切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 669 -675. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.06.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

早、中孕期宫颈息肉摘除术孕妇妊娠结局及其影响因素分析
戴祎1, 生诚成1, 王珺1,()   
  1. 1. 中国医科大学附属盛京医院妇产科,沈阳 110001
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-10 修回日期:2019-11-08 出版日期:2019-12-01
  • 通信作者: 王珺

Analysis on pregnancy outcomes and influencing factors of pregnant women undergoing cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester

Yi Dai1, Chengcheng Sheng1, Jun Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China
  • Received:2019-07-10 Revised:2019-11-08 Published:2019-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jun, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province(20180530076)
引用本文:

戴祎, 生诚成, 王珺. 早、中孕期宫颈息肉摘除术孕妇妊娠结局及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(06): 669-675.

Yi Dai, Chengcheng Sheng, Jun Wang. Analysis on pregnancy outcomes and influencing factors of pregnant women undergoing cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(06): 669-675.

目的

探讨早、中孕期宫颈息肉摘除术对母儿妊娠结局的影响。

方法

选择2012年1月至2018年4月,于中国医科大学附属盛京医院妇产科因妊娠合并宫颈息肉于早、中孕期接受宫颈息肉摘除术治疗的167例孕妇为研究对象。按照术后妊娠结局,将其分为自然流产组(自然流产时孕龄<28孕周,n=17),早产组(分娩时孕龄为28~36+6孕周,n=48)和足月产组(分娩时孕龄≥37孕周,n=102)3组。采用Kruskal-Wallis H秩和检验或者Mann-Whitney U秩和检验对年龄、孕次、产次等计量资料进行统计学分析。采用线性趋势χ2检验或者χ2检验对宫颈锥切术史者、妊娠期糖尿病者、合并妊娠高血压疾病者、术前阴道流血者所占比例等计数资料进行统计学分析。在上述单因素分析基础上,根据既往研究结果及临床经验,进一步进行有序多分类非条件logistic回归分析,对早、中孕期宫颈息肉摘除术后可能影响孕妇妊娠结局的相关因素进行分析。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求,并且与受试者本人及其家属签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①自然流产组、早产组和足月产组孕妇的产次均为0,接受宫颈息肉摘除术时的孕龄,分别为13孕周(12~14孕周)、15孕周(13~17孕周)和15孕周(13~18孕周);术后阴道流血发生率分别为35.3%(6/167)、50.0%(24/167)和48.0%(49/167);手术时孕龄≤12孕周所占比例分别为23.5%(4/167)、10.4%(5/167)和5.9%(6/167),3组的上述4项指标分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=7.363、7.535、9.198、4.364,P=0.025、0.023、0.002、0.037)。②结合目前已有研究结果及临床经验与本研究单因素分析结果中差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)因素,对早、中孕期宫颈息肉摘除术后,可能影响孕妇妊娠结局因素的研究结果显示,孕妇接受息肉摘除术后无阴道流血,是足月产分娩的保护因素(OR=13.577,95%CI:1.300~141.743,P=0.029)。③宫颈息肉和宫颈蜕膜息肉孕妇的晚孕期自然流产发生率分别为37.3%(56/150)和76.5%(13/17),合并息肉炎症反应发生率分别为52.7%(79/150)和0,二者分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=9.646、16.991,P=0.002、<0.001)。

结论

妊娠合并宫颈息肉孕妇接受宫颈息肉摘除术治疗,应避免于孕龄<12孕周前进行,术中应采取最适合的止血措施。病理学类型为宫颈蜕膜息肉孕妇,对早、中孕期接受宫颈息肉摘除术不会增加自然流产风险,但是宫颈蜕膜息肉孕妇,较普通宫颈息肉者更易发生晚孕期自然流产。

Objective

To explore pregnancy outcomes and influencing factors of pregnant women undergoing cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester.

Methods

From January 2012 to April 2018, a total of 167 pregnant women with single-pregnancy who were operated by cervical polypectomy during first and second trimester in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University were collected in this study. According to pregnancy outcomes, they were divided into 3 groups: miscarriage group (gestational age at termination of pregnancy < 28 gestational weeks, n=17), premature group (gestational age at termination of pregnancy was 28-36+ 6 gestational weeks, n=48) and full-term group (gestational age at termination of pregnancy ≥37 gestational weeks, n=102). The Kruskal-Wallis H rank sum test or Mann-Whitney U rank sum test were used to carry out statistical analysis on the quantitative data such as age, pregnancy and parity. Linear trend chi-square test or chi-square test were used to statistically analyze the counting data, such as the proportion of patients with cervical conization history, gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy-induced hypertension and preoperative vaginal bleeding. On the basis of the above single factor analysis, according to previous research results and clinical experience, further orderly multi-classification unconditional logistic regression analysis was carried out to analyze the relevant factors that may affect the pregnancy outcomes of patients after cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester. This study was in line with the requirements of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013. All participants confirmed and signed consent forms for clinical trials.

Results

① There were 0 (0-0), 0 (0-1) and 0 (0-0) parity in miscarriage group, preterm group and full-term group, respectively. The gestational age at the time of operation was 13 weeks (12-14 weeks), 15 weeks (13-17 weeks) and 15 weeks (13-18 weeks), respectively. The proportion of vaginal bleeding after operation was 35.3% (6/167), 50.0% (24/167) and 48.0% (49/167), and the proportion of gestational age ≤ 12 weeks at the time of operation was 23.5% (4/167), 10.4% (5/167) and 5.9% (6/167), respectively. The differences among the above four indexes were statistically significant (χ2 =7.363, 7.535, 9.198, 4.364; P=0.025, 0.023, 0.002, 0.037). ② Combined with the existing research results and clinical experience, as well as the factors with statistically significant difference in single factor analysis results (P< 0.05), the orderly multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was conducted. The results showed that no vaginal bleeding after polypectomy was the protective factor for full-term delivery (OR=13.577, 95%CI: 1.300-141.743, P=0.029). ③The rate of spontaneous abortion in third trimester was 37.3% and 76.5% in patients with cervical polyp and decidual polyp, and the rate of patients with polyp inflammation was 52.7% and 0, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (χ2=9.646, 16.991, P=0.002, <0.001).

Conclusions

Cervical polypectomy in pregnancy should be avoided before 12 gestational weeks and hemostasis measures should be taken during operation. However, patients with cervical decidual polyps are more likely to have spontaneous miscarriage in third trimester than those with cervical polyps.

表1 早、中孕期接受宫颈息肉摘除术后,影响孕妇妊娠结局的相关因素分析
组别 例数 年龄[岁,M(P25P75)] 孕次[次,M(P25P75)] 产次[次,M(P25P75)] 高龄妊娠(≥35岁)[例数(%)] 手术时孕龄[周,M(P25P75)] 早孕期自然流产史[例数(%)]
自然流产组 17 30(28~33) 2(1~3) 0(0~0) 2(11.8) 13(12~14) 14(82.4) 3(17.6)
早产组 48 32(29~35) 2(2~3) 0(0~1) 13(27.1) 15(13~17) 43(89.6) 5(10.4)
足月产组 102 31(29~34) 2(1~2) 0(0~0) 18(17.6) 15(13~18) 92(90.2) 10(9.8)
χ2 ? 3.415 5.502 7.363 0.253 7.535 0.477
P ? 0.181 0.064 0.025 0.615 0.023 0.491
组别 例数 晚孕期自然流产史[例数(%)] 宫颈锥切术史[例数(%)] 妊娠期糖尿病[例数(%)] 妊娠高血压疾病[例数(%)] 宫颈息肉长径[例数(%)]
≥3 cm <3 cm
流产组 17 11(64.7) 6(35.3) 1(5.9) 4(23.5) 0(0) 12(70.6) 5(29.4)
早产组 48 24(50.0) 24(50.0) 2(4.2) 7(14.6) 1(2.1) 16(33.3) 32(68.7)
足月产组 102 63(61.8) 39(38.2) 6(5.9) 11(10.8) 1(1.0) 42(41.2) 60(58.8)
χ2 ? 0.527 0.077 1.744 0.022 0.772
P ? 0.468 0.782 0.183 0.881 0.381
组别 例数 宫颈息肉的病理学类型[例数(%)] 阴道分泌物清洁度[例数(%)] 术前阴道流血[例数(%)]
宫颈息肉 宫颈蜕膜息肉 Ⅰ~Ⅱ Ⅲ~Ⅳ 未行检查
流产组 17 15(88.2) 2(11.8) 2(11.8) 0(0) 15(88.2) 11(64.7)
早产组 48 43(89.6) 5(10.4) 15(31.3) 6(12.5) 27(56.3) 24(50.0)
足月产组 102 92(90.2) 10(9.8) 29(28.4) 26(25.5) 47(46.1) 59(57.8)
χ2 ? 0.054 3.332 0.057
P ? 0.816 0.068 0.811
组别 例数 术后阴道流血[例数(%)] 手术时孕龄≤12孕周[例数(%)] 息肉所致炎症反应[例数(%)]
血性分泌物 阴道血流 a
流产组 17 7(41.2) 8(47.1) 6(35.3) 4(23.5) 13(76.5) 6(35.3)
早产组 48 39(81.3) 9(18.8) 24(50.0) 5(10.4) 43(89.6) 24(50.0)
足月产组 102 86(84.3) 15(14.7) 49(48.0) 6(5.9) 96(94.1) 49(48.0)
χ2 ? 9.198 4.364 0.232
P ? 0.002 0.037 0.630
表2 对宫颈息肉摘除术后,影响孕妇妊娠结局因素的有序多分类非条件logistic回归分析变量含义及赋值情况
表3 对宫颈息肉摘除术后,影响孕妇妊娠结局因素的有序多分类非条件logistic回归分析
表4 宫颈息肉组和宫颈蜕膜息肉组孕妇的临床特征比较
组别 例数 年龄[岁,M(P25P75)] 手术时孕龄[周,M(P25P75)] 高龄孕妇[例数(%)] 孕次[次,M(P25P75)] 产次[次,M(P25P75)] 早孕期自然流产史[例数(%)]
宫颈息肉组 150 31(29~34) 15(13~18) 30(20.0) 2(1~3) 0(0~0) 133(88.7) 17(11.3)
宫颈蜕膜息肉组 17 31(28~34) 14(13~15) 3(17.6) 2(2~4) 0(0~0) 16(94.1) 1(5.9)
检验值 ? Z=-0.343 Z=-1.064 χ2=0.053 a Z=-1.591 Z=-1.277 χ2=0.075 a
P ? 0.732 0.288 0.817 0.112 0.201 0.784
组别 例数 晚孕期自然流产史[例数(%)] 宫颈锥切术史[例数(%)] 妊娠期糖尿病[例数(%)] 妊娠期高血压[例数(%)] 宫颈息肉长径[例数(%)]
≥3 cm < 3 cm
宫颈息肉组 150 94(62.7) 56(37.3) 8(5.3) 19(12.7) 2(1.3) 64(42.7) 86(57.3)
宫颈蜕膜息肉组 17 4(23.5) 13(76.5) 1(5.9) 3(17.6) 0(0) 6(35.3) 11(64.7)
检验值 ? χ2=9.646 b χ2=0.039 a b χ2=0.341
P ? 0.002 0.400 0.844 0.800 0.559
组别 例数 息肉炎症反应[例数(%)] 阴道分泌物清洁度[例数(%)] 术前阴道流血[例数(%)]
Ⅰ~Ⅱ Ⅲ~Ⅳ 未行检查
宫颈息肉组 150 71(47.3) 79(52.7) 42(28.0) 27(18.0) 81(54.0) 88(58.7)
宫颈蜕膜息肉组 17 17(100.0) 0(0) 5(29.4) 4(23.5) 8(47.1) 6(35.3)
检验值 ? χ2=16.991 χ2=0.557 a χ2=3.390
P ? <0.001 0.836 0.066
组别 例数 术后阴道流血[例数(%)] 不良妊娠结局[例数(%)] 宫颈息肉摘除术至终止妊娠的时间[周,M(P25P75)] 分娩孕龄[周,M(P25P75)]
血性分泌物 阴道流血 自然流产 早产
宫颈息肉组 150 117(78.0) 30(20.0) 3(2.0) 15(10.0) 43(28.7) 22(17~24) 37(35~38)
宫颈蜕膜息肉组 17 15(88.2) 2(11.8) 0(0) 2(11.8) 5(29.4) 24(21~24) 37(35~38)
检验值 ? b χ2=0.064 a Z=-1.216 Z=-0.278
P ? 0.660 0.969 0.224 0.781
[1]
Schnatz PF, Ricci S, O′Sullivan DM. Cervical polyps in postmenopausal women: is there a difference in risk? [J]. Menopause, 2009, 16(3): 524-528.
[2]
Stamatellos I, Stamatopoulos P, Bontis J. The role of hysteroscopy in the current management of the cervical polyps [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2007, 276(4): 299-303.
[3]
王群,吴步初,龙雯晴,等. 子宫内膜息肉的发病相关高危因素分析[J]. 现代妇产科进展,2015, 24(7):490-492.
[4]
Younis MT, Iram S, Anwar B, et al. Women with asymptomatic cervical polyps may not need to see a gynaecologist or have them removed: an observational retrospective study of 1 126 cases [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2010, 150(2): 190-194.
[5]
Nelson AL, Papa RR, Ritchie JJ. Asymptomatic cervical polyps: can we just let them be? [J]. Womens Health (Lond), 2015, 11(2): 121-126.
[6]
Robertson M, Scott P, Ellwood DA, et al. Endocervical polyp in pregnancy: gray scale and color Doppler images and essential considerations in pregnancy [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 26(5): 583-584.
[7]
Kanayama N, Terao T. The relation between granulocyte elastase activity in cervical mucus and gestational cervical polyp [J]. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi, 1991, 43(1): 26-30.
[8]
李冰,金玲,常春玲,等. 妊娠期生殖道感染对妊娠结局的危害及其影响 [J]. 中国性科学,2017,26(7):68-70.
[9]
Tokunaka M, Hasegawa J, Oba T, et al. Decidual polyps are associated with preterm delivery in cases of attempted uterine cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2015, 28(9): 1061-1063.
[10]
张玉洁,张龑. 妊娠期宫颈息肉摘除术后妊娠结局分析[J]. 中国生育健康杂志,2018,29(2):138-141.
[11]
Panayotidis C, Alhuwalia A. Cervical polypectomy during pregnancy: is there any management advances on the last decades [J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2006, 5(1): 4
[12]
Levin G, Rottenstreich A. 2nd trimester miscarriage following decidual polypectomy [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018, 225: 262-263.
[13]
Kirbas A, Biberolu EH, DaLAR HK, et al. Pregnancy complicated with a giant cervical polyp: case report [J]. Turkiye Klinikleri Jinekoloji Obstetrik, 2015, 25(4): 275-277.
[14]
Hamadeh S, Addas B, Hamadeh N, et al. Conservative management of huge symptomatic endocervical polyp in pregnancy: a case report [J]. Afr J Reprod Health, 2018, 22(2): 88-90.
[15]
孟瑜,吴丹,李柱南,等. 妊娠期行宫颈息肉摘除术与妊娠结局的临床分析[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2019,47(1):94-97.
[16]
陈洁波.线圈套扎治疗妊娠早期合并宫颈息肉出血的效果观察[J].中国当代医药,2018,25(4):179-181.
[17]
Thomas C, Brigitte M, Alex F, et al. Benign diseasses of the cervix. Blaustein′s pathology of the female genital tract [M]. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2011: 155-191.
[18]
Levy RA, Kumarapeli AR, Spencer HJ, et al. Cervical polyps: is histologic evaluation necessary? [J]. Pathol Res Pract, 2016, 212(9): 800-803.
[19]
薛洪燕,杜月光,王瑞权,等. 宫颈息肉样病变临床病理分析[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床,2004,16(4):268-269.
[20]
米贤军,王冬娥,黄泳霞,等. 宫颈息肉样病变临床病理分析[J]. 现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2001,7(5):342-344.
[1] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[2] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[3] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[4] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[5] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[6] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[7] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[8] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[9] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[10] 袁成雪, 张宗霞, 许婷, 斯郎拉姆. 三种内镜手术治疗结肠息肉的效果及安全性观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 78-81.
[11] 张剑明, 叶文慧, 牟廷裕, 蓝孝亮, 邓海军. 腹腔镜全结直肠切除、回肠J型储袋-肛管吻合术近期并发症及防治策略[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 388-395.
[12] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[13] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[14] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[15] 刘雪云, 范颖, 姚爱军, 张胜苗, 吕亚妮, 张冰清, 张晓宇, 刘恒. 基于微信小程序的个体化、全程护理干预对孕妇孕期体重及分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
阅读次数
全文


摘要