切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2014, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 63 -66. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2014.01.015

所属专题: 文献

论著

孕期个体化营养指导对多囊卵巢综合征患者的影响和意义
蒋霞1, 冯亚玲1,*,*(), 许建娟1, 胡玲卿1, 项静英1, 王士艳1, 赵军1   
  1. 1. 214002,南京医科大学附属无锡妇幼保健院
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-18 修回日期:2013-11-11 出版日期:2014-02-01
  • 通信作者: 冯亚玲

Effects and Significance of Individualized Nutrition Guidance of Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome During Pregnancy

Xia Jiang1, Yaling Feng1(), Jianjuan Xu1, Lingqing Hu1, Jingying Xiang1, Shiyan Wang1, Jun Zhao1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214002, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2013-06-18 Revised:2013-11-11 Published:2014-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yaling Feng
  • About author:
    (Correspondingauthor: Feng Yaling, Email: ).
引用本文:

蒋霞, 冯亚玲, 许建娟, 胡玲卿, 项静英, 王士艳, 赵军. 孕期个体化营养指导对多囊卵巢综合征患者的影响和意义[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(01): 63-66.

Xia Jiang, Yaling Feng, Jianjuan Xu, Lingqing Hu, Jingying Xiang, Shiyan Wang, Jun Zhao. Effects and Significance of Individualized Nutrition Guidance of Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome During Pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2014, 10(01): 63-66.

目的

探讨孕期个体化营养指导对多囊卵巢综合症(PCOS)患者的妊娠结局及糖脂代谢的影响及意义。

方法

选择2010年1月至2013年3月在南京医科大学附属无锡妇幼保健院妇产科确诊为PCOS并妊娠成功者68例为研究对象。按照是否接受个体化营养指导,将其分为干预组(n=36)和对照组(n=32),比较分析两组的母婴结局和糖脂代谢差异。对两组受试者于孕龄为32~ 36孕周进行75 g口服葡萄糖耐量检查(OGTT)及胰岛素(INS)释放试验,比较两组空腹血糖(FPG)、空腹胰岛素(FINS)水平与稳态模型的胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)、胰岛β细胞功能指数(HOMA-β)及OGTT血糖曲线下面积(A UCglu)、OGTT胰岛素曲线下面积(AUCINS )。同时比较两组受试者分娩前总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、低密度脂蛋白-胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白-胆固醇(HDL-C)水平和分娩时羊水过多、巨大儿和低出生体质量儿发生率(本研究遵循的程序符合南京医科大学附属无锡市妇幼保健院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。两组受试者的年龄、分娩孕周、孕前体质量指数(BMI)、孕前FPG等一般资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

干预组与对照组的妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)和巨大儿发生率分别为(22.2% vs. 46.9%;8.3% vs.31.3%),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);羊水过多和低出生体质量儿发生率分别为(2.8% vs.6.3%;0vs.9.4%),两组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预组与对照组的TC比较[(6.36 ± 1.97)mmol/L vs.(6.43 ± 2.01)mmol/L],差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),而TG、LDL-C及HDL-C比较[(1.17 ± 0.05)mmol/L vs.(2.31 ± 0.14)mmol/ L;(3.45 ± 0.16)mmol/L vs.(4.38 ± 0.23)mmol/ L;(1.93 ± 0.18) mmol/L vs.(1.18 ± 0.21)mmol/L],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预组和对照组FPG、FINS、HOMA-IR及HOMA-β比较[(4.39 ± 0.56)mmol/L vs.(4.53 ± 0.67)mmol/ L;(6.35 ± 4.92)mIU/L vs.(7.82 ± 4.39)mIU/ L;(1.34 ± 0.87)vs.(1.67 ± 0.98);(132.8 ± 87.8)vs. (171.5 ± 99.8)],差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预组和对照组的AUCglu[(20.14 ± 3.79)mmol/ Lh vs. (23.36 ± 5.18)mmol/Lh]和AUCINS [(163.7 ± 71.80)mU/Lh vs.(230.5 ± 130.32)mU/Lh]比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。

结论

PCOS患者于孕期接受营养指导可改善其孕期糖脂代谢,降低GDM和巨大儿发生率。

Objective

To explore the effects and significance of individualized nutrition guidance of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) during pregnancy.

Methods

Between January 2010 and March 2013, sixty eight pregnant women who were diagnosed as PCOS in Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University were recruited into the study. They were divided into intervention group (n =36) and control group (n =32) . Intervention group accepted individualized nutritional guidance, and control group follow the traditional nutritional guidance. The complications and pregnancy outcomes were compared between two groups. Two groups both underwent 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and insulin - releasing test during 32-36 pregnancy weeks . Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) , fasting plasma insulin (FINS) , homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) , HOMA-β, area under curve of glucose (AUCglu) and area under curve of insulin (AUCINS) were calculated. Lipid level including total cholesterol(TC) , triglyceride (TG) , high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) were examined between two group. The significant differences were not found between two groups on age, delivery weeks, body mass index (BMI) before pregnancy, FPG. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Wuxi Matemal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from all participates.

Results

The incidence rates of GDM and macrosomia of two groups were 22.2%, 46.9% and 8.3%, 31.3%, with significant differences (P<0.05) , but the incidence rates of hydramnios and low birth weight were 2.8%, 6.3% and 0, 9.4%, with no significant differences (P>0.05) .There had no significant differences between two groups on TC [(6.36 ± 1.97) mmol/ L vs. (6.43 ± 2.01) mmol/ L, P>0.05], but had significant differences on TG [(1.17 ± 0.05) mmol/ L vs. (2.31 ± 0.14) mmol/ L], LDL[(3.45 ± 0.16) mmol/ L vs.(4.38 ± 0.23) mmol/ L], and HDL[(1.93 ± 0.18) mmol/ L vs.(1.18 ± 0.21) mmol/ L, P<0.05].There also had no significant differences (P>0.05) between two groups on FPG [(4.39 ± 0.56) mmol/ L vs.(4.53 ± 0.67) mmol/ L], FINS [(6.35 ± 4.92) mU/ L vs.(7.82 ± 4.39) mU/ L], HOMA-IR(1.34 ± 0.87 vs. 1.67 ± 0.98) , HOMA-β(132.8 ± 87.8 vs. 171.5 ± 99.8) , and there had significant differences between two groups on AUCglu [(20.14 ± 3.79) mmol/ Lh vs.(23.36 ± 5.18) mmol/ Lh, P<0.01] and AUCINS [(163.7 ± 71.80) mU/ Lh vs. (230.5 ± 130.32) mU/ Lh, P<0.01].

Conclusions

The individualized nutritional guidance of patients with PCOS during pregnancy may improve glucose and lipid metabolism, decrease the pregnancy complications such as GDM and macrosomia.

表1 两组母婴结局比较[n(%)]
Table 1 Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between intervention group and control group [n(%)]
表2 两组患者脂代谢指标比较(mmol/L,±s
Table 2 Comparison of lipid metabolism between two group (mmol/ L,±s
表3 两组患者糖代谢指标比较(±s
Table 3 Comparison of glucose metabolism between two group (±s
[1]
Legro RS.Diagnostic criteria in polycystic ovary syndrome[J].Semin Reprod Med,2003,21(3):267.
[2]
March WA,Moore VM,Willson KJ,et al.The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria[J].Hum Reprod,2010,25(2):544-551.
[3]
高艳,张少华.阴道超声诊断多囊卵巢综合征60例分析[J].成都医学院学报,2013,8(4):462-464.
[4]
Palomba S,Falbo A,Zullo F,et al.Evidence-based and potential benefits of metformin in the polycycstic ovary syndrome:a comprehensive review[J].Endocr Rev,2009,30:1-50.
[5]
Speroff L,Fritz MA.Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility.7 th ed[M].Philadelphia (PA):Lippincott Williams and Wiikins,2005:724.
[6]
Glueck CJ,Goldenberg N,Wang P,et al.Metformin during pregnancy reduces insulin,insulin resistance,insulin secretion,weight,testosterone and development of gestational diabetes:prospective longitudinal assessment of women with polycystic ovary syndrome from preconception throughout pregnancy [J].Hum Reprod,2004,19(3):510.
[7]
Altieri P,Gambineri A,Prontera O,et al.Maternal polycystic ovary syndrome may be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2010,149(1):31-36.
[8]
Azziz R,Sanchez LA,Knochenhauer ES,et al.Androgen excess in women:Experience with over 1000 consecutive patients[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2004,89(2):453-462.
[9]
Hahn S,Tan S,Elsenbruch S,et al.Clinical and biochemical characterizationof women with polycystic ovary syndrome in north Rhine-Westphalia[J].Horm Metab Res,2005,37(7):438-444.
[10]
代玉洁,阮祥燕.生活方式干预疗法治疗多囊卵巢综合征[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,5(23):493.
[11]
Malik SM,Traub ML.Defining the role of bariatric surgery in polycystic ovarian syndrome patients[J].World J Diabetes,2012,3(4):71-79.
[12]
代荫梅.多囊卵巢综合征诊断标准与治疗[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2013,7(4):20-21.
[1] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] 周东杰, 蒋敏, 范海瑞, 高玲玲, 孔祥, 卢丹, 王丽萍. 非编码RNA在卵泡发育成熟中作用及其机制的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 387-393.
[7] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[8] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[9] 李晓晖, 上官昌盛, 向英, 裴芝皆, 车俊志, 谢飞. 3D腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后机体能量代谢与多囊卵巢综合征患者性激素水平关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 538-541.
[10] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[11] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[12] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[13] 吴晓翔, 杨波, 李景漩, 张凤玲, 郭桂辉, 郑少培. 脐动脉超声检查联合NLR、sFlt-1/PLGF对妊娠高血压综合征患者不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[14] 张丽姿, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的不良结局及远期影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
[15] 刘育昕, 王子晗, 张艺馨, 栾永婕, 孟凯. 肾母细胞瘤基因1在卵巢疾病发病机制中的研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 178-183.
阅读次数
全文


摘要