切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 226 -233. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.02.015

所属专题: 文献

论著

智能手机程序检测新生儿胆红素浓度的临床价值
刘国玉(), 付洪涛, 侯桂军   
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-07 修回日期:2021-03-08 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 刘国玉

Application value of smartphone application in detecting neonatal bilirubin level

Guoyu Liu(), Hongtao Fu, Guijun Hou   

  • Received:2020-10-07 Revised:2021-03-08 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Guoyu Liu
  • Supported by:
    Key Project of Medical Science Research of Hebei Province(20181331)
引用本文:

刘国玉, 付洪涛, 侯桂军. 智能手机程序检测新生儿胆红素浓度的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(02): 226-233.

Guoyu Liu, Hongtao Fu, Guijun Hou. Application value of smartphone application in detecting neonatal bilirubin level[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(02): 226-233.

目的

探讨智能手机程序自动拍照检测胆红素(AIB)浓度在新生儿黄疸患儿中的应用价值。

方法

选取2018年1至12月,唐山市妇幼保健院收治的300例新生儿黄疸患儿为研究对象。对其采取以下3种方法测新生儿胆红素浓度:①采集肘静脉血测定血清总胆红素(TSB)浓度;②采用经皮黄疸测试仪测定经皮胆红素(TcB)浓度;③采用智能手机程序AIB浓度。对其AIB与TSB浓度、TcB与TSB浓度比较,采用配对t检验。采用Bland-Altman一致性检验对3种方法检测新生儿胆红素浓度的AIB与TSB浓度、TcB与TSB浓度一致性进行分析,再采用直线相关分析对其中2种方法的检测结果进行相关性分析。本研究得到唐山市妇幼保健院伦理委员会批准(伦理第202002901),并且与受试者签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

① 300例患儿的TSB、TcB和AIB浓度分别为(192.2±66.5) μmol/L、(195.3±70.2) μmol/L和(198.7±52.6) μmol/L,其AIB和TSB浓度、TcB和TSB浓度分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=1.333、0.564,P=0.182、0.586)。Bland-Altman一致性检验结果提示,检测新生儿AIB与TSB、TcB与TSB浓度均具有较强一致性[96.0%(288/300)、97.0%(291/300)]。新生儿AIB与TSB、TcB与TSB浓度均呈正相关关系(r=0.601、0.783,P=0.024、0.018)。②胎龄>35周患儿AIB和TcB与TSB浓度比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.041、0.188,P=0.974、0.867);胎龄<35周患儿TcB与TSB浓度比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.385,P=0.175),AIB和TSB浓度比较,差异有统计学意义(t=2.931,P=0.002)。不同胎龄、不同日龄新生儿AIB与TSB、TcB与TSB浓度均有较强的一致性。③受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析结果显示,本组新生儿AIB、TcB浓度的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.693(95%CI:0.614~0.723,P=0.014)和0.690(95%CI:0.604~0.776,P=0.027)。根据约登指数最大原则,AIB浓度的最佳临界值为193.247 μmol/L时,对于诊断新生儿黄疸患儿的敏感度为68.7%,特异度为67.4%;TcB浓度最佳临界值为189.348 μmol/L时,敏感度为75.0%,特异度为71.2%。

结论

本组新生儿AIB和TcB与TSB浓度均具有良好的一致性,对诊断新生儿黄疸具有较高敏感度和特异度。智能手机程序因其无创,而更容易被出院后需进行胆红素浓度检测的随访患儿接受。

Objective

To explore the application value of automated image-based bilirubin (AIB) detection by smartphone application in neonates with jaundice.

Methods

From January to December, 2018, a total of 300 neonates with jaundice were selected into this study. Venous blood was collected from all children to determine serum total bilirubin (TSB) concentration, transcutaneous jaundice tester was used to determine the transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) concentration, and smartphone application program was used to automatically take pictures to detect the AIB concentration. Paired t test was used to compare the concentrations of AIB and TSB, TcB and TSB in neonates with jaundice. The Bland-Altman consistency test was used to analyze the consistency between different methods, and then the linear correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between two detection methods. The procedures followed in this study were in accordance with the standards established by the Committee of Investigation in Human Beings of Tangshan Maternal and Children Health Hospital, and this study was approved by the committee (Approval No. 202002901). Informed consent was obtained from each participates′ guardians.

Results

①The concentrations of TSB, TcB and AIB of 300 children were (192.2±66.5) μmol/L, (195.3± 70.2) μmol/L and (198.7±52.6) μmol/L, respectively. There were no significant differences between the concentrations of AIB and TSB, TcB and TSB, respectively (t=1.333, 0.564, P=0.182, 0.586). The Bland-Altman consistency test results showed that AIB and TSB, TcB and TSB had strong consistency [96.0% (288/300), 97.0% (291/300)]. Linear correlation analysis between AIB and TSB, TcB and TSB showed positive correlation, respectively (r=0.601, 0.783, P=0.024, 0.018). ② There were no statistically significant differences between AIB and TSB, between TcB and TSB of children with gestational age>35 weeks (t=0.041, 0.188, P=0.974, 0.867); there was no significant difference between TcB and TSB in children with gestational age<35 weeks (t=1.385, P=0.175), but there was significant difference between AIB and TSB (t=2.931, P=0.002). There were strong consistency between AIB and TSB, TcB and TSB in neonates with jaundice at different gestational age and different age. ③ Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis showed the following. The area under curve (AUC) of AIB and TcB for serum bilirubin levels were 0.693 (95%CI: 0.614-0.723, P=0.014) and 0.690 (95%CI: 0.604-0.776, P=0.027), respectively. According to the principle of maximum Youden index, the optimal critical value of serum bilirubin level determined by AIB was 193.247 μmol/L, and the sensitivity and specificity was 68.7% and 67.4%, respectively. The optimal critical value for the determination of serum bilirubin by TcB was 189.348 μmol/L, and the sensitivity was 75.0% and the specificity was 71.2%.

Conclusions

Both AIB and TcB have good consistency with TSB, and have high sensitivity and specificity. Smartphone applications are more suitable for children with jaundice who need follow-up after discharge.

图1 本组300例新生儿黄疸患儿AIB与TSB浓度的Bland-Altman一致性检验分析图
图2 本组300例新生儿黄疸患儿TcB与TSB浓度的Bland-Altman一致性检验分析图
图3 本组234例胎龄>35周新生儿黄疸患儿AIB与TSB浓度的Bland-Altman一致性检验分析图
图4 本组234例胎龄>35周新生儿黄疸患儿TcB与TSB浓度的Bland-Altman一致性检验分析图
图5 本组66例胎龄≤35周新生儿黄疸患儿AIB与TSB浓度的Bland-Altman一致性检验分析图
图6 本组66例胎龄≤35周新生儿黄疸患儿TcB与TSB浓度的Bland-Altman一致性检验分析图
图7 本组143例日龄<10 d新生儿黄疸患儿AIB与TSB浓度的Bland-Altman一致性检验分析图
图8 本组143例日龄<10 d新生儿黄疸患儿TcB与TSB浓度的Bland-Altman一致性检验分析图
图9 本组157例日龄≥10 d新生儿黄疸患儿AIB与TSB浓度的Bland-Altman一致性检验分析图
图10 本组157例日龄≥10 d新生儿黄疸患儿的TcB与TSB浓度的Bland-Altman一致性检验分析图
图11 AIB及TcB测定胆红素浓度的ROC曲线
[1]
吴晓燕,叶云,谭晓霞. 总胆红素、非结合胆红素、总胆汁酸和超敏C-反应蛋白检测在新生儿病理性黄疸诊治中的应用[J].浙江医学,2020,42(8):847-850. DOI:10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2020.42.8.2019-2499.
[2]
Mreihil K, Benth JŠ, Stensvold HJ, et al. Phototherapy is commonly used for neonatal jaundice but greater control is needed to avoid toxicity in the most vulnerable infants[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2018, 107(4): 611-619. DOI: 10.1111/apa.14141.
[3]
张娜,王惠娟. 不同方式光照疗法辅以药物治疗新生儿病理性黄疸的临床对比研究[J].山西医药杂志,2018,47(2):154-156. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2018.02.011.
[4]
徐凯,雷军强. 新生儿胆红素脑病发病机制及磁共振诊断的研究进展[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志,2019,17(1):141-145. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2019.01.043.
[5]
《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会,中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组. 新生儿黄疸诊疗原则的专家共识[J].中华儿科杂志,2010, 48(9): 685-686. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2010.09.012.
[6]
容志惠,罗芳,马丽亚,等. 基于智能手机应用软件拍照监测对新生儿高胆红素血症随访的意义[J].中华儿科杂志,2016,54(8):597-600. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2016.08.008.
[7]
赵丹丹,黄迪,高翔羽.经皮胆红素测定在新生儿黄疸中的应用[J].中华儿科杂志,2017, 55(1):74-77. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2017.01.018.
Khan KA, Alam J, Nahar N, et al. Predicting neonatal hyperbilirubinemia using first day serum bilirubin level in late preterm and term healthy newborn[J]. Mymensingh Med J, 2017, 26(4): 854-862.
[8]
Jones KDJ, Grossman SE, Kumaranayakam D, et al. Umbilical cord bilirubin as a predictor of neonatal jaundice: a retrospective cohort study[M]. BMC Pediatr, 2017, 17(1): 186. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-017-0938-1.
[9]
陈海云,崔华英,陈博文. 间歇蓝光照射联合静脉滴注白蛋白治疗新生儿病理性黄疸患儿的临床疗效[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2019,15(5): 579-584. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.05.016.
[10]
汤丽,许欣.新生儿病理性黄疸患儿血清胆红素、TSBA及HS-CRP检测浓度分析[J].中国实验诊断学,2018,22(9):1518-1521. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2018.09.009.
[11]
王杨,谷冬梅,陈京山,等. 三种常规方法检测血清胆红素结果的可比性和偏倚评估[J].中国实验诊断学,2017,21(10):1744-1747. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2017.10.020.
[12]
杨波,黄迪,高翔羽,等.智能手机软件拍照监测新生儿及早期婴儿黄疸的应用研究[J].中华新生儿科杂志,2018,33(4):277-282. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2932.2018.04.009.
[14]
黄迪,杨波,高翔羽,等. 不同条件对智能手机软件拍照估算新生儿胆红素值准确性的影响[J].中华围产医学杂志,2019,22(4):269-277. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2019.04.012.
[15]
Taylor JA, Stout JW, Greef LD, et al. Use of a smartphone App to assess neonatal jaundice[J]. Pediatrics, 2017, 40(3): pii: e20170312. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-0312.
[16]
薛国昌,丁学星,陈娜,等.黄疸比色卡辅助目测识别新生儿高胆红素血症[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2018,33(22):1731-1734. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2018.22.013.
[17]
丁宁,胡晓明. 我国儿科移动医疗应用程序功能分析及展望[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2018, 27(8): 57-61. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3982.2018.08.010.
[1] 张禾璇, 杨雪, 王侣金, 李林洁, 刘兴宇. 新生儿葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症筛查及基因突变特征分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 200-208.
[2] 马海月, 南晓琴. 网织红细胞百分比/未成熟网织红细胞指数联合胆红素与白蛋白比值对新生儿溶血病的病情评估意义[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 89-96.
[3] 徐珍娥, 杨娅丽, 徐晨霞, 向巴曲西, 王家蓉. 无创脑水肿监测技术在高原地区重度窒息新生儿脑水肿中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 114-119.
[4] 姜舟, 唐立, 杨柳, 邹凌. 先天性甲状腺功能减退症患儿确诊时间的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 649-656.
[5] 刘轩瑶, 赵晓曦. 孕妇常见产前筛查指标单独及联合检测对胎儿染色体异常的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 657-664.
[6] 张艳兰, 徐琳, 王彩英, 杨洪玲, 庞琳. 56例先天性梅毒新生儿的临床特征及预后[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 163-169.
[7] 鲁鑫, 杨琴, 许佳怡. 不同术式治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸疗效及对免疫功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 180-183.
[8] 尚培中, 张润萍, 张伟, 贾国洪, 李晓武, 苗建军, 刘冰. 梗阻性黄疸临床防治新技术单中心应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 104-107.
[9] 张艺萱, 罗金丹, 葛小丽, 钟红琴. 先天性心脏病伴PH血清H-FABP、NT-proBNP与肺动脉内径、血流速度及PASP的关系[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 252-255.
[10] 路长贵, 唐维兵. 新生儿及小婴儿先天性胆管扩张症临床特征分析及微创治疗[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 76-82.
[11] 赵月, 田坤, 张宗明, 郭震天, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓. 降钙素原对老年急性重度胆囊炎发生的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 801-806.
[12] 陈昌雄, 吕云福, 郑进方. 胆总管结石胆汁动力学研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 100-102.
[13] 马燕芳, 高修银, 李平静, 李雷. 甘油三酯葡萄糖乘积指数与消化性溃疡出血的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 128-131.
[14] 李变, 王莉娜, 桑田, 李珊, 杜雪燕, 李春华, 张兴云, 管巧, 王颖, 冯琪, 蒙景雯. 亚低温技术治疗缺氧缺血性脑病新生儿的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[15] 周慧慧, 石洁, 陶晶晶. 探讨基于云平台的个案追踪管理在新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病出院后的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-595.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?