Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05): 558 -565. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.05.011

Special Issue:

Original Article

Analysis of maternal and infant perinatal period outcomes of pregnant women with premature birth caused by hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy

Kaifei Zhang1, Qingqing Lyu1, Ning Sun1, Li Wang1, Haining Wang1, Aiqun Xu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2018-04-08 Revised:2018-08-19 Published:2018-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Aiqun Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Aiqun, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Planning Project of Binzhou Medical University(BY2015KYQD32)
Objective

To study the maternal and infant perinatal period outcomes of pregnant women with premature birth caused by hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy.

Methods

From January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016, a total of 87 cases of singleton pregnancy with premature birth caused by hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy were selected as research subjects and were included into study group. The gestational age ranged from 28 weeks to 36+ 6 weeks. Among those 87 pregnant women, 73 cases were complicated with preeclampsia (PE) including mild PE (9 cases), severe PE (60 cases), and chronic hypertension complicated with PE (4 cases), and 14 cases were not complicated with PE including gestational hypertension(10 cases) and chronic hypertension (4 cases). Meanwhile, another 120 cases of singleton pregnancy of spontaneous preterm and preterm premature rupture of membranes with premature birth with the same gestational weeks during the same period and in the same hospital were selected as control group. The clinical data of all subjects were analyzed by retrospective method. The differences of general maternal characteristics, pregnancy and preterm infants′ outcomes, as well as birth weights, Z scores of birth weights of preterm infants in different gestational age periods were statistically analyzed. Gestational age at admission and gestational age at delivery were analyzed by independent-samples t test between two groups. Age and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) were analyzed by Wilcoxon rank sum test. The constituent ratio of delivery mode (vaginal delivery and cesarean section), prenatal antimicrobial drug use rate of pregnant women, incidence of hyperbilirubinemia, pneumonia and gastrointestinal disorders of premature infants were compared by chi-square test, continuity correction chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method. This study met the requirements of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①There were no significant differences between two groups in age, gestational age at admission, gestational age at delivery, and the constituent ratio of delivery modes (P>0.05). ②Before pregnancy, the BMI of pregnant women in study group was 23.5 kg/m2 (21.1-27.7 kg/m2), which was significantly higher than that of 22.4 kg/m2 (20.3-24.6 kg/m2) in control group. And the difference between two groups was statistically significant (Z=-3.480, P=0.001). ③Comparison of the constituent ratio of delivery modes between two groups showed statistically significant difference (χ2=124.130, P<0.001). The prenatal antimicrobial drug use rate of pregnant women in study group was 10.3% (9/87), which was significantly lower than that of 24.2% (29/120) in control group, and there was a statistically significant difference (χ2=6.429, P=0.011). ④The birth weight of preterm infants in study group was 2 250.0 g (1 820.0-2 600.0 g), which was significantly lower than that of 2 650.0 g (2 212.5-2 980.0 g) in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-3.866, P<0.001); and the Z score of birth weight of preterm infants in study group was -0.63 (-1.27-0.10), which was significantly lower than that of 0.33 (-3.38-0.85) in control group, and the difference was also statistically significant (Z=-5.695, P<0.001). In addition, the birth weight and Z score of birth weight of preterm infants with gestational age ≥32-34+ 6 weeks and gestational age ≥ 34-36+ 6 weeks in study group were lower than those in control group, and all the differences between 2 groups were also statistically significant (preterm infants with gestational age ≥ 32-34 weeks: Z=4.706, -3.690, P<0.001; preterm infants with gestational age ≥ 34-3636 weeks: Z=-5.116, -5.555, P<0.001). ⑤ The proportion of 1 min Apgar score ≤7 scores after birth, incidence of neonatal asphyxia, and incidence of mild asphyxia in study group were 12.6% (11/87), 12.6% (11/87), and 9.2% (8/87), respectively, which were higher than those in control group 3.3% (4/120), 3.3% (4/120), and 3.3% (4/120), respectively, and all the differences were statistically significant (χ2= 6.504, 9.017, 7.514; P= 0.011, 0.003, 0.025). ⑥ In study group, there were statistically significant differences in the constituent ratio of the delivery modes and rate of preterm infants transferred to the neonatology department between pregnant women complicated with PE and uncomplicated with PE (P=0.002; χ2=4.351, P=0.037).

Conclusions

Reasonable diet and weight control before pregnancy are of great significance to prevent the occurrence and development of hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy. Premature birth caused by hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy can increase the risk of neonatal asphyxia. More closely monitored and actively intervened measures should be conducted on pregnant women with hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy, so as to decrease the incidence of premature birth.

表1 2组孕妇一般临床资料比较
表2 2组孕妇围生结局比较[例数(%)]
表3 2组孕妇分娩早产儿出生体重及其Z评分值比较[M(P25P75)]
表4 87例病例组孕妇与120例对照组孕妇分娩早产儿不同胎龄出生体重及其Z评分值比较[M(P25P75)]
表5 2组孕妇分娩早产儿围生结局比较[例数(%)]
表6 87例病例组孕妇中,合并PE与未合并PE者的母婴围生结局比较[例数(%)]
[1]
王益群.妊娠期高血压疾病相关影响因素及对妊娠结局影响的研究[J].中华全科医学,2015,13(4):602-604.
[2]
魏炜,王雅琴,徐晓辉,等.妊娠期高血压疾病性心脏病心力衰竭15例临床分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2016, 17(1): 40-44.
[3]
Avanasi R,Shin HM,Vieira VM, et al. Variability and epistemic uncertainty in water ingestion rates and pharmacokinetic parameters, and impact on the association between perfluorooctanoate and preeclampsia in the C8 Health Project population [J]. Environ Res, 2016, 146: 299-307.
[4]
夏敏,杨平,崔伟,等. 双胎妊娠早产的临床特点及早产儿结局分析[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2016,12(5):590-596.
[5]
Durst JK,Tuuli MG,Stout MJ, et al. Degree of obesity at delivery and risk of preeclampsia with severe features [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 214(5): 651. e1-e5.
[6]
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antenatal Corticosteroids to Reduce Neonatal Morbidity and Morbidity (Green-top Guideline No. 7)[EB/OL]. (2014-02-05) [2018-01-18].

URL    
[7]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组.妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2015)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2015,50(10):721-728.
[8]
中华医学会围产医学分会新生儿复苏学组.新生儿窒息诊断的专家共识(2016)[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(1):3-6.
[9]
徐爱群,曾蔚越,何礼霞,等.多疗程糖皮质激素治疗孕34周前早产临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(10):610-613.
[10]
杨孜. 从如何看妊娠期高血压疾患分类和诊断标准变迁谈践行 [J/CD] . 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2015,11(3): 289-291.
[11]
Vulic′ M,Roje D,Mestrovic′ Z, et al. Is there difference in perinatal outcome of singleton and twin pregnancies after assisted conception: two-year experience [J]. Acta Clin Croat, 2013, 52(2): 241-246.
[12]
Caserta D,Bordi G,Stegagno M, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in spontaneous versus assisted conception twin pregnancies [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2014, 174: 64-69.
[13]
王大伟. 蛋白尿与肾功能损伤对妊娠高血压综合征患者预后的影响 [J]. 中国实用医刊,2016,43(9): 34-35.
[14]
Yliniemi A,Nurkkala MM,Kopman S, et al. First trimester placental retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) and pregnancy-associated placental protein A (PAPP-A) in the prediction of early-onset severe pre-eclampsia [J]. Metabolism, 2015, 64(4): 521-526.
[15]
Averett SL,Fletcher EK. Prepregnancy obesity and birth outcomes [J]. Matern Child Health J, 2016, 20(3): 655-664.
[16]
Dietz PM,Callaghan WM,Cogswell ME, et al. Combined effects of prepregnancy body mass index and weight gain during pregnancy on the risk of preterm delivery [J]. Epidemiology, 2006, 17(2): 170-177.
[17]
Shaw GM,Wise PH,Mayo J, et al. Maternal prepregnancy body mass index and risk of spontaneous preterm birth [J]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2014, 28(4): 302-311.
[18]
黄禾,陈倩. 妊娠期体质量管理的标准、方法及评估[J].实用妇产科杂志,2018,34(4):246-249.
[19]
Kominiarek MA,Peaceman AM. Gestational weight gain [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 217(6): 642-651.
[20]
聂明月,王欣,段华. 双胎妊娠早产危险因素的临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2017,33(11):856-859.
[21]
宋佳轶. 瘢痕子宫再次妊娠早产产妇经阴道分娩的临床护理[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(18): 144-146.
[22]
邱艳,熊庆.低出生体重相关因素研究[J].四川医学,2006,27(2):123-124.
[23]
柯华,李占魁. 母亲妊娠期高血压疾病对新生儿预后的影响[J/CD]. 发育医学电子杂志,2018, 6(2): 74-76.
[24]
何洋,蔡丽梅,唐军,等.晚期早产儿中小于胎龄儿和适于胎龄儿的临床特点分析[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2017,13(4):461-465.
[25]
Ishikawa H,Miyazaki K,Ikeda T, et al. The effects of antenatal corticosteroids on short- and long-term outcomes in small-for-gestational-age infants [J]. Int J Med Sci, 2015, 12(4): 295-300.
[1] Jingyu Qian, Mingming Zheng. Interpretation of the Italian guidelines on non-invasive and invasive prenatal diagnosis:executive summary of recommendations for practice the Italian Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology(SIGO)[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[2] Xialin Li, Fang He. Risk assessment and early warning system for postpartum hemorrhage[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 498-503.
[3] Yiming Fei, Zhuo Liu, Lijuan Zhang. Current research status of omics analysis in the molecular mechanism of preterm birth[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 504-510.
[4] Ziyang Liu, Jianjian Cui, Yin Zhao. Current research status on obstetric disseminated intravascular coagulation and its scoring system[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 511-518.
[5] Fanying Zeng, Jie Ruan, Xinghui Liu, Guolin He. Current status of perinatal medicine advances under the new reproductive situation and coping strategies in prenatal care[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 519-524.
[6] Xiaofei Li, Hongli Liu, Qiuling Shi, Jing Tian, Li Li, Hongbo Qi, Xin Luo. A prospective randomized controlled study of low intensity focused ultrasound uterine involution treatment for prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage in natural childbirth women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 534-539.
[7] Rong Huang, Ziyu Liang, Wenjin Qi. Expression and significance of NLRP3 inflammasome in serum of pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 540-548.
[8] Xia He, Rong Huang, Wenjin Qi. High-throughput sequencing study on the abundance of placenta and fetal membrane flora in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 549-555.
[9] Jiangyan Xie, Yafei Wang, Fang He. Pregnancy complicated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura:two cases report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[10] Tingting Xu, Yongchi Zhan, Xiaodong Wang, Xiaodong Wang. Perinatal outcomes of fetomaternal hemorrhage syndrome pregnant women with sinusoidal fetal heart tracing[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(04): 382-389.
[11] Xiaoyan Han, Hua Yang. Relationship between low level of serum placental growth factor in the second trimester pregnancy women and adverse fetal prognosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(04): 398-402.
[12] Jiali Du, Rui Bao, Chunhong Qiao, Wei Han. Construction of a prediction model for adverse pregnancy outcomes after emergency cervical cerclage in pregnant women with cervical incompetence during the second trimester[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(04): 403-409.
[13] Huihui Yu, Zongzhi Yin. Gastric perforation during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(04): 209-213.
[14] Shan Lu, Yunshan Yao, Seni Liao, Zien Chen, Yijian Zhang, Jianhao Lan, Wei Wei, Yanyang Liu, Yanhong Chen, Duijin Chen. Clinical study of 100 cases of suspected pregnancy complicated with acute appendicitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
[15] Wenyan Wang, Jianlan Zheng, Lici Zhu. Clinical study on the risk of pregnancy and perinatal period after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfe[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(04): 220-226.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract