切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 314 -319. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.03.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

不良孕产史夫妇染色体核型的大样本分析
唐敬龙1,(), 王丽媛2, 冯雪花3   
  1. 1. 济南艾迪康医学检验中心生殖遗传实验室 250014
    2. 山东中医药大学第二附属医院肿瘤科,济南 250001
    3. 山东中医药大学第二附属医院生殖中心,济南 250001
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-13 修回日期:2019-05-13 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 通信作者: 唐敬龙

Large sample analysis of chromosome karyotypes in couples with poor fertility history

Jinglong Tang1,(), Liyuan Wang2, Xuehua Feng3   

  1. 1. Department of Reproduction and Genetics, Jinan Adicon Clinical Laboratories, Jinan 250014, Shandong Province, China
    2. Department of Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250001, Shandong Province, China
    3. Reproductive Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250001, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2019-02-13 Revised:2019-05-13 Published:2019-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jinglong Tang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tang Jinglong, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81273996)
引用本文:

唐敬龙, 王丽媛, 冯雪花. 不良孕产史夫妇染色体核型的大样本分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(03): 314-319.

Jinglong Tang, Liyuan Wang, Xuehua Feng. Large sample analysis of chromosome karyotypes in couples with poor fertility history[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(03): 314-319.

目的

探讨不良孕产史夫妇染色体异常核型检出率及其分布,以及染色体异常核型与不良孕产史的关系,为优生优育及遗传咨询提供理论依据。

方法

选取2016年1月1日至2017年12月31日,于济南艾迪康医学检验中心进行染色体核型检测的10 330对(20 660例)不良孕产史育龄夫妇为研究对象。采集每例受试者肘静脉血3 mL,肝素钠抗凝,取0.3 mL进行血细胞培养、标本制备,采用常规G显带技术进行染色体核型分析。对于染色体异常核型检出率、不同类型染色体异常核型占染色体异常核型总例数的比例等计数资料,采用率(%)表示。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。

结果

①本组10 330对(20 660例)不良孕产史育龄夫妇中,共计检出染色体异常核型为1 119例(不含染色体多态性),染色体异常核型检出率为5.42%(1 119/20 660)。其中,常染色体异常者为658例,占染色体异常核型的58.80%(658/1 119),包括354例染色体平衡易位、205例染色体倒位、83例染色体罗伯逊易位、11例染色体插入、5例染色体重复,分别占染色体异常核型的31.64%、18.32%、7.41%、0.98%、0.45%。染色体倒位者中,以9号染色体倒位居多,偶见于1、4、7、11、12号染色体,并且多合并自然流产。性染色体异常者为440例,占染色体异常核型的39.32%(440/1 119),包括365例性染色体数目异常(占染色体异常核型的32.62%)。其中,男性多表现为无精子症,以47,XXY染色体异常核型居多(144例),女性多表现为原发性不孕,以45,X染色体异常核型居多(103例); 61例为性染色体结构异常、14例为性别反转,分别占染色体异常核型的5.45%、1.25%。其他罕见染色体异常核型者为21例,占染色体异常核型的1.88%(21/1 119),如环状染色体、mar染色体等。②本组10 330对(20 660例)不良孕产史育龄夫妇中,11例为常染色体插入,5例为常染色体重复,54例为性染色体缺失,其主要临床表现为原发性不孕不育、胚胎停止发育、无精子症或重度少精子症。

结论

染色体异常核型是导致育龄期夫妇不良孕产史的重要原因之一。对于不良孕产史夫妇,建议进行染色体核型分析和遗传咨询。临床为这类患者进行优生优育指导,可提高出生人口质量。

Objective

To analyze the detection rate of abnormal chromosome karyotypes and distribution of abnormal karyotypes of couples with poor fertility history, and to explore the relationship between abnormal chromosomal karyotypes and infertility, and to provide theoretical basis for genetic problems in eugenics.

Methods

A total of 10 330 pairs (20 660 cases) of childbearing couples with poor fertility history who received detection of chromosome karyotypes at Jinan Adicon Clinical Laboratories from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017 were selected as research subjects. And 3 mL elbow venous blood of each subject was collected and anticoagulated with heparin sodium. Then, 0.3 mL venous blood was selected for cell culture and specimen preparation. Routine G-band technique was used for chromosomal karyotype analysis. For the detection rate of abnormal chromosome karyotypes, and the proportion of different types of abnormal chromosome karyotypes in total abnormal chromosome karyotypes, etc. were expressed by rate (%). The procedures followed in this study were in line with the requirement of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①Among the 10 330 pairs (20 660 cases) of childbearing couples with poor fertility history, 1 119 cases of abnormal chromosome karyotypes were detected (excluding chromosome polymorphism), and the detection rate was 5.42% (1 119/20 660). There were 658 cases of autosomal abnormalities, accounting for 58.80% (658/1 119) of total abnormal karyotypes, which included 354 cases of chromosome balance translocations, 205 cases of chromosome inversions, 83 cases of chromosome Robertsonian translocations, 11 cases of chromosome insertions, and 5 cases of chromosome duplication, respectively, accounting for 31.64%, 18.32%, 7.41%, 0.98% and 0.45% of total abnormal karyotypes, respectively. Most of the subjects with chromosome inversions were characterized by spontaneous abortions, and most of the inversional chromosomes were inverted on chromosome 9, and occasionally on chromosomes 1, 4, 7, 11, and 12. There were 440 cases of sex chromosome abnormalities, accounting for 39.32% (440/1 119) of total abnormal karyotypes. Among them, number of abnormal sex chromosomes occurred in 365 cases (accounting for 32.62% of total abnormal karyotypes), of which males were mostly characterized by azoospermia and 47, XXY abnormality, and most of the females were characterized by primary infertility and 45, X abnormality. There were 61 cases of sex chromosome structural abnormalities (accounting for 5.45% of total abnormal karyotypes), 14 cases of sexual reversal (accounting for 1.25% of total abnormal karyotypes). There were 21 cases of other rare abnormal chromosome karyotypes, accounting for 1.88% (21/1 119) of total abnormal karyotypes, such as circular chromosomes and mar chromosomes. ②Among the 10 330 pairs (20 660 cases) of childbearing couples with abnormal fertility history, there were 11 cases of autosomal insertion abnormal karyotypes, 5 cases of autosomal duplication abnormal karyotypes, 54 cases of sex chromosome deletion, and their main clinical manifestations were primary infertility, embryonic losses, azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia.

Conclusions

Abnormal chromosome karyotypes are one of the most important causes of poor fertility of childbearing couples. For childbearing couples with poor fertility history, karyotype analysis and genetic counseling are recommended. Clinically, the guidance of prenatal and postnatal care for such patients can improve the quality of birth population.

表1 本组10 330对(20 660例)不良孕产史夫妇中,1 119例染色体异常核型分布(%)
表2 本组70例染色体插入、重复、缺失异常核型受试者的临床表现
[1]
Jenderny J. Chromosome aberrations in a large series of spontaneous miscarriages in the German population and review of the literature[J]. Mol Cytogenet, 2014, 7: 38.
[2]
Simons A, Shaffer LG, Hastings RJ. Cytogenetic nomenclature: changes in the ISCN 2013 compared to the 2009 edition[J]. Cytogenet Genome Res, 2013, 141(1): 1-6.
[3]
Ravel C, Berthaut I, Bresson JL, et al. Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in phenotypically normal and fertile adult males: large-scale survey of over 10 000 sperm donor karyotypes[J]. Hum Reprod, 2006, 21(6): 1484-1489.
[4]
唐敬龙,王丽媛,吴莉莉. 罕见46,XX,inv(4)(q12q22)一例[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志,2016, 33(4): 497.
[5]
李琳. 染色体臂间倒位的遗传效应分析[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志,2007, 24(4): 487-488.
[6]
唐敬龙,王丽媛,吴莉莉,等. 47,XX,del(Y)(q11.23)一例[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志,2015, 32(2): 295.
[7]
刘风纯,唐敬龙,王丽媛,等. 一例男性性反转综合征[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志,2014, 31(2): 162.
[8]
唐敬龙,吴莉莉,饶伟强,等. 山东地区260例男性不育Y染色体AZF微缺失诊断的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(12): 5270-5274.
[9]
Schiff JD, Palermo GD, Veeck LL, et al. Success of testicular sperm extraction [corrected] and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with Klinefelter syndrome[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005, 90(11): 6263-6267.
[10]
赵连明,姜辉,洪锴,等. 非嵌合型克氏综合征患者显微取精成功3例报告[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(4): 547-550.
[11]
McCarthy K, Bondy CA. Turner syndrome in childhood and adolescence[J]. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab, 2008, 3(6): 771-775.
[12]
DiasMdo C, Castro LC, Gandolfi L, et al. Screening for celiac disease among patients with Turner syndrome in Brasília, DF, midwest region of Brazil[J]. Arq Gastroenterol, 2010, 47(3): 246-249.
[13]
Jarrah N, El-Shanti H, Khier A, et al. Familial disorder of sex determination in seven individuals from three related sibships[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2000, 159(12): 912-918.
[14]
Mittal RD, Singh G, Srivastava A, et al. Y chromosome micro-deletions in idiopathic infertility from Northern India[J]. Ann Genet, 2004, 47(4): 331-337.
[15]
莫毅,梁方方,檀大羡,等. 150例男性不育患者Y染色体AZF基因微缺失分析[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2010, 18(9): 541-543.
[16]
项云改,谭丽. Y染色体微缺失与男性不育的研究现状[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志,2007, 26 (1): 5-8.
[17]
符梅,徐克惠. 复发性自然流产夫妇的病因分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(4): 395-400.
[18]
魏丽娜,张俊博,赵考考,等. 不同治疗方案在体外受精-胚胎移植患者中的临床疗效比较[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(3): 317-323.
[1] 满婷婷, 郝晓艳, 刘晓伟, 孙海瑞, 何怡华. 法洛四联症常见心内合并畸形及遗传学异常分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(08): 779-784.
[2] 曾照敏, 余海燕. 超雌综合征的临床认知[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 145-150.
[3] 卞玉香, 王丽春, 蔡蓉. 胎儿超声软指标对胎儿染色体异常的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 85-92.
[4] 张禾璇, 宋咏刚, 杨雪. 孕妇无创产前检测结果的大样本分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 685-691.
[5] 陈晶晶, 钱芳. 新疆地区不同民族育龄妇女胚胎停育与叶酸代谢酶基因多态性及染色体异常的相关性[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 599-605.
[6] 刘磊, 李颖思, 周航, 程肯, 霍颖, 雷婷缨. 单脐动脉合并其他先天性结构畸形胎儿预后的临床分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 427-432.
[7] 崔婉婷, 赵彦艳. 染色体嵌合体及单亲二体的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(02): 132-138.
[8] 谢良玉, 王和, 赵小文, 张迅, 张雪梅, 刘洪倩, 祝茜, 王婧, 胡婷, 张竹, 赖怡, 秦利, 刘珊玲. 中孕期胎儿染色体异常高危孕妇羊水细胞胎儿染色体核型及介入性产前诊断指征的大样本分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(01): 73-79.
[9] 姚利民, 章锦曼, 朱姝, 黎冬梅, 余蕊, 陆丽花, 赵庆芬, 丁云川. 18-三体综合征胎儿中孕期超声检查与染色体核型结果分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(05): 590-597.
[10] 张丽娜, 李东至, 韩瑾, 潘敏, 雷婷缨, 符芳, 甄理. 胎龄为16~18周系统胎儿超声检查联合胎儿全外显子组测序技术的产前诊断价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(05): 559-565.
[11] 蔡艾杞, 章锦曼, 唐新华, 朱宝生. 胎儿拷贝数变异的产前诊断与遗传咨询[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(03): 262-267.
[12] 索峰, 张燕, 王亿, 王鹏, 方媛, 张嫚, 王娜, 王传霞, 顾茂胜, 缑灵山. 无创产前检测技术筛查胎儿性染色体非整倍体的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(05): 584-589.
[13] 秦朗, 赵福敏, 陈娇, 罗红, 杨帆, 田雨, 庞厚清, 何敏, 徐红, 唐英, 叶璐. 产前经腹胎儿超声诊断体外受精-胚胎移植胎儿鼻骨发育异常的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(04): 389-395.
[14] 孟骁, 钟世林, 邓玉清. 无创基因检测筛查胎儿染色体异常的效果及其与孕妇年龄和检测孕周相关性的探讨[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2021, 10(03): 169-173.
[15] 耿丹, 杜荷香, 陈帆, 牟婷, 包进, 李清鲜. 一例染色体复杂变异伴性反转的遗传学分析[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 88-92.
阅读次数
全文


摘要