Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03): 357 -365. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.03.016

Original Article

Clinical effects of early postpartum static contraction training combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of postpartum diastasis recti abdominis

Dandan Xie1,2, Zunke Gong1,(), Lilin Fan2, Caixia Zhang2   

  1. 1The Second Clinical Medical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221000, Jiangsu Province, China
    2Department of Postpartum Health Care, Huai′an Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Huai′an 223001, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2022-02-24 Revised:2022-05-13 Published:2022-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Zunke Gong
  • Supported by:
    Jiangsu Maternal and Child Health Scientific Research Project(F201707)
Objective

To explore therapeutic effects of early postpartum (4-6 weeks postpartum) static contraction training (SCT) combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NES) in the treatment of parturients with postpartum diastasis recti abdominis (DRA).

Methods

A total of 90 cases of postpartum DRA parturients who were admitted to Huai′an Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from January 2018 to October 2021 were selected into this study. They were randomly divided into study group (n=45) and control group (n=45) by random number table method. At 4-6 weeks of early postpartum, parturients in study group were treated with SCT combined with NES, while parturients in control group were only treated with NES. Abdominal circumference, bilateral inter-recti distance (IRD), voltage values of type Ⅰ and Ⅱ muscle fiber of pelvic floor and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of waist and back pain in two groups at the 2nd, 4th and 6th week of treatment were compared by variance of repeated measurement data method. Least significant difference (LSD)-t test was used for pairwise comparison of the above indicators at different time points. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Huai′an Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital (Approval No.201806), and informed consent for clinical research was signed with all subjects.

Results

① There were no significant differences between two groups in general clinical data, such as gestational age of delivery, proportion of cesarean section, weight gain during pregnancy, duration of the first and second stage of labor, proportion of neonatal birth weight ≥ 4 000 g, parity, proportion of cesarean section more than twice, and proportion of body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24 kg/m2, abdominal circumference and bilateral IRD before treatment (P>0.05). ② Analysis of variance of repeated measurement data of abdominal circumference and bilateral IRD of two groups at the 4th and 6th weeks of treatment showed that there were no statistical difference in interaction effects between different treatment measures and time factors (Ftreatment×time=4.214, 2.193, Ptreatment×time=0.062, 0.241). Further analysis of main effect of DRA treatment measures showed that main effects of different DRA treatment measures on abdominal circumference and bilateral IRD at different treatment time points of postpartum DRA parturients were statistically significant (Ftreatment=6.874, 8.291; Ptreatment=0.032, 0.012). Abdominal circumference and bilateral IRD in study group were 4.1 cm (95%CI: 1.2-5.3 cm, P<0.05) and 0.17 cm (95%CI: 0.06-0.31 cm, P<0.05) smaller and shorter than those in control group, respectively. Main effect analysis results of time factors showed that main effects of time factors on abdominal circumference and bilateral IRD of postpartum DRA parturients at different treatment time points were statistically significant (Ftime=14.286, 9.574; P<0.001, =0.004). Further pairwise analysis showed that abdominal circumference and bilateral IRD at the 4th and 6th week of treatment were significantly smaller and shorter than those at the 2nd week of treatment, and abdominal circumference and bilateral IRD at the 6th week of treatment were also significantly smaller and shorter than those at the 4th week of treatment, all differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ③ Analysis of variance of repeated measurement data of voltage values of type Ⅰ and Ⅱ muscle fiber of pelvic floor and VAS scores of waist and back pain in two groups at the 2nd, 4th and 6th weeks of treatment showed that there were statistical difference in interactive effects between different treatment measures and time factors (Ftreatment×time=6.721, 7.284, 8.277; Ptreatment×time=0.024, 0.017, 0.012). Further analysis of individual effects of treatment measures showed that voltage values of type Ⅰ muscle fiber of pelvic floor at the 4th and 6th weeks of treatment in study group were higher than those in control group, and voltage value of type Ⅱ muscle fiber of pelvic floor in study group was significantly higher than that in control group, and all differences were statistically significant (t=2.075, 4.336, 7.798; P=0.008, <0.001, <0.001). Further analysis of individual effects of time factors in study group and control group respectively showed that there were statistical differences in voltage values of type Ⅰ muscle fiber of pelvic floor at the 2nd, 4th and 6th week of treatment both of study group and control group (study group: F=155.488, 229.732, 598.316, all P<0.001; control group: F=83.498, 92.179, 765.398, all P<0.001). Further pairwise comparison within study group and control group showed that voltage values of type Ⅰ muscle fiber of pelvic floor at the 4th and 6th week of treatment of two groups were statistically higher than those at the 2nd week of treatment within group, VAS scores of waist and back pain were statistically lower than those at the 2nd week of treatment within group, and voltage values of type Ⅰ muscle fiber of pelvic floor at the 6th week of treatment of two groups were statistically higher than those at the 4th week of treatment within group, VAS scores of waist and back pain were statistically lower than those at the 4th week of treatment within group, and all differences were statistically significant (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Early postpartum SCT combined with NES in the treatment of postpartum DRA parturients can promote recovery of abdominal circumference and bilateral IRD, improve pelvic floor muscle strength and relieve lumbar and back pain.

表1 2组产后DRA产妇一般临床资料比较
表2 2组产后DRA产妇治疗不同时间点的腹围和双侧IRD比较(cm,±s)
表3 2组产后DRA产妇治疗不同时间点的盆底Ⅰ、Ⅱ类肌纤维肌电压值及腰、背部疼痛的VAS评分比较(±s)
[1]
兰小曼,兰鹰,覃桂莲. 集束化护理在产后腹直肌分离患者康复治疗中的应用[J]. 中国医药导报2020, 17(19): 175-178.
[2]
李玲,崔金晖,欧阳丽萍,等. 产后腹直肌分离的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2021, 42(5): 790-795. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2021.0519.
[3]
Olsson A, Kiwanuka O, Wilhelmsson S, et al. Cohort study of the effect of surgical repair of symptomatic diastasis recti abdominis on abdominal trunk function and quality of life[J]. BJS Open, 2019, 3(6): 750-758. DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50213.
[4]
付鹏,江凌,崔立刚. 高频超声在产后女性腹直肌分离评估中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(1): 79-83. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.01.016.
[5]
陈杰,靳翠红,申英末. 腹直肌分离的诊断与治疗[J]. 中华消化外科杂志2021, 20(7): 764-768. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20210518-00283.
[6]
顾叶春,许虹波,吴莉娜,等. 二胎产妇产后腹直肌分离症发生情况的临床分析[J]. 中华全科医师杂志2020, 19(12): 1157-1163. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20200521-00609.
[7]
Gitta S, Magyar Z, Tardi P, et al. Prevalence, potential risk factors and sequelae of diastasis recti abdominis[J]. Orv Hetil, 2017, 158(12): 454-460. DOI: 10.1556/650.2017.30703.
[8]
陈晔,白伟伟,项达军,等. 超声检测诊断孕产妇腹直肌分离的临床应用[J]. 东南大学学报(医学版), 2020, 39(2): 200-203. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6264.2020.02.014.
[9]
Michalska A, Rokita W, Wolder D, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis - a review of treatment methods[J]. Ginekol Pol, 2018, 89(2): 97-101. DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2018.0016.
[10]
金添,苏仲秋. 股四头肌静力性收缩治疗髌骨软化症143例[J]. 中国骨伤2001, 14(11): 693. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2001.11.023.
[11]
赵杨,程芳,刘卫平,等. 产后早期医疗体操联合神经肌肉电刺激治疗产后腹直肌分离的临床效果[J]. 中国医药导报2022, 19(12): 104-107.
[12]
田才宣. 会阴无保护联合无痛分娩对初产妇分娩结局及产后盆底功能的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健2018, 33(14): 3153-3156. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2018.14.10.
[13]
王娟,梁旭霞. 神经肌肉电刺激联合瑜伽锻炼治疗产后腹直肌分离的临床效果[J]. 广西医学2021, 43(6): 681-684. DOI: 10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2021.06.08.
[14]
高倩,张凤,高赛楠,等. 仿生物电刺激疗法治疗产后腹直肌分离疗效的研究[J]. 实用临床医药杂志2020, 24(9): 73-76. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202009021.
[15]
王影,张洁,冯艳霞,等. 电刺激治疗产后腹直肌分离的效果观察[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(2): 218-221. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.02.018.
[16]
张秋君,李哲. Flexi-bar运动训练联合神经肌肉电刺激治疗产后腹直肌分离的效果[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2022, 57(2): 284-288. DOI: 10.13705/j.issn.1671-6825.2021.06.025.
[17]
王丽芳,刘玉环,李京晶,等. 神经肌肉电刺激联合自主训练对产后腹直肌分离的疗效[J]. 中国性科学2022, 31(2): 106-109. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2022.02.027.
[18]
张泳钊,麦楚婷. 身痛逐瘀汤配合静力收缩训练治疗急性期气滞血瘀型腰椎间盘突出症的临床观察[J]. 中国民间疗法2020, 28(20): 80-82, 102. DOI: 10.19621/j.cnki.11-3555/r.2020.2035.
[19]
邹燕齐,张光正,安礼,等. 盆底神经肌肉电刺激和悬吊训练治疗产后腹直肌分离的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践2020, 26(11): 1353-1357. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.11.019.
[20]
石薇,牛晓宇,陈悦悦,等. 盆底神经肌肉电刺激治疗薄型子宫内膜患者的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(2): 215-220. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.02.013.
[21]
Gluppe SL, Hilde G, Tennfjord MK, et al. Effect of a postpartum training program on the prevalence of diastasis recti abdominis in postpartum primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Phys Ther, 2018, 98(4): 260-268. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzy008.
[22]
Gluppe S, Engh ME, K. What is the evidence for abdominal and pelvic floor muscle training to treat diastasis recti abdominis postpartum? A systematic review with Meta-analysis[J]. Braz J Phys Ther, 2021, 25(6): 664-675. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.06.006.
[23]
窦丽,陈华卫,章凌凌,等. 12周高强度间歇训练对大学生健康体适能、能量消耗和心率的影响[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志2020, 36(1): 55-59. DOI: 10.12047/j.cjap.5862.2020.012.
[24]
韦瑞敏,肖霞,吕丽清,等. 盆底神经肌肉电刺激配合康复按摩促进产后腹直肌分离疗效的研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健2016, 31(21): 4361-4364. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2016.21.13.
[25]
谢亮,魏海棠,杨珺,等. 产后腹直肌分离临床治疗研究进展[J]. 中国康复2021, 36(2): 125-128. DOI: 10.3870/zgkf.2021.02.014.
[26]
靳翠平,尚玉敏,胡同秀,等. 盆底肌电在产后盆底功能障碍性疾病诊断和治疗中的价值[J]. 中国现代医学杂志2021, 31(1): 62-67. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2021.01.011.
[27]
李洁,侯睿,梁熠,等. 产后6~8周盆底功能障碍性疾病危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华护理杂志2019, 54(8): 1241-1247. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.08.027.
[1] Xin Chen, Sha Hu, Hong Luo. Ultrasonographic features and diagnostic value of obstructive cervical dysplasia[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(10): 1052-1057.
[2] Minrong Ma, Cong Li, Qin Zhou. Current research status of treatment of cervical cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 497-504.
[3] Changsheng Lin, Jun Zhan, Xue Xiao. Genetic testing and precision molecular targeted therapy in diagnosis and treatment of epithelial ovarian caner[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 505-510.
[4] Juan Gu, Qingqing Sun, Fangfang Hu, Yijuan Cao, Yujuan Qi. Clinical application of endometrial receptivity array to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] Wenrong Dai, Lijuan Zhao, Zhihui Li. Research progress of influence of extracellular vesicles on embryo implantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 616-620.
[6] Dongjie Zhou, Min Jiang, Hairui Fan, Lingling Gao, Xiang Kong, Dan Lu, Liping Wang. Current research progress on non-coding RNA in follicular development and maturation[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 387-393.
[7] Huizhu Chen, Yingkun Guo, Xinrong Wang, Gang Ning, Xijian Chen. Current research status on the " dualistic model" of epithelial ovarian cancer and its molecular biology[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 394-402.
[8] Chunying Han, Tingting Wang, Yanyan Li, Jinxia Piao. Current research status on predictors of lymphatic vascular invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 403-409.
[9] Zhaomin Zeng, Haiyan Yu. Clinical cognition of superfemale syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(02): 145-150.
[10] Quan Wei, Shen Zhang, Huijia Chen, Heng Zou, Lina Hu. Current research progress on correlation between female reproductive tract microbiota and assisted reproductive technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(02): 151-155.
[11] Yanyan Liu, Xi Tan, Xue Peng. Pregnancy complicated with papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(02): 212-218.
[12] Ouchan Hu, Zhongying Huang. Current status and outlook of research in treatment of unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(01): 16-22.
[13] Xiaofang Zhang, Ping Wang. Research progress on diagnosis and therapy for vaginal melanoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(06): 621-626.
[14] Lin You, Zhenwei Cai, Jing Qiao. Clinical research progress on Turner syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(06): 634-639.
[15] Lifei Tian, Jianfeng Yao, Le Zhang, Yaqi Qu, Xiaolong Zhang, Pan Quan, Likun Yan. Application of deperitonealization of the round ligament in female inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(01): 56-59.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract