切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 189 -193. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.02.012

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

妊娠期糖尿病母亲分娩新生儿的脐血血清S100B蛋白、caspase-3蛋白含量与新生儿行为神经测定评分的相关性研究
范伟1, 郝丽1, 殷其改1,(), 李珊1   
  1. 1. 222000 江苏,连云港市第一人民医院新生儿科
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-04 修回日期:2017-03-01 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 殷其改

Correlation on the S100B protein, caspase-3 protein levels of neonatal umbilical cord blood and neonatal behavior neurological assessment score in gestational diabetes mellitus women

Wei Fan1, Li Hao1, Qigai Yin1,(), Shan Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Neonatal, First People′s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2016-12-04 Revised:2017-03-01 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Qigai Yin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yin Qigai, Email:
引用本文:

范伟, 郝丽, 殷其改, 李珊. 妊娠期糖尿病母亲分娩新生儿的脐血血清S100B蛋白、caspase-3蛋白含量与新生儿行为神经测定评分的相关性研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(02): 189-193.

Wei Fan, Li Hao, Qigai Yin, Shan Li. Correlation on the S100B protein, caspase-3 protein levels of neonatal umbilical cord blood and neonatal behavior neurological assessment score in gestational diabetes mellitus women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 13(02): 189-193.

目的

探讨妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)母亲分娩新生儿与健康足月新生儿脐血血清S100B蛋白、caspase-3蛋白含量变化及其与新生儿行为神经测定(NBNA)评分的关系,并分析S100B蛋白、caspase-3蛋白含量与GDM母亲分娩新生儿脑损伤的关系。

方法

选择2015年1月至2016年3月于连云港市第一人民医院产科分娩的86例足月新生儿为研究对象。根据母亲孕期是否合并GDM,将其分为GDM组(n=33)和对照组(n=53)。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)法测定2组新生儿脐血血清S100B蛋白、caspase-3蛋白含量,并于生后第3天对新生儿进行NBNA评分。

结果

①2组新生儿性别构成比、胎龄、出生体重、母亲年龄等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。② GDM组新生儿脐血血清S100B蛋白、caspase-3蛋白含量均高于对照组[(38.8±9.3) pg/mL vs (12.4±2.6) pg/mL,(5.3±1.7) μg/mL vs (2.8±0.6) μg/mL],并且差异均有统计学意义(t=8.314、15.977,P<0.001)。GDM组NBNA评分低于对照组[(36.3±1.2) 分 vs (38.3±1.2)分],并且差异亦有统计学意义(t=8.129,P<0.001)。③GDM组中,新生儿脐血血清S100B蛋白、caspase-3蛋白含量与NBNA评分呈负相关关系(r=-0.583、-0.814,P<0.001),新生儿脐血血清S100B蛋白含量与caspase-3蛋白含量呈正相关关系(r=0.394,P=0.023)。对照组中,新生儿脐血血清S100B蛋白、caspase-3蛋白含量与NBNA评分,均无相关性(P>0.05)。

结论

GDM母亲分娩新生儿可能存在脑损伤,新生儿脐血血清S100B蛋白和caspase-3蛋白可作为预判GDM母亲分娩新生儿脑损伤及其程度的指标。

Objective

To discuss correlation on the S100B protein, caspase-3 protein levels of neonatal umbilical cord blood and neonatal behavior neurological assessment (NBNA) score in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) women.

Methods

From January 2015 to March 2016, a total of 86 neonates delivered in the First People′s Hospital of Lianyungang were recruited into this study. They were divided into GDM group (n=33) and control group (n=53) on the basis of mother with or without GDM during pregnancy period. The content of S100B protein and caspase-3 protein of neonatal umbilical cord blood were detected by enzyme-linked immuosorbent assay (ELISA). The NBNA scores were determined at postnatal day 3.

Results

①There were no significant differences between two groups in the aspects of constitution ratio of gender, gestational age, birth weight maternal age, etc. (P>0.05). ②The contents of S100B protein and caspase-3 protein in GDM group were higher than those of control group [(38.8±9.3) pg/mL vs (12.4±2.6) pg/mL, (5.3±1.7) μg/mL vs (2.8±0.6) μg/mL], and the differences were statistically significant (t=8.314, 15.977; P<0.001). The NBNA score in GDM group was lower than that of control group [(36.3±1.2) scores vs (38.3±1.2) scores], and the difference was statistically significant (t=8.129, P<0.001). ③In GDM group, the content of S100B protein and caspase-3 protein of neonatal umbilical cord blood were negative correlated with NBNA score in GDM group, respectively (r=-0.583, -0.814; P<0.001), and the content of S100B protein of neonatal umbilical cord blood was positive correlated with caspase-3 protein (r= 0.394, P=0.023 ). While in control group, S100B protein, caspase-3 protein of neonatal umbilical cord blood and NBNA score had no correlation with each other (P>0.05).

Conclusions

GDM is probably the one of the risk factors of neonatal brain damage. It is suggested that S100B protein and caspase-3 protein of neonatal umbilical cord blood can be used as an reference index predicting the degree of brain damage.

表1 2组新生儿一般临床资料比较
表2 2组新生儿脐血血清S100B蛋白、caspase-3蛋白含量及NBNA评分比较(±s)
[1]
Hawdon JM. Babies born after diabetes in pregnancy: what are the short- and long-term risks and how can we minimise them? [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2011, 25(1): 91-104.
[2]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组,中华医学会围产医学分会妊娠合并糖尿病协作组. 妊娠合并糖尿病诊治指南(2014)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2014, 49(8): 561-569.
[3]
Allore R, O′Hanlon D, Price R, et al. Gene encoding the beta subunit of S100 protein is on chromosome 21: implications for Down syndrome [J]. Science, 1988, 239(4845): 1311-1313.
[4]
Savard A, Brochu ME, Chevin M, et al. Neuronal self-injury mediated by IL-1β and MMP-9 in a cerebral palsy model of severe neonatal encephalopathy induced by immune activation plus hypoxia-ischemia [J]. J Neuroinflammat, 2015, 12: 111.
[5]
Donato R, Sorci G, Riuzzi F, et al. S100B′s double life: intracellular regulator and extracellular signal [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2009, 1793(6): 1008-1022.
[6]
Terada T. Recurrent multifocal langerhans cell histiocytosis of the mandible and maxilla in a 46-year-old man: a pathologic case report [J]. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2013, 6(5): 939-942.
[7]
陈珊,李薇,瞿柳红,等. 血浆S100B蛋白和髓鞘碱性蛋白与早产儿脑损伤的关系[J]. 中华实用儿科杂志,2014, 29(12): 902-906.
[8]
荣昆,高缨.妊娠期糖尿病对围生期新生儿神经行为发育的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2015,30(20):3353-3355.
[9]
Samejima K, Svingen PA, Basi GS, et al. Caspase-mediated cleavage of DNA topoisomerase I at unconventional sites during apoptosis [J]. J Biol Chem, 1999, 274(7): 4335-4340.
[10]
Nicholson DW. Caspase structure, proteolytic substrates, and function during apoptotic cell death [J]. Cell Death Differ, 1999, 6(11): 1028-1042.
[11]
汪皓,崔睿.预吸氧对新生鼠对宫内再灌注损伤caspase-3和iNOS的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2013,28(45):2782-2783.
[12]
杜雪平,李天慧.新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病血清中半胱氨酸蛋白酶-3测定的意义[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2014,17(6):79-82.
[13]
Byrne E, Campbell SK. Physical therapy observation and assessment in the neonatal intensive care unit [J]. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 2013, 33(1): 39-74.
[14]
Voigt B, Brandl A, Pietz J, et al. Negative reactivity in toddlers born prematurely: indirect and moderated pathways considering self-regulation, neonatal distress and parenting stress [J]. Infant Behav Dev, 2013, 36(1): 124-138.
[15]
陈丽琼,沈剑. 妊娠期糖尿病对新生儿神经行为发育影响的Meta分析[J].现代实用医学杂志,2012, 24(2): 221.
[16]
罗淑静,杨慧霞.晚期糖基化终末产物及其受体在妊娠期糖尿病孕鼠的子鼠脑损伤中的作用[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2012, 47(5):364-367.
[17]
Perna R, Loughan AR, Le J, et al. Gestational diabetes: long-term central nervous system developmental and cognitive sequelae [J]. Appl Neuropsychol Child, 2015, 4(3): 217-220.
[18]
Roberts AL, Nguyen VT. Growing evidence that maternal gestational diabetes increases risk of autism in offspring [J]. Evid Based Ment Health, 2015, 18(4): 113.
[19]
Xiang AH, Wang X, Martinez MP, et al. Association of maternal diabetes with autism in offspring [J]. JAMA, 313(14): 1425-1434.
[20]
Teramo K, Klemetti M, Tikkanen M, et al. Maternal diabetes and fetal hypoxia [J]. Duodecim, 2013, 129(3): 228-234.
[21]
Del Rio D, Stewart AJ, Pellegrini N. et al. A review of recent studies on malondialdehyde as toxic molecule and biological marker of oxidative stress [J]. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2005, 15(4): 316-328.
[22]
Myatt L, Cui X. Oxidative stress in the placenta [J]. Histochem Cell Biol, 2004, 122(4): 369-382.
[23]
Ahmed A. New insights into the etiology of preeclampsia: identification of key elusive factors for the vascular complications [J]. Thromb Res, 2011, 127(Suppl 3): S72-S75.
[24]
Myatt L, Kossenjans W, Sahay R, et al. Oxidative stress causes vascular dysfunction in the placenta [J]. J Matern Fetal Med, 2000, 9(1): 79-82.
[25]
丰有吉.妇产科学.2版[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:91.
[26]
Hollander MH, Paarlberg KM, Huisjes AJ. Gestational diabetes: a review of the current literature and guidelines [J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2007, 62(2): 125-136.
[1] 孔莹莹, 谢璐涛, 卢晓驰, 徐杰丰, 周光居, 张茂. 丁酸钠对猪心脏骤停复苏后心脑损伤的保护作用及机制研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 355-362.
[2] 李文琳, 羊玲, 邢凯慧, 陈彩华, 钟丽花, 张娅琴, 张薇. 脐动脉血血气分析联合振幅整合脑电图对新生儿窒息脑损伤的早期诊断价值分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 550-558.
[3] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[4] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[5] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[6] 董晓燕, 赵琪, 唐军, 张莉, 杨晓燕, 李姣. 奥密克戎变异株感染所致新型冠状病毒感染疾病新生儿的临床特征分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 595-603.
[7] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[8] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[9] 钱晓英, 吴新, 徐婷婷. 颅脑损伤并发呼吸衰竭患者早期机械通气的效果分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 526-528.
[10] 刘玲, 肖颖, 王蓉. 严重创伤并发肺部感染死亡病例分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 581-583.
[11] 朱泽超, 杨新宇, 李侑埕, 潘鹏宇, 梁国标. 染料木黄酮通过SIRT1/p53信号通路对蛛网膜下腔出血后早期脑损伤的作用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 261-269.
[12] 李飞翔, 段虎斌, 李晋虎, 吴昊, 王永红, 范益民. 急性颅脑损伤继发下肢静脉血栓的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 277-282.
[13] 潘立, 谢理政, 程宏伟, 茆翔. 创伤性颅脑损伤后垂体功能减退[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 308-312.
[14] 王景景, 符锋, 李建伟, 任党利, 陈翀, 刘慧, 孙洪涛, 涂悦. 针刺对中型创伤性颅脑损伤后BDNF/TrkB信号通路的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 199-205.
[15] 运陌, 李茂芳, 王浩, 刘东远. 微创穿刺引流联合吡拉西坦、乌拉地尔治疗基底节区高血压性脑出血的临床研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 278-285.
阅读次数
全文


摘要