切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (05) : 369 -379. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2026.05.001

专家述评

从临床研究视角探析宫颈癌治疗进展的历程
顾雪敏, 邬素芳†()   
  1. 同济大学附属同济医院妇产科,上海 200065
  • 收稿日期:2026-09-11 修回日期:2026-09-20 出版日期:2026-10-01
  • 通信作者: 邬素芳

Evolution of cervical cancer treatment: a clinical research perspective

Xuemin Gu, Sufang Wu†()   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China
  • Received:2026-09-11 Revised:2026-09-20 Published:2026-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Sufang Wu
  • Supported by:
    National Key R & D Program of China(2025YFC2708404); General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(82272334, 82672138)
引用本文:

顾雪敏, 邬素芳. 从临床研究视角探析宫颈癌治疗进展的历程[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(05): 369-379.

Xuemin Gu, Sufang Wu. Evolution of cervical cancer treatment: a clinical research perspective[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2026, 22(05): 369-379.

宫颈癌治疗历经百年演进,已经实现从经验医学向循证医学与精准医学,从局部根治向全身精准诊疗的历史性跨越,其各领域的治疗演进历程如下。①手术领域:Wertheim宫颈癌根治术的奠基、Piver分型(按照手术范围将宫颈癌患者手术依次分为Ⅰ~Ⅴ型)的规范及Querleu-Morrow分型(在Piver分型基础上对上述5型子宫切除术进一步细分)的精准化,共同勾勒出宫颈癌外科手术治疗规范化的"三部曲"。②放疗领域:治疗手段从镭疗发展为内外照射联合放疗,直至1999年5项随机对照试验(RCT)确立同步放化疗标准,实现了宫颈癌治疗史上的首次飞跃。③化疗与靶向治疗领域:妇科肿瘤学组(GOG)-169和GOG-179研究奠定了宫颈癌患者的联合化疗基础,GOG-240研究证实贝伐珠单抗可为宫颈癌患者带来总体生存(OS)期获益,抗体药物偶联物(ADC)历经维替索妥尤单抗(TV)等药物的系列开发,推动治疗由"化疗主导"走向"生物标志物驱动"的精准治疗新格局。④免疫治疗领域:以KEYNOTE-158研究实现了宫颈癌患者的后线治疗方案的破冰、KEYNOTE-826研究改写一线治疗标准;CALLA与KEYNOTE-A18研究结果"一阴一阳"(前者为阴性、后者为阳性),提示精准的人群选择是改善宫颈癌患者治疗疗效的关键。此外,中国学者在宫颈癌微创手术证据辨析、用化疗替代放疗以保护患者生活质量等方向作出了独特贡献。笔者拟基于临床研究证据,从传统手术、放疗、化疗及靶向治疗、免疫治疗与前沿进展等方面,系统梳理宫颈癌治疗的演进历程,聚焦多维度分子分层、治疗性宫颈癌疫苗与个体化联合策略,以期为宫颈癌患者的个体化诊疗与临床实践提供参考,并探讨宫颈癌从"治疗"走向"消除"的筛查-疫苗-治疗协同机制,为其他实体瘤的治疗模式提供范本。

Cervical cancer treatment has undergone over a century of evolution, achieving a historic leap from empirical medicine to evidence-based medicine and precision medicine, and from local radical treatment to systemic precision diagnosis and treatment. The evolutionary process is briefly summarized as follows. ① In the field of surgery, the foundation of the Wertheim radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer, the standardization of the Piver classification (which classifies cervical cancer surgeries into 5 types according to the extent of resection), and the refinement of the Querleu-Morrow classification (which further subdivides the five types of hysterectomy based on the Piver classification) together outline the " trilogy" of standardized surgical treatment for cervical cancer. ② In the field of radiotherapy, treatment modalities evolved from radium therapy to combined external-beam and intracavitary irradiation, until 1999 when five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) established concurrent chemoradiotherapy as the standard, achieving the first leap in the history of cervical cancer treatment. ③ In the field of chemotherapy and targeted therapy, Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-169 and GOG-179 laid the foundation for combination chemotherapy, GOG-240 confirmed that bevacizumab provides overall survival (OS) benefit for patients with cervical cancer, and antibody-drug conjugates(ADC), through the serial development of agents such as tisotumab vedotin (TV), have driven treatment from a " chemotherapy-dominated" approach toward a new paradigm of biomarker-driven precision therapy. ④ In the field of immunotherapy, KEYNOTE-158 achieved a breakthrough in later-line treatment options, and KEYNOTE-826 rewrote the standard of care for first-line treatment; the results of CALLA and KEYNOTE-A18 were one " negative" and one " positive" (the former negative, the latter positive), suggesting that precise patient selection is the key to improving treatment efficacy. In addition, Chinese scholars have made unique contributions in areas such as the critical appraisal of evidence for minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer and the use of chemotherapy as an alternative to radiotherapy to preserve patients′ quality of life. Based on clinical research evidence, the authors intend to systematically review the evolution of cervical cancer treatment from the aspects of conventional surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and frontier advances, focusing on multidimensional molecular stratification, therapeutic vaccines, and individualized combination strategies, with the aim of providing a reference for individualized diagnosis and treatment and clinical practice of cervical cancer, and exploring the synergistic mechanism of screening-vaccination-treatment in the transition of cervical cancer from " treatment" to " elimination", thereby providing a model for the treatment patterns of other solid tumors.

[1]
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-263. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21834.
[2]
World Health Organization. Global strategy to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem[R]. Geneva: WHO, 2020.
[3]
Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, et al. Cervical cancer[J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(10167): 169-182. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32470-X.
[4]
Tewari KS, Sill MW, Long HJ, et al. Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370(8): 734-743. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309748.
[5]
Chung HC, Ros W, Delord JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical cancer: results from the phase Ⅱ KEYNOTE-158 study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(17): 1470-1478. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.01265.
[6]
Colombo N, Dubot C, Lorusso D, et al. Pembrolizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2021, 385(20): 1856-1867. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112435.
[7]
Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, et al. Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2021, 155(Suppl 1): 28-44. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13865.
[8]
Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1974, 44(2): 265-272.
[9]
Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2008, 9(3): 297-303. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70074-3.
[10]
Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(20): 1895-1904. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395.
[11]
Ramirez PT, Robledo KP, Frumovitz M, et al. LACC trial: final analysis on overall survival comparing open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2024, 42(23): 2741-2746. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.02335.
[12]
Frumovitz M, Obermair A, Coleman RL, et al. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2020, 21(6): 851-860. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30081-4.
[13]
Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, et al. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(20): 1905-1914. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804923.
[14]
向阳. 早期宫颈癌腹腔镜手术面临的挑战[J]. 协和医学杂志,2019, 10(2): 100-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.02.002.
[15]
马丁. 精准医学时代下妇科肿瘤防治面临的机遇与挑战[J]. 中华医学杂志,2022, 102(26): 1963-1966. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20211028-02392.
[16]
魏军成. 早期宫颈癌的微创手术:中国人群真实世界研究[C]. 第36届国际妇科内镜学会年会暨北京大学妇科肿瘤高峰论坛,北京,2024.
[17]
Guo C, Tang X, Meng Y, et al. Effect of the surgical approach on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a real-world multicenter study of a large Chinese cohort from 2006 to 2017[J]. Cancer Med, 2020, 9(16): 5908-5921. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3287.
[18]
Huang Y, Cai J, Wang H, et al. Survival after laparoscopic radical surgery for stage ⅠA-ⅡB cervical cancer: 131 6 consecutive cases from a national laparoscopic training center in China[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2023, 28(1): 175-183. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02262-1.
[19]
Burmeister CA, Khan SF, Schäfer G, et al. Cervical cancer therapies: current challenges and future perspectives[J]. Tumour Virus Res, 2022, 13: 200238. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvr.2022.200238.
[20]
Srivastava A, Datta NR. Brachytherapy in cancer cervix: time to move ahead from point A?[J]. World J Clin Oncol, 2014, 5(4): 764-774. DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i4.764.
[21]
Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 1999, 340(15): 1144-1153. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199904153401502.
[22]
Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 1999, 340(15): 1137-1143. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199904153401501.
[23]
Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, et al. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage ⅠB cervical carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 1999, 340(15): 1154-1161. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199904153401503.
[24]
Peters WA, Liu PY, Barrett RJ, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2000, 18(8): 1606-1613. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.8.1606.
[25]
Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage ⅡB-ⅣA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17(5): 1339-1348. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1339.
[26]
Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(35): 5802-5812. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4368.
[27]
Moore DH, Blessing JA, McQuellon RP, et al. Phase Ⅲ study of cisplatin with or without paclitaxel in stage ⅣB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22(15): 3113-3119. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.170.
[28]
Long HJ, Bundy BN, Grendys EC Jr, et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(21): 4626-4633. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.021.
[29]
Kenter GG, Greggi S, Vergote I, et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus chemoradiation in stage ⅠB2-ⅡB cervical cancer: EORTC-55994[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(32): 5035-5043. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.02852.
[30]
Weng D, Xiong H, Zhu C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy after radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a randomized, non-inferiority, multicenter trial[J]. Front Med, 2023, 17(1): 93-104. DOI: 10.1007/s11684-021-0892-z.
[31]
Tewari KS, Sill MW, Penson RT, et al. Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240)[J]. Lancet, 2017, 390(10103): 1654-1663. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31607-0.
[32]
Kitagawa R, Katsumata N, Shibata T, et al. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus cisplatin in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer: the open-label randomized phase Ⅲ trial JCOG0505[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(19): 2129-2135. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.4391.
[33]
Chau CH, Steeg PS, Figg WD. Antibody-drug conjugates for cancer[J]. Lancet, 2019, 394(10200): 793-804. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31774-X.
[34]
Coleman RL, Lorusso D, Gennigens C, et al. Efficacy and safety of tisotumab vedotin in previously treated recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (innovaTV 204/GOG-3023/ENGOT-cx6): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2021, 22(5): 609-619. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00056-5.
[35]
Vergote I, González-Martín A, Fujiwara K, et al. Tisotumab vedotin as second- or third-line therapy for recurrent cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2024, 391(1): 44-55. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2313811.
[36]
Monk BJ, Toita T, Wu X, et al. Durvalumab versus placebo with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (CALLA): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2023, 24(12): 1334-1348. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00479-5.
[37]
Lorusso D, Xiang Y, Hasegawa K, et al. Pembrolizumab or placebo with chemoradiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial[J]. Lancet, 2024, 403(10434): 1341-1350. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00317-9.
[38]
Lorusso D, Xiang Y, Hasegawa K, et al. Pembrolizumab or placebo with chemoradiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18): overall survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2024, 404(10460): 1321-1332. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01808-7.
[39]
Matulonis UA, Herrstedt J, Oza A, et al. ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial of niraparib in recurrent ovarian cancer: survival and long-term safety[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2025, 195: 192-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.03.018.
[40]
Naumann RW, Hollebecque A, Meyer T, et al. Safety and efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent or metastatic cervical, vaginal, or vulvar carcinoma: results from the phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ CheckMate 358 trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(31): 2825-2834. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00739.
[41]
Oaknin A, Moore K, Meyer T, et al. Nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (CheckMate 358): a phase 1-2, open-label, multicohort trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2024, 25(5): 588-602. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00088-3.
[42]
Xu Q, Wang J, Sun Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus anlotinib for PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, prospective phase Ⅱ trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2022, 40(16): 1795-1805. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02091.
[43]
Zheng Y, Ding Y, Chen L, et al. Breaking therapeutic barriers in solid tumors: clinical progress of antibody-drug conjugate/immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations (review)[J]. Oncol Rep, 2025, 54(4): 124. DOI: 10.3892/or.2025.8956.
[44]
Trimble CL, Morrow MP, Kraynyak KA, et al. Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of VGX-3100, a therapeutic synthetic DNA vaccine targeting human papillomavirus 16 and 18 E6 and E7 proteins for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial[J]. Lancet, 2015, 386(10008): 2078-2088. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00239-1.
[45]
Zhang W, Liu YM, Li D, et al. Research progress on tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy for cervical cancer[J]. Front Immunol, 2025, 16: 1524842. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1524842.
[46]
国家药品监督管理局药物临床试验登记与信息公示平台. KDTV001注射液治疗子宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)的多中心、开放性Ⅰ/Ⅱ期临床研究[EB/OL]. (2025-12-12) [2026-08-09].

URL    
[47]
Zhang Y, Li C, Xiang Y. Tumor immune microenvironment in cervical cancer: histological subtype-specific immune landscapes and therapeutic implications[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2026, 1881(3): 189581. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2026.189581.
[48]
Mayadev J, Vázquez Limón JC, Ramírez Godinez FJ, et al. Ultrasensitive detection and tracking of circulating tumor DNA to predict relapse and survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: phase Ⅲ CALLA trial analyses[J]. Ann Oncol, 2025, 36(9): 1047-1057. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.05.533.
[49]
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: cervical cancer (version 1.2025[EB/OL]. Plymouth Meeting, PA: NCCN. (2024-12-19) [2026-08-09].

URL    
[50]
Wu X, Sun Y, Yang H, et al. Cadonilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (COMPASSION-16): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial in China[J]. Lancet, 2024, 404(10463): 1668-1676. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02135-4.
[51]
Sturdza A, Pötter R, Fokdal LU, et al. Image guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: improved pelvic control and survival in RetroEMBRACE, a multicenter cohort study[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2016, 120(3): 428-433. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.03.011.
[52]
Kirchheiner K, Nout RA, Lindegaard JC, et al. Dose-effect relationship and risk factors for vaginal stenosis after definitive radio(chemo)therapy with image-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in the EMBRACE study[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2016, 118(1): 160-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.12.025.
[1] 忻慰, 岳志鹏, 祝云利, 祝钧, 陈宜, 符培亮, 钱齐荣. 机器人辅助前交叉韧带重建术的研究现状及进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 494-503.
[2] 刘瀚旻. 关于母胎,现在向未来[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(04): 277-282.
[3] 陈昌贤, 罗钟玢, 李力. 血管生成抑制剂治疗铂耐药复发性卵巢癌患者的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(04): 290-297.
[4] 刘芳丽, 李金科, 郝敏. 复方口服避孕药与妇科恶性肿瘤关系的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(04): 298-304.
[5] 徐敏骅, 方圆, 朱丽均, 杨瑜麟. 女性参加宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查意愿及其影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(03): 250-258.
[6] 范祖莉, 谭惠文, 朱慧莉. 《女性雄激素过多症评估临床实践指南》解读:从机制到临床实践[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(03): 204-213.
[7] 李霞, 李世平, 屈艺. 免疫因素在新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎患儿中的作用机制的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(02): 93-102.
[8] 张雪洛, 陈艳花, 王仙萍, 梁利霞, 张志平. 早发性卵巢功能不全患者的病因和生育策略[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(02): 109-116.
[9] 刘子阳, 巫宛玳, 李征宇. 早期上皮性卵巢癌患者术后腹腔热灌注化疗疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(02): 117-127.
[10] 刘传于, 胡建国, 王荔, 许鑫玥, 刁帅, 杨茜, 胡丽娜. 特殊类型宫颈腺癌患者的多中心回顾性临床分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(02): 128-139.
[11] 阿巴拜克日·阿卜力孜, 李泽鑫, 张腾辉, 张力为. 补片在食管裂孔疝修补中的临床价值与安全性:系统评价与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 352-361.
[12] 邹凯翔, 许诗语, 陈创奇. 结直肠癌免疫治疗新进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 281-289.
[13] 张阿妮, 王冠华, 袁亚迎, 任志超, 梁杰, 赵蕊新, 陈妍, 郭娟妮, 康瑞. 肺超声联合膈肌超声检测指标预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者拔管的临床研究—附126例分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 392-398.
[14] 郑瑞, 何天霖. 人工智能引领胃癌外科治疗迈向精准微创新时代[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 183-186.
[15] 彭婧仪, 谢宁, 陈绪娟, 英策, 杜元灏. 针灸治疗慢性腰肌劳损的临床研究现状及选穴规律[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 154-160.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?