Effect of serum adiponectin and placental leucine aminopeptidase levels on pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.03.009

Objective

To explore the effects of serum adiponectin and placental leucine aminopeptidase (P-LAP) levels on pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods

A total of 143 cases of GDM pregnant women admitted to Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Women's Hospital of Jiangnan University from December 2019 to January 2022 were selected in the study. According to the pregnancy outcome, pregnant women with GDM were divided into good result group (n=115) and poor result group (n=28) by retrospective analysis method. Fasting blood glucose (FPG) and 1 h, 2 h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum adiponectin and P-LAP levels were detected in all pregnant women at 24 week of gestation, and were analyzed by independent-samples t test. The influencing factors of pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with GDM were analyzed by multivariate unconditional logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyzed predictive value of serum adiponectin and P-LAP levels for pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with GDM. The procedures followed in this study were in line with ethical standards set by the Ethics Committee of Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Women's Hospital of Jiangnan University and were approved by the Ethics Committee (Approval No. 2018-003-02). There were no statistical differences in age, body mass index (BMI), gravidity and parity between two groups (P>0.05).

Results

Gestation age at delivery, serum adiponectin and P-LAP levels in poor group of pregnant women with GDM were significantly lower than those in good result group, while proportion of poor control of blood glucose concentration and HbA1c level were significantly higher than those in good result group, and all differences were statistically significant (t=3.89, P<0.001; t=8.22, P<0.001; t=2.57, P=0.025; χ²=101.54, P<0.001; t=3.95, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in FPG, 1 h and 2 h OGTT blood glucose concentration between two groups (P>0.05). Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that gestational age at delivery, HbA1c level, serum adiponectin and P-LAP levels, and poor control of blood glucose concentration were all independent influencing factors for pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with GDM (OR=3.307, 0.216, 3.846, 3.099, 0.552; 95%CI: 1.401-7.806, 0.091-0.509, 1.629-9.079, 1.313-7.315, 0.416-0.783; P=0.017, 0.014, 0.025). ROC curve analysis results showed that area under curve (AUC) of serum adiponectin and P-LAP levels and their combined prediction of pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with GDM were 0.709 (95%CI: 0.594-0.825, P=0.002), 0.706 (95%CI: 0.584-0.821, P=0.001), and 0.791 (95%CI: 0.679-0.897, P=0.003), respectively.

Conclusions

The decrease in serum adiponectin and P-LAP levels are both independent influencing factors of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with GDM, and can be used to predict pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with GDM.

Key words: Diabetes, gestational, Adiponectin, Placental leucine aminopeptidase, Pregnancy outcome, Pregnant women

表1 2组GDM患者相关临床资料比较

组别	例数	分娩年龄(岁，±s)	孕前BMI(kg/m²，±s)	分娩孕龄(周，±s)	孕次[例数(%)]		孕次[例数(%)]		FPG(mmol/L，±s))	OGTT(mmol/L，±s)
组别	例数	分娩年龄(岁，±s)	孕前BMI(kg/m²，±s)	分娩孕龄(周，±s)	<2次	≥2次	<2次	≥2次	FPG(mmol/L，±s))	1 h	2 h
良好组	115	29.9±4.4	22.1±0.5	39.2±1.3	36(31.3)	79(68.7)	69(60.0)	46(40.0)	7.0±0.8	10.1±1.4	8.6±0.7
不佳组	28	31.6±4.3	22.3±0.5	38.2±1.1	5(17.9)	23(82.1)	17(60.7)	11(39.3)	7.2±0.6	10.2±1.5	8.7±0.9
统计量		t＝1.86	t＝1.01	t＝3.89	χ²＝1.99		χ²＝0.01		t＝1.43	t＝0.33	t＝0.64
P值		0.065	0.316	<0.001	0.158		0.994		0.156	0.739	0.524
组别	例数	HbA1c(%，±s)	HDL(mmol/L，±s)	LDL(mmol/L，±s)	TG(mmol/L，±s)	TC(mmol/L，±s)	脂联素(μg/mL，±s)	P-LAP(pg/mL，±s)	血糖控制[例数(%)]
组别	例数	HbA1c(%，±s)	HDL(mmol/L，±s)	LDL(mmol/L，±s)	TG(mmol/L，±s)	TC(mmol/L，±s)	脂联素(μg/mL，±s)	P-LAP(pg/mL，±s)	不佳	良好
良好组	115	5.4±1.1	1.7±0.3	2.4±0.5	1.6±0.5	5.1±1.0	9.6±0.4	561.4±125.5	3(2.6)	112(97.4)
不佳组	28	6.3±1.0	1.8±0.5	2.2±0.6	1.6±0.6	5.2±1.0	8.9±0.5	494.2±117.3	24(85.7)	4(14.3)
统计量		t＝3.95	t＝0.25	t＝1.35	t＝0.53	t＝0.72	t＝8.22	t＝2.57	χ²＝101.54
P值		<0.001	0.803	0.179	0.597	0.473	<0.001	0.025	<0.001

表1 2组GDM患者相关临床资料比较

组别	例数	分娩年龄(岁，±s)	孕前BMI(kg/m²，±s)	分娩孕龄(周，±s)	孕次[例数(%)]		孕次[例数(%)]		FPG(mmol/L，±s))	OGTT(mmol/L，±s)
组别	例数	分娩年龄(岁，±s)	孕前BMI(kg/m²，±s)	分娩孕龄(周，±s)	<2次	≥2次	<2次	≥2次	FPG(mmol/L，±s))	1 h	2 h
良好组	115	29.9±4.4	22.1±0.5	39.2±1.3	36(31.3)	79(68.7)	69(60.0)	46(40.0)	7.0±0.8	10.1±1.4	8.6±0.7
不佳组	28	31.6±4.3	22.3±0.5	38.2±1.1	5(17.9)	23(82.1)	17(60.7)	11(39.3)	7.2±0.6	10.2±1.5	8.7±0.9
统计量		t＝1.86	t＝1.01	t＝3.89	χ²＝1.99		χ²＝0.01		t＝1.43	t＝0.33	t＝0.64
P值		0.065	0.316	<0.001	0.158		0.994		0.156	0.739	0.524
组别	例数	HbA1c(%，±s)	HDL(mmol/L，±s)	LDL(mmol/L，±s)	TG(mmol/L，±s)	TC(mmol/L，±s)	脂联素(μg/mL，±s)	P-LAP(pg/mL，±s)	血糖控制[例数(%)]
组别	例数	HbA1c(%，±s)	HDL(mmol/L，±s)	LDL(mmol/L，±s)	TG(mmol/L，±s)	TC(mmol/L，±s)	脂联素(μg/mL，±s)	P-LAP(pg/mL，±s)	不佳	良好
良好组	115	5.4±1.1	1.7±0.3	2.4±0.5	1.6±0.5	5.1±1.0	9.6±0.4	561.4±125.5	3(2.6)	112(97.4)
不佳组	28	6.3±1.0	1.8±0.5	2.2±0.6	1.6±0.6	5.2±1.0	8.9±0.5	494.2±117.3	24(85.7)	4(14.3)
统计量		t＝3.95	t＝0.25	t＝1.35	t＝0.53	t＝0.72	t＝8.22	t＝2.57	χ²＝101.54
P值		<0.001	0.803	0.179	0.597	0.473	<0.001	0.025	<0.001

表2 GDM患者妊娠结局影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析变量含义及赋值情况

自变量/因变量	变量名	赋值
GDM患者妊娠结局	y	y＝0表示妊娠结局不佳，y＝1表示妊娠结局良好
分娩孕龄	x₁	定量变量
血清脂联素水平	x₂	定量变量
血清P-LAP水平	x₃	定量变量
HbA1c水平	x₄	定量变量
血糖控制情况	x₅	x₅＝0表示血糖控制良好，x₅＝1表示血糖控制不佳

表2 GDM患者妊娠结局影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析变量含义及赋值情况

自变量/因变量	变量名	赋值
GDM患者妊娠结局	y	y＝0表示妊娠结局不佳，y＝1表示妊娠结局良好
分娩孕龄	x₁	定量变量
血清脂联素水平	x₂	定量变量
血清P-LAP水平	x₃	定量变量
HbA1c水平	x₄	定量变量
血糖控制情况	x₅	x₅＝0表示血糖控制良好，x₅＝1表示血糖控制不佳

表3 GDM患者妊娠结局影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果

影响因素	B	SE	Wald值	P值	OR值	OR值95%CI
分娩孕龄	1.196	0.601	3.960	0.017	3.307	1.401~7.806
血清脂联素水平	1.347	0.682	3.901	0.017	3.846	1.629~9.079
血清P-LAP水平	1.131	0.504	5.036	0.014	3.099	1.313~7.315
HbA1c水平	－1.534	0.691	4.928	0.014	0.216	0.091~0.509
血糖控制不佳	－0.594	0.247	5.783	0.025	0.552	0.416~0.783

表3 GDM患者妊娠结局影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果

影响因素	B	SE	Wald值	P值	OR值	OR值95%CI
分娩孕龄	1.196	0.601	3.960	0.017	3.307	1.401~7.806
血清脂联素水平	1.347	0.682	3.901	0.017	3.846	1.629~9.079
血清P-LAP水平	1.131	0.504	5.036	0.014	3.099	1.313~7.315
HbA1c水平	－1.534	0.691	4.928	0.014	0.216	0.091~0.509
血糖控制不佳	－0.594	0.247	5.783	0.025	0.552	0.416~0.783

图1 血清脂联素及P-LAP水平预测GDM患者妊娠结局的ROC曲线注：P-LAP为胎盘亮氨酸氨肽酶，GDM为妊娠期糖尿病，ROC曲线为受试者工作特征曲线

表4 血清脂联素与P-LAP水平预测GDM患者妊娠结局的ROC曲线分析结果

指标	ROC曲线			最佳临界值	敏感度(%)	特异度(%)	约登指数
指标	AUC	AUC 95%CI	P值	最佳临界值	敏感度(%)	特异度(%)	约登指数
血清脂联素水平	0.709	0.594~0.825	0.002	9.20 μg/mL	67.9	73.0	0.409
血清P-LAP水平	0.706	0.584~0.821	0.001	527.97 pg/mL	64.3	75.7	0.399
血清脂联素水平+P-LAP水平	0.791	0.679~0.897	0.003	—	78.6	75.7	0.542

表4 血清脂联素与P-LAP水平预测GDM患者妊娠结局的ROC曲线分析结果

指标	ROC曲线			最佳临界值	敏感度(%)	特异度(%)	约登指数
指标	AUC	AUC 95%CI	P值	最佳临界值	敏感度(%)	特异度(%)	约登指数
血清脂联素水平	0.709	0.594~0.825	0.002	9.20 μg/mL	67.9	73.0	0.409
血清P-LAP水平	0.706	0.584~0.821	0.001	527.97 pg/mL	64.3	75.7	0.399
血清脂联素水平+P-LAP水平	0.791	0.679~0.897	0.003	—	78.6	75.7	0.542

[1]	Lowe WJ, Scholtens DM, Kuang A, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome follow-up study (HAPO FUS): maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and childhood glucose metabolism[J]. Diabetes Care, 2019, 42(3): 372-380. DOI: 10.2337/dc18-1646.
[2]	Hillier TA, Pedula KL, Ogasawara KK, et al. A pragmatic, randomized clinical trial of gestational diabetes screening[J]. N Engl J Med, 2021, 384(10): 895-904. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026028.
[3]	张烨，郭晓蒙，陶敏芳，等. 血浆CMPF水平诊断妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(6): 636-643. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.06.003.
[4]	Nasioudis D, Doulaveris G, Kanninen TT. Dyslipidemia in pregnancy and maternal-fetal outcome[J]. Minerva Ginecol, 2019, 71(2): 155-162. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04330-7.
[5]	张凡凡，田霞，袁燕. 妊娠糖尿病患者脂联素和肿瘤坏死因子-α的表达及其与妊娠结局的关系[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志，2021, 20(12): 1307-1310. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2021.12.021.
[6]	朱曼宁，孙立涛，李晓莹，等. 脂联素与妊娠期糖尿病相关性研究进展[J]. 国际遗传学杂志，2021, 44(4): 274-279. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn231536-20210123-00013.
[7]	徐跃心，宋雯霞. P-LAP在产科领域的研究意义和前景[J]. 中国妇幼保健，2021, 36(4): 967-970. DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2021.04.075.
[8]	Kautzky-Willer A, Harreiter J, Winhofer-Stockl Y, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus (update 2019)[J]. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2019, 131(Suppl 1): 91-102. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-018-1419-8.
[9]	王朦朦，王颖，陈赵静，等. 维生素D补充与妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖控制和不良母婴结局的研究进展[J]. 中国医学科学院学报，2021, 43(2): 253-258. DOI: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.13177.
[10]	贾秦亮，郭晓波. 血清PAPP-A、β-hCG与妊娠期糖尿病及不良妊娠结局关系[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志，2021, 29(6): 1263-1265, 1269. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2021.06.045.
[11]	王泽华，王艳丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京：人民卫生出版社. 2019.
[12]	Harper LM, Jauk V, Longo S, et al. Early gestational diabetes screening in obese women: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 222(5): 491.e1-495.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.021.
[13]	Sabolović Rudman S, Djaković I, Gall V, et al. Pregnancy outcome in gestational diabetes compared to body mass index[J]. Acta Clin Croat, 2019, 58(1): 37-41. DOI: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.05.
[14]	Mistry SK, Das GR, Alam S, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcome in south Asia: a systematic review[J]. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab, 2021, 4(4): e00285. DOI: 10.1002/edm2.285.
[15]	Guillén-Sacoto MA, Barquiel B, Hillman N, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: glycemic control during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of twin and singleton pregnancies[J]．Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed), 2018, 65(6): 319-327. DOI: 10.1016/j.endinu.2018.01.011.
[16]	Ornoy A, Becker M, Weinstein-Fudim L, et al.Diabetes during pregnancy: a maternal disease complicating the course of pregnancy with long-term deleterious effects on the offspring. A clinical review[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(6): 2965-2967. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22062965.
[17]	Kattini R, Hummelen R, Kelly L. Early gestational diabetes mellitus screening with glycated hemoglobin: a systematic review[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2020, 42(11): 1379-1384. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.12.015.
[18]	韩宏秀，杜雪丽. 妊娠早期血清脂联素水平对妊娠期糖尿病的预测价值[J]. 中国妇幼保健，2022, 37(2): 199-201. DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2022.02.003.
[19]	徐跃心，吕文豪，南洋，等. 血清P-LAP与妊娠期糖尿病的相关性[J]. 现代妇产科进展，2021, 30(5): 368-370. DOI: 10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2021.05.009.
[20]	周慧，谢芳，句卫玲. 不同孕周加用胰岛素对妊娠期糖尿病患者母婴结局的影响[J]. 中国基层医药，2018, 25(14): 1837-1840. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2018.14.017.
[21]	王佩茹，陶峰，王霞，等. 妊娠期糖尿病孕妇糖化血红蛋白水平与不良母婴结局的相关性[J]. 临床与病理杂志，2021, 41(4): 793-800. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2021.04.010.
[22]	廖薇，佘志玲，张吉华，等. 孕妇人体质量指数、C反应蛋白和糖化血红蛋白与妊娠期糖尿病的关系及预测意义[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(4): 410-414. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.04.009.
[23]	张佳妮，毛赤慧，曹祺，等. 妊娠期糖尿病患者产后糖代谢异常转归影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(1): 53-60. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.01.007.
[24]	梁杨，么大伟. 妊娠期糖尿病孕妇脂联素、趋化素、超敏C反应蛋白及胰岛素抵抗的表达及意义[J]. 发育医学电子杂志，2019, 7(4): 282-286. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5340.2019.04.009.
[25]	朱曼宁，孙立涛，李晓莹，等. 脂联素与妊娠期糖尿病相关性研究进展[J]. 国际遗传学杂志，2021, 44(4) : 274-279. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn231536-20210123-00013.
[26]	Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. Fertil Steril，2004，81(1)：19-25. DOI：10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.004.
[27]	吴敏，颜申姬，杨联君，等. 妊娠期糖尿病患者血清Lp-PLA2、P-LAP水平与糖脂代谢指标的相关性分析[J]. 中国医学创新，2022, 19(11): 10-13.

[1]	Haoyuan Yang, Jie Gong, Qingwei Zou, Hang Ruan. Current research status on adverse pregnancy outcomes of maternal and infant in pregnant women with asthma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2]	Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3]	Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4]	Juan Gu, Qingqing Sun, Fangfang Hu, Yijuan Cao, Yujuan Qi. Clinical application of endometrial receptivity array to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5]	Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[6]	Xu Chen, Yuru Zhan, Chunhua Wang. Clinical value of ABO blood group combined with thyroid function in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[7]	Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[8]	Chenxi Ran, Rufei Shen, Mingyu Liao, Qian Liao, Ling Zhou, Yuling Zhang, Min Long. Treatment and management of pituitary tumor during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[9]	Li Chen, Xueqin Lei, Lian Duan, Yue Zeng, Guolin He. Analysis of influencing factors of success of trial of labor after twice cesarean sections and its pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[10]	Ying Chen, Yanli Chen. Causes of heart rate variability and perinatal outcomes in elderly pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[11]	Defeng Kuang, Zhiguo Li, Shaofang Hua, Fengxia Xue. Levels and significance of fatty acid-binding protein 4 in serum and placental tissues and related lipid protein expression of high-fat-induced pregnant rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 338-344.
[12]	Guohua Ren, Xiaoxiao Du, Shanling Hong, Shuai Shao. Change and significance of serum interleukin-22, hydrogen sulfide, and osteoprotegerin levels of patients with hypertensive acute kidney injury in pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[13]	Yuyan Zhang, Bin Hu, Weihong Zhang, Mei Xu, Hui Zhu, Xinyue Yang, Hailing Liu. Relationship between echocardiography parameters and liver function during the second trimester of pregnancy and their predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[14]	Xin Wang, Lin Liu, Zhejia Wen, Chunling Liu, Hong Zhang, Fang Lyu. Effect of stress exposure before pregnancy on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[15]	Xueyun Liu, Ying Fan, Aijun Yao, Shengmiao Zhang, Yani Lv, Bingqing Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Heng. Liu. Effects of individualized whole-course nursing intervention based on WeChat mini program on pregnancy weight and delivery outcome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export