切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2010, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (06) : 432 -436. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2010.06.012

论著

呼吸衰竭新生儿应用高频振荡通气的循证医学研究
王华, 母得志, 熊英   
  1. 610041 四川成都,四川大学华西第二医院新生儿科
  • 出版日期:2010-12-01

Evidence-Based Medicine Study Suggestion on High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Neonates

Hua WANG, De-zhi MU, Ying XIONG   

  1. Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Published:2010-12-01
引用本文:

王华, 母得志, 熊英. 呼吸衰竭新生儿应用高频振荡通气的循证医学研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2010, 06(06): 432-436.

Hua WANG, De-zhi MU, Ying XIONG. Evidence-Based Medicine Study Suggestion on High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Neonates[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2010, 06(06): 432-436.

目的

系统评价(systematic evaluation)高频振荡通气(high frequency oscillatory ventilation, HFOV)在呼吸衰竭新生儿的使用价值。

方法

采用循证医学方法,检索1983年1月1日至2009年12月31日,Medline,EMBASE,中国循证医学/Cochrane中心数据库文献中有关高频振荡通气和常频通气(conventional ventilation, CV)的文献19篇(均为英文文献),其中17篇为早产儿(胎龄<34孕周)或低出生体重(low birth weight,LBW,产重<2000 g)儿使用HFOV亚组1与CV亚组1的比较,共纳入受试患儿3652例;另外2篇为足月及近足月儿选择性、解救性使用HFOV亚组2与CV亚组2的比较,共纳入受试患儿197例。采用Meta分析法对研究文献进行系统评价,比较两种通气方式治疗新生儿呼吸衰竭的有效性。

结果

在早产儿或低出生体重儿中,HFOV亚组1和CV亚组1(28~30)d龄新生儿中,死亡率、颅内出血(intracranial hemorrhage,ICH)及脑室周围白质软化(periventricular leukomalacia,PVL)、气漏发生率比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05),HFOV组支气管肺发育不良(bronchopulmonary dysplasia, BPD)发生率有降低(P<0.05),早产儿视网膜病(retinopathy of prematurity, ROP)发生率降低(P<0.05)。在足月儿和近足月儿中,HFOV亚组2和CV亚组2新生儿中,生后28 d死亡率、气漏发生率、支气管肺发育不良、颅内岀血及脑室周围白质软化发病率比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05)。

结论

现有的循证医学证据表明,由于各种疾病所致新生儿呼吸衰竭时,选择高频振荡通气并不比常频通气模式有十分明显的优势。

Objective

Most of diseases which cause neonatal respiratory failure could use high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) or conventional ventilation (CV) to treat, but till now, it is unclear which is better. In this article, from the view of evidence-based medicine (EBM), we evaluate the effectiveness of high frequency oscillatory ventilation on the treatment of neonatal respiratory failure.

Method

We collected relative articles from Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane data base during January 1, 1983 to December 31, 2009, and then conducted systematic evaluation between high frequency oscillatory ventilation or conventional ventilation among preterm, low birth weight(LBW) infants (HFOV sub-group 1 and CV sub-group 1), term and near term infants(HFOV sub-group 2 and CV sub-group 2).

Results

Among preterm and low birth weight infants, there was no significant difference of incident rate of mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), pneumothorax between HFOV sub-group 1 and CV sub-group 1 (P>0.05) during 28~30 days after birth. In HFOV sub-group 1, the incident rates of chronic lung disease (CLD) and retinopathy were obviously lower (P<0.05). As for term and near term infants, there still was no significant difference of mortality, pneumothorax, chronic lung disease, intracranial hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia rate between HFOV sub-group 2 and CV sub-group 2.

Conclusion

The existing evidence-based medicine can not show that high frequency oscillatory ventilation is much better than conventional ventilation in newborn respiratory failure.

1 Smith VC, Zupancic JA, McCormick MC, et al. Trends in severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia rates between 1994 and 2002[J]. J Pediatr, 2005, 146(4): 469-473.
2 The HIFI study group. High frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants[J]. N Engl J Med, 1989, 320(2): 88-93.
3 Clark RH, Gerstmann DL, Null DM, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of high-frequency oscillatory and conventional ventilation in respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Pediatrics, 1992, 89(1): 5-12.
4 Ogawa Y, Miyasaka K, Kawano T, et al. A multicentre randomised trial of high frequency oscillatory ventilation as compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory failure[J]. Early Hum Dev, 1993, 32(1): 1-10.
5 Gerstmann DR, Minton SD, Stoddard RA, et al. The Provo multicenter early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation trial: Improved pulmonary and clinical outcome in respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Pediatrics, 1996, 98(6 Pt 1): 1044-1057.
6 Rettwitz-Volk W, Veldman A, Roth B, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicentre trial of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome receiving surfactant treatment[J]. J Pediatr, 1998, 132(2): 249-254.
7 Thome U, Kossel H, Lipowsky G, et al. Randomized comparison of high-frequency ventilation with high-rate intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory failure[J]. J Pediatr, 1999, 135(1): 39-46.
8 Plavka R, Kopecky P, Sebron V, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of conventional mechanical ventilation and early high frequency oscillatory ventilation in extremely premature newborns with repiratory distress syndrome[J]. Intensive Care Med, 1999, 25(1): 68-75.
9 Moriette G, Paris-Llado J, Walti H, et al. Prospective randomized multicenter comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional ventilation in preterm infants of less than 30 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Pediatrics, 2001, 107(2): 363-372.
10 Durand DJ, Asselin JM, Hudak ML, et al. Early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus synchronized mandatory ventilation in very low birth weight infants: A pilot study of two ventilation protocols[J]. J Perinatol, 2001, 21: 221-229.
11 Courtney SE, Durand DJ, Asselin JM, et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants[J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347(9): 643-652.
12 Johnson AH, Peacock JL, Greenough A, et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity[J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347(9): 633-642.
13 Van Reempts P, Borstlap C, Laroche S, et al. Early use of high frequency ventilation in the premature neonate[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2003, 162(4): 219-226.
14 Craft SP, Bhandari V, Finer NN. The sy-fi study: A randomized prospective trial of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus a high-frequency flow interrupter in infants less than 1000 g[J]. J Perinatol, 2003, 23:14-19.
15 Schreiber MD, Gin-Mestan K, Marks JD, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide in premature infants with the respiratory distress syndrome[J]. N Engl J Med, 2003, 349(22): 2099-2107.
16 Vento G, Matassa PG, Ameglio F, et al. HFOV in premature neonates: Effects on pulmonary mechanics and epithelial lining fluid cytokines. A randomized controlled trial[J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 2005, 31: 463-470.
17 Dani C, Bertini G, Pezzati M, et al. Effects of pressure support ventilation plus volume guarantee vs. high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on lung inflammation in preterm infants[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2006, 41: 242-249.
18 Lista G, Castoldi F, Bianci S, et al. Volume guarantee versus high-frequency ventilation: Lung inflammation in preterm infants[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2008, 93(4): F252-256.
19 Clark RH, Yoder BA, Sell MS. Prospective, randomized comparison of high-frequency oscillation and conventional ventilation in candidates for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation[J]. J Pediatr, 1994, 124: 447-454.
20 Rojas MA, Lozano JM, Rojas MX, et al. Colombian Neonatal Research Network. Randomized, multicentre trial of conventional ventilation versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for the early management of respiratory failure in term or near-term infants in Colombia[J]. J Perinatol, 2005, 25: 720-724.
21 Roy BJ, Rycus P, Conrad SA, et al. The changing demographics of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients reported to the extracorporeal life support organization (ELSO) Registry[J]. Pediatrics, 2000, 106(5): 1334-1338.
22 Chang HK. Mechanisms of gas transport during ventilation by high-frequency oscillation[J]. J Appl Physiol, 1984, 56(3): 553-563.
23 Frantz ID 3rd, Werthammer J, Stark AR. High-frequency ventilation in premature infants with lung disease: Adequate gas exchange at low tracheal pressure[J]. Pediatrics, 1983, 71(4): 483-488.
24 Pokora T, Bing DR, Mammel MC, et al. Neonatal high-frequency jet ventilation[J]. Pediatrics, 1983, 72: 27-32.
25 Bunnell JB. High-frequency ventilation: General concepts[M]. In: Donn SM, Sinha SK, ed. Neonatal respiratory care. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby, Inc, 2006, 222-230.
26 Jackson JC, Truog WE, Standaert TA, et al. Effect of high-frequency ventilation on the development of alveolar edema in premature monkeys at risk for hyaline membrane disease[J]. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1991, 143(4 Pt 1): 865-871.
27 Horbar JD, Carpenter JH, Kenny M, ed. Vermont Oxford network annual database summaries 1997-2005[M]. Burlington (VT): Vermont Oxford Network: 1998-2006.
[1] 翟敬芳, 吴杰斌, 刘枭, 金宝, 王彦波, 陈洋, 王云, 周广玲, 周彬. 无创高频振荡通气在极低出生体重早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征初始呼吸支持治疗中的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(05): 598-605.
[2] 孙柏平, 赵小琳, 武鹏, 杜耿, 徐泉, 罗若谷. 重症先天性膈疝患儿的临床治疗策略[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(03): 327-332.
[3] 刘砚韬, 张伶俐, 黄亮, 曾力楠. 细辛脑注射液治疗儿童呼吸系统疾病的有效性及安全性的系统评价[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(06): 689-697.
[4] 王凌飞, 张耀东, 卫海燕. 维生素D受体基因BsmⅠ位点多态性与儿童1型糖尿病发生的Meta分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(03): 357-360.
[5] 董兰, 徐望明, 罗增丽, 周小燕, 王慧明. 两种降调节方案对体外受精胚胎移植中子宫内膜异位症不孕患者有效性的Meta分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(03): 287-294.
[6] 黄慧琼, 唐静, 彭鸿灵, 赵霞. 血清人附睾蛋白联合糖链抗原-125检测在卵巢癌诊断中作用的系统评价[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2012, 08(03): 290-294.
[7] 张丽, 黄桂琼, 王晓东. 硝苯地平治疗先兆早产的Meta分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2012, 08(02): 137-145.
[8] 强昀, 熊俊. 异位妊娠无创诊断的研究进展[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 07(02): 160-163.
[9] 罗林荫, 杨凡, 李晋蓉, 雷明雨. 神经节苷脂对脑瘫患儿疗效的meta分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2009, 05(03): 217-220.
[10] 李俊兰, 张晓荣. 肺表面活性物质联合NCPAP对新生儿呼吸衰竭血清ET-1及CC16的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(05): 623-627.
阅读次数
全文


摘要