切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2014, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06) : 766 -769. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2014.06.015

所属专题： 文献；

论著

不同羊膜腔穿刺适应证患者的染色体异常核型检出情况分析
赵晓曦1,*,*(), 谷孝月1, 武艾宁1, 于荣鑫1   
  1. 1. 010050　呼和浩特，内蒙古医科大学附属医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-05 修回日期:2014-11-18 出版日期:2014-12-01
  • 通信作者: 赵晓曦

The Detection Rate of Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients With Different Indications of Amniocentesis

Xiaoxi Zhao1(), Xiaoyue Gu1, Aining Wu1, Rongxin Yu1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliate Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2014-09-05 Revised:2014-11-18 Published:2014-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoxi Zhao
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author : Zhao Xiaoxi,Email: )
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

赵晓曦, 谷孝月, 武艾宁, 于荣鑫. 不同羊膜腔穿刺适应证患者的染色体异常核型检出情况分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(06): 766-769.

Xiaoxi Zhao, Xiaoyue Gu, Aining Wu, Rongxin Yu. The Detection Rate of Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients With Different Indications of Amniocentesis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2014, 10(06): 766-769.

目的

分析不同羊膜腔穿刺适应证患者的染色体异常核型检出率及其遗传咨询方法。

方法

选择2009年1月至2013年12月于内蒙古医科大学附属医院行羊膜腔穿刺胎儿染色体检查的523例患者中羊水细胞培养成功的520例患者为研究对象。本研究遵循的程序符合本研究遵循的程序符合内蒙古医科大学附属医院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准，得到该委员会批准，并征得受试对象本人的知情同意，与之签署临床研究知情同意书。分析不同羊膜腔穿刺适应证患者的染色体异常核型检出率。

结果

520例羊水细胞培养成功的患者中，异常核型检出率为4.42%(23/520)。高龄妊娠患者染色体异常核型发生率为1.45% (3/206)，中孕期母体血清筛查高危患者为3.15% (7/222)，胎儿超声结果异常患者为12.72% (7/55)，夫妇一方系染色体平衡结构异常患者为66.67% (2/3)，无创产前DNA检测示高危为80.00% (4/5)，有染色体异常儿生育史患者为0(0/29)。23例检出异常核型胎儿中，染色体非整倍体异常胎儿为19例(82.6%)，染色体结构异常为4例(17.4%)。

结论

目前羊膜腔穿刺染色体异常核型检出率较低。对胎儿进行超声检查和无创产前DNA检测有助于提高羊膜腔穿刺染色体异常核型检出率。

关键词: 羊水细胞, 染色体核型分析, 遗传咨询
Objective

To evaluate the detection rate of fetal chromosomal abnormalities in patients with different indications of amniocentesis and their genetic counseling.

Methods

From January 2009 and December 2013,a total of 520 pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis in the First Affiliate Hospital of Inner Mongolia University were included in the study. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of First Affiliate Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from each participants. The detection rates of fetal chromosomal abnormalities in patients with different indications of amniocentesis were analyzed.

Results

Chromosomal abnormalities were observed in 4.42% (23/520) of the samples. The detection rates of chromosomal abnormalities for each indication were 1.45% (3/206) in advanced maternal age,3.15% (7/222) in the increasing-risk maternal triple-marker screening test,12.72% (7/55) in the abnormal ultrasound finding, 0 (0/29) for family history of chromosomal abnormality, 80.00% (4/5) for the increasing-risk in the non-invasive prenatal testing, 66.67% (2/3) in one of the parents carrying abnormal chromosome.

Conclusions

The detection rate of fetal chromosomal abnormalities in amniocentesis is low. The result of ultrasound examination and non-invasive prenatal testing were helpful to enhance that rate.

Key words: Amniotic cells, Chromosomal karyotype, Genetic counseling
表1 不同穿刺适应证患者的染色体异常核型检出率[n(%)]
Table 1 Detection rates of fetal chromosomal abnormalities in patients with different indications[n( % )]
穿刺适应证 例数 染色体异常核型检出率
高龄妊娠 206 3 (1.45)
中孕期母体血清筛查高危 222 7 (3.15)
胎儿超声结果异常 55 7 (12.72)
染色体平衡易位携带者 3 2(66.67)
无创产前DNA检测示高危 5 4(80. 00)
有染色体异常儿生育史 29 0 (0.00)
合计 520 23 (4.42)
表2 不同穿刺适应证患者检出的异常核型情况
Table 2 Results of fetal chromosomal abnormalities in patients with different indications
穿刺适应证 例数 异常核型
高龄妊娠 3 47,XX(XY) + 21
中孕期母体血清筛查高危 5 47,XX(XY) + 21
1 46,XX,inv(9)
1 46,XY,t(13;14)
胎儿超声结果异常 4 47,XX(XY) + 21
2 47,XX(XY) + 18
1 45,X
染色体平衡易位携带者 1 47,XX,t(4q;5q)+der(4)
1 46,XY,t(12q;21q)
无创产前DNA检测示高危 1 47,XX,+ 18
1 47,XY,+21
1 47,XXY
1 45,X
合计 23
[1]
Chang YW，Chang CM, Sung PL，et al. An overview of a 30-year experience with amniocentesis in a sigle tertiary medical center in Taiwan [J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 51 (2): 206–211.
[2]
Benn P, Cuckle H, Pergament E. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 42(1) : 15–33.
[3]
陆国辉.产前遗传病诊断[M].广州：广东科技出版社，2002：91–95.
[4]
张玢，曹芳，孙达成，等.孕中期羊水细胞染色体核型分析及相关遗传咨询研究[J].重庆医学，2013，33：4075–4076.
[5]
Alamillo CM, Krantz D, Evans M. Nearly a third of abnormalities found after first-trimester screening are different than expected: 10-year experience from a single center[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2013, 33(3):251–256.
[6]
Sahota DS, Leung WC, Chan WP. Prospective assessment of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority universal Down syndrome screening programme[J]. Hong Kong Med J, 2013, 19 (2) : 101–108.
[7]
孟然，戚红.早孕期颈部透明层增厚胎儿产前诊断分析[J].中国全科医学，2010, (14)：1587–1588.
[8]
冯怀英，朱宝生，李春华，等.247例妊娠中，晚期羊水细胞产前诊断及异常核型分析[J].中国小儿血液，2001, 6(3)：126–128.
[9]
赵淳，邓学东.染色体异常胎儿超声指标分析[J].中华医学超声杂志：电子版，2011，08(1)：27–29.
[10]
张月萍，任德麟，徐建忠.染色体平衡易位携带者生育风险研究[J].上海医学, 2003, 26 (10)：710–713.
[11]
赵晓曦，苏日娜，谷孝月，等.无创产前基因检测技术在临床应用价值[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志：电子版，2013, 7(23)：284–287.
[12]
杨湘玲，朱健生，刘贤云.新型无创DNA产前检测在诊断胎儿染色体非整倍体疾病中的应用[J/CD].中国产前诊断杂志：电子版，2013,5 (2):15–17.
[13]
陈晓蕾，陈辉，李扬.孕妇血浆中游离胎儿DNA的检测和分析[J]. 国际遗传学杂志，2010, 33(2)：65–66.
[14]
琚竹梅，郑梅玲.早孕妇女血浆中胎儿游离DNA的检测[J].临床医药实践，2006, 15 (03)：175–177.
[15]
戚庆炜，蒋宇林，周希亚.6585例高龄孕妇妊娠中期羊水染色体核型分析结果[J].中华围产医学杂志，2013，16(2)：76–77.
[1] 崔婉婷, 赵彦艳. 染色体嵌合体及单亲二体的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(02): 132-138.
[2] 蔡艾杞, 章锦曼, 唐新华, 朱宝生. 胎儿拷贝数变异的产前诊断与遗传咨询[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(03): 262-267.
[3] 唐敬龙, 王丽媛, 冯雪花. 不良孕产史夫妇染色体核型的大样本分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(03): 314-319.
[4] 程苾恒, 陈建华, 徐万洲. 单核苷酸多态性微阵列技术检测自然流产妊娠产物的应用价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(02): 236-240.
[5] 潘石蕾, 黄郁馨. 妊娠合并地中海贫血[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2015, 04(01): 28-31.
[6] 耿丹, 杜荷香, 陈帆, 牟婷, 包进, 李清鲜. 一例染色体复杂变异伴性反转的遗传学分析[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 88-92.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号