| [1] |
Siristatidis CS,Sertedaki E,Vaidakis D. Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 5(5): CD011872.
|
| [2] |
Wong C,Chen AA,Behr B, et al. Time-lapse microscopy and image analysis in basic and clinical embryo development research[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2013, 26(2): 120-129.
|
| [3] |
李楠，黎靖宇，唐永梅，等. 早期胚胎质量评估：提高预测胚胎发育潜能的敏感性和特异性[J]. 中国组织工程研究，2014, 18(42): 6849-6855.
|
| [4] |
Mizobe Y,Oya N,Iwakiri R, et al. Effects of early cleavage patterns of human embryos on subsequent in vitro development and implantation[J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 106(2): 348-353.
|
| [5] |
Hesters L,Prisant N,Fanchin R, et al. Impact of early cleaved zygote morphology on embryo development and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome: a prospective study[J]. Fertil Steril, 2008, 89(6): 1677-1684.
|
| [6] |
Watanabe S,Kamihata M,Matsunaga R, et al. Effect of an abnormal first cleavage on embryonic development: time-lapse video analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 100(3): S245-S246.
|
| [7] |
Desch L,Bruno C,Luu M, et al. Embryo multinucleation at the two-cell stage is an independent predictor of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes[J]. Fertil Steril, 2017, 107(1): 97-103.
|
| [8] |
Martínez-Granados L,Serrano M,González-Utor A, et al. Reliability and agreement on embryo assessment: 5 years of an external quality control programme[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2018, 36(3): 259-268.
|
| [9] |
李楠，唐永梅，牟联俊，等，辅助生殖技术中胚胎质量评估方法的研究进展[J/CD]．中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(2): 265-268.
|
| [10] |
Aguilar J,Rubio I,Muñoz E, et al. Study of nucleation status in the second cell cycle of human embryo and its impact on implantation rate[J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 106(2): 291-299.
|
| [11] |
Yang L,Cai S,Zhang S, et al. Single embryo transfer by day 3 time-lapse selection versus day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial[J]. Hum Reprod, 2018, 33(5): 869-876.
|
| [12] |
Milewski R，Milewska AJ，Kuczyńska A，et al. Do morphokinetic data sets inform pregnancy potential？[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2016, 33(3): 357-365.
|
| [13] |
Basile N,Barrière P,Meseguer M, et al. Time-lapse in the IVF lab: how should we assess potential benefit？[J]. Hum Reprod, 2015, 30(5): 1276.
|
| [14] |
Racowsky C,Kovacs P,Martins WP. A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go？[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2015, 32(7): 1025-1030.
|
| [15] |
Vergouw CG,Heymans MW,Hardarson T, et al. No evidence that embryo selection by near-infrared spectroscopy in addition to morphology is able to improve live birth rates: results from an individual patient data Meta-analysis[J]. Hum Reprod, 2014, 29(3): 455-461.
|
| [16] |
Kirkegaard K,Svane ASP,Nielsen JS, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomic profiling of day 3 and 5 embryo culture medium does not predict pregnancy outcome in good prognosis patients: a prospective cohort study on single transferred embryos[J]. Hum Reprod, 2014, 29(11): 2413-2420.
|
| [17] |
Parlatan U,Basar G,Bavili N, et al. Embryo viability indexing using raman spectroscopy of spent culture media[J]. Spectrosc Lett, 2016, 49(7): 458-463.
|
| [18] |
RoyChoudhury S,Singh A,Gupta NJ, et al. Repeated implantation failure versus repeated implantation success: discrimination at a metabolomic level[J]. Hum Reprod, 2016, 31(6): 1265-1274.
|
| [19] |
Yang YC,Kuo CH,Tseng YJ, et al. Identifying differential expressed metabolites in viable embryos with UHPLC-ToF-MS (ultra high-performance liquid chromatography-time of flight-mass spectrometry): a comprehensive metabolomic approach[J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 100(3): S119.
|
| [20] |
Tejera A,Castelló D,de los Santos JM, et al. Combination of metabolism measurement and a time-lapse system provides an embryo selection method based on oxygen uptake and chronology of cytokinesis timing[J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 106(1): 119-126.
|
| [21] |
Bjelica A,Subanovic S. Assessment of the embryo quality in the procedure of in vitro fertilization[J]. Med Pregl, 2016, 69(7-8): 241-246.
|
| [22] |
姚元庆. 人类白细胞抗原-G与早期胚胎生长发育和着床[J]. 生殖医学杂志，2014, 23(3): 206-209.
|
| [23] |
Niu Z,Wang L,Pang RTK, et al. A Meta-analysis of the impact of human leukocyte antigen-G on the outcomes of IVF/ICSI[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2017, 34(6): 611-618.
|
| [24] |
McReynolds S,Vanderlinden L,Stevens J, et al. Lipocalin-1: a potential marker for noninvasive aneuploidy screening[J]. Fertil Steril, 2011, 95(8): 2631-2633.
|
| [25] |
Dominguez F,Meseguer M,Aparicio-Ruiz B, et al. New strategy for diagnosing embryo implantation potential by combining proteomics and time-lapse technologies[J]. Fertil Steril, 2015, 104(4): 908-914.
|
| [26] |
Rødgaard T，Heegaard PM，Callesen H. Non-invasive assessment of in-vitro embryo quality to improve transfer success[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2015, 31(5): 585-592.
|
| [27] |
Lee E,Illingworth P,Wilton L, et al. The clinical effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in all 24 chromosomes (PGD-A): systematic review[J]. Hum Reprod, 2015, 30(2): 473-483.
|
| [28] |
Lu L,Lv B,Huang K, et al. Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2016, 33(9): 1129-1134.
|
| [29] |
Capalbo A,Ubaldi FM,Cimadomo D, et al. Consistent and reproducible outcomes of blastocyst biopsy and aneuploidy screening across different biopsy practitioners: a multicentre study involving 2 586 embryo biopsies[J]. Hum Reprod, 2016, 31(1): 199-208.
|
| [30] |
Magli MC,Pomante A,Cafueri G, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing: polar bodies, blastomeres, trophectoderm cells, or blastocoelic fluid？[J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 105(3): 676-683.
|
| [31] |
Sullivan-Pyke C,Dokras A. Preimplantation genetic screening and preimplantation genetic diagnosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 2018, 45(1): 113-125.
|
| [32] |
Forman EJ,Upham KM,Cheng M, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening alters traditional morphology-based embryo selection: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cycles of planned fresh euploid blastocyst transfer[J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 100(3): 718-724.
|
| [33] |
Keltz MD,Vega M,Sirota I, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) following day 3 single cell blastomere biopsy markedly improves IVF outcomes while lowering multiple pregnancies and miscarriages[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2013, 30(10): 1333-1339.
|
| [34] |
Sermon K. Novel technologies emerging for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy[J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2017, 17(1): 71-82.
|
| [35] |
Griesinger G. Beware of the " implantation rate" ！ Why the outcome parameter " implantation rate" should be abandoned from infertility research[J]. Hum Reprod, 2016, 31(2): 249-251.
|