切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 321 -325. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.03.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜检查联合连续硬膜外阻滞治疗对于慢性盆腔痛的近期及远期总体疗效
杨树环1,(), 王志毅1   
  1. 1. 644000 四川,宜宾市第一人民医院妇科
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-03 修回日期:2017-03-26 出版日期:2017-06-01
  • 通信作者: 杨树环

Short-term and long-term overall curative effects of laparoscopy combined continuous epidural block to patients with chronic pelvic pain

Shuhuan Yang1,(), Zhiyi Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Yibin First People′s Hospital, Yibin 644000, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2016-12-03 Revised:2017-03-26 Published:2017-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Shuhuan Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Shuhuan, Email:
引用本文:

杨树环, 王志毅. 腹腔镜检查联合连续硬膜外阻滞治疗对于慢性盆腔痛的近期及远期总体疗效[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(03): 321-325.

Shuhuan Yang, Zhiyi Wang. Short-term and long-term overall curative effects of laparoscopy combined continuous epidural block to patients with chronic pelvic pain[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 13(03): 321-325.

目的

探讨腹腔镜检查联合连续硬膜外阻滞治疗,对于慢性盆腔痛(CPP)的近期(治疗结束第6个月时)及远期(治疗结束1年时)总体疗效。

方法

选择2012年4月至2014年4月,于宜宾市第一人民医院妇科住院治疗的临床确诊为CPP,并符合本研究纳入与排除标准的80例患者为研究对象。根据这80例CPP患者的年龄,将其分为≤35岁组(n=14)、>35~45岁组(n=21)、>45~55岁组(n=38)、>55岁组(n=7)。同时,根据其腹腔镜下检查的不同病理学类型结果,将其再分为正常盆腔组(n=10)、慢性盆腔炎组(n=16)、盆腔黏连组(n=26)及盆腔淤血组(n=28)。以上疾病类型在同一位患者中若有交叉,则以病理学类型结果严重者,将该例患者纳入相应疾病组。分别对腹腔镜检查联合连续硬膜外阻滞治疗不同病理学类型组、不同年龄组CCP患者的总有效率,进行统计学分析。

结果

腹腔镜检查联合连续硬膜外阻滞治疗对不同病理学类型组、不同年龄组CCP患者的近期与远期总有效率分别为96.3%(77/80)与92.5%(74/80), 93.8%(75/80)与91.3%(73/80),总有效率均>91%。不同病理学类型组及不同年龄组CCP患者的近期与远期总有效率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

CPP是多种因素导致的临床综合征,病因复杂,目前临床对CPP的治疗方法尚不统一。采用腹腔镜检查联合连续硬膜外阻滞治疗CPP,其治疗的近期及远期总有效率均较高。

Objective

To study the short-term (at the end of 6-month of treatment) and long-term (at the end of 1-year of treatment) overall curative effects of laparoscopy combined with continuous epidural block in treatment of chronic pelvic pain (CPP).

Methods

From April 2012 to April 2014, a total of 80 cases CPP patients who were treated in Yibin First People′s Hospital, and in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria of CPP patients in this research were selected as the research subjects. According to the age of CPP patients, they were divided into ≤35-year old group (n=14), >35-45-year old group (n=21), >45-55-year old group (n=38), >55-year old group (n=7). At the same time, according to the different pathological types of laparoscopic examination results, they were divided into normal pelvic group (n=10), chronic pelvic inflammation group(n=16), pelvic adhesions group(n=26) and pelvic congestion group(n=28). If the above pathological types were crossed in one patient, the patient was enrolled into the serious degree pathological type group. By statistical method to analyze the short-term and long-term overall curative effects of laparoscopy combined with continuous epidural block in treatment of CPP.

Results

Short-term and long-term overall curative effects of laparoscopy combined with continuous epidural block in treatment of CPP in different pathological types groups, and different age groups were 96.3% (77/80) and 92.5%(74/80), 93.8% (75/80) and 91.3% (73/80), respectively, all the overall efficacies were over 91%. There were no significant differences of overall efficacies of long-term and short-term in different pathological types groups and in different age groups (P>0.05), respectively.

Conclusions

CPP is caused by multiple factors, the clinical syndromes are complicated, and its treatment method is still uncertain currently. Both the short-term and long-term curative effects of laparoscopy combined with continuous epidural block in treatment of CPP are good.

表1 不同病理学类型组慢性盆腔疼痛患者近期(治疗结束第6个月时)与远期(治疗结束1年时)总体疗效比较[例数(%)]
表2 不同年龄组慢性盆腔疼痛患者近期(治疗结束第6个月时)及远期(治疗结束1年时)总体疗效比较[例数(%)]
[1]
Zondervan KT, Kennedy SH. Epidemiology of chronic pelvic pain[J]. Int Congress Series, 2005, 1279(1): 77-84.
[2]
Neis KJ, Neis F. Chronic pelvic pain: cause, diagnosis and therapy from a gynaecologist′s and an endoscopist′s point of view[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2009, 25( 11): 757-761.
[3]
Engeler D, Baranowski A, Elneil S, et al. Guidelines on chronic pelvic pain[J]. Eur Assoc Urol, 2010, 57(1): 35-48.
[4]
金堂,郭红燕,韩劲松,等. 225例女性慢性盆腔痛的病因分析及诊治探索[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志,2015, 21(4): 279-283.
[5]
蒋建发,孙爱军. 浅谈女性慢性盆腔痛诊治[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志,2014, 20(10): 689-693.
[6]
Saxena R, Gupta M, Shankar N, et al. Effects of yogic intervention on pain scores and quality of life in females with chronic pelvic pain[J]. Int J Yoga, 2017, 10(1): 9-15.
[7]
Weijenborg PT, Ter Kuile MM, Stones W. A cognitive behavioural based assessment of women with chronic pelvic pain[J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2009, 30(4): 262-268.
[8]
Learman LA, Gregorich SE, Schembri M, et al. Symptom resolution after hysterectomy and alternative treatments for chronic pelvic pain: does depression make a difference?[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 204(3): 269. e1- e9.
[9]
Berna C, Leknes S, Holmes EA, et al. Induction of depressed mood disrupts emotion regulation neurocircuitry and enhances pain unpleasantness[J]. Biol Psychiatry, 2010, 67(11): 1083-1090.
[10]
冷金花. 重视慢性盆腔痛的诊治[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2013, 29(3): 161-163.
[11]
金堂,贺豪杰. 神经阻滞疗法治疗慢性盆腔痛及痛经[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2014, 30(8): 582-585.
[12]
Dai Y, Leng JH, Lang JH, et al. Anatomical distribution of pelvic deep infiltrating endometriosis and its relationship with pain symptoms[J]. Chin Med J, 2012, 125(2): 209-213.
[1] 李浩纶, 杨佳麒, 李羽. 盐酸氢吗啡酮在小儿术后镇痛作用中的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 166-171.
[2] 何欣林, 阎昊铮, 赵亦非, 江彩霞, 李征宇. 新辅助化疗联合间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术对上皮性卵巢癌患者预后及血清学与影像学指标对患者预后的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 47-57.
[3] 贺媛媛, 李佳, 杨红. 宫颈中肾腺癌1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 97-104.
[4] 孔令伶俐, 常青, 丁岩, 冯云, 黄绘, 陆萍, 林奕, 李君, 张静, 许良智. 基层医院更年期妇女健康分级管理流程建议(2023)[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 621-628.
[5] 罗丹, 孔为民, 陈姝宁, 赵小玲, 谢云凯. 子宫内膜异位症患者在位及异位内膜上皮细胞-间充质转化相关生物标志物的变化[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 530-539.
[6] 黄来明, 张旭东. 雾化吸入布地奈德混悬液联合气管导管涂抹达克罗宁胶浆对改善妇科腹腔镜手术气管插管全身麻醉患者咽喉部不适作用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 480-486.
[7] 刘星辰, 刘娟, 魏宝宝, 刘洁, 刘辉. XIAP与XAF1异常表达与卵巢癌的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 419-427.
[8] 杨一君, 董雯, 刘晓平, 石灿, 张磊, 谷琎, 龚咪, 华馥. 腹腔镜折叠对接缝合联合宫腔镜憩室开渠法治疗剖宫产瘢痕憩室的疗效[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 330-337.
[9] 邹佳桐, 王颂扬, 徐薇, 余婷婷, 叶红霞, 谯小勇. 自然流产女性精神健康问题的相关危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 77-84.
[10] 董双, 李晓莹, 孙立涛, 田家玮. 影像学技术在宫颈癌术前临床分期中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 113-119.
[11] 戴佑任, 张悦, 李扬, 王聪, 陈婷, 程文俊, 罗成燕. 未分化/去分化子宫内膜癌的临床病理学特征及治疗研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 660-668.
[12] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[13] 李海风, 战俊, 滕世岗, 尹鹏, 刘忠诚. 改良套扎法在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中关闭腹膜破裂的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 192-196.
[14] 胡小靖, 张华. 妊娠期卵巢囊肿蒂扭转的诊断与治疗[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 197-201.
[15] 彭小蓉, 莫伟, 李琴, 吴雅琴, 李兰. 妊娠期妇女静脉血栓栓塞症预防的知信行现状及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 274-280.
阅读次数
全文


摘要