Application values of transport risk index of physiologic stability in assessment of illness severity of premature infants

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.05.005

Objective

To investigate the values of transport risk index of physiologic stability (TRIPS) at admission to evaluate illness severity and prognosis of preterm infants.

Methods

From July 2014 to December 2016, a total of 130 preterm infants with gestational age < 32 weeks who were hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Affiliated Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were selected as research subjects. All preterm infants included in the study were given TRIPS score and neonatal critical illness score (NCIS) at the same time. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between TRIPS score and NCIS, then the results of NCIS were taken as standard, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve which assessed the severity of preterm infants with TRIPS score was drawn, to get the best cutoff value of TRIPS score in judging the severity of preterm infants. According to this best cutoff value, preterm infants of this study were divided into two groups: the non-critical group (TRIPS score < the best cutoff value) and the critical group (TRIPS score > the best cutoff value). The independent-samples t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-square test were used to compare the measurement and numeration data of premature birth related complications and clinical outcomes between two groups of preterm infants. This study was in line with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①Pearson correlation analytic results showed that there was a linear negative correlation between TRIPS score and NCIS (r=-0.421, P<0.001). ②The ROC curve of evaluation of the severity of preterm infants by TRIPS score showed that the best cutoff value for judging the severity of preterm infants by TRIPS score was 13.5 scores, the area under curve (AUC) was 0.721(95%CI: 0.634-0.807), the sensitivity was 86.5%, and the specificity was 52.6%. ③Grouping results according to the best cutoff value of TRIPS score were 76 preterm infants in non-critical group and 54 cases in critical group. ④The incidence rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and intracranial hemorrhage of preterm infants in critical group (37.0%, 40.7%) were all higher than those in non-critical group (15.8%, 15.8%), also the body weight at discharge from NICU and hospital discharge rate based on improved patients′ condition in critical group [(2 025±533) g, 72.2%] were all lower than those in non-critical group [(2 192±267) g, 96.1%], and all the differences were statistically significant (χ²=7.681, P=0.006; χ²=10.176, P=0.001; t=-2.351, P=0.020; χ²=15.441, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between two groups of preterm infants in incidence rate of necrotizing enterocolitis, hospital onset of infection, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and duration of hospitalization (P>0.05).

Conclusion

TRIPS score at admission could be used to evaluate illness severity and prognosis of preterm infants.

Key words: Intensive care units, neonatal, Transport risk index of physiologic stability, Neonatal critical illness score, ROC curve, Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, Intracranial hemorrhages, Infant, premature

图1 130例早产儿转运生理稳定指数评分与新生儿危重病例评分的散点图

图2 转运生理稳定指数评分评估早产儿病情危重度的受试者工作特征曲线

表2 2组早产儿相关并发症及临床转归比较

组别	例数	TRIPS评分[分，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	BPD [例数(%)]	坏死性小肠结肠炎[例数(%)]	院内感染[例数(%)]	ROP [例数(%)]	颅内出血[例数(%)]
非危重组	76	6.0(6.0～12.0)	12(15.8)	2(2.6)	12(15.8)	1(1.3)	12(15.8)
危重组	54	21.5(21.0～28.0)	20(37.0)	1(1.9)	14(25.9)	5(9.3)	22(40.7)
检验值	?	Z＝－9.284	χ²＝7.681	χ²＝0.091 ^a	χ²＝2.027	χ²＝2.900 ^a	χ²＝10.176
P值	?	<0.001	0.006	0.763	0.154	0.089	0.001
组别	例数	住院时间[d，M (P₂₅～P₇₅)]	转出NICU时体重(g，±s)	结局[例数(%)]
组别	例数	住院时间[d，M (P₂₅～P₇₅)]	转出NICU时体重(g，±s)	好转出院	死亡	转上级或专科医院
非危重组	76	39.0(28.0～49.0)	2 192±267	73(96.1)	0(0)	3(3.9)
危重组	54	47.0(28.5～59.0)	2 025±533	39(72.2)	3(5.6)	12(22.2)
检验值	?	Z＝－1.914	t＝－2.351	?	χ²＝15.441	?
P值	?	0.056	0.020	?	<0.001	?

表2 2组早产儿相关并发症及临床转归比较

组别	例数	TRIPS评分[分，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	BPD [例数(%)]	坏死性小肠结肠炎[例数(%)]	院内感染[例数(%)]	ROP [例数(%)]	颅内出血[例数(%)]
非危重组	76	6.0(6.0～12.0)	12(15.8)	2(2.6)	12(15.8)	1(1.3)	12(15.8)
危重组	54	21.5(21.0～28.0)	20(37.0)	1(1.9)	14(25.9)	5(9.3)	22(40.7)
检验值	?	Z＝－9.284	χ²＝7.681	χ²＝0.091 ^a	χ²＝2.027	χ²＝2.900 ^a	χ²＝10.176
P值	?	<0.001	0.006	0.763	0.154	0.089	0.001
组别	例数	住院时间[d，M (P₂₅～P₇₅)]	转出NICU时体重(g，±s)	结局[例数(%)]
组别	例数	住院时间[d，M (P₂₅～P₇₅)]	转出NICU时体重(g，±s)	好转出院	死亡	转上级或专科医院
非危重组	76	39.0(28.0～49.0)	2 192±267	73(96.1)	0(0)	3(3.9)
危重组	54	47.0(28.5～59.0)	2 025±533	39(72.2)	3(5.6)	12(22.2)
检验值	?	Z＝－1.914	t＝－2.351	?	χ²＝15.441	?
P值	?	0.056	0.020	?	<0.001	?

[1]	邱如新. 新生儿危重病例评分与美国新生儿急性生理学评分围产期补充Ⅱ在预测危重症患儿死亡风险的比较[D]. 南京：东南大学，2010.
[2]	Lee SK,Zupancic JA,Pendray M, et al. Transport risk index of physiologic stability: a practical system for assessing infant transport care[J]. J Pediatr, 2001, 139(2): 220-226.
[3]	Broughton SJ,Berry A,Jacobe S, et al. The mortality index for neonatal transportation score: a new mortality prediction model for retrieved neonates[J]. Pediatrics, 2004, 114(4): e424-e428.
[4]	中华医学会急诊学分会儿科学组，中华医学会儿科学分会急诊学组、新生儿学组．新生儿危重病例评分法(草案)[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志，2001, 16(11): 694-695.
[5]	中华医学会眼科学分会眼底病学组. 中国早产儿视网膜病变筛查指南(2014年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志，2014, 50(12): 933-935.
[6]	International Neonatal Network. The CRIB (clinical risk index for babies) score: a tool for assessing initial neonatal risk and comparing performance of neonatal intensive care units[J]. Lancet, 1993, 342(8865): 193-198.
[7]	Richardson DK,Corcoran JD,Escobar GJ, et al. SNAP-Ⅱ and SNAPPE-Ⅱ：simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores[J]. J Pediatr, 2001, 138(1): 92-100.
[8]	Vakrilova L,Emilova Z,Slǔncheva B, et al. Using the CRIB as an early prognostic index for very low birthweight infants, treated in neonatal intensive care unites[J]. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia), 2007, 46(Suppl 1): 66-73.
[9]	何柳，夏斌，虎春元，等. 新生儿危重病例评分法的临床应用[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(2): 162-168.
[10]	邱如新，杨莉. 新生儿危重病例评分与美国新生儿急性生理学评分围产期补充Ⅱ预测危重新生儿死亡风险比较[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志，2012, 27(1): 42-44.
[11]	Faraggi D,Reiser B. Estimation of the area under the ROC curve[J]. Stat Med, 2002, 21(20): 3093-3106.
[12]	Lucas da Silva PS,Euzébio de Aguiar V,Reis ME. Assessing outcome in interhospital infant transport: the transport risk index of physiologic stability score at admission[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2012, 29(7): 509-514.
[13]	Lee SK,Aziz K,Dunn M, et al. Transport Risk Index of Physiologic Stability, version Ⅱ (TRIPS-Ⅱ): a simple and practical neonatal illness severity score[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2013, 30(5): 395-400.
[14]	Ng PC,Lee CH,Lam CW, et al. Early pituitary-adrenal response and respiratory outcomes in preterm infants[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2004, 89(2): F127-F130.
[15]	Yang MB,Donovan EF,Wagge JR. Race, gender, and clinical risk index for babies (CRIB) score as predictors of severe retinopathy of prematurity[J]. J AAPOS, 2006, 10(3): 253-261.
[16]	Bonnard A,Zamakhshary M,Ein S, et al. The use of the score for neonatal acute physiology-perinatal extension (SNAPPE Ⅱ) in perforated necrotizing enterocolitis: could it guide therapy in newborns less than 1 500 g? [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2008, 43(6): 1170-1174.

[1]	Yaning Kang, Chao Fu, Caifeng Si, Yanfei Guo, Jing Li, Kefei Cui. Efficacy of different TI-RADS classification systems in diagnosis of thyroid nodules[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(06): 561-566.
[2]	Xu Chen, Yuru Zhan, Chunhua Wang. Clinical value of ABO blood group combined with thyroid function in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[3]	Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[4]	Wenlin Li, Ling Yang, Kaihui Xing, Caihua Chen, Lihua Zhong, Yaqin Zhang, Wei Zhang. Analysis of early diagnostic value of umbilical artery blood gas analysis combined with amplitude integrated electroencephalography in neonatal asphyxia brain injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 550-558.
[5]	Zhengyun Hu, Jianwei Shi, Jianwei Shen, Bing Wang, Chunmiao Jiang, Chong Liu. Identification of hub genes associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants based on machine learning[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 446-454.
[6]	Li Liu, Xiaohui Jia, Yan Liu, Xiaojia Shen, Qian Zhou, Haiyang Zhang, Lijia Xiang, Xiaobin Wen, Yuanlin Zhou, Wanting Xu, Lei Yang, Lei Li, Lin Wang, Yirong Tang. The epidemiological characteristics of pediatric influenza in Chengdu from 2017 to 2022 and the prediction of pediatric early warning score for severity of illness[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(02): 235-241.
[7]	Ping Yang, Shimin Xu, Liangliang Li, Xiangyun Yin, Hongmin Xi, Lili Ma, Xianghong Li. Influencing factors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia complicated with metabolic bone disease in preterm infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(02): 202-211.
[8]	Bing Yuan, Kai Yan. Current research status in treatment of preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia by human amniotic epithelial stem cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(06): 640-644.
[9]	Jinli Yan, Dapeng Chen. Research progress on probiotics in clinical application of neonatal respiratory diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(05): 517-522.
[10]	Hongling Fu, Hanmin Liu. Research progress on signaling pathways involved in bronchopulmonary dysplasia and pulmonary hypertension[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(05): 497-505.
[11]	Xue Li, Jin Lu, Hong Zhang. Screening and treatment of thrombus markers of pregnant women in first trimester with recurrent spontaneous abortion[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(04): 476-483.
[12]	Yan Liu, Ming Zhao, Hong Jiang, Chen Chen, Xiaoqin Wang, Lei Zhang. Risk factors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants: a multicenter study[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(04): 419-426.
[13]	Yaokun Ye, Jiasuo Jiang, Jing Ye, Lisha Zhang, Qiaohui Jiang, Guisu Din, Lingfeng Min. Evaluation of prognosis of patients with spontaneous pneumothorax by CT radiomics[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 16(02): 185-189.
[14]	Mingjing Lin, Dong Cai, Wenting Feng, Fangfang Wu, Kaiyan Zhang. Risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants born from 2017 to 2019[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(09): 908-913.
[15]	Zhipeng Cheng, Tiening Zhang, Lei Gao, Shengjun Cao, Quan Li. Application of thromboelasticity in the diagnosis of coagulation dysfunction after early burns[J]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(05): 257-261.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export