIN patients were found margin positive of residual lesions in uterine specimens by biopsy after LEEP treatment, and the rate of margin positive of CIN was 4.51%-23.40%. A large number of studies have confirmed that margin positive of CIN is associated with postoperative residual lesions in uterine specimens by biopsy and recurrence of CIN. Further treatment strategies of patients with margins positive of CIN after LEEP treatment, no consensus has been reached in domestic and foreign studies of this area. At present, it is considered that the follow-up treatment of patients with CIN who have residual lesions and margins positive of CIN after receiving LEEP treatment need comprehensive evaluation and appropriate measures, especially for patients with positive of CIN in internal and external margins. This article focuses on latest research progresses of high-risk factors and treatment strategies in patients with margins positive of CIN after LEEP treatment, in order to provide reference for standardized clinical diagnosis and treatment of CIN patients.

[1]
Senol T, Polat M, Ozkaya E, et al. Comparison of two step LEEP and cold conisation for cervical intraepithelial lesions to decrease positive surgical margins[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2016, 17(7): 3317-3320.
[2]
Lin J, Wu D, Li Z, et al. Residual lesions in uterine specimens after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with CIN[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2018, 298(4): 805-812.
[3]
Ayhan A, Tuncer HA, Reyhan NH, et al. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2016, 201(1): 1-6.
[4]
Fu Y, Chen C, Feng S, et al. Residual disease and risk factors in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and positive margins after initial conization[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2015, 11: 851-856.
[5]
Arbyn M, Redman CWE, Verdoodt F, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2017, 18(12): 1665-1679.
[6]
Sangkarat S, Ruengkhachorn I, Benjapibal M, et al. Long-term outcomes of a loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a high incidence country[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2014, 15(2): 1035-1039.
[7]
van Bogaert LJ. Involved LEEP excision margins as predictor of residual/recurrent disease in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women in a low-resource setting[J]. Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol, 2015, 37(2): 105-108.
[8]
Chang Y, Duan Y. Analysis of factors associated with recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedure[J]. Chin Med J, 2014, 94(47): 3751-3754.
[9]
Witt BL, Factor RE, Jarboe EA, et al. Negative loop electrosurgical cone biopsy finding following a biopsy diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: frequency and clinical significance[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2012, 136(10): 1259-1261.
[10]
Zhou W, Zhou Y, Liu J. Pathological analysis in 210 cases of CIN Ⅲ following LEEP and total hysterectomy[J]. Acta Acad Med Wannan, 2017, 36(1): 77-79.
[11]
Liss J, Alston M, Krull MB, et al. Predictors of positive margins at time of Loop electrosurgical excision procedure[J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2017, 21(1): 64-66.
[12]
Chen H, Liu X, Xu LN. Incisal margin condition after LEEP for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia patients and prognosis[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2016, 12(2): 1019-1021.
[13]
李雯茹. 高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变LEEP术后病理切缘阳性的处理[J]. 吉林医学,2015, 36(8): 1507-1508.
[14]
刘畅. 高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变锥切术后切缘阳性患者处理方式的Meta分析[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2018.
[15]
牛晓宇,冯余宽. 重度宫颈上皮内瘤变进行环状电切手术治疗后病灶残余和复发的高危因素[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2015, 46(2): 321-325.
[16]
冯力民,史小雨,李晶华. 宫颈锥切除术及其相关问题[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(5): 553-558.
[17]
Liu L, Chen LM, Tao X, et al. Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases[J]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 52(11): 751-756.
[18]
Noothong S, Inthasorn P, Warnnissorn M. Pathological discrepancy between colposcopic directed cervical biopsy and loop electrosurgical-excision procedures (LEEPs) in patients with biopsies proven high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 56(5): 628-631.
[19]
徐惠琴. 248例宫颈上皮内瘤变患者宫颈环形电切术后复发的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科,2016, 8(11): 47-51.
[20]
李柱南,吴丹,丁李,等. 宫颈上皮内瘤变宫颈环形电切术后2 098例标本切缘阳性的临床病理分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2012, 28(2): 150-152.
[21]
Nie XC, Shi YL, Cong JP, et al. Analysis of high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat, 2016, 23(4): 262-265.
[22]
Zhu MH, He Y, Baak JP, et al. Factors that influence persistence or recurrence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with positive margins after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a retrospective study[J]. BMC Cancer, 2015, 15(1): 744.
[23]
Zhang H, Zhang T, You Z, et al. Positive surgical margin, HPV persistence, and expression of both TPX2 and PD-L1 are associated with persistence/recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(12): e0142868.
[24]
Yildirim JG, Arabaci Z. Innovations in HPV vaccination and roles of nurses in cervical cancer prevention[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2014, 15(23): 10053-10056.
[25]
赖爱鸾. 宫颈锥切术后切缘呈阳性的临床处理建议[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(1): 20-23.
[26]
Houfflin Debarge V, Collinet P, Vinatier D, et al. Value of human papillomavirus testing after conization by loop electrosurgical excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2003, 90(3): 587-592.
[27]
廖庆梅,王红霞,王燕英. 宫颈上皮内瘤变患者宫颈环形电切术后切缘阳性的研究[J]. 中国医学创新,2013, 10(16): 118-119.
[28]
Demir F, Kimiloglu E, Igdem AA, et al. High risk HPV in situ hybridization, p16 INK 4A, and survivin expressions in cervical carcinomas and intraepithelial neoplasms: evaluation of prognostic factors[J]. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 2014, 35(6): 708-717.
[29]
Ruano Y, Torrents M, Ferrer FJ. Human papillomavirus combined with cytology and margin status identifies patients at risk for recurrence after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 2015, 36(3): 245-251.
[30]
王国华,吴芬英,蒋建峰. LEEP术后切缘阳性的高级别CIN绝经前患者病灶残留相关因素研究[J]. 浙江医学,2014, 36(12): 1056-1059.
[31]
龙馨,杨君,秦婷婷,等. 宫颈上皮内瘤变LEEP术后残留或复发相关因素分析[J]. 重庆医学,2016, 45(3): 372-374.
[32]
Jiang YM, Chen CX, Li L. Meta-analysis of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2016, 9: 3907-3915.
[33]
van Bogaert LJ. Histometry of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and LEEP excision margin in HIV-infected and uninfected women[J]. Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol, 2014, 36(4): 183-188.
[34]
Wu J, Jia Y, Luo M, et al. Analysis of residual/recurrent disease and its risk factors after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2016, 81(4): 296-301.
[35]
Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a Meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2007, 8(11): 985-993.
[36]
杨艳琪,付小萌,王志欣,等. 宫颈病变锥切术后病理切缘阳性患者的处理[J]. 中国癌症杂志,2010, 20(4): 295-298.
[37]
Soutter WP, de Barros Lopes A, Fletcher A, et al. Invasive cervical cancer after conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Lancet, 1997, 349(9057): 978-980.
[38]
向礼兵,蔡祎品,徐晓丽,等. 再次宫颈锥切术在处理残留或复发宫颈上皮内瘤变中的应用[J]. 中国癌症杂志,2013, 23(5): 370-374.
[39]
Liu L, Chen LM, Tao X, et al. Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases[J]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 52(11): 751-756.
[1] Ye Fang, Xiaohong Xie, Hui Luo. Application of quality control circle in improving prostate cancer detection rate by puncture biopsy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(07): 722-727.
[2] Jianhui Cao, Dong Xu, Bin Feng, Junbiao Zheng, Weiwei Huang. Application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in prostate cancer biopsy in patients with different prostate specific antigen levels[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(03): 307-312.
[3] Minrong Ma, Cong Li, Qin Zhou. Current research status of treatment of cervical cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 497-504.
[4] Changsheng Lin, Jun Zhan, Xue Xiao. Genetic testing and precision molecular targeted therapy in diagnosis and treatment of epithelial ovarian caner[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 505-510.
[5] Juan Gu, Qingqing Sun, Fangfang Hu, Yijuan Cao, Yujuan Qi. Clinical application of endometrial receptivity array to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[6] Wenrong Dai, Lijuan Zhao, Zhihui Li. Research progress of influence of extracellular vesicles on embryo implantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 616-620.
[7] Dongjie Zhou, Min Jiang, Hairui Fan, Lingling Gao, Xiang Kong, Dan Lu, Liping Wang. Current research progress on non-coding RNA in follicular development and maturation[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 387-393.
[8] Huizhu Chen, Yingkun Guo, Xinrong Wang, Gang Ning, Xijian Chen. Current research status on the " dualistic model" of epithelial ovarian cancer and its molecular biology[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 394-402.
[9] Chunying Han, Tingting Wang, Yanyan Li, Jinxia Piao. Current research status on predictors of lymphatic vascular invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 403-409.
[10] Jun Li, Jianyun Peng, Wanbing Qiu, Qianyi Dou, Fushun Pan, Jinyu Liang. Risk stratification of malignant thyroid nodules (guidelines): A comparative study of diagnostic efficacy of ACR TI-RADS versus C-TIRADS and consistency of guideline application by different physicians[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 401-407.
[11] Hongxia Zhao, Jing Liu, Xiaowei Li, Jinchan Chen, Zhixia Wang. Effectiveness of laparoscopic total transvaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair in the treatment of uterine prolapse in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 561-565.
[12] Chufeng Wang, An Jiang. Molecular diagnosis of primary liver cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(05): 499-503.
[13] Yimin E, Sizheng Sun, Xiaoyu Fan, Chunzhao Yu. Present status and prospect of fecal screening for colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(04): 331-336.
[14] Zhirong Guo, Jingmei Ma. Risk factors assessment and surgical strategies of placenta accreta spectrum[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 151-154.
[15] Wenshi Wu, Songquan Wei, Guimin Li, Xiaofang Zheng, Wen Sun, Dunjin Chen, Lin Yu. Outcomes of subsequent pregnancies after partial hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 180-186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract