Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03): 291 -297. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.03.009

Original Article

Effects of MTHFR gene polymorphism and serum folic acid level on pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their pregnancy outcomes

Jianhong Fang(), Shuhong Zhang, Min Xu, Yan Yang, Wei Lu   

  • Received:2020-04-06 Revised:2021-04-20 Published:2021-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianhong Fang
  • Supported by:
    Project of Medical Science and Technology Development Research Center of National Health and Family Planning Commission(W2015CAE169); National Natural Science Foundation of China(8140289); Science and Technology Development Project for People′s Livelihood of Chengyang District, Qingdao, 2015(Qingchengkezi 〔2015〕 No.25)
Objective

To investigate effects of methyleneterahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphism and serum folic acid level on pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

A total of 568 pregnant women with GDM who underwent prenatal examination in Qingdao Chengyang People′s Hospital from December 2016 to December 2018 were selected as research objects, and they were included into GDM group. A total of 674 healthy pregnant women who underwent prenatal examination in the same period and same hospital were included into control group. Genotypes at locus C677T and A1298C of MTHFR gene in all subjects were analyzed by fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (fqPCR), meanwhile, their serum folic acid levels were detected. The alleles and genotype distributions of C677T and A1298C loci of MTHFR gene between two groups, also genotype distribution of C677T locus between pregnant women with different pregnancy outcomes in GDM group were compared by chi-square test. Serum folic acid levels between pregnant women with different pregnancy outcomes in GDM group were compared by independent-samples t test, one-way ANOVA and least significant difference (LSD)-t test were used to compare serum folic acid levels of subjects with 3 genotypes of MTHFR gene C667T loci within and between two groups. The predictive value of GDM through different genotypes of C667T locus combined with serum folic acid level were analyzed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The procedures followed in this study were approved by the Ethics Committee of Qingdao Chengyang People′s Hospital [Approval No. (2015) Ethics Lot No. (11)]. All subjects signed the informed consents.

Results

① The frequency of allele C at C667T locus of MTHFR gene in GDM group was significantly higher than that in control group (70.9% vs 61.5%, χ2=24.483, P<0.001), and the genotype of this locus was mainly CC, while that of control group was mainly CT. There were no significant differences in distribution of alleles (A/C) and genotypes (AA/AC/CC) of MTHFR gene A1298C locus between two groups (all P>0.05), and A allele and AA genotype were dominant in both groups. ② The results in both groups showed that the differences of serum folic acid levels of the subjects with CC, CT and TT genotype at C667T loci of MTHFR gene was statistically significant (P<0.05), and serum folic acid level of subjects with CC genotype was significantly higher than that with TT genotype, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). ③ Serum folic acid levels of subjects with CC, CT and TT genotypes at C667T locus of MTHFR gene in GDM group were (16.4±2.4) nmoL/L, (14.6±3.8) nmoL/L and (12.4±3.1) nmoL/L, which were significantly lower than those of (20.4±2.5) nmoL/L, (18.5±3.4) nmoL/L and (16.3±3.0) nmoL/L in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=28.040, 19.292, 22.869; all P<0.001). ④ The area under the ROC curve for prediction of GDM by different genotypes of MTHFR gene C667T locus combined with serum folic acid level was 0.816 (P<0.05). ⑤ The CC genotype frequency of MTHFR gene C667T locus and serum folic acid level of subjects with adverse pregnancy outcomes in GDM group were 32.5% and (13.3±4.2) nmoL/L, which were significantly lower than those of 42.3% and (15.9±4.0) nmoL/L of subjects without adverse pregnancy outcomes, and the TT genotype frequency (25.3%) was significantly higher than that of subjects without adverse pregnancy outcomes (17.8%), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=5.626, P=0.018; t=7.446, P<0.001; χ2=4.680, P=0.031).

Conclusions

Proportion of CC genotype at MTHFR gene C667T locus was higher in pregnant women with GDM, and their serum folic acid level was lower than that of healthy pregnant women. Genotype at MTHFR gene C667T locus and serum folic acid level were associated with pregnancy outcome of GDM pregnant women.

图1 MTHFR基因2个单核苷酸多态性位点fqPCR检测结果
表1 2组受试者MTHFR基因2个SNP位点等位基因及基因型分布比较[例数(%)]
表2 2组MTHFR基因C667T位点3个基因型受试者的血清叶酸水平组内及组间比较(nmoL/L,±s)
图2 MTHFR基因C667T位点不同基因型联合血清叶酸水平预测GDM的ROC曲线
表3 GDM组发生与未发生不良妊娠结局受试者的MTHFR基因C667T位点基因型频率、血清叶酸水平比较
[1]
Zhu Y, Zhang C. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: a global perspective[J]. Curr Diab Rep, 2016, 16(1): 7. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-015-0699-x.
[2]
Farrar D, Simmonds M, Bryant M, et al. Hyperglycaemia and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. BMJ, 2016, 354: i4694. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4694.
[3]
Page KA, Luo S, Wang X, et al. Children exposed to maternal obesity or gestational diabetes mellitus during early fetal development have hypothalamic alterations that predict future weight gain[J]. Diabetes Care, 2019, 42(8): 1473-1480. DOI: 10.2337/dc18-2581.
[4]
饶文泉,刘强,周建,等. 叶酸与血管疾病发病关系的研究进展[J]. 安徽医学2018, 39(8): 1020-1022. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2018.08.036.
[5]
石仁丽,丁选胜,王俐,等. 叶酸对心血管相关疾病作用机制及影响的研究进展[J]. 中南药学2016, 14(5): 516-520. DOI: 10.7539/j.issn.1672-2981.2016.05.015.
[6]
肖枝兰. 血清超敏-C反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6及同型半胱氨酸在妊娠期糖尿病诊断中的价值分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健2016, 31(8): 1611-1612. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2016.08.16.
[7]
李杰,李转转,张吉才. 十堰地区女性人群亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶基因多态性分析[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志2018, 35(4): 572-576. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2018.04.025.
[8]
徐旭赟,黄美英. 血清hs-CRP、Hcy与妊娠期糖尿病及妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究2015, (3): 592-594. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2015.03.069.
[9]
郭换欣,杨青. 叶酸代谢相关基因的多态性与胎儿先天缺陷关系分析[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志2019, 27(2): 204-205, 211.
[10]
李晓娜,高秀叶,孙茗,等. 育龄妇女叶酸代谢相关基因多态性分布研究[J]. 安徽医药2018, 22(6): 1068-1070. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2018.06.016.
[11]
宋沁峰,王佳楣,高素红,等. 孕妇叶酸正确服用率及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 中国生育健康杂志2019, 30(5): 487-489. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-878X.2019.05.023.
[12]
Centeno Tablante E, Pachón H, Guetterman HM, et al. Fortification of wheat and maize flour with folic acid for population health outcomes[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 7(7): CD012150. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012150.pub2.
[13]
Kehoe L, Walton J, Hopkins SM, et al. Modelling the impact of mandatory folic acid fortification of bread or flour in Ireland on the risk of occurrence of NTD-affected pregnancies in women of childbearing age and on risk of masking vitamin B(12) deficiency in older adults[J]. Eur J Nutr, 2020, 59(6): 2631-2639. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-019-02111-4.
[14]
聂柏林. 妊娠期糖尿病干预治疗对胎儿和婴儿心脏功能的影响[J]. 河北医学2015, (7): 1092-1095. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2015.07.012.
[15]
尚鹏超. 基因芯片法分析MTHFR C677T位点多态性与不明原因胎停育的关系[J]. 中国医师杂志2016, 18(5): 702-705. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.2016.05.016.
[16]
Lin JJ, Cao SY, Wu Y, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in folate metabolism as risk for Down syndrome in the southern China[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2019, 32(12): 2030-2035. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1424818.
[17]
Sayyah-Melli M, Ghorbanihaghjo A, Alizadeh M, et al. The effect of high dose folic acid throughout pregnancy on homocysteine (Hcy) concentration and pre-eclampsia: a randomized clinical trial[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(5): e0154400. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154400.
[18]
Higa R, Kurtz M, Mazzucco MB, et al. Folic acid and safflower oil supplementation interacts and protects embryos from maternal diabetes-induced damage[J]. Mol Hum Reprod, 2012, 18(5): 253-264. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gar080.
[19]
Schneider MP, Schneider A, Jumar A, et al. Effects of folic acid on renal endothelial function in patients with diabetic nephropathy: results from a randomized trial[J]. Clin Sci (Lond), 2014, 127(7): 499-505. DOI: 10.1042/CS20140111.
[20]
Gauster M, Majali-Martinez A, Maninger S, et al. Maternal type 1 diabetes activates stress response in early placenta[J]. Placenta, 2017, 50: 110-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2017.01.118.
[21]
Beksaç K, Örgül G, Çağan M, et al. Retrospective evaluation of pregnant women with celiac disease[J]. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc, 2017, 18(1): 56-59. DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.2016.0198.
[1] Haoyuan Yang, Jie Gong, Qingwei Zou, Hang Ruan. Current research status on adverse pregnancy outcomes of maternal and infant in pregnant women with asthma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] Juan Gu, Qingqing Sun, Fangfang Hu, Yijuan Cao, Yujuan Qi. Clinical application of endometrial receptivity array to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[6] Xu Chen, Yuru Zhan, Chunhua Wang. Clinical value of ABO blood group combined with thyroid function in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[7] Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[8] Chenxi Ran, Rufei Shen, Mingyu Liao, Qian Liao, Ling Zhou, Yuling Zhang, Min Long. Treatment and management of pituitary tumor during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[9] Li Chen, Xueqin Lei, Lian Duan, Yue Zeng, Guolin He. Analysis of influencing factors of success of trial of labor after twice cesarean sections and its pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[10] Ying Chen, Yanli Chen. Causes of heart rate variability and perinatal outcomes in elderly pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[11] Danyan Feng, Xiaohui Cao, Yuxia Shi. Effect of serum adiponectin and placental leucine aminopeptidase levels on pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[12] Defeng Kuang, Zhiguo Li, Shaofang Hua, Fengxia Xue. Levels and significance of fatty acid-binding protein 4 in serum and placental tissues and related lipid protein expression of high-fat-induced pregnant rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 338-344.
[13] Yuyan Zhang, Bin Hu, Weihong Zhang, Mei Xu, Hui Zhu, Xinyue Yang, Hailing Liu. Relationship between echocardiography parameters and liver function during the second trimester of pregnancy and their predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[14] Xin Wang, Lin Liu, Zhejia Wen, Chunling Liu, Hong Zhang, Fang Lyu. Effect of stress exposure before pregnancy on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[15] Xueyun Liu, Ying Fan, Aijun Yao, Shengmiao Zhang, Yani Lv, Bingqing Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Heng. Liu. Effects of individualized whole-course nursing intervention based on WeChat mini program on pregnancy weight and delivery outcome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract