Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06): 669 -675. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.06.010

Special Issue:

Original Article

Analysis on pregnancy outcomes and influencing factors of pregnant women undergoing cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester

Yi Dai1, Chengcheng Sheng1, Jun Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China
  • Received:2019-07-10 Revised:2019-11-08 Published:2019-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jun, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province(20180530076)
Objective

To explore pregnancy outcomes and influencing factors of pregnant women undergoing cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester.

Methods

From January 2012 to April 2018, a total of 167 pregnant women with single-pregnancy who were operated by cervical polypectomy during first and second trimester in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University were collected in this study. According to pregnancy outcomes, they were divided into 3 groups: miscarriage group (gestational age at termination of pregnancy < 28 gestational weeks, n=17), premature group (gestational age at termination of pregnancy was 28-36+ 6 gestational weeks, n=48) and full-term group (gestational age at termination of pregnancy ≥37 gestational weeks, n=102). The Kruskal-Wallis H rank sum test or Mann-Whitney U rank sum test were used to carry out statistical analysis on the quantitative data such as age, pregnancy and parity. Linear trend chi-square test or chi-square test were used to statistically analyze the counting data, such as the proportion of patients with cervical conization history, gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy-induced hypertension and preoperative vaginal bleeding. On the basis of the above single factor analysis, according to previous research results and clinical experience, further orderly multi-classification unconditional logistic regression analysis was carried out to analyze the relevant factors that may affect the pregnancy outcomes of patients after cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester. This study was in line with the requirements of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013. All participants confirmed and signed consent forms for clinical trials.

Results

① There were 0 (0-0), 0 (0-1) and 0 (0-0) parity in miscarriage group, preterm group and full-term group, respectively. The gestational age at the time of operation was 13 weeks (12-14 weeks), 15 weeks (13-17 weeks) and 15 weeks (13-18 weeks), respectively. The proportion of vaginal bleeding after operation was 35.3% (6/167), 50.0% (24/167) and 48.0% (49/167), and the proportion of gestational age ≤ 12 weeks at the time of operation was 23.5% (4/167), 10.4% (5/167) and 5.9% (6/167), respectively. The differences among the above four indexes were statistically significant (χ2 =7.363, 7.535, 9.198, 4.364; P=0.025, 0.023, 0.002, 0.037). ② Combined with the existing research results and clinical experience, as well as the factors with statistically significant difference in single factor analysis results (P< 0.05), the orderly multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was conducted. The results showed that no vaginal bleeding after polypectomy was the protective factor for full-term delivery (OR=13.577, 95%CI: 1.300-141.743, P=0.029). ③The rate of spontaneous abortion in third trimester was 37.3% and 76.5% in patients with cervical polyp and decidual polyp, and the rate of patients with polyp inflammation was 52.7% and 0, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (χ2=9.646, 16.991, P=0.002, <0.001).

Conclusions

Cervical polypectomy in pregnancy should be avoided before 12 gestational weeks and hemostasis measures should be taken during operation. However, patients with cervical decidual polyps are more likely to have spontaneous miscarriage in third trimester than those with cervical polyps.

表1 早、中孕期接受宫颈息肉摘除术后,影响孕妇妊娠结局的相关因素分析
组别 例数 年龄[岁,M(P25P75)] 孕次[次,M(P25P75)] 产次[次,M(P25P75)] 高龄妊娠(≥35岁)[例数(%)] 手术时孕龄[周,M(P25P75)] 早孕期自然流产史[例数(%)]
自然流产组 17 30(28~33) 2(1~3) 0(0~0) 2(11.8) 13(12~14) 14(82.4) 3(17.6)
早产组 48 32(29~35) 2(2~3) 0(0~1) 13(27.1) 15(13~17) 43(89.6) 5(10.4)
足月产组 102 31(29~34) 2(1~2) 0(0~0) 18(17.6) 15(13~18) 92(90.2) 10(9.8)
χ2 ? 3.415 5.502 7.363 0.253 7.535 0.477
P ? 0.181 0.064 0.025 0.615 0.023 0.491
组别 例数 晚孕期自然流产史[例数(%)] 宫颈锥切术史[例数(%)] 妊娠期糖尿病[例数(%)] 妊娠高血压疾病[例数(%)] 宫颈息肉长径[例数(%)]
≥3 cm <3 cm
流产组 17 11(64.7) 6(35.3) 1(5.9) 4(23.5) 0(0) 12(70.6) 5(29.4)
早产组 48 24(50.0) 24(50.0) 2(4.2) 7(14.6) 1(2.1) 16(33.3) 32(68.7)
足月产组 102 63(61.8) 39(38.2) 6(5.9) 11(10.8) 1(1.0) 42(41.2) 60(58.8)
χ2 ? 0.527 0.077 1.744 0.022 0.772
P ? 0.468 0.782 0.183 0.881 0.381
组别 例数 宫颈息肉的病理学类型[例数(%)] 阴道分泌物清洁度[例数(%)] 术前阴道流血[例数(%)]
宫颈息肉 宫颈蜕膜息肉 Ⅰ~Ⅱ Ⅲ~Ⅳ 未行检查
流产组 17 15(88.2) 2(11.8) 2(11.8) 0(0) 15(88.2) 11(64.7)
早产组 48 43(89.6) 5(10.4) 15(31.3) 6(12.5) 27(56.3) 24(50.0)
足月产组 102 92(90.2) 10(9.8) 29(28.4) 26(25.5) 47(46.1) 59(57.8)
χ2 ? 0.054 3.332 0.057
P ? 0.816 0.068 0.811
组别 例数 术后阴道流血[例数(%)] 手术时孕龄≤12孕周[例数(%)] 息肉所致炎症反应[例数(%)]
血性分泌物 阴道血流 a
流产组 17 7(41.2) 8(47.1) 6(35.3) 4(23.5) 13(76.5) 6(35.3)
早产组 48 39(81.3) 9(18.8) 24(50.0) 5(10.4) 43(89.6) 24(50.0)
足月产组 102 86(84.3) 15(14.7) 49(48.0) 6(5.9) 96(94.1) 49(48.0)
χ2 ? 9.198 4.364 0.232
P ? 0.002 0.037 0.630
表2 对宫颈息肉摘除术后,影响孕妇妊娠结局因素的有序多分类非条件logistic回归分析变量含义及赋值情况
表3 对宫颈息肉摘除术后,影响孕妇妊娠结局因素的有序多分类非条件logistic回归分析
表4 宫颈息肉组和宫颈蜕膜息肉组孕妇的临床特征比较
组别 例数 年龄[岁,M(P25P75)] 手术时孕龄[周,M(P25P75)] 高龄孕妇[例数(%)] 孕次[次,M(P25P75)] 产次[次,M(P25P75)] 早孕期自然流产史[例数(%)]
宫颈息肉组 150 31(29~34) 15(13~18) 30(20.0) 2(1~3) 0(0~0) 133(88.7) 17(11.3)
宫颈蜕膜息肉组 17 31(28~34) 14(13~15) 3(17.6) 2(2~4) 0(0~0) 16(94.1) 1(5.9)
检验值 ? Z=-0.343 Z=-1.064 χ2=0.053 a Z=-1.591 Z=-1.277 χ2=0.075 a
P ? 0.732 0.288 0.817 0.112 0.201 0.784
组别 例数 晚孕期自然流产史[例数(%)] 宫颈锥切术史[例数(%)] 妊娠期糖尿病[例数(%)] 妊娠期高血压[例数(%)] 宫颈息肉长径[例数(%)]
≥3 cm < 3 cm
宫颈息肉组 150 94(62.7) 56(37.3) 8(5.3) 19(12.7) 2(1.3) 64(42.7) 86(57.3)
宫颈蜕膜息肉组 17 4(23.5) 13(76.5) 1(5.9) 3(17.6) 0(0) 6(35.3) 11(64.7)
检验值 ? χ2=9.646 b χ2=0.039 a b χ2=0.341
P ? 0.002 0.400 0.844 0.800 0.559
组别 例数 息肉炎症反应[例数(%)] 阴道分泌物清洁度[例数(%)] 术前阴道流血[例数(%)]
Ⅰ~Ⅱ Ⅲ~Ⅳ 未行检查
宫颈息肉组 150 71(47.3) 79(52.7) 42(28.0) 27(18.0) 81(54.0) 88(58.7)
宫颈蜕膜息肉组 17 17(100.0) 0(0) 5(29.4) 4(23.5) 8(47.1) 6(35.3)
检验值 ? χ2=16.991 χ2=0.557 a χ2=3.390
P ? <0.001 0.836 0.066
组别 例数 术后阴道流血[例数(%)] 不良妊娠结局[例数(%)] 宫颈息肉摘除术至终止妊娠的时间[周,M(P25P75)] 分娩孕龄[周,M(P25P75)]
血性分泌物 阴道流血 自然流产 早产
宫颈息肉组 150 117(78.0) 30(20.0) 3(2.0) 15(10.0) 43(28.7) 22(17~24) 37(35~38)
宫颈蜕膜息肉组 17 15(88.2) 2(11.8) 0(0) 2(11.8) 5(29.4) 24(21~24) 37(35~38)
检验值 ? b χ2=0.064 a Z=-1.216 Z=-0.278
P ? 0.660 0.969 0.224 0.781
[1]
Schnatz PF, Ricci S, O′Sullivan DM. Cervical polyps in postmenopausal women: is there a difference in risk? [J]. Menopause, 2009, 16(3): 524-528.
[2]
Stamatellos I, Stamatopoulos P, Bontis J. The role of hysteroscopy in the current management of the cervical polyps [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2007, 276(4): 299-303.
[3]
王群,吴步初,龙雯晴,等. 子宫内膜息肉的发病相关高危因素分析[J]. 现代妇产科进展,2015, 24(7):490-492.
[4]
Younis MT, Iram S, Anwar B, et al. Women with asymptomatic cervical polyps may not need to see a gynaecologist or have them removed: an observational retrospective study of 1 126 cases [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2010, 150(2): 190-194.
[5]
Nelson AL, Papa RR, Ritchie JJ. Asymptomatic cervical polyps: can we just let them be? [J]. Womens Health (Lond), 2015, 11(2): 121-126.
[6]
Robertson M, Scott P, Ellwood DA, et al. Endocervical polyp in pregnancy: gray scale and color Doppler images and essential considerations in pregnancy [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 26(5): 583-584.
[7]
Kanayama N, Terao T. The relation between granulocyte elastase activity in cervical mucus and gestational cervical polyp [J]. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi, 1991, 43(1): 26-30.
[8]
李冰,金玲,常春玲,等. 妊娠期生殖道感染对妊娠结局的危害及其影响 [J]. 中国性科学,2017,26(7):68-70.
[9]
Tokunaka M, Hasegawa J, Oba T, et al. Decidual polyps are associated with preterm delivery in cases of attempted uterine cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2015, 28(9): 1061-1063.
[10]
张玉洁,张龑. 妊娠期宫颈息肉摘除术后妊娠结局分析[J]. 中国生育健康杂志,2018,29(2):138-141.
[11]
Panayotidis C, Alhuwalia A. Cervical polypectomy during pregnancy: is there any management advances on the last decades [J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2006, 5(1): 4
[12]
Levin G, Rottenstreich A. 2nd trimester miscarriage following decidual polypectomy [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018, 225: 262-263.
[13]
Kirbas A, Biberolu EH, DaLAR HK, et al. Pregnancy complicated with a giant cervical polyp: case report [J]. Turkiye Klinikleri Jinekoloji Obstetrik, 2015, 25(4): 275-277.
[14]
Hamadeh S, Addas B, Hamadeh N, et al. Conservative management of huge symptomatic endocervical polyp in pregnancy: a case report [J]. Afr J Reprod Health, 2018, 22(2): 88-90.
[15]
孟瑜,吴丹,李柱南,等. 妊娠期行宫颈息肉摘除术与妊娠结局的临床分析[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2019,47(1):94-97.
[16]
陈洁波.线圈套扎治疗妊娠早期合并宫颈息肉出血的效果观察[J].中国当代医药,2018,25(4):179-181.
[17]
Thomas C, Brigitte M, Alex F, et al. Benign diseasses of the cervix. Blaustein′s pathology of the female genital tract [M]. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2011: 155-191.
[18]
Levy RA, Kumarapeli AR, Spencer HJ, et al. Cervical polyps: is histologic evaluation necessary? [J]. Pathol Res Pract, 2016, 212(9): 800-803.
[19]
薛洪燕,杜月光,王瑞权,等. 宫颈息肉样病变临床病理分析[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床,2004,16(4):268-269.
[20]
米贤军,王冬娥,黄泳霞,等. 宫颈息肉样病变临床病理分析[J]. 现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2001,7(5):342-344.
[1] Haoyuan Yang, Jie Gong, Qingwei Zou, Hang Ruan. Current research status on adverse pregnancy outcomes of maternal and infant in pregnant women with asthma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] Juan Gu, Qingqing Sun, Fangfang Hu, Yijuan Cao, Yujuan Qi. Clinical application of endometrial receptivity array to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[6] Xu Chen, Yuru Zhan, Chunhua Wang. Clinical value of ABO blood group combined with thyroid function in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[7] Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[8] Chenxi Ran, Rufei Shen, Mingyu Liao, Qian Liao, Ling Zhou, Yuling Zhang, Min Long. Treatment and management of pituitary tumor during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[9] Li Chen, Xueqin Lei, Lian Duan, Yue Zeng, Guolin He. Analysis of influencing factors of success of trial of labor after twice cesarean sections and its pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[10] Chengxue Yuan, Zongxia Zhang, Ting Xu, Slanglam. Effect and safety of three kinds of endoscopic surgeries on colon polyps[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 78-81.
[11] Guohua Ren, Xiaoxiao Du, Shanling Hong, Shuai Shao. Change and significance of serum interleukin-22, hydrogen sulfide, and osteoprotegerin levels of patients with hypertensive acute kidney injury in pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[12] Yuyan Zhang, Bin Hu, Weihong Zhang, Mei Xu, Hui Zhu, Xinyue Yang, Hailing Liu. Relationship between echocardiography parameters and liver function during the second trimester of pregnancy and their predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[13] Xin Wang, Lin Liu, Zhejia Wen, Chunling Liu, Hong Zhang, Fang Lyu. Effect of stress exposure before pregnancy on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[14] Xueyun Liu, Ying Fan, Aijun Yao, Shengmiao Zhang, Yani Lv, Bingqing Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Heng. Liu. Effects of individualized whole-course nursing intervention based on WeChat mini program on pregnancy weight and delivery outcome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
[15] Xiaoxiang Wu, Bo Yang, Jingxuan Li, Fengling Zhang, Guihui Guo, Shaopei Zheng. Predictive value of umbilical artery ultrasonography parameters, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and sFlt-1/PLGF ratio for adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with pregnancy induced hypertension syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract