切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 94 -101. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.01.013

论著

盆底肌锻炼改善中老年女性绝经相关症状的临床研究
樊卫敏1,1, 梅小会2,2, 陈记娜2,2, 董富云2,2, 张丽文2,2, 陈亚萍2,2, 周金华1,1, 陈汝君2,†,2()   
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-06 修回日期:2022-01-08 出版日期:2022-02-01
  • 通信作者: 陈汝君

Clinical study of improvement on menopausal symptoms in middle aged and elderly women by pelvic floor muscle training

Weimin Fan1,1, Xiaohui Mei2,2, Jina Chen2,2, Fuyun Dong2,2, Liwen Zhang2,2, Yaping Chen2,2, Jinhua Zhou1,1, Rujun Chen2,2,†()   

  • Received:2021-05-06 Revised:2022-01-08 Published:2022-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Rujun Chen
  • Supported by:
    Scientific Research Project of Health Commission of Minhang District, Shanghai(2019MW05)
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

樊卫敏, 梅小会, 陈记娜, 董富云, 张丽文, 陈亚萍, 周金华, 陈汝君. 盆底肌锻炼改善中老年女性绝经相关症状的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(01): 94-101.

Weimin Fan, Xiaohui Mei, Jina Chen, Fuyun Dong, Liwen Zhang, Yaping Chen, Jinhua Zhou, Rujun Chen. Clinical study of improvement on menopausal symptoms in middle aged and elderly women by pelvic floor muscle training[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(01): 94-101.

目的

评价盆底肌锻炼(PFMT)对中老年女性绝经相关症状(MS)的作用。

方法

选择2020年1月至2021年1月，因出现MS于复旦大学附属上海市第五人民医院更年期门诊，或盆底中心就诊的165例中老年女性为研究对象。按照生殖衰老分期系统(STRAW+10)分期结果，将其分为绝经前期组(n＝45，为STRAW+10的-3b~-2阶段)，绝经早期组(n＝62，为STRAW+10的-1~+1b阶段)，绝经晚期组(n＝58，为STRAW+10的+1c~+2阶段)。采用前瞻性研究方法，对各组受试者进行PFMT干预12周，并采用绝经指数(KI)量表、绝经期等级评定量表(MRS)、绝经期泌尿生殖系统综合征(GSM)症状评分量表及国际尿失禁咨询委员会尿失禁问卷简表(ICIQ-UI SF)(以下简称为4个量表)，对PFMT干预效果进行综合评估。采用Mann-Whitney U检验，对受试者PFMT干预前、后各量表评分结果进行统计学比较。本研究经复旦大学附属上海市第五人民医院伦理委员会批准[审批文号：(2019)伦审(149)]，并与所有受试者签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①绝经前期组采取PFMT干预后，对受试者的4个量表评分均低于干预前，并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)；MRS中的躯体感觉及泌尿生殖道评分、ICIQ-UI SF中对日常生活影响评分，均低于干预前，并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②绝经早期组采取PFMT干预后，受试者的KI量表、GSM症状评分量表及ICIQ-UI SF评分，均低于干预前，并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)；MRS中的心理感觉评分，GSM症状评分量表中的阴道干燥及阴道刺痛评分，ICIQ-UI SF中的尿失禁频率及对日常生活影响评分，均低于干预前，并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)；而MRS中的泌尿生殖道症状评分[3分(0~3分)]，则高于干预前[3分(0~3分)]，并且差异有统计学意义(Z＝-2.710、P＝0.007)。③绝经晚期组采取PFMT干预后，对受试者的4个量表评分均低于干预前，并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)；MRS中的躯体感觉、心理感觉及泌尿生殖道评分，GSM症状评分量表中的阴道干燥及性交困难评分，ICIQ-UI SF中的漏尿量及对日常生活影响评分，均低于干预前，并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

从绝经前期到绝经晚期，采取PFMT均可改善中老年女性MS。

关键词: 围绝经期, 绝经前期, 绝经后期, 骨盆底, 尿失禁, 绝经期症状, 盆底肌锻炼, 女(雌)性
Objective

To evaluate effects of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on menopausal symptoms (MS) in middle aged and elderly women.

Methods

From January 2020 to January 2021, a total of 165 middle aged and elderly women who were treated in menopause clinic or pelvic floor center of Shanghai Fifth People′s Hospital, Fudan University due to MS were selected as research subjects. According to stages of reproductive aging workshop + 10 (STRAW+ 10), they were divided into premenopausal group (n=45, with -3b to -2 stage of STRAW+ 10), early menopausal group (n=62, with -1 to + 1b stage of STRAW+ 10) and late menopausal group (n=58, with + 1C to + 2 stage of STRAW+ 10). Using prospective research methods, PFMT intervention measure was performed on subjects in each group for 12 weeks. The intervention effects of PFMT was comprehensively evaluated by Kupperman Index (KI) Scale, Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) Symptom Score Scale and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) (hereinafter referred to as four scales). Mann-Whitney U test was used to statistically compare scores of various scales between before and after PFMT intervention. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Fifth People′s Hospital, Fudan University [Approval No. (2019) lunshen (149)]. All subjects signed the clinical study informed consent forms.

Results

① Scores of four scales after PFMT intervention in premenopausal group were all lower than those before intervention, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Scores of somatosensory and urogenital tract in MRS, and scores of impact on daily life in ICIQ-UI SF after PFMT intervention, were all lower than those before intervention, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ② Scores of KI Scale, GSM Symptom Score Scale and ICIQ-UI SF after PFMT intervention in early menopausal group were all lower than those before intervention, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Scores of psychological sensation in MRS, scores of vaginal dryness and vaginal tingling in GSM Symptom Score Scale, scores of the frequency of urinary incontinence and its impact on daily life in ICIQ-UI SF after PFMT intervention, were all lower than those before intervention, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); While the urogenital symptom score in MRS after PFMT intervention was 3 scores (0-3 scores), which was higher than that of 3 scores (0-3 scores) before intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-2.710, P=0.007). ③ Scores of four scales after PFMT intervention in late menopausal group were all lower than those before intervention, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Scores of somatic sensation, psychological sensation and urogenital tract in MRS, scores of vaginal dryness and dyspareunia in GSM Symptom Score Scale, scores of amount of urine leakage and impact on daily life in ICIQ-UI SF after PFMT intervention, were all lower than those before intervention, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

From premenopausal to late menopause, PFMT can improve MS in middle aged and elderly women.

Key words: Perimenopause, Premenopause, Postmenopause, Pelvic floor, Urinary incontinence, Menopausal symptoms, Pelvic floor muscle training, Female
表1 3组受试者一般临床资料比较
组别 例数 年龄(岁，±s) BMI(kg/m2，±s) 文化程度[例数(%)]a 孕次(次，±s)
本科以下 本科
①绝经前期组 45 43.7±2.9 23.7±2.8 26(57.8) 19(42.2) 3.2±2.5
②绝经早期组 62 49.9±2.1 23.8±1.8 55(88.7) 7(11.3) 3.0±1.7
③绝经晚期组 58 58.0±2.9 23.9±2.8 51(87.9) 7(12.1) 2.1±1.2
总体比较(检验值/P值)   F＝393.600/<0.001 F＝0.045/0.956 χ2＝19.109/<0.001 F＝5.730/0.004
两两比较(检验值/P值)            
  ① vs ②   t＝-12.272/<0.001 — χ2＝11.933/<0.001 t＝0.544/0.588
  ① vs ③   t＝-25.039/<0.001 — χ2＝10.663/<0.001 t＝2.780/0.007
  ② vs ③   t＝-17.696/<0.001 — χ2<0.001/>0.999 t＝3.271/0.001
组别 例数 产次(次，±s) 血清FSH水平(IU/L，±s) 最大新生儿出生体重(g，±s)b 距末次分娩时间(年，±s)
绝经前期组 45 1.4±0.5 5.9±3.1 3 500±250 15.8±10.2
绝经早期组 62 2.0±1.1 26.9±1.7 3 381±439 22.8±7.6
绝经晚期组 58 1.6±0.8 38.0±6.7 3 392±457 31.7±8.4
总体比较(检验值/P值)   F＝5.782/0.004 F＝682.600/<0.001 F＝1.143/0.322 F＝41.290/<0.001
两两比较(检验值/P值)          
  ① vs ②   t＝-3.472/0.001 t＝-41.405/<0.001 — t＝-3.636/<0.001
  ① vs ③   t＝-1.142/0.256 t＝-32.473/<0.001 — t＝-8.105/<0.001
  ② vs ③   t＝2.236/0.027 t＝-12.258/<0.001 — t＝-5.945/<0.001
表2 绝经前期组受试者PFMT干预前、后KI量表和MRS评分结果比较[分，M(P25~P75)]
项目 例数 KI量表评分 MRS评分 躯体感觉评分 心理感觉评分 泌尿生殖道评分
干预前 45 2(2~9) 4(3~20) 0(0~4) 4(0~8) 3(0~9)
干预后 45 2(2~6) 4(3~12) 0(0~4) 3(0~4) 3(0~3)
Z值   2.020 3.310 2.560 1.800 2.450
P值   0.046 0.001 0.013 0.079 0.020
表3 绝经早期组受试者PFMT干预前、后KI量表和MRS评分结果比较[分，M(P25~P75)]
项目 例数 KI量表评分 MRS评分 躯体感觉评分 心理感觉评分 泌尿生殖道评分
干预前 62 6(2~12) 12(4~16) 8(0~8) 4(0~8) 3(0~3)
干预后 62 4(2~10) 12(4~15) 7(0~8) 4(0~4) 3(0~3)
Z值   4.620 1.580 1.840 2.650 -2.710
P值   <0.001 0.121 0.077 0.011 0.007
表4 绝经晚期组受试者PFMT干预前、后KI量表和MRS评分结果比较[分，M(P25~P75)]
项目 例数 KI量表评分 MRS评分 躯体感觉评分 心理感觉评分 泌尿生殖道评分
干预前 58 8(4~12) 19(12~26) 8(4~16) 8(4~8) 3(3~6)
干预后 58 6(4~7) 12(7~14) 4(4~8) 4(0~4) 2(0~3)
Z值   5.090 4.550 2.450 4.100 4.400
P值   <0.001 <0.001 0.020 <0.001 <0.001
表5 绝经前期组受试者PFMT干预前、后GSM症状评分量表结果比较[分，M(P25~P75)]
项目 例数 GSM症状评分量表评分 阴道干燥评分 阴道刺痛评分 排尿困难评分 性交困难评分
干预前 45 3(1~4) 1(0~2) 0(0~1) 0(0~1) 0(0~1)
干预后 45 2(1~4) 1(0~2) 0(0~0) 0(0~0) 0(0~1)
Z值   2.860 1.860 1.730 1.410 1.000
P值   0.005 0.095 0.149 0.203 0.424
表6 绝经早期组受试者PFMT干预前、后GSM症状评分量表结果比较[分，M(P25~P75)]
项目 例数 GSM症状评分量表评分 阴道干燥评分 阴道刺痛评分 排尿困难评分 性交困难评分
干预前 62 3(2~4) 1(0~2) 0(0~1) 0(0~1) 1(0~2)
干预后 62 3(1~3) 1(0~1) 0(0~1) 0(0~1) 1(0~1)
Z值   3.380 2.270 2.240 1.000 1.930
P值   <0.001 0.031 0.037 0.424 0.065
表7 绝经晚期组受试者PFMT干预前、后GSM症状评分量表结果比较[分，M(P25~P75)]
项目 例数 GSM症状评分量表评分 阴道干燥评分 阴道刺痛评分 排尿困难评分 性交困难评分
干预前 58 3(2~5) 1(1~2) 0(0~0) 0(0~1) 1(1~2)
干预后 58 3(2~4) 1(1~2) 0(0~0) 0(0~1) 1(0~2)
Z值   3.190 2.460 0.450 -1.410 2.330
P值   <0.001 0.018 0.766 0.182 0.026
表8 绝经前期组受试者PFMT干预前、后ICIQ-UI SF评分比较[分，M(P25~P75)]
项目 例数 ICIQ-UI SF评分 尿失禁频率评分 漏尿量评分 对日常生活影响评分
干预前 45 0(0~4) 0(0~1) 0(0~2) 0(0~1)
干预后 45 0(0~3) 0(0~1) 0(0~1) 0(0~1)
Z值   3.070 1.730 2.000 2.460
P值   0.003 0.149 0.072 0.018
表9 绝经早期组受试者PFMT干预前、后ICIQ-UI SF评分比较[分，M(P25~P75)]
项目 例数 ICIQ-UI SF评分 尿失禁频率评分 漏尿量评分 对日常生活影响评分
干预前 62 3(0~4) 1(0~1) 1(0~1) 1(0~2)
干预后 62 3(0~4) 1(0~1) 1(0~1) 1(0~1)
Z值   3.300 2.270 2.000 2.640
P值   0.001 0.031 0.072 0.010
表10 绝经晚期组受试者PFMT干预前、后ICIQ-UI SF评分比较[分，M(P25~P75)]
项目 例数 ICIQ-UI SF评分 尿失禁频率评分 漏尿量评分 对日常生活影响评分
干预前 58 0(0~4) 0(0~2) 0(0~1) 0(0~1)
干预后 58 0(0~3) 0(0~1) 0(0~1) 0(0~1)
Z值   3.070 2.070 2.740 2.390
P值   0.002 0.053 0.007 0.021
[1]
Shifren JL. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 61(3): 508-516. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000380.
[2]
Faubion SS, Sood R, Kapoor E. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: management strategies for the clinician[J]. Mayo Clin Proc, 2017, 92(12): 1842-1849. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.08.019.
[3]
Lobo RA. Hormone-replacement therapy: current thinking[J]. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2017, 13(4): 220-231. DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.164.
[4]
Mercier J, Morin M, Tang A, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training: mechanisms of action for the improvement of genitourinary syndrome of menopause[J]. Climacteric, 2020, 23(5): 468-473. DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1724942.
[5]
Harlow SD, Gass M, Hall JE, et al. Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop + 10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2012, 97(4): 1159-1168. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-3362.
[6]
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 175(1): 10-17. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.
[7]
Alder E. The Blatt-Kupperman menopausal index: a critique[J]. Maturitas, 1998, 29(1): 19-24. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5122(98)00024-3.
[8]
Heinemann LA, Potthoff P, Schneider HP. International versions of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS)[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2003, 1: 28. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-28.
[9]
Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, et al. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2004, 23(4): 322-330. DOI: 10.1002/nau.20041.
[10]
Vulvovaginal Atrophy Terminology Consensus Conference Panel, Portman DJ, Gass ML. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: new terminology for vulvovaginal atrophy from the International Society for the Study of Women′s Sexual Health and the North American Menopause Society[J]. Menopause, 2014, 21(10): 1063-1068. DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000329.
[11]
中华医学会妇产科学分会绝经学组. 中国绝经管理与绝经激素治疗指南(2018)[J]. 协和医学杂志， 2018, 9(6): 512-525. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.06.007.
[12]
Kucukkaya B, Kahyaoglu Sut H. Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle and abdominal training in women with stress urinary incontinence[J]. Psychol Health Med, 2021, 26(6): 779-786. DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1842470.
[13]
Elavsky S, Gonzales JU, Proctor DN, et al. Effects of physical activity on vasomotor symptoms: examination using objective and subjective measures[J]. Menopause, 2012, 19(10): 1095-1103. DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31824f8fb8.
[14]
Luoto R, Moilanen J, Heinonen R, et al. Effect of aerobic training on hot flushes and quality of life--a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Med, 2012, 44(6): 616-626. DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2011.583674.
[15]
Reed SD, Guthrie KA, Newton KM, et al. Menopausal quality of life: RCT of yoga, exercise, and omega-3 supplements[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 210(3): 244.e1-244.e11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.11.016.
[16]
Nguyen TM, Do TTT, Tran TN, et al. Exercise and quality of life in women with menopausal symptoms: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(19): 7049. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197049.
[17]
North TC, McCullagh P, Tran ZV. Effect of exercise on depression[J]. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 1990, 18: 379-415.
[18]
Woods NF. Menopause, symptom clusters, and the complexity of women′s lives[J]. Menopause, 2015, 22(11): 1153-1154. DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000555.
[19]
Mercier J, Morin M, Zaki D, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training as a treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a single-arm feasibility study[J]. Maturitas, 2019, 125: 57-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.03.002.
[20]
Wu C, Newman D, Schwartz TA, et al. Effects of unsupervised behavioral and pelvic floor muscle training programs on nocturia, urinary urgency, and urinary frequency in postmenopausal women: secondary analysis of a randomized, two-arm, parallel design, superiority trial (TULIP study)[J]. Maturitas, 2021, 146: 42-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.01.008.
[1] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[2] 张舒沁, 陈练. 产后宫腔内妊娠物残留的诊断和临床处理[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 493-497.
[3] 石皆春, 范子玉, 邢燕. 不同筛查方法预警宫颈原位腺癌的效能[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 575-581.
[4] 唐丹, 姚晓曦, 杨博文, 薛绍龙, 李梦瑶, 韦柳杏, 郄明蓉. 双肾上腺皮质激素样激酶1对子宫内膜样腺癌患者临床特征的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 582-590.
[5] 魏艺, 周羽西, 杨烨, 凌秀凤, 赵纯. 微小RNA对子宫内膜容受性影响的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 266-270.
[6] 林琳, 田思萌, 于永华, 徐飞飞, 黄明莉. 干细胞及其外泌体治疗宫腔黏连的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 271-275.
[7] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[8] 花卉, 许晨莹, 刘金凤. 盆底肌训练时机对高龄初产妇产后盆底肌张力及性功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 284-291.
[9] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[10] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[11] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[12] 黄俊龙, 李文双, 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 陈逸龙, 丘惠平, 周祥福. 基于盆底彩超的人工智能模型在女性压力性尿失禁分度诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 597-605.
[13] 屈勤芳, 束方莲. 盆腔器官脱垂患者盆底重建手术后压力性尿失禁发生的影响因素及列线图预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 606-612.
[14] 黄俊龙, 刘柏隆, 罗瑞翔, 李晓阳, 李文双, 柳政, 陈嘉良, 周祥福. 联合盆底彩超数据和临床资料探讨压力性尿失禁的危险因素[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-330.
[15] 李宜璐, 曹永丽, 杨阳, 王思远, 张远耀, 杨维维, 王信琛, 陈俊, 魏东. 腹腔镜盆底修复联合PPH 术治疗直肠内脱垂的手术疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 394-401.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号

AI
小
编
AI小编
你好！我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编，有什么可以帮您的吗？