切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 215 -220. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.02.013

所属专题: 文献

论著

盆底神经肌肉电刺激治疗薄型子宫内膜患者的临床研究
石薇, 牛晓宇, 陈悦悦, 魏冬梅, 余晓鹃(), 黄仲英, 杨洁, 张智涵   
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-06 修回日期:2021-03-11 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 余晓鹃

Pelvic floor neuromuscular electrical stimulation in treatment of patients with thin endometrium

Wei Shi, Xiaoyu Niu, Yueyue Chen, Dongmei Wei, Xiaojuan Yu(), Zhongying Huang, Jie Yang, Zhihan Zhang   

  • Received:2020-11-06 Revised:2021-03-11 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaojuan Yu
  • Supported by:
    Sun Simiao′s Special Subject of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China Medical Education Association(2016SKT-M031); Scientific Research Project of Chengdu Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission(2016043)
引用本文:

石薇, 牛晓宇, 陈悦悦, 魏冬梅, 余晓鹃, 黄仲英, 杨洁, 张智涵. 盆底神经肌肉电刺激治疗薄型子宫内膜患者的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(02): 215-220.

Wei Shi, Xiaoyu Niu, Yueyue Chen, Dongmei Wei, Xiaojuan Yu, Zhongying Huang, Jie Yang, Zhihan Zhang. Pelvic floor neuromuscular electrical stimulation in treatment of patients with thin endometrium[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(02): 215-220.

目的

探讨盆底神经肌肉电刺激(PFNES)治疗,对于薄型子宫内膜(TE)患者子宫内膜厚度(ET)与血流灌注及妊娠情况的影响。

方法

选择2016年5月至2018年5月,在四川大学华西第二医院生殖医学科与生殖内分泌科接受门诊治疗、有生育需求的96例TE患者为研究对象。根据其是否接受PFNES治疗,将其分为研究组(n=51,采取雌激素+PFNES治疗)和对照组(n=45,仅采取雌激素治疗)。2组患者治疗前、后ET与子宫动脉搏动指数(PI)、阻力指数(RI)、子宫动脉收缩期与舒张期持续时间比值(S/D)的组间与组内比较,采用成组t检验与配对t检验。2组患者自然妊娠率、流产率比较,采用χ2检验。与所有患者签署临床研究知情同意书。本研究获得四川大学华西第二医院伦理委员会的批准(审批文号:2015026)。2组患者年龄、不孕年限,基础雌二醇、卵泡刺激素(FSH)、促黄体激素(LH)水平,治疗前ET与子宫动脉PI、RI、S/D等临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

①治疗后,研究组TE患者ET值为(9.2±1.1)mm,显著厚于其治疗前的(5.4±0.8)mm与对照组的(7.9±0.7)mm,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=6.327、4.352,均为P<0.001)。②治疗后,研究组TE患者子宫动脉PI、RI及S/D分别为(0.52±0.16)、(0.23±0.06)与(2.05±0.29),均显著低于其治疗前的(0.89±0.23)、(0.79±0.22)与(4.86±1.02),以及对照组的(0.78±0.12)、(0.67±0.14)与(3.92±1.02),并且差异均有统计学意义(t=4.178、6.743、7.246、6.583、5.235、5.932均为P<0.001)。③治疗1年后,研究组患者自然妊娠率为43.1%(22/51),显著高于对照组的13.3%(6/45),并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.279,P=0.001);而2组患者流产率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

采取PFNES治疗可增加TE患者的ET,提高子宫内膜血流灌注及其容受性,进而提高自然妊娠率。

Objective

To investigate the effects of pelvic floor neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PFNES) on endometrial thickness (ET), blood perfusion and pregnancy in patients with TE.

Methods

A total of 96 outpatients with TE in the Department of Reproductive Medicine and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University and had fertility needs from May 2016 to May 2018 were selected as research subjects. According to whether patients received PFNES therapy or not, they were divided into study group (n=51, received estrogen and PFNES therapy) and control group (n=45, only received estrogen therapy). ET, uterine artery pulsation index (PI), resistance index (RI), ratio of systolic to diastolic duration (S/D) before and after treatment in two groups were compared between groups and within groups by independent-samples t test and pairwise t test. Comparisons of spontaneous pregnancy rate and abortion rate between two groups were performed by chi-square test. All patients signed clinical research informed consents. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University (Approved No.2015026). There were no statistical differences between two groups in age, years of infertility, basic estradiol, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, and ET, uterine artery PI, RI, S/D before treatment and other general clinical data (P>0.05).

Results

①After treatment, ET of TE patients in study group was (9.2±1.1) mm, which was significantly higher than that before treatment (5.4±0.8) mm, and also significantly higher than that of control group (7.9±0.7) mm, and differences were statistically significant (t=6.327, 4.352, P all<0.001). ②After treatment, uterine artery PI, RI and S/D of TE patients in study group were (0.52±0.16), (0.23±0.06), and (2.05±0.29), respectively, which were significantly lower than those before treatment (0.89±0.23), (0.79±0.22), and (4.86±1.02), and also significantly lower than those of control group of (0.78±0.12), (0.67±0.14) and (3.92±1.02), and all differences were statistically significant (t=4.178, 6.743, 7.246, 6.583, 5.235, 5.932; P all<0.001). ③One year after treatment in two groups, spontaneous pregnancy rate of study group was 43.1% (22/51), which was significantly higher than that of control group 13.3% (6/45), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=10.279, P=0.001); while there was no statistically significant difference in abortion rate between two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The treatment of PFNES can increase ET of TE patients, improve endometrial blood perfusion and receptivity, thus improving spontaneous pregnancy rate of patients.

表1 2组TE患者相关临床资料比较(±s)
表2 2组TE患者治疗前、后ET值及子宫动脉PI、RI、S/D比较(±s)
表3 2组TE患者治疗后1年后妊娠结局比较[例数(%)]
[1]
Riad ON, Hak AA. Assessment of endometrial receptivity using Doppler ultrasonography in infertile women undergoing intrauterine insemination[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2014, 30(1):70-73. DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2013.859668.
[2]
Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, et al. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Hum Reprod Update,2014,20(4):530-541.DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmu011.
[3]
黎雪茹,王中海. 薄型子宫内膜的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(1): 109-112. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2015.01.027.
[4]
郝洁,李艳萍. 薄型子宫内膜的诊治现状[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2019, 35(2): 84-86.
[5]
Lebovitz O, Orvieto R. Treating patients with " thin" endometrium - an ongoing challenge[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2014, 30(6): 409-414. DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2014.906571.
[6]
Liu KE, Hartman M, Hartman A.Management of thin endometrium in assisted reproduction: a clinical practice guideline from the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society[J].Reprod Biomed Online, 2019, 39(1): 49-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.02.013.
[7]
Momeni M, Rahbar MH, Kovanci E. A Meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles[J]. J Hum Reprod Sci, 2011, 4(3): 130-137. DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.92287.
[8]
Bodombossou-Djobo MM, Zheng C, Chen S, et al. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and biofeedback therapy may improve endometrial growth for patients with thin endometrium during frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a preliminary report[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2011, 9(1): 122.DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-122.
[9]
范祎,黄柳,范瑾,等. 盆底仿生物电刺激治疗薄型子宫内膜的临床研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2016, 31(10): 2215-2216. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2016.10.73.
[10]
薛惠英,左阳花,冯播,等. U8仿生物电刺激治疗薄型子宫内膜不孕症的临床研究[J]. 重庆医学,2013, 42(7): 2505-2507. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2013.20.024.
[11]
罗一平,何洁仪,肖丽. 盆底神经肌肉电刺激改善薄型子宫内膜患者子宫内膜厚度及血流灌注的研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2015, 30(20): 3496-3498. DOI:10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2015.20.62.
[12]
薛惠英,仲纪祥,左阳花,等. 盆底仿生物电刺激干预治疗薄型子宫内膜患者的冷冻胚胎移植结局[J]. 生殖医学杂志,2015, 24(1): 12-16. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2015.01.003.
[13]
胡艳,光晓燕,李环,等. 仿生物电刺激改善薄型子宫内膜厚度及血流灌注的研究[J]. 罕少疾病杂志,2013, 20(6): 17-19. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-3257.2013.06.005.
[14]
樊琳,刘风华. 盆底仿生物电刺激治疗在薄型子宫内膜患者行冷冻胚胎移植周期中的临床疗效[J]. 中华生物医学工程杂志,2018, 24(1): 38-42. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-1927.2018.01.008.
[15]
杨云洁,史文静,程芳. 仿生物理电刺激治疗对人工终止妊娠术后子宫内膜修复的临床疗效[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(1): 93-98. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.01.014.
[16]
Takasaki A, Tamura H, Miwa I, et al. Endometrial growth and uterine blood flow: a pilot study for improving endometrial thickness in the patients with a thin endometrium[J]. Fertil Steril, 2010, 93(6): 1851-1858. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.062.
[1] 张静, 张毅, 蔡治平, 魏俊帅, 刘政. 不同超声治疗时间激励微泡空化对肿瘤血流灌注的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1294-1299.
[2] 李蓉. 薄型子宫内膜治疗新方法[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 591-591.
[3] 张舒沁, 陈练. 产后宫腔内妊娠物残留的诊断和临床处理[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 493-497.
[4] 石皆春, 范子玉, 邢燕. 不同筛查方法预警宫颈原位腺癌的效能[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 575-581.
[5] 唐丹, 姚晓曦, 杨博文, 薛绍龙, 李梦瑶, 韦柳杏, 郄明蓉. 双肾上腺皮质激素样激酶1对子宫内膜样腺癌患者临床特征的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 582-590.
[6] 魏艺, 周羽西, 杨烨, 凌秀凤, 赵纯. 微小RNA对子宫内膜容受性影响的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 266-270.
[7] 林琳, 田思萌, 于永华, 徐飞飞, 黄明莉. 干细胞及其外泌体治疗宫腔黏连的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 271-275.
[8] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[9] 高伟聪, 李丽, 张中华, 朱向辉, 刘素巧. 宫颈癌患者糖调节受损对改良根治术后2年内复发的影响作用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 231-237.
[10] 杨琳, 尹如铁. 外阴白色病变病因研究及治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 157-165.
[11] 王丽, 王月莺, 周芬, 郭宇堃, 魏丽娜. 促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂对子宫内膜容受性影响的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 629-635.
[12] 武渊, 朱必清, 何丹, 王海蓉, 李倩. 采取调强放疗联合后装治疗宫颈癌患者的预后模型及危险分层系统构建[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 734-744.
[13] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[14] 马敏榕, 李聪, 周勤. 宫颈癌治疗研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 497-504.
[15] 李煜, 王鹏, 陆翮, 冯蓉琴, 韩军涛. 采用低频脉冲电刺激治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 474-478.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?