Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02): 227 -233. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.02.015

Special Issue:

Original Article

Clinical analysis of abdominal pregnancy

Xinzhe Li1, Shiqiao Tan1, Ruijuan Xu1, Xu Wang2, Jia Wang3, Ying Hu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrine and Reproductive Regulation, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
    2. West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
    3. Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Department of Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2019-06-27 Revised:2020-03-16 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Ying Hu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hu Ying, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China for Youth(21507094); Project of Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau(2018-YFYF-00078-SN)
Objective

To explore the characteristics of abdominal pregnancy (AP) and provide clinical reference for its diagnosis, treatment and management.

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2018, a total of 37 patients with AP who were admitted to West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University were selected as research subjects. Among them, there were 36 cases and 1 case of AP in the first and second trimester, respectively. General clinical data, clinical manifestations, auxiliary examination results, diagnosis, treatments, gestational sac implantation site, postoperative pathology and recovery of AP were collected by retrospective method, and their clinical characteristics were analyzed. This study was in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

The clinical characteristics of 36 cases in the first trimester were as follows. ①General clinical data: preoperative serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) value was 2 594.9 mIU/mL (179.1-173 450.0 mIU/mL); 34 cases (94.4%) were natural pregnancy and 2 cases (5.6%) were by fertilization in vitro-embryo transfer; there were 1 case of pregnancy with intrauterine device in situ and 1 case with intrauterine pregnancy, the other 34 cases (94.4%) were not combined with other kind of pregnancy. ②Clinical manifestations: 35 cases (97.2%) had a period of amenorrhea ranging from 29 to 76 d, 1 case (2.8%) had an unknown period of amenorrhea; 33 cases (91.7%) had varying degrees of abdominal pain; 26 cases (72.2%) had vaginal bleeding. ③Preoperative diagnosis results: only 3 cases (8.3%) were diagnosed as spleen pregnancy by ultrasound combined with serum β-hCG and clinical manifestations before operation, but 2 cases were misdiagnosed as fallopian tubal pregnancy (FTP) in other hospital institutions, and salpingectomy has been performed on the affected side. The other 33 cases (91.7%) were not diagnosed before operation. ④Treatments: 34 cases (94.4%) underwent laparoscopy; as to the other 2 cases, 1 case (2.8%) underwent laparotomy, 1 case (2.8%) was converted to laparotomy for extreme difficulty in exposure of surgical field during laparoscopic surgery, and both cases underwent splenectomy. ⑤Postoperative pathological examination results showed that 35 cases (97.2%) suggested pregnancy; 1 case (2.8%) did not show pregnancy, but the value of serum β-hCG decreased gradually and returned to normal level 14 days after operation. ⑥Prognosis: all patients recovered well after operation, none serious complication occurred, and the value of serum β-hCG decreased significantly in the first reexamination time (one to three days after operation). Clinical characteristics of a patient with AP in the second trimester were as follows. ①She was misdiagnosed as intrauterine pregnancy by ultrasound before operation, and received drug induced labor and clamping under ultrasound monitoring in our hospital, but all failed. Finally, exploratory laparotomy was performed to remove a dead fetus and placenta. ②Treatment and prognosis: after operation, complications such as coagulation dysfunction, shock and repeated mild fever occurred in this patient. After blood transfusion, anti-shock and anti-infection treatment, the patient gradually recovered and discharged from hospital on the 14th day after operation.

Conclusions

Diagnosis and accurate positioning of gestational sac of AP in the first trimester are difficult. It is easy to be misdiagnosed, especially when the implantation site is in upper abdominal cavity and secluded spot. Most of the AP gestational sac in the first trimester are still planted in pelvic cavity, and mainly diagnosed by surgical exploration. Laparoscopic surgery is a recommended method for termination of pregnancy of AP patients in the first trimester. AP in the second trimester is easy to be misdiagnosed by ultrasound. Due to the complicated and changeable condition of AP, once misdiagnosed, it can lead to an increased risk of pregnancy. Therefore, patients with suspected AP should be strengthened in monitoring and individualized management.

[1]
Panelli DM, Phillips CH, Brady PC. Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review [J]. Fertil Res Pract, 2015, 1: 15. DOI: 10.1186/s40738-015-0008-z.
[2]
Parker VL, Srinivas M. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2016, 294(1): 19-27. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4069-y.
[3]
Barel O, Suday RR, Stanleigh J, et al. Laparoscopic removal of an abdominal pregnancy in the pelvic sidewall [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2019, 26(6): 1007-1008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.12.020.
[4]
Atrash HK, Friede A, Hogue CJ. Abdominal pregnancy in the United States: frequency and maternal mortality [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1987, 69(3 Pt 1): 333-337.
[5]
Hailu FG, Yihunie GT, Essa AA, et al. Advanced abdominal pregnancy, with live fetus and severe preeclampsia, case report [J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2017, 17(1): 243. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1437-y.
[6]
Nemat AbdulRahman AbdulJabbar, Saquib S, Mohammed Talha WE. Successful management of abdominal pregnancy: two case reports [J]. Oman Med J, 2018, 33(2): 171-175. DOI: 10.5001/omj.2018.32.
[7]
Mummert T, Gnugnoli DM. Ectopic pregnancy [M]. Florida: StatPearls Publishing, 2019.
[8]
Gaskins AJ, Missmer SA, Rich-Edwards JW, et al. Demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive risk factors for ectopic pregnancy [J]. Fertil Steril, 2018, 110(7): 1328-1337. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.022.
[9]
Nkusu Nunyalulendho D, Einterz EM. Advanced abdominal pregnancy: case report and review of 163 cases reported since 1946 [J]. Rural Remote Health, 2008, 8(4): 1087.
[10]
Ramanathan S, Raghu V, Ladumor SB, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of common, uncommon, and rare implantation sites in ectopic pregnancy [J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2018, 43(12): 3425-3435. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1604-2.
[11]
Cohen JM, Weinreb JC, Lowe TW, et al. MR imaging of a viable full-term abdominal pregnancy [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1985, 145(2): 407-408. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.145.2.407.
[12]
Wagner A, Burchardt AJ. MR imaging in advanced abdominal pregnancy. A case report of fetal death [J]. Acta Radiol, 1995, 36(2): 193-195.
[13]
Chen L, Liu J, Shu J, et al. Successful laparoscopic management of diaphragmatic pregnancy: a rare case report and brief review of literature [J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2019, 19(1): 99. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2248-0.
[14]
Yagil Y, Beck-Razi N, Amit A, et al. Splenic pregnancy: the role of abdominal imaging [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2007, 26(11): 1629-1632. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.11.1629.
[15]
Gang G, Yudong Y, Zhang G. Successful laparoscopic management of early splenic pregnancy: case report and review of literature [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2010, 17(6): 794-797. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.004.
[16]
Lockhat F, Corr P, Ramphal S, et al. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and management of extra-uterine abdominal pregnancy [J]. Clin Radiol, 2006, 61(3): 264-269. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2005.10.013
[17]
Sapuri M, Klufio C. A case of advanced viable extrauterine pregnancy [J]. P N G Med J, 1997, 40(1): 44-47.
[18]
Ombelet W, Vandermerwe JV, Van Assche FA. Advanced extrauterine pregnancy: description of 38 cases with literature survey [J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 1988, 43(7): 386-397.
[19]
Cotter AM, Jacques EG, Izquierdo LA. Extended field of view sonography: a useful tool in the diagnosis and management of abdominal pregnancy [J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2004, 32(4): 207-210. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20012.
[20]
Murphy AA, Nager CW, Wujek JJ, et al. Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial [J]. Fertil Steril, 1992, 57(6): 1180-1185. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55070-5.
[21]
Vermesh M, Silva PD, Rosen GF, et al. Management of ruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1989, 73(3 Pt 1): 400-404.
[22]
Lundorff P, Thorburn J, Hahlin M, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in ectopic pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy [J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1991, 70(4-5): 343-348. DOI: 10.3109/00016349109007885.
[23]
Konickx PR, Witters K, Brosens I, et al. Conservative laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancies using CO2-laser [J]. Br J Obstet Gynecol, 1991, 98(12): 1254-1259. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb15398.x.
[24]
Cosentino F, Rossitto C, Turco LC, et al. Laparoscopic management of abdominal pregnancy [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017, 24(5): 724-725. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.023.
[25]
Crespo R, Campillos JM, Villacampa A, et al. Successful methotrexate treatment of an abdominal pregnancy in the pouch of Douglas [J]. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 35(4): 289-290.
[26]
Poole A, Haas D, Magann EF. Early abdominal ectopic pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature [J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2012, 74(4): 249-260. DOI: 10.1159/000342997.
[27]
杨岑,彭澎,于昕,等. 早期腹腔异位妊娠保守治疗成功经验及文献复习[J]. 生殖医学杂志,2015, 24(7): 538-541. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2015.07.005.
[28]
Masukume G. Live births resulting from advanced abdominal extrauterine pregnancy, a review of cases reported from 2008 to 2013 [J]. Webmed Central Obstet Gynaecol, 2013, 4(12): WMC004477. DOI: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2013.004477.
[29]
Stevens CA. Malformations and deformations in abdominal pregnancy [J]. Am J Med Genet, 1993, 47(8): 1189-1195. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320470812.
[30]
Mekki Y, Gilles JM, Mendez L, et al. Abdominal pregnancy: to remove or not to remove the placenta [J]. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns, 1998, 5(4): 192. DOI: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00118-8.
[31]
Oneko O, Petru E, Masenga G, et al. Management of the placenta in advanced abdominal pregnancies at an East african tertiary referral center [J]. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2010, 19(7):1369-1375. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1704.
[32]
Hymel JA, Hughes DS, Gehlot A, et al. Late abdominal pregnancies (≥20 weeks gestation): a review from 1965 to 2012 [J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2015, 80(4): 253-258. DOI: 10.1159/000381264.
[33]
Rahman MS, Al-Suleiman SA, Rahman J, et al. Advanced abdominal pregnancy--observation in 10 cases [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1982, 59(3): 366-372.
[1] Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[2] Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[3] Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[4] Xu Chen, Yuru Zhan, Chunhua Wang. Clinical value of ABO blood group combined with thyroid function in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[5] Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] Chenxi Ran, Rufei Shen, Mingyu Liao, Qian Liao, Ling Zhou, Yuling Zhang, Min Long. Treatment and management of pituitary tumor during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[7] Ying Chen, Yanli Chen. Causes of heart rate variability and perinatal outcomes in elderly pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[8] Danyan Feng, Xiaohui Cao, Yuxia Shi. Effect of serum adiponectin and placental leucine aminopeptidase levels on pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[9] Defeng Kuang, Zhiguo Li, Shaofang Hua, Fengxia Xue. Levels and significance of fatty acid-binding protein 4 in serum and placental tissues and related lipid protein expression of high-fat-induced pregnant rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 338-344.
[10] Longhai Wu, Miao Huang, Yunhui Gong, Yunqian Yu. Clinical value of serum chemokines in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 357-362.
[11] Lu Zhang, Huijuan Yang, Kaibo Liu. Birth trends and adverse pregnancy outcomes of live births under assisted reproductive technology in Beijing, 2015-2021[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(01): 46-53.
[12] Liping Shen, Yuyun Long, Yuehua Yang, Min Zhang, Yang Xu, Yali Zhao, Jing Li, Yun Zhang, Shiwen Jiang, Zhiming Sun. Influencing factors of different contraceptive methods on female fertility[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(01): 107-112.
[13] Hexuan Zhang, Yonggang Song, Xue Yang. Results of non-invasive prenatal testing to pregnant women: a large sample analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(06): 685-691.
[14] Xueyun Liu, Ying Fan, Aijun Yao, Shengmiao Zhang, Yani Lv, Bingqing Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Heng. Liu. Effects of individualized whole-course nursing intervention based on WeChat mini program on pregnancy weight and delivery outcome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
[15] Yanru Shen, Jietai Duo, Lei Li. Clinical analysis of 367 cases of gastric cancer detected by endoscopy in Tibet[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(12): 1224-1228.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract