Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06): 669 -675. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.06.010

Special Issue:

Original Article

Analysis on pregnancy outcomes and influencing factors of pregnant women undergoing cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester

Yi Dai1, Chengcheng Sheng1, Jun Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China
  • Received:2019-07-10 Revised:2019-11-08 Published:2019-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jun, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province(20180530076)
Objective

To explore pregnancy outcomes and influencing factors of pregnant women undergoing cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester.

Methods

From January 2012 to April 2018, a total of 167 pregnant women with single-pregnancy who were operated by cervical polypectomy during first and second trimester in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University were collected in this study. According to pregnancy outcomes, they were divided into 3 groups: miscarriage group (gestational age at termination of pregnancy < 28 gestational weeks, n=17), premature group (gestational age at termination of pregnancy was 28-36+ 6 gestational weeks, n=48) and full-term group (gestational age at termination of pregnancy ≥37 gestational weeks, n=102). The Kruskal-Wallis H rank sum test or Mann-Whitney U rank sum test were used to carry out statistical analysis on the quantitative data such as age, pregnancy and parity. Linear trend chi-square test or chi-square test were used to statistically analyze the counting data, such as the proportion of patients with cervical conization history, gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy-induced hypertension and preoperative vaginal bleeding. On the basis of the above single factor analysis, according to previous research results and clinical experience, further orderly multi-classification unconditional logistic regression analysis was carried out to analyze the relevant factors that may affect the pregnancy outcomes of patients after cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester. This study was in line with the requirements of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013. All participants confirmed and signed consent forms for clinical trials.

Results

① There were 0 (0-0), 0 (0-1) and 0 (0-0) parity in miscarriage group, preterm group and full-term group, respectively. The gestational age at the time of operation was 13 weeks (12-14 weeks), 15 weeks (13-17 weeks) and 15 weeks (13-18 weeks), respectively. The proportion of vaginal bleeding after operation was 35.3% (6/167), 50.0% (24/167) and 48.0% (49/167), and the proportion of gestational age ≤ 12 weeks at the time of operation was 23.5% (4/167), 10.4% (5/167) and 5.9% (6/167), respectively. The differences among the above four indexes were statistically significant (χ2 =7.363, 7.535, 9.198, 4.364; P=0.025, 0.023, 0.002, 0.037). ② Combined with the existing research results and clinical experience, as well as the factors with statistically significant difference in single factor analysis results (P< 0.05), the orderly multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was conducted. The results showed that no vaginal bleeding after polypectomy was the protective factor for full-term delivery (OR=13.577, 95%CI: 1.300-141.743, P=0.029). ③The rate of spontaneous abortion in third trimester was 37.3% and 76.5% in patients with cervical polyp and decidual polyp, and the rate of patients with polyp inflammation was 52.7% and 0, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (χ2=9.646, 16.991, P=0.002, <0.001).

Conclusions

Cervical polypectomy in pregnancy should be avoided before 12 gestational weeks and hemostasis measures should be taken during operation. However, patients with cervical decidual polyps are more likely to have spontaneous miscarriage in third trimester than those with cervical polyps.

表1 早、中孕期接受宫颈息肉摘除术后,影响孕妇妊娠结局的相关因素分析
组别 例数 年龄[岁,M(P25P75)] 孕次[次,M(P25P75)] 产次[次,M(P25P75)] 高龄妊娠(≥35岁)[例数(%)] 手术时孕龄[周,M(P25P75)] 早孕期自然流产史[例数(%)]
自然流产组 17 30(28~33) 2(1~3) 0(0~0) 2(11.8) 13(12~14) 14(82.4) 3(17.6)
早产组 48 32(29~35) 2(2~3) 0(0~1) 13(27.1) 15(13~17) 43(89.6) 5(10.4)
足月产组 102 31(29~34) 2(1~2) 0(0~0) 18(17.6) 15(13~18) 92(90.2) 10(9.8)
χ2 ? 3.415 5.502 7.363 0.253 7.535 0.477
P ? 0.181 0.064 0.025 0.615 0.023 0.491
组别 例数 晚孕期自然流产史[例数(%)] 宫颈锥切术史[例数(%)] 妊娠期糖尿病[例数(%)] 妊娠高血压疾病[例数(%)] 宫颈息肉长径[例数(%)]
≥3 cm <3 cm
流产组 17 11(64.7) 6(35.3) 1(5.9) 4(23.5) 0(0) 12(70.6) 5(29.4)
早产组 48 24(50.0) 24(50.0) 2(4.2) 7(14.6) 1(2.1) 16(33.3) 32(68.7)
足月产组 102 63(61.8) 39(38.2) 6(5.9) 11(10.8) 1(1.0) 42(41.2) 60(58.8)
χ2 ? 0.527 0.077 1.744 0.022 0.772
P ? 0.468 0.782 0.183 0.881 0.381
组别 例数 宫颈息肉的病理学类型[例数(%)] 阴道分泌物清洁度[例数(%)] 术前阴道流血[例数(%)]
宫颈息肉 宫颈蜕膜息肉 Ⅰ~Ⅱ Ⅲ~Ⅳ 未行检查
流产组 17 15(88.2) 2(11.8) 2(11.8) 0(0) 15(88.2) 11(64.7)
早产组 48 43(89.6) 5(10.4) 15(31.3) 6(12.5) 27(56.3) 24(50.0)
足月产组 102 92(90.2) 10(9.8) 29(28.4) 26(25.5) 47(46.1) 59(57.8)
χ2 ? 0.054 3.332 0.057
P ? 0.816 0.068 0.811
组别 例数 术后阴道流血[例数(%)] 手术时孕龄≤12孕周[例数(%)] 息肉所致炎症反应[例数(%)]
血性分泌物 阴道血流 a
流产组 17 7(41.2) 8(47.1) 6(35.3) 4(23.5) 13(76.5) 6(35.3)
早产组 48 39(81.3) 9(18.8) 24(50.0) 5(10.4) 43(89.6) 24(50.0)
足月产组 102 86(84.3) 15(14.7) 49(48.0) 6(5.9) 96(94.1) 49(48.0)
χ2 ? 9.198 4.364 0.232
P ? 0.002 0.037 0.630
表2 对宫颈息肉摘除术后,影响孕妇妊娠结局因素的有序多分类非条件logistic回归分析变量含义及赋值情况
表3 对宫颈息肉摘除术后,影响孕妇妊娠结局因素的有序多分类非条件logistic回归分析
表4 宫颈息肉组和宫颈蜕膜息肉组孕妇的临床特征比较
组别 例数 年龄[岁,M(P25P75)] 手术时孕龄[周,M(P25P75)] 高龄孕妇[例数(%)] 孕次[次,M(P25P75)] 产次[次,M(P25P75)] 早孕期自然流产史[例数(%)]
宫颈息肉组 150 31(29~34) 15(13~18) 30(20.0) 2(1~3) 0(0~0) 133(88.7) 17(11.3)
宫颈蜕膜息肉组 17 31(28~34) 14(13~15) 3(17.6) 2(2~4) 0(0~0) 16(94.1) 1(5.9)
检验值 ? Z=-0.343 Z=-1.064 χ2=0.053 a Z=-1.591 Z=-1.277 χ2=0.075 a
P ? 0.732 0.288 0.817 0.112 0.201 0.784
组别 例数 晚孕期自然流产史[例数(%)] 宫颈锥切术史[例数(%)] 妊娠期糖尿病[例数(%)] 妊娠期高血压[例数(%)] 宫颈息肉长径[例数(%)]
≥3 cm < 3 cm
宫颈息肉组 150 94(62.7) 56(37.3) 8(5.3) 19(12.7) 2(1.3) 64(42.7) 86(57.3)
宫颈蜕膜息肉组 17 4(23.5) 13(76.5) 1(5.9) 3(17.6) 0(0) 6(35.3) 11(64.7)
检验值 ? χ2=9.646 b χ2=0.039 a b χ2=0.341
P ? 0.002 0.400 0.844 0.800 0.559
组别 例数 息肉炎症反应[例数(%)] 阴道分泌物清洁度[例数(%)] 术前阴道流血[例数(%)]
Ⅰ~Ⅱ Ⅲ~Ⅳ 未行检查
宫颈息肉组 150 71(47.3) 79(52.7) 42(28.0) 27(18.0) 81(54.0) 88(58.7)
宫颈蜕膜息肉组 17 17(100.0) 0(0) 5(29.4) 4(23.5) 8(47.1) 6(35.3)
检验值 ? χ2=16.991 χ2=0.557 a χ2=3.390
P ? <0.001 0.836 0.066
组别 例数 术后阴道流血[例数(%)] 不良妊娠结局[例数(%)] 宫颈息肉摘除术至终止妊娠的时间[周,M(P25P75)] 分娩孕龄[周,M(P25P75)]
血性分泌物 阴道流血 自然流产 早产
宫颈息肉组 150 117(78.0) 30(20.0) 3(2.0) 15(10.0) 43(28.7) 22(17~24) 37(35~38)
宫颈蜕膜息肉组 17 15(88.2) 2(11.8) 0(0) 2(11.8) 5(29.4) 24(21~24) 37(35~38)
检验值 ? b χ2=0.064 a Z=-1.216 Z=-0.278
P ? 0.660 0.969 0.224 0.781
[1]
Schnatz PF, Ricci S, O′Sullivan DM. Cervical polyps in postmenopausal women: is there a difference in risk? [J]. Menopause, 2009, 16(3): 524-528.
[2]
Stamatellos I, Stamatopoulos P, Bontis J. The role of hysteroscopy in the current management of the cervical polyps [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2007, 276(4): 299-303.
[3]
王群,吴步初,龙雯晴,等. 子宫内膜息肉的发病相关高危因素分析[J]. 现代妇产科进展,2015, 24(7):490-492.
[4]
Younis MT, Iram S, Anwar B, et al. Women with asymptomatic cervical polyps may not need to see a gynaecologist or have them removed: an observational retrospective study of 1 126 cases [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2010, 150(2): 190-194.
[5]
Nelson AL, Papa RR, Ritchie JJ. Asymptomatic cervical polyps: can we just let them be? [J]. Womens Health (Lond), 2015, 11(2): 121-126.
[6]
Robertson M, Scott P, Ellwood DA, et al. Endocervical polyp in pregnancy: gray scale and color Doppler images and essential considerations in pregnancy [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 26(5): 583-584.
[7]
Kanayama N, Terao T. The relation between granulocyte elastase activity in cervical mucus and gestational cervical polyp [J]. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi, 1991, 43(1): 26-30.
[8]
李冰,金玲,常春玲,等. 妊娠期生殖道感染对妊娠结局的危害及其影响 [J]. 中国性科学,2017,26(7):68-70.
[9]
Tokunaka M, Hasegawa J, Oba T, et al. Decidual polyps are associated with preterm delivery in cases of attempted uterine cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2015, 28(9): 1061-1063.
[10]
张玉洁,张龑. 妊娠期宫颈息肉摘除术后妊娠结局分析[J]. 中国生育健康杂志,2018,29(2):138-141.
[11]
Panayotidis C, Alhuwalia A. Cervical polypectomy during pregnancy: is there any management advances on the last decades [J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2006, 5(1): 4
[12]
Levin G, Rottenstreich A. 2nd trimester miscarriage following decidual polypectomy [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018, 225: 262-263.
[13]
Kirbas A, Biberolu EH, DaLAR HK, et al. Pregnancy complicated with a giant cervical polyp: case report [J]. Turkiye Klinikleri Jinekoloji Obstetrik, 2015, 25(4): 275-277.
[14]
Hamadeh S, Addas B, Hamadeh N, et al. Conservative management of huge symptomatic endocervical polyp in pregnancy: a case report [J]. Afr J Reprod Health, 2018, 22(2): 88-90.
[15]
孟瑜,吴丹,李柱南,等. 妊娠期行宫颈息肉摘除术与妊娠结局的临床分析[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2019,47(1):94-97.
[16]
陈洁波.线圈套扎治疗妊娠早期合并宫颈息肉出血的效果观察[J].中国当代医药,2018,25(4):179-181.
[17]
Thomas C, Brigitte M, Alex F, et al. Benign diseasses of the cervix. Blaustein′s pathology of the female genital tract [M]. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2011: 155-191.
[18]
Levy RA, Kumarapeli AR, Spencer HJ, et al. Cervical polyps: is histologic evaluation necessary? [J]. Pathol Res Pract, 2016, 212(9): 800-803.
[19]
薛洪燕,杜月光,王瑞权,等. 宫颈息肉样病变临床病理分析[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床,2004,16(4):268-269.
[20]
米贤军,王冬娥,黄泳霞,等. 宫颈息肉样病变临床病理分析[J]. 现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2001,7(5):342-344.
[1] Jingyu Qian, Mingming Zheng. Interpretation of the Italian guidelines on non-invasive and invasive prenatal diagnosis:executive summary of recommendations for practice the Italian Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology(SIGO)[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[2] Xialin Li, Fang He. Risk assessment and early warning system for postpartum hemorrhage[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 498-503.
[3] Ziyang Liu, Jianjian Cui, Yin Zhao. Current research status on obstetric disseminated intravascular coagulation and its scoring system[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 511-518.
[4] Fanying Zeng, Jie Ruan, Xinghui Liu, Guolin He. Current status of perinatal medicine advances under the new reproductive situation and coping strategies in prenatal care[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 519-524.
[5] Xiaofei Li, Hongli Liu, Qiuling Shi, Jing Tian, Li Li, Hongbo Qi, Xin Luo. A prospective randomized controlled study of low intensity focused ultrasound uterine involution treatment for prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage in natural childbirth women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 534-539.
[6] Rong Huang, Ziyu Liang, Wenjin Qi. Expression and significance of NLRP3 inflammasome in serum of pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 540-548.
[7] Xia He, Rong Huang, Wenjin Qi. High-throughput sequencing study on the abundance of placenta and fetal membrane flora in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 549-555.
[8] Jiangyan Xie, Yafei Wang, Fang He. Pregnancy complicated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura:two cases report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[9] Tingting Xu, Yongchi Zhan, Xiaodong Wang, Xiaodong Wang. Perinatal outcomes of fetomaternal hemorrhage syndrome pregnant women with sinusoidal fetal heart tracing[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(04): 382-389.
[10] Xiaoyan Han, Hua Yang. Relationship between low level of serum placental growth factor in the second trimester pregnancy women and adverse fetal prognosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(04): 398-402.
[11] Jiali Du, Rui Bao, Chunhong Qiao, Wei Han. Construction of a prediction model for adverse pregnancy outcomes after emergency cervical cerclage in pregnant women with cervical incompetence during the second trimester[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(04): 403-409.
[12] Fuxiu Huang, Ningning Zhang, Chenyang Li, Shuling Li, Chao Chen. Effect of electrodesiccation alone, electrocoagulation alone and electrocoagulation-electrodesiccation on the efficacy of flat intestinal polyps and the incidence of adverse events[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(04): 310-314.
[13] Shan Lu, Yunshan Yao, Seni Liao, Zien Chen, Yijian Zhang, Jianhao Lan, Wei Wei, Yanyang Liu, Yanhong Chen, Duijin Chen. Clinical study of 100 cases of suspected pregnancy complicated with acute appendicitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
[14] Wenyan Wang, Jianlan Zheng, Lici Zhu. Clinical study on the risk of pregnancy and perinatal period after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfe[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(04): 220-226.
[15] Yi Mou, Lifan Zhang, Bing Hu. Advances in cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyp[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), 2024, 11(04): 253-258.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract