切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 155 -160. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.02.006

所属专题: 文献

专题论坛

多胎妊娠延迟分娩的研究现状
战军1, 邢爱耘1,(), 廖光东1, 吴琳1, 谭曦1, 童安1   
  1. 1. 四川大学华西第二医院妇产科、出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室,成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-01 修回日期:2020-03-23 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 邢爱耘

Research status of delayed interval delivery in multiple pregnancy

Jun Zhan1, Aiyun Xing1,(), Guangdong Liao1, Lin Wu1, Xi Tan1, An Tong1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2019-11-01 Revised:2020-03-23 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Aiyun Xing
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xing Aiyun, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Plan Project by Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province(2017JY0257)
引用本文:

战军, 邢爱耘, 廖光东, 吴琳, 谭曦, 童安. 多胎妊娠延迟分娩的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(02): 155-160.

Jun Zhan, Aiyun Xing, Guangdong Liao, Lin Wu, Xi Tan, An Tong. Research status of delayed interval delivery in multiple pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(02): 155-160.

多胎妊娠延迟分娩(DID)是指多胎中的一胎(胎儿1)在中孕期,特别是胎龄≤24周时发生流产或早产后,孕妇子宫收缩逐渐减弱,宫口逐渐回缩,甚至宫颈管闭合,若及时采取措施,则可使宫内留存胎儿在宫腔内继续妊娠数天,甚至数周,待其各器官进一步成熟后再娩出。目前,随着女性受孕年龄增加及辅助生殖技术的应用,多胎妊娠发生率逐年上升,多胎妊娠发生胎儿1流产或早产后,对宫内留存胎儿实施DID的成功率也逐渐增高。多胎妊娠DID的适应证包括胎儿1于胎龄≤24周时分娩后,母体宫缩消退,不伴胎膜早破(PROM)、绒毛膜羊膜炎、严重阴道流血、可疑胎盘早剥及其他严重内科与外科合并症,宫内留存胎儿无胎儿宫内窘迫、先天畸形等。目前,DID临床处理措施包括:高位结扎胎儿1脐带,采取宫缩抑制剂抑制母体宫缩、抗菌药物预防母胎感染、宫颈环扎术及对母胎进行严密监护,必要时使用糖皮质激素促胎肺成熟。对宫内留存胎儿实施DID后,分娩时机掌握,非常重要。笔者拟就多胎妊娠胎儿1于胎龄≤24周时分娩后,对宫内留存胎儿实施DID的必要性、适用人群、临床管理、临床处理流程及多胎妊娠DID胎儿妊娠结局等最新研究进展进行阐述,旨在为相关临床研究提供参考。

Definition of delayed interval delivery (DID) in multiple pregnancy is that in the middle pregnancy, especially when gestational age ≤ 24-week, after the abortion or preterm delivery of one of the fetuses (fetus 1) among multiple pregnancy fetuses, the uterine contraction of pregnant women gradually decreases, the uterine orifice gradually retracts, and even cervical canal is closed. If intervention measures are taken in time, the other fetuses can remain in the uterus of pregnant women for several days or even several weeks, and then be delivered after the organs of remaining fetuses being more mature. Due to the increasing of women′s conceptional age and the application of assisted reproductive technology, the occurrence rate of multiple pregnancy has increased gradually. After the abortion or preterm delivery of fetus 1 among multiple pregnancy fetuses, the success rate of DID for the remaining fetuses is also increasing. The indications of DID in multiple pregnancy including: uterine contraction decrease or disappear without premature rupture of membrane (PROM), chorioamnionitis, serious vaginal bleeding, suspected placental abruption or serious complications diseases of internal medicine or surgery of the patients, no intrauterine distress or congenital malformation in the fetus. At present, the clinical treatment measures of DID included ligation of the umbilical cord of the expelled fetus as high as possible, prophylactic use of tocolytic for inhibition of uterine contraction and antimicrobial agents for infections, cervical cerclage and continuous monitorization of the patient, and useing glucocorticoid to promote fetal lung maturity if necessary. It is very important to determine the delivery time after DID for the remaining fetuses. This article focuses on the latest research progresses on necessity, applicable population, clinical management, clinical processes and pregnancy outcomes of DID fetus in multiple pregnancy, in order to provide reference for related clinical research of DID in multiple pregnancy.

[1]
Chasen ST, Chervenak FA. Twin pregnancy: prenatal issues [EB/OL]. (2020-03-13) [2020-03-15].

URL    
[2]
Porreco RP, Farkouh LJ. Delayed-interval delivery in multifetal pregnancy [EB/OL]. 2018[2020-03-15].

URL    
[3]
Arabin B, van Eyck J. Delayed-interval delivery in twin and triplet pregnancies: 17 years of experience in 1 perinatal center [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 200(2): 154.e1-154.e8. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.046.
[4]
劳子僖,梁永昌,马润玫,等. 双胎妊娠中第2个胎儿延迟分娩[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2006, 41(4): 281-283. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0529-567X.2006.04.023.
[5]
朱慧莉,陈悦悦,周容. 三胎妊娠延迟分娩1例[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2016, 32(8): 633-635.
[6]
Beinder E, Lang N. Delayed interval delivery in a twin pregnancy with monochorionic placenta [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 176(1 Pt 1): 254. DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80044-0.
[7]
Baltus T, Martin M L. Successful delayed-interval delivery in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy: a case report [J]. Case Rep Womens Health, 2018, 21: e00093. DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2018.e00093.
[8]
Cao S, Walter L, Valenzuela GJ, et al. Delayed-interval delivery of twin gestation via cesarean section: a case report [J]. Am J Case Rep, 2019, 20: 739-742. DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.915196.
[9]
Arias F. Delayed delivery of multifetal pregnancies with premature rupture of membranes in the second trimester [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1994, 170(5): 1233-1237. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70132-6.
[10]
Roman AS, Fishman S, Fox N, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after delayed-interval delivery of multifetal pregnancies [J]. Am J Perinatol, 2011, 28(2): 91-96. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262513.
[11]
Farkouh LJ, Sabin ED, Heyborne KD, et al. Delayed-interval delivery: extended series from a single maternal-fetal medicine practice [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 183(6): 1499-1503. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.107319.
[12]
Fayad S, Bongain A, Holhfeld P, et al. Delayed delivery of second twin: a multicentre study of 35 cases [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2003, 109(1): 16-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00430-x.
[13]
Abboud P, Gallais A, Janky E. Intentional delayed delivery in twin pregnancy: two additional cases and literature review [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol, 1997, 75(2): 139-143. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(97)00111-5.
[14]
Platt JS, Rosa C. Delayed interval delivery in multiple gestations [J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 1999, 54(5): 343-348. DOI: 10.1097/00006254-199905000-00025.
[15]
Zhang J, Johnson CD, Hoffman M. Cervical cerclage in delayed interval delivery in a multifetal pregnancy: a review of seven case series [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol, 2003, 108(2): 126-130. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00479-7.
[16]
Doger E, Cakiroglu Y, Ceylan Y, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of delayed interval delivery in cerclage and non-cerclage cases: an analysis of 20 multiple pregnancies [J]. J Obstet and Gynaecol Res, 2014, 40(7): 1853-1861. DOI: 10.1111/jog.12435.
[17]
Rafael TJ, Berghella V, Alfirevic Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancy [J]. Cochrane Database Sys Rev, 2014, (9): CD009166. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009166.pub2.
[18]
Zhang J, Hamilton B, Martin J, et al. Delayed interval delivery and infant survival: a population-based study [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 191(2): 470-476. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.002.
[19]
Benito Vielba M, De Bonrostro Torralba C, Pallares Arnal V, et al. Delayed-interval delivery in twin pregnancies: report of three cases and literature review [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2019, 32(2): 351-355. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1378336.
[20]
Rosbergen M, Vogt HP, Baerts W, et al. Long-term and short-term outcome after delayed-interval delivery in multi-fetal pregnancies [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2006, 122(1): 66-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.036.
[21]
Kalchbrenner MA, Weisenborn EJ, Chyu JK, et al. Delayed delivery of multiple gestations: maternal and neonatal outcomes [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1998, 179(5): 1145-1149. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70122-x.
[22]
Oyelese Y, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, et al. Delayed interval delivery in twin pregnancies in the United States: impact on perinatal mortality and morbidity [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 192(2): 439-444. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.055.
[23]
Livingston JC, Livingston LW, Ramsey R, et al. Second-trimester asynchronous multifetal delivery results in poor perinatal outcome [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 103(1): 77-81. DOI: 10.1097/01.aog.0000103995.79536.9c.
[24]
Padilla-Iserte P, Vila-Vives JM, Ferri B, et al. Delayed interval delivery of the second twin: obstetric management, neonatal outcomes, and 2-year follow-up [J]. Obstet Gynaecol India, 2014, 64(5): 344-348. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-014-0544-1.
[1] 危玲, 李会, 陈奕. 孕产妇产超广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌定植/感染与母婴传播研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 517-521.
[2] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[3] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[4] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[5] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[6] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[7] 赵金琦, 杨楠, 宫丽霏, 唐玥, 李璐璐, 杨海河, 孔元原. 2011—2020年北京市小于胎龄儿出生状况分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 278-286.
[8] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[9] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[10] 冯丹艳, 曹晓辉, 史玉霞. 血清脂联素与胎盘亮氨酸氨肽酶对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[11] 李振华, 解宝江, 易为, 李丽, 卫雅娴, 周明书, 伊诺. 82例孕产妇对新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情防控认知的心理干预及常态化疫情防控应对要点[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 173-179.
[12] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[13] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[14] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[15] 张丽姿, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的不良结局及远期影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
阅读次数
全文


摘要