Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02): 164 -170. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.02.007

Special Issue:

Original Article

Clinical significance of expressions of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein in placenta of patients with early onset severe preeclampsia

Lina Zhao1, Jinghua Wu1, Guocheng Liu1, Ruixia Ma1,()   

  1. 1. Guangdong Women and Children′s Hospital, Guangzhou 510610, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2018-11-10 Revised:2019-03-06 Published:2019-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Ruixia Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Ruixia, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province(2018KJYZ015)
Objective

To investigate the expression and correlation of Notch1 protein and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ protein in placenta of early onset severe preeclampsia ( PE ) pregnant women.

Methods

From October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017, 65 pregnant women with severe PE who were hospitalized in Guangdong Women and Children′s Hospital and underwent elective cesarean section were selected into this study. According to different gestational ages, 33 pregnant women with early onset severe PE (gestational age≤34 weeks) were included into early onset severe PE group, and 32 pregnant women with late onset severe PE (gestational age>34 weeks) were included in late onset severe PE group. At the same time, 30 pregnant women who were hospitalized in the same hospital due to abnormal fetal position or fetal distress and underwent elective cesarean section during the same period were randomly selected into control group. Immunohistochemically streptavidin peroxidase (SP) method was used to detect the distribution and expression levels of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein in placental tissues. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the age, gestational age, average gray-value scale of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein among three groups. The least significant difference (LSD) method was used to further compare the average gray-value scale of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein among three groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein in placenta tissue of pregnant women. The procedures followed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards established by the Human Subjects Trial Committee of Guangdong Women and Children′s Hospital, and this study was approved by this committee (Approval No. 201601027). Informed consent was obtained and signed with each subject.

Results

①There were no significant differences in age and gestational age between early onset severe PE group, late onset severe PE group and control group (P>0.05). ② Notch1 protein was expressed in placental tissues of 3 groups, mainly localized in the cytoplasm of placental trophoblast cells, showing pale yellow-dark brown granules. PPAR-γ protein is mainly located in the nucleus of villous cytotrophoblast, and a small part of PPAR-γ protein is expressed in cytoplasm, presenting tan-dark brown granules. ③ The average grey-scale values of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein in placental tissues among 3 groups were all statistically significant (F=5.565, P=0.012; F=8.694, P=0.006). Multiple comparison results showed the following results. The average gray-scale values of Notch1 protein in placenta tissues of 3 groups were respectively pairwise compared, and the differences were statistically significant (early onset severe PE group vs late onset severe PE group: LSD-t=3.218, P=0.005; early onset severe PE group vs control group: LSD-t=4.832, P=0.007; late onset severe PE group vs control group: LSD-t=2.948, P=0.008). The average grey-scale values of PPAR-γ protein in placental tissues were compared among 3 groups, and the differences were also statistically significant (early onset severe PE group vs late onset severe PE group: LSD-t=3.412, P=0.003; early onset severe PE group vs control group: LSD-t=4.927, P=0.002; late onset severe PE group vs control group: LSD-t=3.168, P=0.001). ④Pearson correlation analysis of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein in placenta tissues of early severe PE group and late severe PE group showed that the average gray-scale values of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein were negatively correlated (r=-0.461, P<0.05).

Conclusions

The relative expression level of Notch1 and PPAR-γ protein in placental tissue of pregnant women with early onset severe PE were down-regulated and up-regulated, suggesting that abnormal expressions of Notch1 protein and PPAR-γ protein may play a leading role in the infiltration of trophoblasts and affect the occurrence and development of early onset severe PE.

表1 3组产妇的一般临床资料比较(±s)
图1 Notch1蛋白在3组产妇胎盘组织中的表达(图1A:早发型重度PE组;图1B:晚发型重度PE组;图1C:对照组)(SP染色,高倍)
图2 PPAR-γ蛋白在3组产妇胎盘组织中的表达(图2A:早发型重度PE组;图2B:晚发型重度PE组,图2C:对照组)(SP染色,高倍)
表2 3组产妇胎盘组织中Notch1和PPAR-γ蛋白平均灰度值比较(±s)
[1]
Liu Q, Yang J. Expression and significance of miR155 and vascular endothelial growth factor in placenta of rats with preeclampsia [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(9): 15731-15737.
[2]
赵杨,韩凤珍,刘益芬,等. 正常妊娠和子痫前期胎盘Syncytin表达差异探讨[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版),2009, 30(2): 211-214.
[3]
Liu X, Luo Q, Zheng Y, et al. Notch1 impairs endothelial progenitor cell bioactivity in preeclampsia [J]. Reprod Sci, 2017, 24(1): 47-56.
[4]
Haider S, Meinhardt G, Saleh L, et al. Notch1 controls development of the extravillous trophoblast lineage in the human placenta [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2016, 113(48): E7710-E7719.
[5]
Tache V, Ciric A, Moretto-Zita M, et al. Hypoxia and trophoblast differentiation: a key role for PPARγ [J]. Stem Cells Dev, 2013, 22(21): 2815-2824.
[6]
Pham J, Arul NRK, Li P, et al. The role of Sirtuin1-PPARγ axis in placental development and function [J]. J Mol Endocrinol, 2018, 60(4): R201-R201, R212.
[7]
Garnier V, Traboulsi W, Salomon A, et al. PPARγ controls pregnancy outcome through activation of EG-VEGF: new insights into the mechanism of placental development [J]. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 2015, 309(4): E357-E369.
[8]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组. 妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2015)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2015, 50(10): 721-728.
[9]
赵卫秀,林建华. Notch2和Notch3对滋养细胞株迁移与侵袭功能的影响[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2015, 35(12): 1785.
[10]
Zhao WX, Wu ZM, Liu W, et al. Notch2 and Notch3 suppress the proliferation and mediate invasion of trophoblast cell lines [J]. Biol Open, 2017, 6(8): 1123-1129.
[11]
Hany H, Shalaby A, Al Kashef W, et al. Evaluation of the role of Notch1 expression in hepatic carcinogenesis with clinicopathological correlation [J]. Pathology, 2018, 50(7): 730-736.
[12]
Sun HW, Wu C, Tan HY, et al. Combination DLL4 with Jagged1-siRNA can enhance inhibition of the proliferation and invasiveness activity of human gastric carcinoma by Notch1/VEGF pathway [J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2012, 59(115): 924-929.
[13]
Hsu KW, Fang WL, Huang KH, et al. Notch1 pathway-mediated microRNA-151-5p promotes gastric cancer progression [J]. Oncotarget, 2016, 7(25): 38036-38051.
[14]
Li D, Masiero M, Banham AH, et al. The notch ligand JAGGED1 as a target for anti-tumor therapy [J]. Front Oncol, 2014, 4: 254.
[15]
Krebs LT, Xue Y, Norton CR, et al. Notch signaling is essential for vascular morphogenesis in mice [J]. Genes Dev, 2000, 14(11): 1343-1352.
[16]
Limbourg FP, Takeshita K, Radtke F, et al. Essential role of endothelial Notch1 in angiogenesis [J]. Circulation, 2005, 111(14): 1826-1832.
[17]
Harris LK. Trophoblast-vascular cell interactions in early pregnancy: how to remodel a vessel [J]. Placenta, 2010, 31(Suppl): S93-S98.
[18]
Szpera-Godziewicz A, Majcherek M, Boruczkowski M, et al. Circulating endothelial cells, circulating endothelial progenitor cells, and von Willebrand factor in pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 2017, 77(3): e12625.
[19]
狄政莉,牛小麟,魏瑾,等. PPAR-γ在自发性高血压大鼠血管平滑肌表达的增龄性变化[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2006, 37(2): 204-207.
[20]
McCarthy FP, Delany AC, Kenny LC, et al. PPAR-γ-a possible drug target for complicated pregnancies[J]. Br J Pharmacol, 2013, 168(5): 1074-1085.
[21]
Pekson R, Poltoratsky V, Gorasiya S, et al. N,N-Dimethylacetamide significantly attenuates LPS- and TNFα-induced proinflammatory responses via inhibition of the nuclear factor kappa B pathway [J]. Mol Med, 2016, 22(1): 747-758.
[22]
Sakowicz A. The role of NFκB in the three stages of pregnancy-implantation, maintenance, and labour: a review article [J]. BJOG, 2018, 125(11): 1379-1387.
[23]
Holdsworth-Carson SJ, Lim R, Mitton A, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are altered in pathologies of the human placenta: gestational diabetes mellitus, intrauterine growth restriction and preeclampsia [J]. Placenta, 2010, 31(3): 222-229.
[24]
李苑,陈文玲,刘岚,等. 子痫前期孕妇胎盘组织中PPAR、FABP-4的表达及其与孕妇预后的相关性[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2017,52(7): 443-448.
[25]
Levytska K, Drewlo S, Baczyk D. PPAR-γ regulates trophoblast differentiation in the BeWo cell model [J]. PPAR Res, 2014, 2014: 637251.
[26]
Meher A, Sundrani D, Joshi S. Maternal nutrition influences angiogenesis in the placenta through peroxisome proliferator activated receptors: a novel hypothesis [J]. Mol Reprod Dev, 2015, 82(10): 726-734.
[27]
Ganss R. Maternal metabolism and vascular adaptation in pregnancy: the PPAR link [J]. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2017, 28(1): 73-84.
[28]
Echeverría F, Ortiz M, Valenzuela R, et al. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids regulation of PPARs, signaling: relationship to tissue development and aging [J]. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids, 2016, 114: 28-34.
[29]
Hutter S, Knabl J, Andergassen U, et al. The role of PPARs in placental immunology: a systematic review of the literature[J]. PPAR Res, 2013, 2013: 970276.
[1] Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[2] Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[3] Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[4] Xu Chen, Yuru Zhan, Chunhua Wang. Clinical value of ABO blood group combined with thyroid function in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[5] Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] Chenxi Ran, Rufei Shen, Mingyu Liao, Qian Liao, Ling Zhou, Yuling Zhang, Min Long. Treatment and management of pituitary tumor during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[7] Xianmei Wei, Yu Han, Yingcai Jiang. Knockdown of circSERPINE2 inhibits trophoblast cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting miR-34a-5p expression[J]. Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(04): 193-201.
[8] Xueyun Liu, Ying Fan, Aijun Yao, Shengmiao Zhang, Yani Lv, Bingqing Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Heng. Liu. Effects of individualized whole-course nursing intervention based on WeChat mini program on pregnancy weight and delivery outcome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
[9] Maternal and Fetal Medicine Special Committee of Obstetrics and Gynecology Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association;, Critical Care Subgroup, Chinese Society of Perinatal Medicine, Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on the use of prophylactic interventional radiology in placenta accrete spectrum diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 133-140.
[10] Ying Chen, Wanjiang Zeng. The effect and significance of histopathological examination on the placenta accreta spectrum[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 143-146.
[11] Xianlan Zhao, Yan Zhou. The interventional radiology of postpartum hemorrhage in placenta accrete spectrum[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 147-150.
[12] Zhirong Guo, Jingmei Ma. Risk factors assessment and surgical strategies of placenta accreta spectrum[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 151-154.
[13] Lizi Zhang, Dunjin Chen. Adverse outcomes and long­term prognosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
[14] Shifeng Gu, Lizi Zhang, Jingying Liang, Lili Du, Wen Sun, Dunjin Chen. Hot spots of placenta accreta spectrum disorders research in China from 2011 to 2021: a visualized analysis based on CiteSpace[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 159-166.
[15] Yongfei Yue, Liping Zhu, Xiaoyan Wang. Evaluation of blood loss by magnetic resonance imaging during cesarean section in placenta accreta spectrum disorders[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 167-172.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract