Chinese Medical E-ournals Database
Adv Search
中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01): 100 -106. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.01.013

Special Issue: ；

Original Article

Predictive value of preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio on pelvic lymph node metastasis of early cervical cancer patients

Ying Tang1, Fangxiang Tang1, Huiquan Hu1,†(), Fan Xu1, Dongmei Bin2   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan Province, China
    2. Nanchong Maternal and Child Care Service Centre, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2019-10-18 Revised:2020-01-07 Published:2020-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Huiquan Hu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hu Huiquan, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Science & Technology Program by Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province(2015JY0056); Program by Bureau of Science & Technology and Intellectual Property of Nanchong City, Sichuan Province(17YFZJ0005, 18YFZJ0012)
HTML ( ) PDF ( )
Objective

To explore the value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) on pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) of early cervical cancer patients.

Methods

The clinical and pathological data of 516 patients with early cervical cancer whose initial treatment were radical hysterectomy in the Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2008 to January 2018 were selected into this study. According to being accompanied with PLNM or not, they were divided into PLNM (+ ) group (n=113) and PLNM(-)group (n=403). Retrospective analysis was used to analyze clinical data of all subjects. Chi-square was used to statistically compare the proportions of the age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical stages, histopathological grades, histopathological types, vessel carcinoma embolus, parametrial invasion, cervical interstitial invasion depth, tumor diameters, levels of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen(SCC-Ag), LMR between two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of LMR predicting PLNM in early cervical cancer patients was drawn and analyzed, and the area under ROC curve (ROC-AUC) was calculated. The accuracy of LMR in the prediction of PLNM in early cervical cancer patients was evaluated by multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis. This study met the requirements of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013. There was no significant difference between two groups in age (P>0.05).

Results

①The results of univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in proportions of FIGO clinical stages, histopathological grades, histopathological types, tumor diameters, levels of serum SCC-Ag, vessel carcinoma embolus, parametrial invasion, depth of cervical interstitial invasion and LMR (χ2=13.057, 18.998, 9.584, 85.667, 7.225, 88.538, 69.807, 32.644, 126.453; P<0.05). ②The results of multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that FIGO clinical stage ⅡA (OR=2.805, 95%CI: 1.224-4.160, P=0.009), histopathological grade G1 (OR=2.256, 95%CI: 1.245-6.323, P=0.013), vessel carcinoma embolus (OR=5.818, 95%CI: 3.139-10.782, P<0.001), parametrial invasion (OR=4.482, 95%CI: 1.730-11.615, P<0.002), tumor diameters≥4 cm (OR=3.955, 95%CI: 2.119-7.383, P<0.001), levels of serum SCC-Ag≥1.6 ng/mL (OR=1.909, 95%CI: 1.057-3.446, P=0.032) were risk factors of PLNM in early cervical cancer patients, while LMR > 2.2 (OR=0.155, 95%CI: 0.081-0.296, P<0.001) was the protective factor of PLNM in early cervical cancer patients. ③The ROC curve of LMR predicting PLNM of early cervical cancer showed that the ROC-AUC was 0.790 (95%CI: 0.753-0.825, P<0.001). According to the maximum principle of the Youden index, the optimal cut-off value of LMR predicting PLNM in patients with early cervical cancer was 2.2, and the sensitivity and specificity were 66.4% and 85.9%, respectively.

Conclusion

Peripheral blood LMR>2.2 is an independent protective factor to predict PLNM of early cervical cancer.

Key words: Uterine cervical neoplasms, Neoplasms, squamous cell, Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, Lymphatic metastasis, Lymphocytes, tumor-infiltrating, ROC curve, Women
表1 本组516例早期宫颈癌患者的一般临床资料
项目 结果 项目 结果
年龄[岁，M(P25～P75)] 49(28～72) 宫旁浸润[例数(%)] ?
BMI[kg/m2，M(P25～P75)] 23.7(16.5～32.0) ? 阳性 45(8.7)
FIGO临床分期[例数(%)] ? ? 阴性 471(91.3)
? ⅠB期 402(77.9) 脉管癌栓[例数(%)] ?
? ⅡA期 114(22.1) ? 阳性 471(91.3)
组织病理学类型[例数(%)] ? ? ? 阴性
? 鳞癌 406(78.7) 宫颈间质浸润深度[例数(%)] ?
? 腺癌 103(20.0) ? >2/3 180(34.9)
? 腺鳞癌 6(1.1) ? ≤2/3 336(65.1)
? 其他类型 1(0.2) 腹膜后淋巴结转移[例数(%)] ?
组织病理学分级[例数(%)] ? ? 阳性 403(78.1)
? G1 56(10.8) ? 阴性 113(21.9)
? G2 390(75.6) 肿瘤直径[cm，M(P25～P75)] 2.5(0.1～11.0)
? G3 70(13.6) 血清SCC-Ag含量[ng/mL，M(P25～P75)] 1.6(0.6～54.5)
单核细胞计数[×109/L，M(P25～P75)] 0.6(0.1～4.8) 淋巴细胞计数[×109/L，M(P25～P75)] 1.8(0.3～7.1)
表2 2组早期宫颈癌患者发生盆腔淋巴结转移影响因素的单因素分析结果[例数(%)]
组别 例数 年龄 FIGO临床分期 手术切除组织病理学分级
<49岁 ≥49岁 ⅠB期 ⅡA期 G1 G2/G3
PLNM(＋)组 113 51(45.1) 62(54.9) 63(55.8) 50(44.2) 25(22.1) 88(77.9)
PLNM(－)组 403 190(47.1) 213(52.9) 296(73.4) 107(26.6) 31(7.7) 372(92.3)
χ2值 ? 0.144 13.057 18.998
P值 ? 0.705 <0.001 <0.001
组别 例数 组织病理学类型 脉管癌栓 宫旁浸润
鳞癌 非鳞癌 阳性 阴性 阳性 阴性
PLNM(＋)组 113 77(68.1) 36(31.9) 81(71.7) 32(28.3) 32(28.3) 81(71.7)
PLNM(－)组 403 329(81.6) 74(18.4) 97(24.0) 306(76.0) 13(3.2) 390(96.8)
χ2值 ? 9.584 88.538 69.807
P值 ? 0.002 <0.001 <0.001
组别 例数 宫颈间质浸润深度 肿瘤直径 血清SCC-Ag含量
≥2/3 <2/3 >4 cm ≤4 cm ≥1.6 ng/mL <1.6 ng/mL
PLNM(＋)组 113 65(57.5) 48(42.5) 58(51.3) 55(48.7) 70(61.9) 43(38.1)
PLNM(－)组 403 115(28.5) 288(71.5) 47(11.7) 356(88.3) 192(47.6) 211(52.4)
χ2值 ? 32.644 85.667 7.225
P值 ? <0.001 <0.001 0.007
组别 例数 LMR
≤2.2 >2.2
PLNM(＋)组 113 75(66.4) 38(33.6)
PLNM(－)组 403 57(14.1) 346(85.9)
χ2值 ? 126.453
P值 ? <0.001
表3 早期宫颈癌患者发生盆腔淋巴结转移影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析变量含义及赋值
自变量/因变量 变量名 赋值
PLNM y y＝0表示早期宫颈癌患者PLNM(－)；y＝1表示早期宫颈癌患者PLNM(＋)
FIGO临床分期 x1 x1＝0表示FIGO临床分期为ⅠB期；x1＝1表示FIGO临床分期为ⅡA期
组织病理学分级 x2 x2＝0表示手术切除组织病理学分级为G2和G3；x2＝1表示手术切除组织病理学分级为G1
组织病理学类型 x3 x3＝0表示除鳞癌外的其他组织病理学类型；x3＝1表示鳞癌
脉管癌栓 x4 x4＝0表示未合并脉管癌栓；x4＝1表示合并脉管癌栓
宫旁浸润 x5 x5＝0表示未合并宫旁浸润；x5＝1表示合并宫旁浸润
宫颈间质浸润深度 x6 x6＝0表示宫颈间质浸润深度<2/3；x6＝1表示宫颈间质浸润深度≥2/3
肿瘤直径 x7 x7＝0表示肿瘤直径≤4 cm；x7＝1表示肿瘤直径>4 cm
血清SCC-Ag含量 x8 x8＝0表示血清SCC-Ag含量<1.6 ng/mL；x8＝1表示血清SCC-Ag含量≥1.6 ng/mL
LMR x9 x9＝0表示LMR≤2.2；x9＝1表示LMR>2.2
表4 早期宫颈癌患者发生盆腔淋巴结转移影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果
影响因素 B SE Wald值 P值 OR值 OR值95%CI
常数项 －2.549 0.485 27.664 <0.001 0.078 —
FIGO临床分期 0.814 0.312 6.800 0.009 2.256 1.224～4.160
组织病理学分级 1.032 0.415 6.190 0.013 2.805 1.245～6.323
组织病理学类型 0.365 0.354 1.063 0.303 1.440 0.720～2.882
脉管癌栓 1.761 0.315 31.299 <0.001 5.818 3.139～10.782
宫旁浸润 1.500 0.486 9.537 0.002 4.482 1.730～11.615
宫颈间质浸润深度 －0.056 0.320 0.031 0.861 0.945 0.505～1.770
肿瘤直径 1.375 0.319 18.636 <0.001 3.955 2.119～7.383
血清SCC-Ag含量 0.064 0.301 4.600 0.032 1.909 1.057～3.446
LMR －1.864 0.330 31.887 <0.001 0.155 0.081～0.296
图1 LMR预测早期宫颈癌患者发生PLNM的ROC曲线
[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(1): 7-30. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21442.
[2]
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2): 69-90. DOI: 10.3322/caac.20107.
[3]
谢幸，孔北华，段涛. 妇产科学 [M]. 9版．北京：人民卫生出版社，2018：298-302.
[4]
Han X, Wen H, Ju X, et al. Predictive factors of para-aortic lymph nodes metastasis in cervical cancer patients: a retrospective analysis based on 723 para-aortic lymphadenectomy cases [J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(31): 51840-51847. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16025.
[5]
Nanthamongkolkul K, Hanprasertpong J. Predictive factors of pelvic lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer [J]. Oncol Res Treat, 2018, 41(4): 194-198. DOI: 10.1159/000485840.
[6]
Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, et al. Cervical cancer, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2019, 17(1): 64-84. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0001.
[7]
Tanaka T, Sasaki S, Tsuchihashi H, et al. Which is better for predicting pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer: fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography or a sentinel nodebiopsy? A retrospective observational study [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(16): e0410. DOI: info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000010410.
[8]
SKoh WJ, Greer BE, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. Cervical cancer, version 2.2015 [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2015, 13(4): 395-404. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0055
[9]
Kim SI, Lim MC, Lee JS, et al. Impact of lower limb lymphedema on quality of life in gynecologic cancer survivors after pelvic lymph node dissection [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2015, 192：31-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.011.
[10]
Kim JH, Kim DY, Suh DS, et al. The efficacy of sentinel lymph node mapping with indocyanine green in cervical cancer [J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2018, 16(1): 52. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1341-6.
[11]
Tanaka T, Terai Y, Ono YJ, et al. Genitofemoral neuropathy after pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with uterine corpus cancer [J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2015, 25(3): 533-536. DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000335.
[12]
Singh R, Mishra MK, Aggarwal H. Inflammation, immunity, and cancer [J]. Mediators Inflamm, 2017, 2017: 6027305. DOI: 10.1155/2017/6027305.
[13]
Nie D, Gong H, Mao X, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective study [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2019, 152(2): 259-264. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.034.
[14]
Lin JX, Lin JP, Xie JW, et al. Prognostic importance of the preoperative modified systemic inflammation score for patients with gastric cancer [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2019, 22(2): 403-412. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-018-0854-6.
[15]
Chen L, Zhang F, Sheng XG, et al. Decreased pretreatment lymphocyte/monocyte ratio is associated with poor prognosis in stage Ⅰb1-Ⅱa cervical cancer patients who undergo radical surgery [J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2015, 8: 1355-1362. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S82174.
[16]
Hu RJ, Ma JY, Hu G. Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: prognostic significance and Meta-analysis [J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2018, 481: 142-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.03.008.
[17]
D′Andrea D, Moschini M, Gust KM, et al. Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as biomarkers for predicting lymph node metastasis and survival in patients treated with radical cystectomy [J]. J Surg Oncol, 2017, 115(4): 455-461. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24521.
[18]
Matsuo K, Machida H, Mandelbaum RS, et al. Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2019, 152(1): 87-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.026.
[19]
D′Andrea D, Moschini M, Gust KM, et al. Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as biomarkers for predicting lymph node metastasis and survival in patients treated with radical cystectomy [J]. J Surg Oncol, 2017, 115(4): 455-461. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24521.
[20]
Lu C, Zhou L, Ouyang J, et al. Prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in ovarian cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(24): e15876. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015876.
[21]
Sun Y, Zhang L. The clinical use of pretreatment NLR, PLR, and LMR in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: evidence from a Meta-analysis [J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2018, 10: 6167-6179. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S171035.
[22]
Li M, Deng Q, Zhang L, et al. The pretreatment lymphocyte to monocyte ratio predicts clinical outcome for patients with urological cancers: a Meta-analysis [J]. Pathol Res Pract, 2019, 215(1): 5-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2018.10.026.
[23]
Song L, Zhu J, Li Z, et al. The prognostic value of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio for high-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2019, 11: 8451-8462. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S219163.
[24]
Zhou Z, Li W, Zhang F, et al. The value of squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCa) to determine the lymph nodal metastasis in cervical cancer: a Meta-analysis and literature review [J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(12): e0186165. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186165.
[25]
Yang H, Hu H, Gou Y, et al. Combined detection of Twist1, Snail1 and squamous cell carcinoma antigen for the prognostic evaluation of invasion and metastasis in cervical squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2018, 23(2): 321-328. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-017-1210-2.
[26]
Tang Y, Li J, Hu HQ, et al. Analysis of correlation between preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and FIGO stage of ovarian cancer [J]. Chin J Prac Gynecol Obstet, 2018, 34(1): 106-109. DOI：10.19538/j.fk2018010123.
[1] Lu Wang, Yang Fan. Advances in endometrial cancer-related biomarker research[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 511-516.
[2] Ling Wei, Hui Li, Yi Chen. Current research status on colonization or infection and mother-to-child transmission of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in pregnant and post-partum women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 517-521.
[3] Dan Luo, Weimin Kong, Shuning Chen, Xiaoling Zhao, Yunkai Xie. Differences in epithelial mesenchymal transition-related biological markers between in-situ and ectopic endometrial epithelial cells in endometriosis patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 530-539.
[4] Wenlin Li, Ling Yang, Kaihui Xing, Caihua Chen, Lihua Zhong, Yaqin Zhang, Wei Zhang. Analysis of early diagnostic value of umbilical artery blood gas analysis combined with amplitude integrated electroencephalography in neonatal asphyxia brain injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 550-558.
[5] Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[6] Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[7] Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[8] Xu Chen, Yuru Zhan, Chunhua Wang. Clinical value of ABO blood group combined with thyroid function in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[9] Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[10] Xingchen Liu, Juan Liu, Baobao Wei, Jie Liu, Hui Liu. Correlation analysis of abnormal expression of XIAP and XAF1 with ovarian cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 419-427.
[11] Chenxi Ran, Rufei Shen, Mingyu Liao, Qian Liao, Ling Zhou, Yuling Zhang, Min Long. Treatment and management of pituitary tumor during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[12] Ying Chen, Yanli Chen. Causes of heart rate variability and perinatal outcomes in elderly pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[13] Hongjie Yang, Zhichun Zhang, Yi Sun. Study progress in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[14] Hongqin Gao, Chen Chen, Ruike Lu, Xiaoyu Wang, Min Zhang, Shaohua Li, Lilan Hao, Xincheng Huang, Lingyao Guan, Yunhong Zhang. Impact of vulvovaginal candidiasis on vaginal-cervical microbiota in women[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 720-725.
[15] Xueyun Liu, Ying Fan, Aijun Yao, Shengmiao Zhang, Yani Lv, Bingqing Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Heng. Liu. Effects of individualized whole-course nursing intervention based on WeChat mini program on pregnancy weight and delivery outcome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Copyright © Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Medical Multimedia Press  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号