切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 221 -225. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.02.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

支气管激发试验在儿童哮喘管理中的应用
张腾腾1,1, 边继美2,2, 张中平1,,1(), 王海燕1,1, 刘晓娟1,1, 甄立娜1,1   
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-09 修回日期:2021-03-10 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 张中平

Clinical application of bronchial provocation tests in childhood asthma management

Tengteng Zhang1,1, Jimei Bian2,2, Zhongping Zhang1,1,(), Haiyan Wang1,1, Xiaojuan Liu1,1, Lina Zhen1,1   

  • Received:2020-07-09 Revised:2021-03-10 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhongping Zhang
  • Supported by:
    Key Project Plan of Medical Science Research of Hebei Province(20190851)
引用本文:

张腾腾, 边继美, 张中平, 王海燕, 刘晓娟, 甄立娜. 支气管激发试验在儿童哮喘管理中的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(02): 221-225.

Tengteng Zhang, Jimei Bian, Zhongping Zhang, Haiyan Wang, Xiaojuan Liu, Lina Zhen. Clinical application of bronchial provocation tests in childhood asthma management[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(02): 221-225.

目的

探讨支气管激发试验(BPT)在儿童哮喘管理中的应用价值。

方法

选择2018年5月至2019年10月,河北省儿童医院门诊就诊的临床缓解期,并达到良好控制水平至少1年的39例哮喘患儿为研究对象。根据患儿小气道功能,将其分为研究组(n=11,小气道功能下降)及对照组(n=28,小气道功能正常)。回顾性分析2组患儿的临床病例资料,包括肺功能、Astograph法醋甲胆碱BPT结果、BPT后6个月随访期内不同情况下哮喘控制情况。采用独立样本t检验及Fisher确切概率法,对2组患儿BPT阳性率及基础气道阻力,以及不同情况下患儿哮喘控制情况进行统计学分析。本研究经河北省儿童医院医学伦理委员会批准(审批文号:医研伦审第120号),入组时,征得患儿及其监护人知情同意。

结果

① 2组患儿BPT阳性率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组患儿基础气道阻力为(6.21±1.69) cmH2O/(L·s)(1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa),显著高于对照组患儿的(4.97±1.42) cmH2O/(L·s),并且差异有统计学意义(t=2.324、P=0.026)。②28例BPT呈阳性患儿中,停药患儿哮喘复发率为64.3%(9/14),显著高于采取原方案继续治疗患儿的21.4%(3/14),并且差异有统计学意义(P=0.027);停药治疗的BPT呈阳性患儿哮喘复发率(64.3%,9/14),显著高于停药治疗BPT呈阴性患儿的9.1%(1/11),并且差异有统计学意义(P=0.007)。

结论

对于临床缓解期、达到良好控制水平的哮喘患儿,在监测肺功能的同时,建议监测其气道反应性。对于BPT呈阳性者,建议暂缓药物降级或者停药,以便更好控制其哮喘发作。

Objective

To explore application values of bronchial provocation test (BPT) in the management of childhood asthma.

Methods

A total of 39 asthmatic children treated in outpatient clinic of Hebei Children′s Hospital as clinical remission, and reached a well-controlled level for at least 1 year from May 2018 to October 2019, were selected as research subjects. According to small airway function, they were divided into research group (n=11, decreased small airway function) and control group (n=28, normal small airway function). Their clinical data were analyzed retrospectively, including lung function, the BPT results of methacholine by Astograph, and control level of asthma in different conditions during the follow-up period of 6 months after BPT. Independent-samples t test and Fisher exact probability method were used to statistically compare the BPT positive rate and basic airway resistance between two groups of children, as well as the asthma control level of children under different conditions. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Hebei Children′s Hospital (Approval No. Medical Research Ethics Approval No. 120). All children and their guardians were informed and agreed at the time of enrollment.

Results

①There was no significant difference in positive rate of BPT between two groups of children (P>0.05). The basic airway resistance of children in research group was (6.21±1.69) cmH2O/(L·s) (1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa), which was significantly higher than that of (4.97±1.42) cmH2O/(L·s) in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.324, P=0.026). ② Among 28 children with BPT positive, the recurrence rate of asthma in children who discontinued treatment was 64.3% (9/14), which was significantly higher than that of 21.4%(3/14) in children who continued the original treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.027); The recurrence rate of asthma in BPT positive children who discontinued treatment (64.3%, 9/14) was significantly higher than that of 9.1%(1/11) in BPT negative children who discontinued treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.007).

Conclusions

For asthmatic children who are in clinical remission and have reached a well-controlled level, it is recommended to monitor their airway responsiveness while monitoring their lung function. For BPT positive asthmatic children, it is recommended to postpone the downgrading of drug or stop the treatment in order to control the asthma attack better.

[1]
中华医学会儿科学分会呼吸学组,《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会. 儿童支气管哮喘诊断与防治指南(2016年版)[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2016, 54(3): 167-181. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2016.03.003.
[2]
Mochizuki H, Shigeta M, Morikawa A. Development of bronchial hyperresponsiveness during childhood[J]. J Asthma, 2001, 38(1): 1-21. DOI: 10.1081/jas-100000018.
[3]
Wong GW, Kwon N, Hong JG, et al. Pediatric asthma control in Asia: phase 2 of the Asthma Insights and Reality in Asia-Pacific (AIRIAP 2) survey[J]. Allergy, 2013, 68(4): 524-530. DOI: 10.1111/all.12117.
[4]
刘传合,洪建国,尚云晓,等. 中国16城市儿童哮喘患病率20年对比研究[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志,2015, 30(8): 596-600. DOI: 10.7504/ek2015080609.
[5]
中华医学会儿科学分会呼吸学组肺功能协作组,《中华实用儿科临床杂志》编辑委员会.儿童肺功能系列指南(二):肺容积和通气功能[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志,2016, 31(10): 744-750. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2016.10.006.
[6]
中华医学会儿科学分会呼吸学组肺功能协作组,《中华实用儿科临床杂志》编辑委员会. 儿童肺功能系列指南(六):支气管激发试验[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志,2017, 32(4):263-269. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2017.04.007.
[7]
Radford PJ, Hopp RJ, Biven RE, et al. Longitudinal changes in bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic and previously asthmatic children[J]. Chest, 1992, 101(3): 624-629. DOI: 10.1378/chest.101.3.624.
[8]
Muñoz X, Sanchez-Vidaurre S, Roca O, et al. Bronchial inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in well controlled asthma[J]. Clin Exp Allergy, 2012, 42(9): 1321-1328. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2012.04004.x.
[9]
郭伟. 儿童支气管激发试验的进展及临床应用[J]. 医学综述,2012, 18(17): 2812-2816. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2012.17.029.
[10]
林嘉镖,王桂兰,黄东明,等. 缓解期支气管哮喘行气道反应性测定临床价值研究[J]. 中国医药科学,2018, 8(3): 199-201. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0616.2018.03.061.
[11]
范袭荣. 儿童支气管哮喘发作期和缓解期肺功能及气道反应性测定[J/CD]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(电子版), 2018, 18(27): 62-63.
[12]
Alexander Moeller, Kai-Hakon Carlsen, Peter D. Sly, et al. Monitoring asthma in childhood: lung function, bronchial responsiveness and inflammation[J]. Eur Respir Rev, 2015, 24 (136): 204-215. DOI:10.1183/16000617.00003914.
[13]
邹俊,杨阳,刘跃建. 哮喘控制测试与支气管激发试验在哮喘管理中的应用[J]. 实用医院临床杂志,2012, 9(5): 70-72. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2012.05.021.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 吴少峰, 张轶男, 孙杰. 机器人辅助手术在儿童微创泌尿手术中的应用和展望[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 440-444.
[8] 朱良振, 于永刚, 陈杲, 廖松柏. 儿童高级别闭合性肾损伤肾动脉栓塞与手术探查的疗效比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 461-465,475.
[9] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[10] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[11] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 余林阳, 王美英, 李建斌, 楼骁斌, 谢思远, 马志忠, 齐海英, 李稼. 高原地区肺炎合并右心功能衰竭体征患儿的肺动脉压力和心脏形态与功能的特征[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 535-544.
阅读次数
全文


摘要