切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 663 -667. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.06.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

宫腔镜下宫颈锥切术和宫颈冷刀锥切术治疗绝经后女性宫颈上皮内瘤变2级临床对比研究
张博1, 王金娟1,(), 张露1   
  1. 1. 100006 首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院妇科微创中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-29 修回日期:2018-10-25 出版日期:2018-12-01
  • 通信作者: 王金娟

Clinical comparative study of transcervical resection of cervical lesion and cervical cold knife conization in treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in postmenopausal women

Bo Zhang1, Jinjuan Wang1,(), Lu Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100006, China
  • Received:2018-06-29 Revised:2018-10-25 Published:2018-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Jinjuan Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jinjuan, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Yangfan Project of Key Clinical Medicine Development Special Fund of Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals(ZYLX201406)
引用本文:

张博, 王金娟, 张露. 宫腔镜下宫颈锥切术和宫颈冷刀锥切术治疗绝经后女性宫颈上皮内瘤变2级临床对比研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(06): 663-667.

Bo Zhang, Jinjuan Wang, Lu Zhang. Clinical comparative study of transcervical resection of cervical lesion and cervical cold knife conization in treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in postmenopausal women[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(06): 663-667.

目的

探讨宫腔镜下宫颈锥切术(TCRC)和宫颈冷刀锥切术(CKC),治疗绝经后女性宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2级的术中及术后情况。

方法

选择2010年10月至2018年3月,于首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院进行治疗的60例绝经后CIN2级患者为研究对象。按照对CIN2级患者采用锥切治疗术式的不同,将其分为TCRC组(n=30,采用TCRC治疗)和CKC组(n=30,采用宫颈CKC治疗)。对2组患者一般临床资料、手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后阴道出血、术后标本切缘阳性率、术后感染情况及手术前、后组织病理学诊断符合率等,采用成组t检验或χ2检验等统计学分析方法,进行回顾性临床对比研究。本研究遵循的程序,符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》的要求。

结果

① 2组绝经后CIN2级患者的年龄、绝经年龄、绝经时间、术前人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)阳性率及术前液基薄层细胞学检查(TCT)结果等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。② 2组绝经后CIN2级患者均顺利完成手术,术后均未发生局部或其他部位感染。TCRC组患者手术时间、术中出血量及术后住院时间分别为(20.7±9.6) min、(11.5±6.8) mL、(2.3±1.3) d,均短于或少于CKC组的(34.5±8.2) min、(36.0±18.7) mL、(4.1±1.4) d,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=5.981、6.731、5.133,P<0.001)。2组患者术后阴道出血率、标本切缘阳性率及手术前、后组织病理学诊断符合率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

TCRC治疗绝经后CIN2级患者,较宫颈CKC具有术中出血量更少、手术时间更短、患者恢复更快等优点,是一种可视、微创、安全的治疗方法。

Objective

To investigate the intraoperative and postoperative parameters of transcervical resection of cervical lesion (TCRC) and cervical cold knife conization (CKC) in treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 in postmenopausal women.

Methods

A total of 60 postmenopausal women with CIN2 who were hospitalized in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University from October 2010 to March 2018, were chosen as research subjects. According to the received surgical method for CIN2 patients, they were divided into TCRC group (n=30, patients received TCRC) and CKC group (n=30, patients received cervical CKC). With the retrospective clinical comparative study, the general clinical data, operative duration, amount of intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization duration after operation, postoperative vaginal bleeding, postoperative cut edge positive rate of specimen, infection condition after operation, and coincidence rate of preoperative and postoperative pathological results were statistically compared between two groups of patients by independent-samples t test or chi-square test. The study met the requirements of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①There were no significant differences between two groups of postmenopausal patients with CIN2 in patients′ age, menopausal age, menopausal time, preoperative human papilloma virus (HPV) positive rate and preoperative thinprep cytologic test (TCT) result (P>0.05). ②The patients in two groups were operated successfully, and presented neither local infection nor systemic infection after operation. The operative duration, amount of intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization duration after operation in TCRC group were (20.7±9.6) min, (11.5±6.8) mL, (2.3±1.3) d, which were all shorter or less than those in CKC group, which were (34.5±8.2) min, (36.0±18.7) mL, (4.1±1.4) d, and the differences were statistically significant (t=5.981, 6.731, 5.133; P<0.001). There were no significant differences between two groups of patients in incidence rate of postoperative vaginal bleeding, the postoperative cut edge positive rate of specimen and the coincidence rate of preoperative and postoperative pathological results (P>0.05).

Conclusions

TCRC in the treatment of CIN2 in postmenopausal women has several advantages of less amount of intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time and faster recovery of patients than cervical CKC. It is a visual, minimally invasive and safe treatment method.

表1 2组绝经后宫颈上皮内瘤变2级患者一般临床资料比较
表2 2组绝经后宫颈上皮内瘤变2级患者术中及术后情况比较
[1]
Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, et al. WHO classification of tumors of female reproductive organs[M]. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press, 2014: 8-25 .
[2]
谢幸, 苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2014: 301-304 .
[3]
刘宁,王颖,王沂峰. 宫颈冷刀锥切术和宫腔镜下宫颈锥切术治疗高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的疗效分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2017, 33(6): 434-437.
[4]
万学红, 卢雪峰. 诊断学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013: 335.
[5]
曹倩文,王宝晨,王辰,等. 绝经后子宫颈癌癌前病变诊治的研究进展[J].中华妇产科杂志,2018, 53(3): 203-206.
[6]
陈梅庄,刘木彪. 宫颈癌前病变手术治疗的现状与未来[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2017, 23(5): 613-621.
[7]
郝增平,陈瑛,靳家玉. 宫颈冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ级的效果评价[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2010, 10(7): 620-622.
[8]
Xiang L, Li J, Yang W, et al. Conization using an electrosurgical knife for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive carcinoma[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(7): e0131790.
[9]
夏恩兰. 宫腔镜学及图谱[M]. 3版. 郑州:河南科学技术出版社,2016: 363.
[10]
Fan A, Zhang L, Wang C, et al. Analysis of clinical factors correlated with the accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2017, 296(5): 965-972.
[11]
Janthanaphan M, Wootipoom V, Tangsinmunkong K, et al. Comparison of success rate and complications of contour-loop excision of the transformation zone (C-LETZ) with cold knife conization (CKC) in high grade lesion (HGL) from colposcopic impression[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2009, 92(12): 1573-1579.
[12]
冯翠平,李敏,林华,等. 冷刀锥切对绝经后妇女高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的诊治[J].中日友好医院学报,2013, 27(3): 146-148.
[13]
夏恩兰. 宫腔镜手术并发症的过往及现状[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(3): 1-4.
[14]
Mittal S, Ghosh I, Banerjee D, et al. Reproducibility of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis on histological review of cervical punch biopsies from a visual inspection with acetic acid and HPV detection-based screening program[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2014, 126(3): 227-231.
[15]
Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 121(4): 829-846.
[1] 张舒沁, 陈练. 产后宫腔内妊娠物残留的诊断和临床处理[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 493-497.
[2] 石皆春, 范子玉, 邢燕. 不同筛查方法预警宫颈原位腺癌的效能[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 575-581.
[3] 唐丹, 姚晓曦, 杨博文, 薛绍龙, 李梦瑶, 韦柳杏, 郄明蓉. 双肾上腺皮质激素样激酶1对子宫内膜样腺癌患者临床特征的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 582-590.
[4] 魏艺, 周羽西, 杨烨, 凌秀凤, 赵纯. 微小RNA对子宫内膜容受性影响的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 266-270.
[5] 林琳, 田思萌, 于永华, 徐飞飞, 黄明莉. 干细胞及其外泌体治疗宫腔黏连的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 271-275.
[6] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[7] 高伟聪, 李丽, 张中华, 朱向辉, 刘素巧. 宫颈癌患者糖调节受损对改良根治术后2年内复发的影响作用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 231-237.
[8] 杨琳, 尹如铁. 外阴白色病变病因研究及治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 157-165.
[9] 王丽, 王月莺, 周芬, 郭宇堃, 魏丽娜. 促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂对子宫内膜容受性影响的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 629-635.
[10] 蒋冉, 邹彩艳, 桑谊荃. 宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ患者血清性激素水平及其与高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染的关系[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 683-688.
[11] 武渊, 朱必清, 何丹, 王海蓉, 李倩. 采取调强放疗联合后装治疗宫颈癌患者的预后模型及危险分层系统构建[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 734-744.
[12] 隋龙. 门诊和日间宫腔镜手术模式的建立与思考[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 745-.
[13] 魏莉, 张浩, 谭欣, 邓姗, 黄秀峰, 冯力民. 《宫腔镜下子宫肌瘤去除术管理规范》团体标准的解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 199-204.
[14] 黎璞, 生秀杰. 妊娠合并子宫颈癌的管理[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 202-208.
[15] 李军. "调神大法"治疗和干预围绝经期综合征[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 56-57.
阅读次数
全文


摘要