切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (03) : 250 -258. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2026.03.008

论著

女性参加宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查意愿及其影响因素研究
徐敏骅, 方圆, 朱丽均(), 杨瑜麟()   
  1. 上海市妇幼保健中心,上海 200062
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-19 修回日期:2026-04-16 出版日期:2026-06-01
  • 通信作者: 朱丽均, 杨瑜麟

Willingness and influencing factors of cervical and breast cancer screening among women

Minhua Xu, Yuan Fang, Lijun Zhu(), Yulin Yang()   

  1. Shanghai Center for Women and Children′s Health, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Received:2025-09-19 Revised:2026-04-16 Published:2026-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Lijun Zhu, Yulin Yang
  • Supported by:
    2025 Health Policy Research Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission(2025HP62)
引用本文:

徐敏骅, 方圆, 朱丽均, 杨瑜麟. 女性参加宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查意愿及其影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(03): 250-258.

Minhua Xu, Yuan Fang, Lijun Zhu, Yulin Yang. Willingness and influencing factors of cervical and breast cancer screening among women[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2026, 22(03): 250-258.

目的

探讨上海市女性参加宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查(以下简称为"两癌"筛查)意愿及其影响因素。

方法

选择2025年1月至6月采用二阶段混合抽样方法在上海市16个区参加"两癌"筛查的779名女性为调查对象。对被调查对象采用本研究自行设计的《上海市妇女"两癌"筛查规范管理路径研究服务对象调查问卷》(以下简称为《调查问卷》)进行调查。该问卷主要包括参加"两癌"筛查调查对象的以下4个方面内容。①一般资料;②参加"两癌"筛查的基本情况;③对"两癌"防治知识知晓情况;④参加筛查意愿。根据《调查问卷》中参加筛查意愿得分,将被调查对象分别纳入低意愿组(n=399,《调查问卷》中参加筛查意愿得分<4分者)与高意愿组(n=380,《调查问卷》中参加筛查意愿得分≥4分者)。采用成组t检验或χ2检验,对2组被调查对象《调查问卷》结果进行统计学分析。对单因素分析中2组被调查对象比较差异有统计学意义的变量(P<0.05),进一步采用多因素非条件logistic回归分析法,对影响被调查对象参加"两癌"筛查意愿的因素进行分析。本研究经过上海市妇幼保健中心医学伦理委员会审查批准(审批文号:2025-F003-001),并与被调查对象均签署调查知情同意书。

结果

①本研究共计发放《调查问卷》为800份,回收有效问卷为779份,有效问卷回收率为97.38%。②本研究779名被调查对象中,对"两癌"筛查服务的筛查项目、筛查流程、筛查环境和筛查人员态度满意度分别为99.36%(774/779)、99.74%(777/779)、99.23%(773/779)、99.36%(774/779);97.56%(760/779)被调查对象认为有必要定期进行"两癌"筛查。影响被调查对象参加"两癌"筛查的因素主要为:本人健康需求(56.48%,440/779),"两癌"筛查便捷程度(38.90%,303/779)和筛查费用(27.09%,211/779)。③低意愿组与高意愿组被调查对象的年龄、居住地点、就业情况、受教育程度、月经情况和家庭人均月收入等分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。以参加"两癌"筛查意愿高、低作为因变量,以上述单因素分析结果中差异有统计学意义的变量作为自变量,进行非条件多因素logistic回归分析的结果显示,居住地远离主城区(OR=0.652,95%CI:0.448~0.950,P=0.026),无业人员(OR=0.418,95%CI:0.219~0.798,P=0.008),受教育程度为初中及以下(OR=0.413,95%CI:0.261~0.655,P<0.001),家庭人均月收入为2 000~4 999元(OR=0.537,95%CI:0.321~0.897,P=0.018)及<2 000元(OR=0.397,95%CI:0.190~0.831,P=0.014)的被调查对象的"两癌"筛查意愿较低。

结论

无业、低收入、受教育程度低及居住地点远离主城区的上海市女性人群参加"两癌"筛查意愿较低,未来应当重点关注此类人群。

Objective

To explore the willingness of women in Shanghai to participate in cervical and breast cancer screening (hereinafter referred to as " Two-cancer screening" ) and its influencing factors.

Methods

From January to June 2025, a two-stage mixed sampling method was adopted to select 779 women participating in the " Two-cancer screening" across 16 districts of Shanghai as research subjects. A field questionnaire survey was conducted using the self-designed Questionnaire on Standardized Management Path of Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening in Shanghai for Service Recipients (hereinaffter referred to as " the Survey Questionnaire" ). The Survey Questionnaire mainly covered four dimensions: ①general information of respondents; ②basic status of respondents′ participation in " Two-cancer screening" ; ③awareness level of respondents regarding prevention and treatment knowledge of the " Two-cancer screening" ; ④respondents′ willingness to underwent " Two-cancer screening". Based on the total score of willingness to underwent " Two-cancer screening", the respondents were divided into low willingness group (n=399, total score of willingness to underwent " Two-cancer screening" < 4 points) and high willingness group (n=380, total score of willingness to underwent " Two-cancer screening" ≥ 4 points). Independent-samples t test or chi-square test was used for statistical comparison of the questionnaire survey results between two groups. Variables with statistically significant differences in univariate analysis (P<0.05) were further included in multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis to identify the influencing factors of women′s willingness to participate in the " Two-cancer screening". This study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Municipal Center for Women and Children′s Health (Approval No. 2025-F003-001), and informed consent for the survey were obtained from all participants.

Results

①A total of 800 questionnaires were distributed, and 779 valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 97.38%. ②Among the 779 respondents in this study, the satisfaction rates with screening items, procedures, environment and staff attitude of the " Two-cancer screening" service were 99.36% (774/779), 99.74% (777/779), 99.23% (773/779), and 99.36% (774/779), respectively; 97.56% (760/779) of respondents considered regular " Two-cancer screening" necessary. The main factors influencing respondents′ participation in " Two-cancer screening" were: their own health needs (56.48%, 440/779), the convenience of " Two-cancer screening" (38.90%, 303/779), and the screening cost (27.09%, 211/779). ③There were statistically significant differences between the low willingness group and high willingness group in terms of age, residential location, employment status, educational level, menstrual status, and per capita monthly household income (all P<0.05). Taking the willingness to participate in " Two-cancer screening" as the dependent variable and the statistically significant variables in univariate analysis as independent variables, multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that respondents residing in outer suburban areas (OR=0.652, 95%CI: 0.448-0.950, P=0.026), unemployed individuals (OR=0.418, 95%CI: 0.219-0.798, P=0.008), those with junior high school education or below (OR=0.413, 95%CI: 0.261-0.655, P<0.001), and those with per capita monthly household income of 2 000-4 999 yuan (OR=0.537, 95%CI: 0.321-0.897, P=0.018) or less than 2 000 yuan (OR=0.397, 95%CI: 0.190-0.831, P=0.014) had lower willingness to participate in the screening.

Conclusions

Unemployed women, those with low income or low educational attainment, and residents of outer suburban districts exhibit lower willingness to participate in " Two-cancer screening". These groups should be given more attention in the future.

表1 本研究779名被调查对象的一般资料与"两癌"防治知识得分比较[例数(%)]
表2 低意愿组与高意愿组被调查对象相关资料比较
组别 例数 年龄(岁,±s) 居住地点[例数(%)] 婚姻状况[例数(%)]
中心城区 近主城区 远离主城区 已婚 未婚 离婚/丧偶
低意愿组 399 54.1±9.7 141(35.34) 70(17.54) 188(47.12) 372(93.23) 7(1.76) 20(5.01)
高意愿组 380 52.0±11.2 186(48.95) 85(22.37) 109(28.68) 359(94.48) 4(1.05) 17(4.47)
统计量   t=2.78 χ2=28.21 χ2=0.83
P   0.006 <0.001 0.660
组别 例数 就业情况[例数(%)] 受教育程度[例数(%)]
在职 退休 退休再聘 无业 初中及以下 高中 本科及以上
低意愿组 399 139(34.84) 190(47.62) 15(3.76) 55(13.78) 168(42.10) 142(35.59) 89(22.31)
高意愿组 380 184(48.42) 164(43.16) 16(4.21) 16(4.21) 78(20.53) 147(38.68) 155(40.79)
统计量   χ2=29.19 χ2=50.43
P   <0.001 <0.001
组别 例数 有慢性病[例数(%)] 月经情况[例数(%)] 家庭人均月收入[例数(%)]
未绝经 已绝经 <2 000元 2 000~4 999元 5 000~10 000元 >10 000元
低意愿组 399 77(19.30) 156(39.10) 243(60.90) 49(12.28) 178(44.61) 139(34.84) 33(8.27)
高意愿组 380 90(23.68) 188(49.47) 192(50.53) 20(5.26) 139(36.58) 151(39.74) 70(18.42)
统计量   χ2=2.22 χ2=8.50 χ2=30.33
P   0.136 0.004 <0.001
组别 例数 家属是否支持参加"两癌"筛查[例数(%)] 个人可支配医疗经费[例数(%)] "两癌"防治知识得分<13分[例数(%)]
不支持 支持 <1 000元 1 000~4 999元 5 000~10 000元 >10 000元
低意愿组 399 5(1.25) 394(98.75) 77(19.30) 102(25.56) 127(31.83) 93(23.31) 169(42.36)
高意愿组 380 3(0.79) 377(99.21) 55(14.47) 99(26.05) 135(35.53) 91(23.95) 165(43.42)
统计量   χ2=0.08 χ2=3.52 χ2=0.09
P   0.775 0.319 0.764
表3 本研究被调查对象参加"两癌"筛查意愿影响因素的非条件多因素logistic回归分析
[1]
王临虹. 实用妇女保健学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2022.
[2]
Yang Z, Liu J, Wang Q. Diagnose earlier, live longer? The impact of cervical and breast cancer screening on life span[J]. Plos One, 2022, 17(7): e0270347. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270347.
[3]
郑荣寿,陈茹,韩冰峰,等. 2022年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志2024, 46(3): 221-231. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240119-00035.
[4]
朱丽均,李力,彭艾平,等. 84 162名上海农村妇女宫颈癌筛查研究[J]. 中国肿瘤2022, 31(5): 361-366. DOI:10.11735/j.issn.1004-0242.2022.05.A007.
[5]
张娟,朱碧帆,侯晓慧,等. 上海市乳腺癌患者诊疗现状研究[J]. 健康发展与政策研究2024, 27(1): 11-14, 35. DOI: 10.12458/HDPR.230378.
[6]
朱丽均,朱丽萍. 女性宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查的上海实践思考[J]. 健康中国观察2021, 3(7): 95-96.
[7]
杨佳婉,张钹,蔡紫庭,等. 鄂尔多斯妇联工作者参与妇女"两癌"筛查工作的意愿及影响因素[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制2024, 32(8): 604-608. DOI: 10.16386/j.cjpccd.issn.1004-6194.2024.08.010.
[8]
Zhang M, Wang L, Zhang X, et al. Cervical cancer screening rates among Chinese women - China, 2023-2024[J]. China CDC Weekly, 2025, 7(10): 321-326. DOI: 10.46234/ccdcw2025.052.
[9]
Bruni L, Serrano B, Roura E, et al. Cervical cancer screening programmes and age-specific coverage estimates for 202 countries and territories worldwide: a review and synthetic analysis[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2022, 10(8): e1115-e1127. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00241-8.
[10]
Fernández-Deaza G, Serrano B, Roura E, et al. Cervical cancer screening coverage in the Americas region: a synthetic analysis[J]. Lancet Reg Health Am, 2024, 30: 100689. DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100689.
[11]
Zhang L, Carvalho A L, Mosquera I, et al. An international consensus on the essential and desirable criteria for an " organized" cancer screening programme[J]. BMC Med, 2022, 20(1): 101. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02291-7.
[12]
张敬,李晨,孙丹丹,等. 妇女"两癌"筛查管理流程优化与实践研究[J]. 中国公共卫生管理2022, 38(2): 183-186, 190. DOI: 10.19568/j.cnki.23-1318.2022.02.0010.
[13]
杨婧帆,王震维,谭晖. 妇女"两病"筛查的满意度现况调查及供需方因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究2020, 31(8): 1116-1120. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2020.08.027.
[14]
贺鹭,秦梦霞,李思甜,等. 山西省女性宫颈癌防治知信行现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志2024, 28(6): 702-708, 720. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2024.06.013.
[15]
Salehiniya H, Momenimovahed Z, Allahqoli L, et al. Factors related to cervical cancer screening among Asian women[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2021, 25(19): 6109-6122. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202110_26889.
[16]
田甜,狄江丽,杨文蕾,等. 我国3省城市和农村妇女乳腺癌知信行现况及其影响因素比较[J]. 中国健康教育2018, 34(1): 14-18. DOI: 10.16168/j.cnki.issn.1002-9982.2018.01.004.
[17]
郑连花,刘潫潫,刘国莲,等. 宁夏地区妇女"两癌"防治知信行现状及其影响因素[J]. 医学与社会2021, 34(12): 130-134. DOI: 10.13723/j.yxysh.2021.12.027.
[18]
黄静,杨湘红,刘爱,等. 农村地区妇女"两癌筛查"项目实施中的问题与对策[J]. 中国全科医学2020, 23(13): 1680-1686. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.509.
[19]
Staley H, Shiraz A, Shreeve N, et al. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening[J]. Cochrane Database Sys Rev, 2021, 9(9): CD002834. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
[20]
Quinn M, Babb P, Jones J, et al. Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics[J]. BMJ, 1999, 318(7188): 904-908. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.904.
[21]
Ueda Y, Sobue T, Morimoto A, et al. Evaluation of a free-coupon program for cervical cancer screening among the young: a nationally funded program conducted by a local government in Japan[J]. J Epidemiol, 2015, 25(1): 50-56. DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20140080.
[22]
Du H, Duan X, Liu Y, et al. Evaluation of cobas HPV and seqHPV assays in the Chinese multicenter screening trial[J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2021, 25(1): 22-26. DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000577.
[23]
Hallik R, Innos K, J?nes J, et al. HPV self-sampling in organized cervical cancer screening program: a randomized pilot study in Estonia in 2021[J]. J Med Screen, 2025, 32(1): 19-27. DOI: 10.1177/09691413241268819.
[24]
World Health Organization. WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention[M]. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.
[25]
Sundqvist A, Hellsten C, Strander B, et al. Self-collected vaginal HPV samples for long-term non-attendees in the Swedish organized cervical cancer screening program[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2025, 104(6): 1181-1189. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.15112.
[26]
Hassani L, Dehdari T, Hajizadeh E, et al. Barriers to pap smear test for the second time in women referring to health care centers in the South of Tehran: a qualitative approach[J]. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery, 2017, 5(4): 376-385.
[27]
樊子暄,严梦瑶,裴晨阳,等. 中国妇女常见病筛查研究的现状与趋势分析[J]. 中国医学科学院学报2024, 46(1): 33-38. DOI: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.15843.
[28]
Zhao F, Lang J, Qiao Y, et al.?How can China achieve WHO′s 2030 targets for eliminating cervical cancer?[J]. BMJ, 2024, 386: e078641. DOI:10.1136/bmj-2023-078641.
[29]
宋红升,赵泽昀,巩翠玉,等. 2024年济南市妇女参与乳腺癌和宫颈癌联合筛查意愿及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生2025, 41(5): 568-573. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1146043.
[30]
陈佳仪. 健康宣教与护理干预在两癌筛查中的应用效果研究[J]. 婚育与健康2025, 31(10): 169-171. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9488.2025.10.057.
[31]
冉青青,葛正好,夏嘉蔚,等. 上海市女性居民宫颈癌认知和筛查参与现状及其影响因素[J]. 医学与社会2023, 36(4): 14-19. DOI: 10.13723/j.yxysh.2023.04.003.
[1] 王硕, 郑新宇. 乳腺癌术后同侧乳腺肿瘤复发的病理学认知与处理[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 133-137.
[2] 丁彩霞, 曲景辉, 裴英宏, 李静娜, 郑晓瑜, 徐岭植, 李思思. 基于RNA结合蛋白基因表达特征的乳腺癌预后预测模型构建及评价分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 138-147.
[3] 王美衡, 李杰, 陈策实, 许超汉. 乳腺癌串联重复表型的识别及分子功能特征分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 148-155.
[4] 范遥, 黄玉娥, 杨森果, 丁华, 张黔, 刘蜀. 线粒体基质导入因子23在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达及其作用机制[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 156-162.
[5] 王静坤, 计美妮, 王玉凤, 宣浩军. 真空辅助乳腺活检与空芯针穿刺活检在乳腺癌诊断中的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 163-168.
[6] 程妹, 金亚彬, 马丁瑞, 程昊, 詹玉莲, 周丹. 基于深度学习的MRI图像分析在乳腺癌诊疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 169-173.
[7] 宁海洋, 武春慧, 刘妍, 许慧娟, 高婷婷, 李炘正. 吲哚菁绿在乳腺癌外科诊疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 174-178.
[8] 黄家骏, 周奕延, 王斐然, 何志贤. 系统性红斑狼疮与乳腺癌关系的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 179-183.
[9] 闫文修, 党受琴, 穆亚男, 曹文荣. 乳腺滤泡树突细胞肉瘤一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 184-186.
[10] 魏欣, 张雁瑞, 刘远欢, 杨怡晖, 汤红平. 乳腺原发性黏液表皮样癌一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 190-192.
[11] 张兆祺, 方燕, 刘德月, 丁淑宁, 王玮, 王敏, 刘俊, 朱丽. 单孔腔镜辅助精准保乳手术与传统保乳手术在早期乳腺癌中的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 161-167.
[12] 何宇杭, 曹中伟. 中性粒细胞百分比-白蛋白比值与乳腺癌的关联性及预测效能研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 279-283.
[13] 田爱洁, 何晨熙, 孔凡庭. 乳腺癌新辅助化疗后乳腺钼靶微钙化术前评估的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 284-288.
[14] 韩丽丽, 范慈勃, 陈纲. PALB2基因胚系突变与中国女性乳腺癌遗传风险及临床特征的关联研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 289-291.
[15] 贾亚南, 尚迎晓, 甄江涛. 乳腺术后皮下高引流量淋巴漏1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 303-304.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?