Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05): 520 -526. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.05.007

Special Issue:

Original Article

Different embolization agents on volumes of bleeding in uterine artery chemoembolization combined with uterine curettage under ultrasound monitoring in pregnant women with caesarean scar pregnancy

Ke Xu1, Gang Ning1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2019-04-16 Revised:2019-09-16 Published:2019-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Gang Ning
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ning Gang, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program)(2017YPC0109004)
Objective

To explore the effect of two different embolization agents polyvinyl alcohol particles (PVA) with a diameter of 560-710 μm and gelfoam particles (GP) with a diameter of 500-710 μm on the volumes of bleeding in uterine artery chemoembolization (UACE) combined with uterine curettage under ultrasound monitoring in pregnant women with caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

Methods

From July 1 of 2015 to March 1 of 2019, a total of 142 cases of CSP pregnant women who received UACE combined with uterine curettage under ultrasound monitoring in Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University were selected as the research subjects by simple random sampling method, and there were 102 cases of CSP Ⅱ, and 40 cases of CSP Ⅲ. According to types of CSP and different embolization agents used in UACE, the 142 pregnant women with CSP were divided into type Ⅱ PVA group (n=51, CSP Ⅱ pregnant women with the use of PVA as embolization agents), type Ⅱ GP group (n=51, CSP Ⅱ pregnant women with the use of GP as embolization agents), type Ⅲ PVA group (n=20, CSP Ⅲ pregnant women with the use of PVA as embolization agents), type Ⅲ GP group (n=20, CSP Ⅲ pregnant women with the use of GP as embolization agents). The age, the maximum diameter of gestational sac, time of menopause at admission, gravidity, number of caesarean sections, levels of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) before operation, length of hospital stay, and volume of bleeding during uterine curettage of all pregnant women were collected by retrospective method. Wilcoxon rank sum test and independent-samples t test were used to compare the volume of bleeding during uterine curettage and length of hospital stay between type Ⅱ PVA group and type Ⅱ GP group, type Ⅲ PVA group and type Ⅲ GP group. This study was in line with the requirements of World Medical Association of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①There were no statistically significant differences between type Ⅱ PAV group and type Ⅱ GP group, type Ⅲ PAV group and type Ⅲ GP group in the age, time of menopause at admission, gravidity, number of caesarean sections, level of hCG before operation (P>0.05). ②The maximum diameters of gestational sac in type Ⅱ PAV group and type Ⅲ PAV group were longer than those in type Ⅱ GP group and type Ⅲ GP group, respectively, and both differences were statistically significant (t=3.377, 2.096; P=0.001, 0.043). The correlation analysis of the maximum diameter of gestational sac and volume of bleeding during uterine curettage showed that the maximum diameter of gestational sac of pregnant women with type Ⅱ CSP was weakly correlated with the volume of bleeding during uterine curettage (rs=0.235, P=0.017), and in pregnant women with type Ⅲ CSP, there was no significant correlation between these two indexes (rs=0.295, P=0.064). ③The volumes of bleeding during uterine curettage in type Ⅱ PVA group and type Ⅱ GP group were 10 mL (2-200 mL) and 10 mL (2-100 mL), respectively, and the length of hospital stay were (5.3±1.5) d and (5.2±1.7) d, respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences between these two groups in these two indexes (P>0.05). The volumes of bleeding during uterine curettage in type Ⅲ PVA group and type Ⅲ GP group were (10.7±7.5) mL and (11.7±13.9) mL, respectively, and the length of hospital stay were (5.5±1.1) d and (4.8±1.8) d, respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences between these two groups in these two indexes (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The effects of reducing the volume of bleeding during uterine curettage are the same with the use of PVA and GP as embolization agents to embolize bilateral uterine artery of CSP pregnant women in UACE combined with uterine curettage under ultrasound monitoring.

表1 Ⅱ型PVA组与Ⅱ型GP组CSP患者一般临床资料比较
表2 Ⅲ型PVA组与Ⅲ型GP组CSP患者一般临床资料比较
图1 1例Ⅱ型CSP患者(入院时停经50 d、腹痛1 d) UACE前与术后子宫或子宫动脉医学影像图[图1A:UACE前子宫MRI检查图,可见子宫峡部前壁处孕囊生长,孕囊部分位于宫腔下段,子宫峡部前壁切口处肌壁明显变薄(箭头所示);图1B:UACE前子宫超声检查图,孕囊突向前壁下段切口可见回声(箭头所示);图1C、1D:UACE前子宫动脉数字减影血管造影图,可见该患者双侧子宫动脉增粗、迂曲,血供丰富(箭头所示);图1E、1F:UACE后子宫动脉数字减影血管造影图,可见该患者双侧子宫动脉均仅主干显影(箭头所示)]
表3 Ⅱ型PVA组与Ⅱ型GP组CSP患者清宫术中出血量及住院时间比较
表4 Ⅲ型PVA组与Ⅲ型GP组CSP患者清宫术中出血量及住院时间比较(±s)
[1]
Qiao B, Zhang Z, Li Y. Uterine artery embolization versus methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy in a Chinese population: a Meta-analysis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2016, 23(7): 1040-1048.
[2]
Litwicka K, Greco E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 25(6): 456-461.
[3]
Cheung VY. Local methotrexate injection as the first-line treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: review of the literature[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22(5): 753-758.
[4]
Fu LP. Therapeutic approach for the cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Med, 2018, 97(18): e0476.
[5]
Pirjani R, Bayani L, Shirazi M. Successful local and systemic medical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy and a subsequent term pregnancy after treatment: a case series[J]. Iran J Reprod Med, 2015, 13(7): 445-450.
[6]
邓玉艳,陆静,宋丁. 剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的超声分型及治疗效果的研究[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2017, 33(7): 538-540.
[7]
刘欣燕. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗方法的探讨:子宫动脉栓塞后清宫与开腹瘢痕妊娠病灶清除的比较[C]//中华医学会第八次全国计划生育学术会议论文集,北京,2012. 北京:中华医学会,2012: 205-206.
[8]
李坪芬,王渠源. 子宫动脉栓塞术在子宫瘢痕妊娠治疗中的利弊[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志,2019, 46(3): 297-300.
[9]
沈铿,马丁. 妇产科学[M]. 3版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2015: 128.
[10]
张婷,原婷,赵菲,等. 剖宫产后瘢痕部位妊娠超声分型的临床意义[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2019, 27(3): 331-334.
[11]
马贺迪,戴姝艳. MRI测量Ⅱ及Ⅲ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病灶大小对微创治疗方式选择的意义[J]. 现代妇产科进展,2019, 28(9): 672-675.
[12]
凡爱华. 子宫动脉栓塞联合甲氨蝶呤治疗子宫切口瘢痕妊娠的临床分析[J]. 临床医学,2016, 36(1): 92-94.
[13]
邵华江,马建婷,杨秀儿,等. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊治方法探讨[J]. 中华医学杂志,2017, 90 (37): 2616-2619.
[14]
徐真,唐静,刘玉兰,等. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠71例临床分析[J]. 生殖与避孕,2014, 34(2): 167-170, 174.
[15]
刘月平,秦涛,李春海. 不同栓塞剂经导管动脉化疗栓塞与全身化疗治疗瘢痕妊娠的疗效对比[J]. 医学影像学杂志,2011, 21(8): 1235-1239.
[16]
楚光华,刘晨,胡春艳,等. 高强度聚焦超声与子宫动脉栓塞术辅助治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床效果比较[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(5): 547-552.
[17]
肖卓妮,杨菁,徐望明. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗策略的临床疗效及并发症发生情况研究[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(1): 31-38.
[18]
Hong TM, Tseng HS, Lee RC, et al. Uterine artery embolization: an effective treatment for intractable obstetric haemorrhage[J]. Clin Radiol, 2004, 59(1): 96-101.
[19]
朱赤,张德志,曹立宇,等. 超选择性子宫动脉化疗栓塞治疗宫颈癌的临床价值[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2009, 18(7): 507-509.
[20]
马奔,曾北蓝,陈春林,等. 子宫动脉栓塞术后闭经的影响因素分析[J/CD]. 妇产与遗传(电子版), 2012, 2(1): 24-27.
[21]
金龙云,杨宝丽,金春明,等. 子宫肌瘤介入治疗前后卵巢功能变化对比研究[J]. 中国实验诊断学,2008, 12(1): 114-116.
[22]
孙增涛,张垒,刘薇,等. 刮宫术前行子宫动脉栓塞术治疗347例子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床价值研究[J/CD]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志,2018, 6(3): 204-208.
[1] Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[2] Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[3] Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[4] Xu Chen, Yuru Zhan, Chunhua Wang. Clinical value of ABO blood group combined with thyroid function in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[5] Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] Chenxi Ran, Rufei Shen, Mingyu Liao, Qian Liao, Ling Zhou, Yuling Zhang, Min Long. Treatment and management of pituitary tumor during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[7] Ying Chen, Yanli Chen. Causes of heart rate variability and perinatal outcomes in elderly pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[8] Danyan Feng, Xiaohui Cao, Yuxia Shi. Effect of serum adiponectin and placental leucine aminopeptidase levels on pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[9] Defeng Kuang, Zhiguo Li, Shaofang Hua, Fengxia Xue. Levels and significance of fatty acid-binding protein 4 in serum and placental tissues and related lipid protein expression of high-fat-induced pregnant rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 338-344.
[10] Longhai Wu, Miao Huang, Yunhui Gong, Yunqian Yu. Clinical value of serum chemokines in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 357-362.
[11] Lu Zhang, Huijuan Yang, Kaibo Liu. Birth trends and adverse pregnancy outcomes of live births under assisted reproductive technology in Beijing, 2015-2021[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(01): 46-53.
[12] Liping Shen, Yuyun Long, Yuehua Yang, Min Zhang, Yang Xu, Yali Zhao, Jing Li, Yun Zhang, Shiwen Jiang, Zhiming Sun. Influencing factors of different contraceptive methods on female fertility[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(01): 107-112.
[13] Xiuying Jin, Feng Chen. Diagnostic value of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography combined with serumβ-HCG detection in cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(03): 155-159.
[14] Xueyun Liu, Ying Fan, Aijun Yao, Shengmiao Zhang, Yani Lv, Bingqing Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Heng. Liu. Effects of individualized whole-course nursing intervention based on WeChat mini program on pregnancy weight and delivery outcome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
[15] Shaofeng Xu, Zhiqiang Wang, Hongjie Hu. Factors influencing uterine artery recanalization after gelatin sponge interventional embolization of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(01): 30-34.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract