Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (01): 105 -113. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2024.01.014

Original Article

Analysis of early pregnancy-related influencing factors of gestational diabetes mellitus, and clinical value of building gestational diabetes mellitus prediction model based on four machine learning algorithms of glycolipid-related biochemical indexes and demographic information of pregnant women in early pregnancy

Li Li1, Mei Ma2, Xinxin Huang3, Danlin Yang1, Mian Pan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China
    2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China
    3. Department of Healthcare, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China
  • Received:2023-11-11 Revised:2024-01-06 Published:2024-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Mian Pan
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Department of Science and Technology in Fujian Province(2021J01406)
Objective

To investigate the early pregnancy-related influencing factors of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), as well as the clinical value of building GDM prediction model based on the glycolipids-related biochemical indexes in early pregnancy and demographic information using four machine learning algorithms.

Methods

A total of 6 257 pregnant women with gestational age of 10 to 13+ 6 gestational weeks who had their first prenatal examinations in Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital from December 2021 to December 2022 were selected for the study. The pregnant women were categorized into the GDM group (n=1 499, GDM pregnant women) and the non-GDM group (n=4 758, non-GDM pregnant women) according to whether or not they were diagnosed with GDM at 24 to 27+ 6 gestational weeks by retrospective analysis. Early pregnancy-related influencing factors on the development of GDM in pregnant women were analyzed using multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis. Based on the biochemical indexes related to glycolipids in early pregnancy and demographic information in pregnant women (8 variables), four machine learning algorithms, namely, decision tree (DT), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) were used to build GDM prediction models, and ten-fold cross-validation was used to assess the performance of each model, and area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve among the GDM prediction models constructed by the four algorithms were compared. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital (Approval No. 2021KRD018). All pregnant women had signed the informed consent forms for clinical research.

Results

①The results of multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that pregnant women with advanced age (delivery age≥35 years) (OR=1.95, 95%CI: 1.70-2.24, P<0.001), with pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18.5-24.0 kg/m2 (OR=1.32, 95%CI: 1.11-1.58, P=0.002), pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 24.0-28.0 kg/m2 (OR=2.17, 95%CI: 1.73-2.73, P<0.001), pre-pregnancy BMI ≥28.0 kg/m2 (OR=2.53, 95%CI: 1.70-3.78, P<0.001), elevated serum apolipoprotein (Apo) B levels during early pregnancy (OR=3.06, 95%CI: 2.14-4.37, P<0.001), and increased serum fasting glucose (FPG) concentration in early pregnancy (OR=2.08, 95%CI: 1.79-2.41, P<0.001) were all independent early pregnancy-related risk factors for the development of GDM in pregnant women. ②According to the magnitude of the eigenvalue in the classification results of the 4 classifiers, the results of GDM prediction model constructed using 8 variables of maternal age, degree of education and pre-pregnancy BMI, serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), ApoA1, ApoB, and FPG during early pregnancy showed that the AUC of the GDM prediction models built by the 4 algorithms, namely, DT, LR, RF, and XGB, were 0.645 (95%CI: 0.591-0.698), 0.699 (95%CI: 0.641-0.749), 0.672 (95%CI: 0.621-0.772), and 0.597 (95%CI: 0.553-0.663), respectively, and the AUC of the LR algorithm was greater than that of the XGB algorithm, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=2.38, P=0.017), and there was no significant difference in AUC of pairwise comparison of the rest of the algorithms (P>0.05). ③The ten-fold cross-validation results showed that the average AUC of the GDM prediction models constructed by the four algorithms, DT, LR, RF, and XGB, were 0.586±0.025, 0.661±0.020, 0.632±0.023, and 0.576±0.019, respectively.

Conclusions

Based on the biochemical indexes related to glycolipids in early pregnancy and demographic data, GDM prediction models constructed with LR and RF algorithms, which has a certain predictive value for GDM, and helps to screen the high-risk group of GDM at early stage, and to provide clinical interventions when necessary to reduce GDM-related adverse pregnancy outcome of mother and fetus.

表1 2组早孕期孕妇一般临床资料及糖脂相关生化指标比较
表2 影响孕妇发生GDM的多因素非条件logistic回归分析
图1 4种机器学习算法构建GDM预测模型的ROC-AUC比较注:GDM为妊娠期糖尿病,ROC曲线为受试者工作特征曲线,AUC为曲线下面积。DT为决策树,LR为逻辑回归,RF为随机森林,XGB为极致梯度提升
表3 4种机器学习算法构建GDM预测模型的4个性能评估指标比较
图2 在训练集中预测GDM患者的4种机器学习算法的十折交叉验证AUC结果折线图注:GDM为妊娠期糖尿病,AUC为曲线下面积。DT为决策树,LR为逻辑回归,RF为随机森林,XGB为极致梯度提升
[1]
Kinnunen J, Nikkinen H, Keikkala E, et al. Gestational diabetes is associated with the risk of offspring′s congenital anomalies: a register-based cohort study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2023, 23(1): 708. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05996-6.
[2]
马雨鸿,马华姝,乔宗旭,等. 妊娠期糖尿病危险因素的结构方程模型分析[J]. 中国卫生统计2022, 39(3): 446-449. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2022.03.029.
[3]
Akash MSH, Noureen S, Rehman K, et al. Investigating the biochemical association of gestational diabetes mellitus with dyslipidemia and hemoglobin[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2023, 10: 1242939. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1242939.
[4]
Tong JN, Chen YX, Guan XN, et al. Association between the cut-off value of the first trimester fasting plasma glucose level and gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective study from Southern China[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2022, 22(1): 540. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04874-x.
[5]
Shen L, Wang D, Huang Y, et al. Longitudinal trends in lipid profiles during pregnancy: association with gestational diabetes mellitus and longitudinal trends in insulin indices[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022, 13: 1080633. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1080633.
[6]
Kouiti M, Hernández-Muñiz C, Youlyouz-Marfak I, et al. Preventing gestational diabetes mellitus by improving healthy diet and/or physical activity during pregnancy: an umbrella review[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 14(10): 2066. DOI: 10.3390/nu14102066.
[7]
Shepherd E, Gomersall JC, Tieu J, et al. Combined diet and exercise interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 11(11): CD010443. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010443.pub3.
[8]
Abell SK, Shorakae S, Boyle JA, et al. Role of serum biomarkers to optimise a validated clinical risk prediction tool for gestational diabetes[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2019, 59(2): 251-257. DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12833.
[9]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组,中华医学会围产医学分会,中国妇幼保健协会妊娠合并糖尿病专业委员会. 妊娠期高血糖诊治指南(2022)[第一部分][J]. 中华妇产科杂志2022, 57(1): 3-12. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210917-00528.
[10]
杨剑锋,乔佩蕊,李永梅,等. 机器学习分类问题及算法研究综述[J]. 统计与决策2019, 35(6): 36-40. DOI: 10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2019.06.008.
[11]
Greener JG, Kandathil SM, Moffat L, et al. A guide to machine learning for biologists[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2022, 23(1): 40-55. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-021-00407-0.
[12]
韩娜,刘珏,金楚瑶,等. 2013—2017年北京市通州区34 637例孕妇妊娠期糖尿病流行情况及其影响因素研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志2019, 23(2): 156-161. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2019.02.007.
[13]
Zhu H, Zhao Z, Xu J, et al. The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus before and after the implementation of the universal two-child policy in China[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022, 13: 960877. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.960877.
[14]
Wu Q, Chen Y, Zhou M, et al. An early prediction model for gestational diabetes mellitus based on genetic variants and clinical characteristics in China[J]. Diabetol Metab Syndr, 2022, 14(1): 15. DOI: 10.1186/s13098-022-00788-y.
[15]
Harrison CL, Lombard CB, East C, et al. Risk stratification in early pregnancy for women at increased risk of gestational diabetes[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2015, 107(1): 61-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.09.006.
[16]
Zheng Y, Hou W, Xiao J, et al. Application value of predictive model based on maternal coagulation function and glycolipid metabolism indicators in early diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10: 850191. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.850191.
[17]
Snyder BM, Baer RJ, Oltman SP, et al. Early pregnancy prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus risk using prenatal screening biomarkers in nulliparous women[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2020, 163: 108139. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108139.
[18]
Xia J, Song Y, Rawal S, et al. Vitamin D status during pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a longitudinal study in a multiracial cohort[J]. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2019, 21(8): 1895-1905. DOI: 10.1111/dom.13748.
[19]
Corcoran SM, Achamallah N, Loughlin JO, et al. First trimester serum biomarkers to predict gestational diabetes in a high-risk cohort: striving for clinically useful thresholds[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018, 222: 7-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.12.051.
[20]
Thériault S, Forest JC, Massé J, et al. Validation of early risk-prediction models for gestational diabetes based on clinical characteristics[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2014, 103(3): 419-425. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.12.009.
[21]
Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen E, et al. Selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. Toronto Trihospital Gestational Diabetes Project Investigators[J]. N Engl J Med, 1997, 337(22): 1591-1596. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199711273372204.
[22]
Caliskan E, Kayikcioglu F, Oztürk N, et al. A population-based risk factor scoring will decrease unnecessary testing for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2004, 83(6): 524-530. DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00389.x.
[23]
van Leeuwen M, Opmeer BC, Zweers EJK, et al. Estimating the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a clinical prediction model based on patient characteristics and medical history[J]. BJOG, 2010, 117(1): 69-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02425.x.
[24]
Teede HJ, Harrison CL, Teh WT, et al. Gestational diabetes: development of an early risk prediction tool to facilitate opportunities for prevention[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2011, 51(6): 499-504. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2011.01356.x.
[25]
Sweeting AN, Wong J, Appelblom H, et al. A novel early pregnancy risk prediction model for gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2019, 45(2): 76-84. DOI: 10.1159/000486853.
[26]
Liu R, Zhan Y, Liu X, et al. Stacking ensemble method for gestational diabetes mellitus prediction in Chinese pregnant women: a prospective cohort study[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2022, 2022: 8948082. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8948082.
[27]
Zhang Z, Yang L, Han W, et al. Machine learning prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: Meta-analysis[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2022, 24(3): e26634. DOI: 10.2196/26634.
[28]
Liu H, Li J, Leng J, et al. Machine learning risk score for prediction of gestational diabetes in early pregnancy in Tianjin, China[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2021, 37(5): e3397. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3397.
[1] Ganlin He, Xiangnong Chen, Ping Li, Jiayi Zhen, Jingxia Li, Waiyi Zou, Duorong Xu. Influencing factors of femoral head necrosis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in leukemia[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 450-456.
[2] Ye Luo, Mengling Hu, Xiaofan Huang, Jinpeng Lin, Zhuman Li, Shaobai Wang. Support vector machine for classification of osteoarthritis and ligamentous injuries in knee[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 201-208.
[3] Qian Li, Qian Liu, Hailing Zhu, Juan Ni, Baoqin Ren, Changyun Liu. Efficacy of recombinant human growth hormone therapy in children with idiopathic short stature[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(03): 346-352.
[4] Lili Liu, Jianru Jia, Jing Zhang, Daqiong Zhou, Jiangyu Liu, Zhenhuan Cao. Clinical characteristics between patients with chronic hepatitis B alone and chronic hepatitis B complicated with hepatic steatosis:a cross-sectional study[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 270-277.
[5] Yicheng Huang, Haiqi Liang, Qihuan He, Faye Wei, Shubo Yang, Shuting Tan, Gaoqiang Zhai, Jiwen Cheng. Machine learning models assess the roles of RAS subfamily genes in immunotherapy based on bladder cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 131-140.
[6] Weiwei Zhang, Qi Chen, Heyu Weng, Liang Huang. Preliminary study on prediction of lymph node metastasis of T1 colorectal cancer by random forest model[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[7] Lu Zhou, Rongbo Wen, Zixuan Liu, Yiyang Li, Leqi Zhou, Xiaoming Zhu, Haifeng Gong, Xianhua Gao, Zheng Lou, Lianjie Liu, Liqiang Hao, Guanyu Yu, Wei Zhang. Health economics research of Changhai-AL-Prediction model to guide rational implementation of protective ostomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(04): 280-287.
[8] Qing Pan, Huiqing Ge. Review on automatic detection methods of patient-ventilatory asynchrony based on big data of mechanical ventilation waveform[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2024, 10(04): 399-403.
[9] Mengshi Lu, Wei Liu, Jiawei Ma, Dandan Ji, Xuan Jia, Xinping Zhan, Liang Luo. Application progress of artificial intelligence in acute respiratory distress syndrome management[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2024, 10(01): 66-71.
[10] Jia Dong, Kun Wang, Li Zhang. Prognostic nutritional index combined with immunoglobulin,fasting blood glucose level and serum alpha-fetoprotein in predicting poor prognosis in patients with HBV associated chronic acute liver failure after treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[11] Shi Tang, Chuanyou Xue, Xing Ye, Hongju Zhang, Rui Dai. Changes of blood lipid, blood glucose, protein and uric acid in patients with acute viral hepatitis and their correlation with prognosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(05): 396-399.
[12] Wenyuan Zhao, Yuting Tian, Jihai Zhang, Jun Zhang. Value of CT tumor volume measurement parameters combined with laboratory indexes in guiding preoperative staging prediction in patients with colon cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(04): 306-309.
[13] Qiuzi Cui, Hongman Yao, Yingchun Ai. Analysis of the predictive value of monitoring NLR, PLR, CAR, albumin, serum calcium and blood glucose levels in acute kidney injury in patients with acute pancreatitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(03): 244-248.
[14] Han Zhu, Shichao Zhuo, Di Wu, Yanan Zhu, Jiaxin Han. Correlation between preoperative plasma fibrinogen, blood lipid level, MMR expression and pathological characteristics and prognosis of colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(02): 141-145.
[15] Mingyuan Sun, Heng Chu, Haibin Xu, Zhe Zhang. Progress in application of artificial intelligence in diagnosis of multiple pulmonary nodules[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(08): 785-790.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract