Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05): 558 -565. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.05.011

Special Issue:

Original Article

Analysis of maternal and infant perinatal period outcomes of pregnant women with premature birth caused by hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy

Kaifei Zhang1, Qingqing Lyu1, Ning Sun1, Li Wang1, Haining Wang1, Aiqun Xu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2018-04-08 Revised:2018-08-19 Published:2018-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Aiqun Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Aiqun, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Planning Project of Binzhou Medical University(BY2015KYQD32)
Objective

To study the maternal and infant perinatal period outcomes of pregnant women with premature birth caused by hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy.

Methods

From January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016, a total of 87 cases of singleton pregnancy with premature birth caused by hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy were selected as research subjects and were included into study group. The gestational age ranged from 28 weeks to 36+ 6 weeks. Among those 87 pregnant women, 73 cases were complicated with preeclampsia (PE) including mild PE (9 cases), severe PE (60 cases), and chronic hypertension complicated with PE (4 cases), and 14 cases were not complicated with PE including gestational hypertension(10 cases) and chronic hypertension (4 cases). Meanwhile, another 120 cases of singleton pregnancy of spontaneous preterm and preterm premature rupture of membranes with premature birth with the same gestational weeks during the same period and in the same hospital were selected as control group. The clinical data of all subjects were analyzed by retrospective method. The differences of general maternal characteristics, pregnancy and preterm infants′ outcomes, as well as birth weights, Z scores of birth weights of preterm infants in different gestational age periods were statistically analyzed. Gestational age at admission and gestational age at delivery were analyzed by independent-samples t test between two groups. Age and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) were analyzed by Wilcoxon rank sum test. The constituent ratio of delivery mode (vaginal delivery and cesarean section), prenatal antimicrobial drug use rate of pregnant women, incidence of hyperbilirubinemia, pneumonia and gastrointestinal disorders of premature infants were compared by chi-square test, continuity correction chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method. This study met the requirements of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①There were no significant differences between two groups in age, gestational age at admission, gestational age at delivery, and the constituent ratio of delivery modes (P>0.05). ②Before pregnancy, the BMI of pregnant women in study group was 23.5 kg/m2 (21.1-27.7 kg/m2), which was significantly higher than that of 22.4 kg/m2 (20.3-24.6 kg/m2) in control group. And the difference between two groups was statistically significant (Z=-3.480, P=0.001). ③Comparison of the constituent ratio of delivery modes between two groups showed statistically significant difference (χ2=124.130, P<0.001). The prenatal antimicrobial drug use rate of pregnant women in study group was 10.3% (9/87), which was significantly lower than that of 24.2% (29/120) in control group, and there was a statistically significant difference (χ2=6.429, P=0.011). ④The birth weight of preterm infants in study group was 2 250.0 g (1 820.0-2 600.0 g), which was significantly lower than that of 2 650.0 g (2 212.5-2 980.0 g) in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-3.866, P<0.001); and the Z score of birth weight of preterm infants in study group was -0.63 (-1.27-0.10), which was significantly lower than that of 0.33 (-3.38-0.85) in control group, and the difference was also statistically significant (Z=-5.695, P<0.001). In addition, the birth weight and Z score of birth weight of preterm infants with gestational age ≥32-34+ 6 weeks and gestational age ≥ 34-36+ 6 weeks in study group were lower than those in control group, and all the differences between 2 groups were also statistically significant (preterm infants with gestational age ≥ 32-34 weeks: Z=4.706, -3.690, P<0.001; preterm infants with gestational age ≥ 34-3636 weeks: Z=-5.116, -5.555, P<0.001). ⑤ The proportion of 1 min Apgar score ≤7 scores after birth, incidence of neonatal asphyxia, and incidence of mild asphyxia in study group were 12.6% (11/87), 12.6% (11/87), and 9.2% (8/87), respectively, which were higher than those in control group 3.3% (4/120), 3.3% (4/120), and 3.3% (4/120), respectively, and all the differences were statistically significant (χ2= 6.504, 9.017, 7.514; P= 0.011, 0.003, 0.025). ⑥ In study group, there were statistically significant differences in the constituent ratio of the delivery modes and rate of preterm infants transferred to the neonatology department between pregnant women complicated with PE and uncomplicated with PE (P=0.002; χ2=4.351, P=0.037).

Conclusions

Reasonable diet and weight control before pregnancy are of great significance to prevent the occurrence and development of hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy. Premature birth caused by hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy can increase the risk of neonatal asphyxia. More closely monitored and actively intervened measures should be conducted on pregnant women with hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy, so as to decrease the incidence of premature birth.

表1 2组孕妇一般临床资料比较
表2 2组孕妇围生结局比较[例数(%)]
表3 2组孕妇分娩早产儿出生体重及其Z评分值比较[M(P25P75)]
表4 87例病例组孕妇与120例对照组孕妇分娩早产儿不同胎龄出生体重及其Z评分值比较[M(P25P75)]
表5 2组孕妇分娩早产儿围生结局比较[例数(%)]
表6 87例病例组孕妇中,合并PE与未合并PE者的母婴围生结局比较[例数(%)]
[1]
王益群.妊娠期高血压疾病相关影响因素及对妊娠结局影响的研究[J].中华全科医学,2015,13(4):602-604.
[2]
魏炜,王雅琴,徐晓辉,等.妊娠期高血压疾病性心脏病心力衰竭15例临床分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2016, 17(1): 40-44.
[3]
Avanasi R,Shin HM,Vieira VM, et al. Variability and epistemic uncertainty in water ingestion rates and pharmacokinetic parameters, and impact on the association between perfluorooctanoate and preeclampsia in the C8 Health Project population [J]. Environ Res, 2016, 146: 299-307.
[4]
夏敏,杨平,崔伟,等. 双胎妊娠早产的临床特点及早产儿结局分析[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2016,12(5):590-596.
[5]
Durst JK,Tuuli MG,Stout MJ, et al. Degree of obesity at delivery and risk of preeclampsia with severe features [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 214(5): 651. e1-e5.
[6]
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antenatal Corticosteroids to Reduce Neonatal Morbidity and Morbidity (Green-top Guideline No. 7)[EB/OL]. (2014-02-05) [2018-01-18].

URL    
[7]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组.妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2015)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2015,50(10):721-728.
[8]
中华医学会围产医学分会新生儿复苏学组.新生儿窒息诊断的专家共识(2016)[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(1):3-6.
[9]
徐爱群,曾蔚越,何礼霞,等.多疗程糖皮质激素治疗孕34周前早产临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(10):610-613.
[10]
杨孜. 从如何看妊娠期高血压疾患分类和诊断标准变迁谈践行 [J/CD] . 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2015,11(3): 289-291.
[11]
Vulic′ M,Roje D,Mestrovic′ Z, et al. Is there difference in perinatal outcome of singleton and twin pregnancies after assisted conception: two-year experience [J]. Acta Clin Croat, 2013, 52(2): 241-246.
[12]
Caserta D,Bordi G,Stegagno M, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in spontaneous versus assisted conception twin pregnancies [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2014, 174: 64-69.
[13]
王大伟. 蛋白尿与肾功能损伤对妊娠高血压综合征患者预后的影响 [J]. 中国实用医刊,2016,43(9): 34-35.
[14]
Yliniemi A,Nurkkala MM,Kopman S, et al. First trimester placental retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) and pregnancy-associated placental protein A (PAPP-A) in the prediction of early-onset severe pre-eclampsia [J]. Metabolism, 2015, 64(4): 521-526.
[15]
Averett SL,Fletcher EK. Prepregnancy obesity and birth outcomes [J]. Matern Child Health J, 2016, 20(3): 655-664.
[16]
Dietz PM,Callaghan WM,Cogswell ME, et al. Combined effects of prepregnancy body mass index and weight gain during pregnancy on the risk of preterm delivery [J]. Epidemiology, 2006, 17(2): 170-177.
[17]
Shaw GM,Wise PH,Mayo J, et al. Maternal prepregnancy body mass index and risk of spontaneous preterm birth [J]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2014, 28(4): 302-311.
[18]
黄禾,陈倩. 妊娠期体质量管理的标准、方法及评估[J].实用妇产科杂志,2018,34(4):246-249.
[19]
Kominiarek MA,Peaceman AM. Gestational weight gain [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 217(6): 642-651.
[20]
聂明月,王欣,段华. 双胎妊娠早产危险因素的临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2017,33(11):856-859.
[21]
宋佳轶. 瘢痕子宫再次妊娠早产产妇经阴道分娩的临床护理[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(18): 144-146.
[22]
邱艳,熊庆.低出生体重相关因素研究[J].四川医学,2006,27(2):123-124.
[23]
柯华,李占魁. 母亲妊娠期高血压疾病对新生儿预后的影响[J/CD]. 发育医学电子杂志,2018, 6(2): 74-76.
[24]
何洋,蔡丽梅,唐军,等.晚期早产儿中小于胎龄儿和适于胎龄儿的临床特点分析[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2017,13(4):461-465.
[25]
Ishikawa H,Miyazaki K,Ikeda T, et al. The effects of antenatal corticosteroids on short- and long-term outcomes in small-for-gestational-age infants [J]. Int J Med Sci, 2015, 12(4): 295-300.
[1] Haoyuan Yang, Jie Gong, Qingwei Zou, Hang Ruan. Current research status on adverse pregnancy outcomes of maternal and infant in pregnant women with asthma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] Wenlin Li, Ling Yang, Kaihui Xing, Caihua Chen, Lihua Zhong, Yaqin Zhang, Wei Zhang. Analysis of early diagnostic value of umbilical artery blood gas analysis combined with amplitude integrated electroencephalography in neonatal asphyxia brain injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 550-558.
[3] Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[4] Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[5] Juan Gu, Qingqing Sun, Fangfang Hu, Yijuan Cao, Yujuan Qi. Clinical application of endometrial receptivity array to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[6] Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[7] Xu Chen, Yuru Zhan, Chunhua Wang. Clinical value of ABO blood group combined with thyroid function in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[8] Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[9] Chenxi Ran, Rufei Shen, Mingyu Liao, Qian Liao, Ling Zhou, Yuling Zhang, Min Long. Treatment and management of pituitary tumor during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[10] Jinqi Zhao, Nan Yang, Lifei Gong, Yue Tang, Lulu Li, Haihe Yang, Yuanyuan Kong. Analysis on birth status of small for gestational age infants in Beijing, 2011-2020[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 278-286.
[11] Guohua Ren, Xiaoxiao Du, Shanling Hong, Shuai Shao. Change and significance of serum interleukin-22, hydrogen sulfide, and osteoprotegerin levels of patients with hypertensive acute kidney injury in pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[12] Yuyan Zhang, Bin Hu, Weihong Zhang, Mei Xu, Hui Zhu, Xinyue Yang, Hailing Liu. Relationship between echocardiography parameters and liver function during the second trimester of pregnancy and their predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[13] Xin Wang, Lin Liu, Zhejia Wen, Chunling Liu, Hong Zhang, Fang Lyu. Effect of stress exposure before pregnancy on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[14] Xueyun Liu, Ying Fan, Aijun Yao, Shengmiao Zhang, Yani Lv, Bingqing Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Heng. Liu. Effects of individualized whole-course nursing intervention based on WeChat mini program on pregnancy weight and delivery outcome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
[15] Xiaoxiang Wu, Bo Yang, Jingxuan Li, Fengling Zhang, Guihui Guo, Shaopei Zheng. Predictive value of umbilical artery ultrasonography parameters, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and sFlt-1/PLGF ratio for adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with pregnancy induced hypertension syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract