Predictive values of first trimester red blood cell parameters on gestational diabetes mellitus in non-anemic pregnant women

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.06.009

Objective

To explore the correlation between first trimester red blood cell parameters and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in non-anemic pregnant women, and to provide references for early clinical prediction of GDM.

Methods

A total of 3 617 cases of non-anemic pregnant women from October 2016 to February 2017 in West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan Universtiy who met the inclusion criteria in this study were selected as research subjects. The retrospective analysis was conducted in general clinical data, and first trimester (10-14 gestational weeks) hemoglobin (Hb) levels, red blood cell count (RBC) and hematocrit (HCT) of all subjects. According to the quartile method, Hb levels, RBC and HCT of all subjects were divided into four ranges: A (<P₂₅), B (≥P₂₅-P₅₀), C (≥P₅₀-P₇₅), D (≥P₇₅), respectively. Incidence of GDM in subjects with different ranges of Hb levels, RBC, HCT were compared, respectively. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was performed on the influencing factors of GDM in non-anemic pregnant women.

Results

①There were statistical differences in GDM incidences in subjects with different ranges of Hb levels, RBC and HCT (χ²=15.499, P=0.001; χ²=20.342, P<0.001; χ²=26.566, P<0.001). Multiple comparison results showed that the incidence of GDM in subjects with D range of Hb levels was higher than those in subjects with A and B ranges of Hb levels; the incidences of GDM in subjects with C and D ranges of RBC were higher than that in subjects with A range of RBC, the incidence of GDM in subjects with D range of RBC was higher than that in subjects with B range of RBC; the incidences of GDM in subjects with B, C and D ranges of HCT were higher than that in subjects with A range of HCT, and all the differences were statistically significant (χ²=13.540, P<0.001; χ²=8.199, P=0.004; χ²=7.841, P=0.005; χ²=10.437, P=0.001; χ²=13.903, P<0.001; χ²=17.953, P<0.001; χ²=23.490, P<0.001). ②Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis of GDM influencing factors in non-anemic pregnant women results showed that first trimester Hb level and HCT were independent influencing factors of GDM in non-anemic pregnant women (OR=2.297, 2.097; 95%CI: 1.121-7.265, 1.019-5.874; P=0.033, 0.019).

Conclusions

In non-anemic pregnant women, the first trimester levels of red blood cell related parameters are closely related to the occurrence of GDM, in which the first trimester Hb levels and RBC are independent influencing factors of GDM. Because this study is a retrospective study, whether clinicians can monitor the high-risk groups of GDM according to the levels of first trimester red blood cell parameters of non-anemic pregnant women or not, it still needs multi-center, large scale, prospective and randomized trial to further confirmed.

Key words: Diabetes, gestational, Red blood cell parameters, Hemoglobins, Erythrocyte count, Hematocrit, Pregnancy trimester, first, Pregnant women

表1 不同早孕期红细胞参数范围的非贫血孕妇妊娠期糖尿病发生率比较结果

不同早孕期红细胞参数范围	早孕期Hb水平			早孕期RBC			早孕期HCT
不同早孕期红细胞参数范围	Hb水平(g/L)	例数	GDM发生率[例数(%)]	RBC(×10¹²/L)	例数	GDM发生率[例数(%)]	HCT	例数	GDM发生率[例数(%)]
A(<P₂₅)	<122	884	150(17.0)	<3.97	885	143(16.1)	<0.380	879	122(13.9)
B(≥P₂₅～P₅₀)	≥122～130	948	176(18.6)	≥3.97～4.25	921	162(17.6)	≥0.380～0.405	947	194(20.5)
C(≥P₅₀～P₇₅)	≥130～137	912	177(19.4)	≥4.25～4.51	895	191(21.3)	≥0.405～0.424	920	198(21.5)
D(≥P₇₅)	≥137	873	210(24.1)	≥4.51	916	217(23.7)	≥0.424	871	199(22.8)
χ²值	?	?	15.449	?	?	20.342	?	?	26.566
P值	?	?	0.001	?	?	<0.001	?	?	<0.001

表1 不同早孕期红细胞参数范围的非贫血孕妇妊娠期糖尿病发生率比较结果

不同早孕期红细胞参数范围	早孕期Hb水平			早孕期RBC			早孕期HCT
不同早孕期红细胞参数范围	Hb水平(g/L)	例数	GDM发生率[例数(%)]	RBC(×10¹²/L)	例数	GDM发生率[例数(%)]	HCT	例数	GDM发生率[例数(%)]
A(<P₂₅)	<122	884	150(17.0)	<3.97	885	143(16.1)	<0.380	879	122(13.9)
B(≥P₂₅～P₅₀)	≥122～130	948	176(18.6)	≥3.97～4.25	921	162(17.6)	≥0.380～0.405	947	194(20.5)
C(≥P₅₀～P₇₅)	≥130～137	912	177(19.4)	≥4.25～4.51	895	191(21.3)	≥0.405～0.424	920	198(21.5)
D(≥P₇₅)	≥137	873	210(24.1)	≥4.51	916	217(23.7)	≥0.424	871	199(22.8)
χ²值	?	?	15.449	?	?	20.342	?	?	26.566
P值	?	?	0.001	?	?	<0.001	?	?	<0.001

表2 非贫血孕妇妊娠期糖尿病发生影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析的变量含义及其赋值

自变量/因变量	变量名	赋值
是否发生GDM	y	y＝0表示未发生GDM，y＝1表示发生GDM
年龄	x₁	x₁＝0表示年龄≤40岁，x₁＝1表示年龄>40岁
BMI	x₂	x₂＝0表示BMI≤24.0 kg/m²，x₂＝1表示BMI>24.0 kg/m²
早孕期Hb水平	x₃	x₃＝0表示早孕期Hb水平<122 g/L，x₃＝1表示早孕期Hb水平≥122 g/L
早孕期RBC	x₄	x₄＝0表示早孕期RBC<3.97×10¹²/L，x₄＝1表示早孕期RBC≥3.97×10¹²/L
早孕期HCT	x₅	x₅＝0表示早孕期HCT<0.380，x₅＝1表示早孕期HCT≥0.380

表2 非贫血孕妇妊娠期糖尿病发生影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析的变量含义及其赋值

自变量/因变量	变量名	赋值
是否发生GDM	y	y＝0表示未发生GDM，y＝1表示发生GDM
年龄	x₁	x₁＝0表示年龄≤40岁，x₁＝1表示年龄>40岁
BMI	x₂	x₂＝0表示BMI≤24.0 kg/m²，x₂＝1表示BMI>24.0 kg/m²
早孕期Hb水平	x₃	x₃＝0表示早孕期Hb水平<122 g/L，x₃＝1表示早孕期Hb水平≥122 g/L
早孕期RBC	x₄	x₄＝0表示早孕期RBC<3.97×10¹²/L，x₄＝1表示早孕期RBC≥3.97×10¹²/L
早孕期HCT	x₅	x₅＝0表示早孕期HCT<0.380，x₅＝1表示早孕期HCT≥0.380

表3 非贫血孕妇妊娠期糖尿病发生影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果

影响因素	B	SE	Wald值	P值	OR值	OR值95%CI
年龄	0.152	0.249	2.147	0.139	1.006	0.713～1.048
BMI	0.201	0.245	3.409	0.064	1.224	0.998～1.518
早孕期Hb水平	0.413	0.798	6.135	0.033	2.297	1.121～7.265
早孕期RBC	0.524	0.301	5.875	0.019	2.097	1.019～5.874
早孕期HCT	0.331	0.297	3.794	0.051	1.080	0.987～1.168

表3 非贫血孕妇妊娠期糖尿病发生影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果

影响因素	B	SE	Wald值	P值	OR值	OR值95%CI
年龄	0.152	0.249	2.147	0.139	1.006	0.713～1.048
BMI	0.201	0.245	3.409	0.064	1.224	0.998～1.518
早孕期Hb水平	0.413	0.798	6.135	0.033	2.297	1.121～7.265
早孕期RBC	0.524	0.301	5.875	0.019	2.097	1.019～5.874
早孕期HCT	0.331	0.297	3.794	0.051	1.080	0.987～1.168

[1]	Hartling L, Dryden DM, Guthrie A, et al. Screening and diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus. Evidence report/technology assessment No. 210[M]. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2012: 1-327.
[2]	Chiefari E, Arcidiacono B, Foti D, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: an updated overview[J]. J Endocrinol Invest, 2017, 40(9): 899-909.
[3]	张言博，张露，严锐，等. 运动对妊娠期糖尿病防治作用的流行病学研究概述[J]. 现代预防医学，2016, 43(24): 4459-4461, 4466.
[4]	朱东，鲁丽利，张剑丰，等. 糖尿病患者免疫功能改变与预防肺部感染的临床研究[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志，2015, 25(8): 1790-1792.
[5]	American Diabetes Association. Initial evaluation and diabetes management planning[J]. Diabetes Care, 2015, 38(Suppl 1): S17-S19.
[6]	世界卫生组织. 血红蛋白浓度用于诊断贫血和评估其严重程度[EB/OL]. (2011) [2017-08-26]. URL
[7]	中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组，中华医学会围产医学分会妊娠合并糖尿病协作组. 妊娠合并糖尿病诊治指南(2014)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志，2014, 49(8): 561-569.
[8]	Cho NH, Whiting D, Forouhi N, et al. IDF diabetes atlas. 7th ed[M]. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2015.
[9]	Poston L, Bell R, Croker H, et al. Effect of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnant women (the UPBEAT study): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2015, 3(10): 767-777.
[10]	Mpondo BC, Ernest A, Dee HE. Gestational diabetes mellitus: challenges in diagnosis and management[J]. J Diabetes Metab Disord, 2015, 14: 42.
[11]	Mehrabian F, Hosseini SM. Comparison of gestational diabetes mellitus and pre-eclampsia in women with high hemoglobin in the first trimester of pregnancy: a longitudinal study[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2013, 29(4): 986-990.
[12]	卢红梅，葛志平，孙丽洲. 非贫血孕妇妊娠早期红细胞参数与妊娠期糖尿病的关系[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 33(9): 1247-1250.
[13]	Hanna FW, Duff CJ, Shelley-Hitchen A, et al. Diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus: implications of recent changes in diagnostic criteria and role of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)[J]. Clin Med (Lond), 2017, 17(2): 108-113.
[14]	李华，冯振东，叶树新，等. 2型糖尿病患者血液流变学指标与血糖监测指标的相关性分析[J]. 中国全科医学，2013, 16(50): 1763-1765.
[15]	Moon JS, Kim JH, Kim JH, et al. Impaired RBC deformability is associated with diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Metab, 2016, 42(6): 448-452.
[16]	谭芸. 非贫血孕妇妊娠早期红细胞参数对妊娠期糖尿病的预测价值[J]. 河北医学，2013, 19(12): 1792-1794.

[1]	Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[2]	Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[3]	Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[4]	Xu Chen, Yuru Zhan, Chunhua Wang. Clinical value of ABO blood group combined with thyroid function in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[5]	Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6]	Chenxi Ran, Rufei Shen, Mingyu Liao, Qian Liao, Ling Zhou, Yuling Zhang, Min Long. Treatment and management of pituitary tumor during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[7]	Ying Chen, Yanli Chen. Causes of heart rate variability and perinatal outcomes in elderly pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[8]	Danyan Feng, Xiaohui Cao, Yuxia Shi. Effect of serum adiponectin and placental leucine aminopeptidase levels on pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[9]	Defeng Kuang, Zhiguo Li, Shaofang Hua, Fengxia Xue. Levels and significance of fatty acid-binding protein 4 in serum and placental tissues and related lipid protein expression of high-fat-induced pregnant rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 338-344.
[10]	Longhai Wu, Miao Huang, Yunhui Gong, Yunqian Yu. Clinical value of serum chemokines in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 357-362.
[11]	Guocheng Wang, Yajing Liu, Yaguang Peng. Reference intervals and its dynamic changes of four indexes of blood routine test of preschool children in Shunyi district, Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(02): 187-193.
[12]	Liping Shen, Yuyun Long, Yuehua Yang, Min Zhang, Yang Xu, Yali Zhao, Jing Li, Yun Zhang, Shiwen Jiang, Zhiming Sun. Influencing factors of different contraceptive methods on female fertility[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(01): 107-112.
[13]	Lu Zhang, Huijuan Yang, Kaibo Liu. Birth trends and adverse pregnancy outcomes of live births under assisted reproductive technology in Beijing, 2015-2021[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(01): 46-53.
[14]	Hexuan Zhang, Yonggang Song, Xue Yang. Results of non-invasive prenatal testing to pregnant women: a large sample analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(06): 685-691.
[15]	Xueyun Liu, Ying Fan, Aijun Yao, Shengmiao Zhang, Yani Lv, Bingqing Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Heng. Liu. Effects of individualized whole-course nursing intervention based on WeChat mini program on pregnancy weight and delivery outcome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export