切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 663 -667. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.06.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

宫腔镜下宫颈锥切术和宫颈冷刀锥切术治疗绝经后女性宫颈上皮内瘤变2级临床对比研究
张博1, 王金娟1,(), 张露1   
  1. 1. 100006 首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院妇科微创中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-29 修回日期:2018-10-25 出版日期:2018-12-01
  • 通信作者: 王金娟

Clinical comparative study of transcervical resection of cervical lesion and cervical cold knife conization in treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in postmenopausal women

Bo Zhang1, Jinjuan Wang1,(), Lu Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100006, China
  • Received:2018-06-29 Revised:2018-10-25 Published:2018-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Jinjuan Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jinjuan, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Yangfan Project of Key Clinical Medicine Development Special Fund of Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals(ZYLX201406)
引用本文:

张博, 王金娟, 张露. 宫腔镜下宫颈锥切术和宫颈冷刀锥切术治疗绝经后女性宫颈上皮内瘤变2级临床对比研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(06): 663-667.

Bo Zhang, Jinjuan Wang, Lu Zhang. Clinical comparative study of transcervical resection of cervical lesion and cervical cold knife conization in treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in postmenopausal women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(06): 663-667.

目的

探讨宫腔镜下宫颈锥切术(TCRC)和宫颈冷刀锥切术(CKC),治疗绝经后女性宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2级的术中及术后情况。

方法

选择2010年10月至2018年3月,于首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院进行治疗的60例绝经后CIN2级患者为研究对象。按照对CIN2级患者采用锥切治疗术式的不同,将其分为TCRC组(n=30,采用TCRC治疗)和CKC组(n=30,采用宫颈CKC治疗)。对2组患者一般临床资料、手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后阴道出血、术后标本切缘阳性率、术后感染情况及手术前、后组织病理学诊断符合率等,采用成组t检验或χ2检验等统计学分析方法,进行回顾性临床对比研究。本研究遵循的程序,符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》的要求。

结果

① 2组绝经后CIN2级患者的年龄、绝经年龄、绝经时间、术前人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)阳性率及术前液基薄层细胞学检查(TCT)结果等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。② 2组绝经后CIN2级患者均顺利完成手术,术后均未发生局部或其他部位感染。TCRC组患者手术时间、术中出血量及术后住院时间分别为(20.7±9.6) min、(11.5±6.8) mL、(2.3±1.3) d,均短于或少于CKC组的(34.5±8.2) min、(36.0±18.7) mL、(4.1±1.4) d,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=5.981、6.731、5.133,P<0.001)。2组患者术后阴道出血率、标本切缘阳性率及手术前、后组织病理学诊断符合率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

TCRC治疗绝经后CIN2级患者,较宫颈CKC具有术中出血量更少、手术时间更短、患者恢复更快等优点,是一种可视、微创、安全的治疗方法。

Objective

To investigate the intraoperative and postoperative parameters of transcervical resection of cervical lesion (TCRC) and cervical cold knife conization (CKC) in treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 in postmenopausal women.

Methods

A total of 60 postmenopausal women with CIN2 who were hospitalized in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University from October 2010 to March 2018, were chosen as research subjects. According to the received surgical method for CIN2 patients, they were divided into TCRC group (n=30, patients received TCRC) and CKC group (n=30, patients received cervical CKC). With the retrospective clinical comparative study, the general clinical data, operative duration, amount of intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization duration after operation, postoperative vaginal bleeding, postoperative cut edge positive rate of specimen, infection condition after operation, and coincidence rate of preoperative and postoperative pathological results were statistically compared between two groups of patients by independent-samples t test or chi-square test. The study met the requirements of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①There were no significant differences between two groups of postmenopausal patients with CIN2 in patients′ age, menopausal age, menopausal time, preoperative human papilloma virus (HPV) positive rate and preoperative thinprep cytologic test (TCT) result (P>0.05). ②The patients in two groups were operated successfully, and presented neither local infection nor systemic infection after operation. The operative duration, amount of intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization duration after operation in TCRC group were (20.7±9.6) min, (11.5±6.8) mL, (2.3±1.3) d, which were all shorter or less than those in CKC group, which were (34.5±8.2) min, (36.0±18.7) mL, (4.1±1.4) d, and the differences were statistically significant (t=5.981, 6.731, 5.133; P<0.001). There were no significant differences between two groups of patients in incidence rate of postoperative vaginal bleeding, the postoperative cut edge positive rate of specimen and the coincidence rate of preoperative and postoperative pathological results (P>0.05).

Conclusions

TCRC in the treatment of CIN2 in postmenopausal women has several advantages of less amount of intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time and faster recovery of patients than cervical CKC. It is a visual, minimally invasive and safe treatment method.

表1 2组绝经后宫颈上皮内瘤变2级患者一般临床资料比较
表2 2组绝经后宫颈上皮内瘤变2级患者术中及术后情况比较
[1]
Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, et al. WHO classification of tumors of female reproductive organs[M]. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press, 2014: 8-25 .
[2]
谢幸, 苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2014: 301-304 .
[3]
刘宁,王颖,王沂峰. 宫颈冷刀锥切术和宫腔镜下宫颈锥切术治疗高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的疗效分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2017, 33(6): 434-437.
[4]
万学红, 卢雪峰. 诊断学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013: 335.
[5]
曹倩文,王宝晨,王辰,等. 绝经后子宫颈癌癌前病变诊治的研究进展[J].中华妇产科杂志,2018, 53(3): 203-206.
[6]
陈梅庄,刘木彪. 宫颈癌前病变手术治疗的现状与未来[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2017, 23(5): 613-621.
[7]
郝增平,陈瑛,靳家玉. 宫颈冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ级的效果评价[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2010, 10(7): 620-622.
[8]
Xiang L, Li J, Yang W, et al. Conization using an electrosurgical knife for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive carcinoma[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(7): e0131790.
[9]
夏恩兰. 宫腔镜学及图谱[M]. 3版. 郑州:河南科学技术出版社,2016: 363.
[10]
Fan A, Zhang L, Wang C, et al. Analysis of clinical factors correlated with the accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2017, 296(5): 965-972.
[11]
Janthanaphan M, Wootipoom V, Tangsinmunkong K, et al. Comparison of success rate and complications of contour-loop excision of the transformation zone (C-LETZ) with cold knife conization (CKC) in high grade lesion (HGL) from colposcopic impression[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2009, 92(12): 1573-1579.
[12]
冯翠平,李敏,林华,等. 冷刀锥切对绝经后妇女高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的诊治[J].中日友好医院学报,2013, 27(3): 146-148.
[13]
夏恩兰. 宫腔镜手术并发症的过往及现状[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(3): 1-4.
[14]
Mittal S, Ghosh I, Banerjee D, et al. Reproducibility of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis on histological review of cervical punch biopsies from a visual inspection with acetic acid and HPV detection-based screening program[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2014, 126(3): 227-231.
[15]
Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 121(4): 829-846.
[1] 马敏榕, 李聪, 周勤. 宫颈癌治疗研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 497-504.
[2] 林昌盛, 战军, 肖雪. 上皮性卵巢癌患者诊疗中基因检测及分子靶向药物治疗[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 505-510.
[3] 王璐, 樊杨. 子宫内膜癌相关生物标志物研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 511-516.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 周东杰, 蒋敏, 范海瑞, 高玲玲, 孔祥, 卢丹, 王丽萍. 非编码RNA在卵泡发育成熟中作用及其机制的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 387-393.
[6] 陈荟竹, 郭应坤, 汪昕蓉, 宁刚, 陈锡建. 上皮性卵巢癌"二元论模型"的分子生物学研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 394-402.
[7] 韩春颖, 王婷婷, 李艳艳, 朴金霞. 子宫内膜癌患者淋巴管间隙浸润预测因素研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 403-409.
[8] 杨一君, 董雯, 刘晓平, 石灿, 张磊, 谷琎, 龚咪, 华馥. 腹腔镜折叠对接缝合联合宫腔镜憩室开渠法治疗剖宫产瘢痕憩室的疗效[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 330-337.
[9] 魏权, 张燊, 陈慧佳, 邹姮, 胡丽娜. 女性生殖道微生物群与辅助生殖技术相关性研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 151-155.
[10] 刘艳艳, 谭曦, 彭雪. 妊娠合并膀胱低度恶性潜能乳头状尿路上皮肿瘤并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 212-218.
[11] 胡欧婵, 黄仲英. 不明原因复发性流产患者的治疗研究现状与展望[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 16-22.
[12] 董双, 李晓莹, 孙立涛, 田家玮. 影像学技术在宫颈癌术前临床分期中的应用进展[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 113-119.
[13] 祁明花, 宋善兰, 俞丕超, 祁雁凌. 宫腔镜电切术联合生化汤加减治疗子宫内膜息肉的疗效及对短期复发的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 171-175.
[14] 戴莉, 高红艳, 邢肖肖, 王清, 彭妍, 李沁, 王慧. 经阴道子宫憩室修补联合宫腔镜内膜电灼术治疗剖宫产瘢痕憩室的效果分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(12): 1243-1247.
[15] 刘迎, 尹嫚, 杨林青, 王云飞. 子宫颈浸润性复层产黏液的癌的诊断学特征并文献复习[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 173-177.
阅读次数
全文


摘要