Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02): 173 -178. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.02.008

Special Issue:

Original Article

Clinical analysis of fetal chromosomes karyotype abnormalities

Xiaojuan Lin1, Qingmei Sun1, Xiaochun He1(), Ju Wu1, Tingting Ge1, Weisi Dai1   

  1. 1. Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
  • Received:2016-01-15 Revised:2016-02-24 Published:2016-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaochun He
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: He Xiaochun, Email:
Objective

To study the indications of prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome karyotype abnormalities, and provide the basis for prenatal diagnosis and clinical genetic counseling.

Methods

From October 2010 to April 2014, a total of 5 655 cases of pregnant women who received prenatal diagnosis of fetal karyotype analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-care Hospital were selected as research subjects. The indications of prenatal diagnosis of the 5 655 cases of pregnant women contained high-risk indications of antenatal serological screening, such as trisomy 21 syndrome risk≥1/270 or trisomy 18 syndrome risk≥1/350 (2 482 cases), age≥35 years old (1 889 cases), adverse pregnancy history (675 cases), chromosomal abnormalities of one of the couple (49 cases), prenatal ultrasound abnormalities (465 cases), and exposure to the poisonous and harmful substance, drugs that may cause teratogenicity and radical line (95 cases). All the indications of prenatal diagnosis were uncrossed. Fetal chromosome karyotype abnormalities were diagnosed by amniocentesis. Different kinds of fetal chromosomes karyotype abnormalities, the number and detection rate, the relationship between fetal chromosome karyotype abnormalities and prenatal ultrasound abnormalities were analyzed by retrospective method. And the fetal chromosomes karyotype abnormalities detection rates of different indications of prenatal diagnosis were analyzed by statistical methods. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-care Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from each patient before receiving invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Results

①Among the 5 655 cases of pregnant women who received invasive prenatal diagnosis, 124 cases were detected as fetal chromosomal karyotype abnormalities, and the detection rate was 2.2%. Among 2 482 cases of pregnant women with high-risk indications, 1 889 cases with age≥35 years old, 675 cases with adverse pregnancy history, 49 cases with chromosomal abnormalities of one of the couple, 465 cases with prenatal ultrasound abnormalities, 95 cases with exposure to abnormal substance, 40 cases, 47 cases, 12 cases, 5 cases, 19 cases, and 1 case were detected as fetal chromosomal karyotype abnormalities, respectively. And the the detection rate of fetal chromosomal karyotype abnormalities was 1.6%, 2.5%, 1.8%, 10.2%, 4.1% and 1.1%, respectively. The rate of fetal chromosomal karyotype abnormalities in pregnant women with chromosomal abnormalities of one of the couple or prenatal ultrasound abnormalities was high. There was statistical difference among the fetal chromosomes karyotype abnormalities detection rate of different indications of prenatal diagnosis (χ2=28.23, P<0.001). ②Among the 19 cases of fetal chromosomes karyotype abnormalities with prenatal ultrasound abnormalities, 6 cases were with obvious structural abnormalities, such as heart abnormalities and anasarca, 13 cases were only with soft ultrasound abnormalities, such as ventricular light point, pyelic separation, choroid plexus cysts, single umbilical artery, liver light point, increased thickness of nuchal translucency (NT), polyhydramnios or oligohydramnios, growth index (head circumference, biparietal diameter, length of femur and humerus) abnormalities, nasal bone absence, lateral ventricle normal high value and so on.

Conclusions

It is necessary for pregnant women to receive the fetal chromosomal karyotype analysis if there is malformation or two or more ultrasound soft markers abnormal of fetal ultrasound screening system.

表1 本组5 655例具有不同产前诊断指征孕妇的胎儿染色体核型异常检出情况
表2 以产前超声检查结果异常为产前诊断指征检出的19例胎儿染色体核型异常的产前超声检查结果情况
编号(No.) 胎儿染色体核型分析结果 胎儿产前超声检查结果
1 21-三体综合征 双顶径与头围均位于M-2s处,鼻骨缺失,左心室强光点
2 21-三体综合征 NT增厚5.4 mm
3 21-三体综合征 左侧脑室正常高值为0.78 cm,左、右房室略不对称
4 21-三体综合征 下腔静脉入口增宽,股骨与肱骨长均位于M+2s处,鼻骨缺失,左心室强光点
5 21-三体综合征 短鼻骨,右足呈草鞋状,右侧脑室正常高值为0.96 cm,脐带过短,S/D增高,股骨与肱骨长均位于M-2s
6 21-三体综合征 颈部皱褶增厚,肝内强光点,腹部肠管回声增强,右室壁增厚,左心室强光点,左侧脑室正常高值为0.91 cm,双顶径位于M-2s
7 21-三体综合征 左心室多发强光点,右侧肾盂分离0.8 cm
8 18-三体综合征 室间隔缺损,完全性心内膜垫缺损,Dandy-Walker综合征,右侧唇腭裂伴牙槽骨突裂,胚外体腔未融合,双侧脉络丛囊肿(左侧为0.6 cm×0.7 cm,右侧为0.5 cm×0.7 cm),双肾盂分离
9 18-三体综合征 双足呈草鞋状,小下颌,右侧脑室正常高值为0.83 cm,四肢短小,头围与股骨长均<M-2s,腹围与肱骨长均位于M-2s处,双顶径/下颌骨长度<1/2
10 18-三体综合征 室间隔缺损,右位心,侧脑室正常高值为0.83 cm,单脐动脉,双眼眶外间距为3.23 cm、内间距为1.15 cm,左侧脉络丛囊肿(0.8 cm×0.7 cm),腹围<M-2s,股骨长位于M-2s处,羊水过多
11 18-三体综合征 NT增厚3.3 mm,室间隔缺损,肺主动脉内径比值异常,主动脉狭窄,中位心,右侧肾盂积水,头围与股骨长均<M-2s
12 18-三体综合征 胎儿全身水肿,脐膨出,单脐动脉
13 XXX 肱骨与股骨长均位于M-2s
14 XXX 室间隔缺损
15 XXX 部分肠管轻度扩张,股骨长<M-2s
16 46,XN,inv(9) 双侧脉络丛囊肿为0.5 cm×0.8 cm
17 46,XN,15s+ 左侧脑室正常高值为0.82 cm,左心室强回声光点
18 46,XN,16h+ 双顶径与头围均<M-2s
19 46,XY,Y<21 右侧脑室正常高值为0.90 cm,双侧肾盂分离0.70 cm
1
尚丽新.出生缺陷研究现状[J].人民军医,2012,55(1):74-76.
2
Krantz DA, Hallahan TW, Macri VJ, et al. Genetic sonography after first-trimester Down syndrome screening[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 29(6): 666-670.
3
童微.甘肃省去年出生缺陷产前筛查率仅为4.74%[EB/OL].(2013-05-28)[2015-12-10].

URL    
4
潘玲.唐氏综合征产前筛查方案的进展[J/CD].中国产前诊断杂志:电子版,2009,1(1):35-41.
5
熊顺,黄国宁,王亚平.人类卵子染色体异常[J].国际遗传学杂志,2008,31(5):392-394.
6
李胜利,文华轩.早孕期产前超声诊断进展[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2011,7(4):287-292.
7
谢红宁.胎儿鼻骨的检测和异常判断及其临床意义[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(5):328-331.
8
Sonek JD, Cicero S, Neiger R, et al. Nasal bone assessment in prenatal screening for trisomy 21[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 195(5): 1219-1230.
9
周祎,鲁云涯,陈涌珍,等.颈项透明层增厚胎儿的产前诊断及预后分析[J].中山大学学报:医学科学版,2013,34(6):888-893.
10
Koklanaris N, Roman AS, Perle MA, et al. Isolated echogenic intracardiac foci in patients with low-risk triple screen results: assessing the risk of trisomy 21[J]. J Perinat Med, 2005, 33(6): 539-542.
11
孙倩,马润玫,陈卓.超声探查胎儿颈项透明层及超声标记物在产前筛查中的应用[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2011,5(9):2669-2671.
12
朱宝生,章锦曼.胎儿染色体非整倍体产前筛查方案及其筛查效率[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2010,6(1):7-10.
13
陆国辉,徐湘民,主编.临床遗传咨询[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2007:127-148.
14
李秋玲,查艺葆.超声软指标在产前诊断胎儿染色体异常中的价值[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2013,21(2):39-40.
15
颜幸燕,覃颖,杨鸿凌.系统胎儿超声检查过程的质量控制在产前诊断中的意义[J].中国医学影像技术,2010,26(9):1783-1785.
16
赵晓曦.无创性产前诊断胎儿染色体异常的研究进展[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2010,6(5):368-370.
[1] Ling Wei, Hui Li, Yi Chen. Current research status on colonization or infection and mother-to-child transmission of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in pregnant and post-partum women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 517-521.
[2] Yaqin Lei, Yunli Lai, Shang Yi, Fuben Xu, Yanqing Tang, Xiaoshan Huang, Jian Yi, Xiaoxia Qiu. Analysis of non-invasive prenatal screening in 50 975 pregnant women in Guangxi region[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(04): 410-419.
[3] Min Pan, Qian Sun, Ruxiang Chen, Cuixing Yi, Jin Han, Dongzhi Li, Can Liao. Pregnancy outcomes in women with very high risk of Down syndrome screening[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(02): 157-163.
[4] Hang Su, Zhiying Liu, Yi Lai, Li Qin, Hongqian Liu, Xuemei Zhang, Qian Zhu, Ting Hu, Xun Zhang, Xiaowen Zhao, Shanling Liu, He Wang. Prenatal diagnosis results of advanced maternal age women and limitations of preferred non-invasive prenatal screening to them: a large sample analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(06): 718-723.
[5] Wen He, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Research status of pregnancy combined with Thalassemia[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 13(01): 14-19.
[6] Mingyan Ni. Effects of early screening and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2015, 11(02): 188-191.
[7] Jie Niu, Shanling Liu, He Wang. Retrospective Study on 2T-Risks and Lifecycle Prenatal Systems in the Second Trimester Down Syndrome Prenatal Screening[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2014, 10(03): 305-309.
[8] Hui YANG, Mei XIAO, Jie-ping SONG, Wei-peng WANG. Screening Clinical Practice Analysis of Down's Syndrome in the Middle Period Pregnancy Among 3275 Cases[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2012, 08(04): 450-453.
[9] Jing-mei MA, Hui LI, Ling WANG, Jie FU, Li YU, Hui-xia YANG. 11 003 Cases of Second Trimester Maternal Serum Screening for Down's Syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2009, 05(04): 404-408.
[10] Yun-ping WU, Bao-sheng ZHU, Cun-xian JIAO, xu-dong DONG, Zhu ZHU, Ji-fang SHI, Juan LIU, Jie SU. The application of maternal pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in prenatal screening[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2007, 03(01): 10-f3.
[11] Bao-Sheng ZHU, Cun-Xian JIAO, Shu ZHU, Xu-Dong DONG, Yun-Ying HU, Yun-Xia LIU, Huai-Ying FENG, Juan LIU, Xin-Hua TANG, Yun-Xia ZHANG, Rui-Hong WANG, Xin-Zheng ZHU, Xiao-Mei ZHANG. A Study on the Incidence of Down's Syndrome and the Interference by Prenatal Screening[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2005, 01(01): 20-22.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract